On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote:
> Mike Jumper wrote: > >> * guacamole-auth-header includes some copies of ALv2 and mentions in your >>> > LICENSE file. You only need to propagate the copyright notice here, >>> not the >>> > license text (since you already have that once). Looks like this >>> might be >>> > the case around the binary tarballs. >>> > >>> > >>> >> Are you referring to the copies of the ALv2 LICENSE for dependencies that >> happen to have that license? >> >> I'm rather partial to the consistency of always having a copy of the >> upstream license within a systematically-named directory structure, >> regardless of whether the text of that license is the same as the license >> of the project bundling it. >> > > Yup. I understand your reasoning for doing that and that's fine. I just > wanted to point out that it was unnecessary (as you had already included a > copy of it the license text). > > Ah, OK then. Thanks for the thorough review, Josh! - Mike
