Re: The podling initial committers issue

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Plus, since the ASF did not watch how Usergrid > was handled when it was external, we (the ASF) has no idea > how "meritocratic" it was... I have no idea how that is important for *entering* the incubator. One of the core tenets of incubatin

Re: Apache project bylaws

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > +1 to Marvin's "I hope that most projects won't bother" although there > needs to be something a little more than a blank piece of paper. > > The best approach, IMHO, is to simply make it official that the project > adopts the same byelaws as p

[IMO] There are no Incubator issues

In my opinion it is always a failure of a podling when they can't get a release out of the door, or are unable to vote in new committers. "The future is not something we enter. The future is something we create." --Leonard I. Sweet As a podling is waiting for its release to be approved, I sure ho

Re: Etch, Isis, NPanday and Wave missing reports

I don't think a report for Etch is coming this month. Please reschedule for next month. Martijn On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Please report ASAP so there's enough time for review. > > If you won't have the report ready by tomorrow, let us know so we can > postpo

Re: key signing

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Which is why we link to the .md5, .sha, .asc, and KEYS files on our severs. > Unless you're assuming a MITM along the request/response path to apache.org, > in which case all bets are off anyway. No? Which is why I have my release vote messag

Re: [VOTE] Retire Chukwa from incubation

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: >> The Chukwa community has voted to retire the project. > > -1 The community vote [1] was far from unanimous. I'd expect the > community being retired to have greater consensus (or, as is

Re: Some missing things for the December report

On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I took these notes yesterday, so please excuse me if some of these > have been fixed. > > etch: no signoffs Just did my signoff and added a personal observation: The processes in this podling are really like trying to pour molasses thro

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Etch podling from Apache Incubator

[X] +1 Graduate Apache Etch podling from Apache Incubator (binding) Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Do all releases need to go to /dist?

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Give me a URL where this policy is and I'll edit it. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org F

Re: Process, policy and best practice

Because 150+ people tasked with oversight, documentation of processes and procedures of podlings, TLPs and themselves, discussing different views of the past, present and future might not be able to agree to anything, but a small team tasked with just documenting process might get the job done with

[IP CLEARANCE] Wicket Free Guide by Andrea del Bene

passed by lazy consensus after 72 hours as stipulated by the IP clearance policy. Many thanks for checking. Martijn Dashorst VP Apache Wicket

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.7-incubating (rc2)

+1 On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache Empire-db community has approved the 2.0.7-incubating > release and we are now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the > release. *As we only have two mentors left we will need at least one > extra vote.

Releases and IPMC votes

I was under the impression that *any* mentor is an IPMC member, has a binding +1 vote for releases and could therefore approve of releases without having to go through general@ While I find it very helpful and valuable for first time releases (and first time release managers) to go to general@ the

Re: [DISCUSS] starting the CMS migration process

+1 for moving to the new CMS. Having written some docs for the Incubator, I find it quite cumbersome to do that in XML and I rather prefer the markdown syntax. Martijn On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Joe Schaefer wrote on Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 09:26:38 -0700: >> If there ar

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Imperius Podling

+1 Martijn -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: questions on proposal I'm championing

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > Hi, I've agreed to champion an incubator submission.  It's my first time > doing this.  I have a few questions. > > 1) The project has been open sourced under ALv2 for a while and has had a > number of releases.  When it comes to the incubato

Re: watching the commit profile

I typically use markmail archives of the commit mailing list. Shows nice graphs of the most active committers. You can filter on a particular committer as wel. Another option would be to use the github mirrors of our repositories (I used that recently to see how active wicket committers were), and

Re: Etch Status?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > What is preventing Etch from graduating? A diverse, active, growing community and building releases. Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apac

Re: [VOTE] Retire Bluesky Podling

+1 Martijn On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:49 AM, berndf wrote: > Hi everyone, > > this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling. > > 3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of > becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and > developers are changi

Re: Incubator Etch Receipts of ICLAs, CCLAs

I just forwarded a grep of iclas.txt for these accounts to private@. cclas.txt didn't have any mention of the account names, and grants.txt listed a svn entry for etch. Martijn On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Michael Fitzner wrote: > I kindly request the current receipts of ICLAs, CCLAs and SGA

Re: [vote] Graduate OGNL as a subproject to Apache Commons

+1 On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Dear all, > > the Commons Community and the OGNL Community (which is overlapping > heavily) would like to see OGNL graduated. > We don't see any risks in graduating OGNL. Most of the OGNL committers > are already ASF committers, or

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

IMO the champion helps clarify the incubator process up to acceptance of the podling into the incubator. For example the champion for Wicket was not a singular person, but both Alex Karasulu and Upayavira were both very instrumental in smoothing our transition into the incubator. general@ can be v

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Why must the name be "Champion" and not just "Mentor"? Because Champion is an aptly name for the role. > champion is just another term for the first potential mentor who steps up. It is the correct name for that role: champion |ˈCH

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> champion |ˈCHampēən| noun >> 1 a person who has defeated or surpassed all rivals in a competition, >> esp. in sports: >> 2 a person who fights or argues for a cause or on behalf of someone else: >> >> The correct usage is of course de

Re: Confusion: Sponsoring entity and Champions

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:14 PM, sebb wrote: >>> Do PPMCs have chairs? >>> If not, then maybe the Champion fulfils that role until eventual >>> graduation; otherwise they fulfil the role until the PPMC elects a >>> chair. >> >> I really thought PPMCs have chairs!  Otherwise how does the Incubator

Re: [DISCUSS] Layout change - remove the right table

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:57 PM, sebb wrote: >> Thats exactly what I mean with a mess. Hope it clarifies a bit, b/c I >> thought about it a pretty long time. > > I agree that the LHS menu is confusing and messy, but for me, the RHS > list is simple and useful. For me the RHS list is not useful at

Re: Projects failing to repoirt for October - appropriate actions?

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:24 AM, wrote: > Can you please clarify what our responsibilities in fact are, as far as you > understand it?  If we are once again expected to report every month, we'd > appreciate receiving appropriate notification to that effect. The expectations are that you report

Re: Java Olio source code release

I trust this is not a release, but the announcement of the import of olio sources into the Apache subversion repository? Martijn On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Kim LiChong wrote: > > Hi, > > We're happy to announce the release of the source code for the Java EE > version of Olio

Re: [PROPOSAL] Graduate Apache Sling as Top Level Project

+1 On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi all, > > The Sling podling has voted on asking the Incubator PMC to support its > graduation as a top level project. > > The vote passed with 23 +1 votes (8 of which from PPMC members), no 0 > and no -1 votes. The vote thread can b

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Sling as Top Level Project

+1 Good luck!!! Martijn On Friday, May 29, 2009, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for the positive feedback on the proposal to graduate Sling as a Top > Level Project [1]. Based on this feedback, I would like to launch the vote to > recommend the graduation of Apache Sling as a To

Re: [VOTE] Apache JSecurity/Ki Project Rename - Final Vote

+1 for Shiro +0 for Aseca (typing in shiro is much easier than aseca) On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > Hi All, > > This is the final vote for the Apache JSecurity/Ki project's new name > between the two proposed finalists.  Please vote for only one of the > following two (a

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.2 RC3

Just a gentle reminder that we have a podling waiting to perform their second release. We need one other binding +1. Martijn On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Sorry for being late, Martijn and I (both Mentors), have voted +1 on > the pivot-dev@ mailing list, and I stand by

Re: Approve Ben Dewey as a committer for Stonehenge incubator project

+1 Martijn On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Kamaljit Bath wrote: > Hi, > > > > The Apache Stonehenge community has voted to approve Ben Dewey as a committer > for the Apache Stonehenge Incubator project. We are now asking the approval > from the Incubator PMC for the same. > > > Results of voti

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Sanselan

+1 Congrats and have fun in commons! Martijn On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > Hi, > > Sanselan has been in incubation since September 2007. Sanselan is a > pure-java image library for reading and writing a variety of image formats. > > Monthly and then quarterly reports

Community readiness-when does it show?

When is a community Apache Ready™? According to our exit criteria (iirc): - when the community has performed at least one Apache release - when the community has cleaned the code from all license issues - when the community is diverse and open My current issue is with the definition of "open".

Re: Community readiness-when does it show?

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:42 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote: >> If a community meets all the criteria, but hasn't discovered a new >> committer (or two) by itself, is the community ready for graduation? >> If not, how can we—mentors— nudge the community to focus on this >> thing, without it becoming an exe

Re: Mentors role after Graduation?

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Upayavira wrote: > I think it is important to have some representation of the ASF > membership on a PMC. Perhaps the gauge is to stay on, as a member of the > PMC, until the PMC starts to breed its own ASF members. It also helps if a podling's PMC consists only of

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Pivot

+1 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Gang, > > Apache Pivot is one of the fastest moving codebases at Apache, and the > Pivot team has done an excellent job, both technically as well as > community-wise. The initial team consisting of two Vmware employees > showed good commun

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Pivot

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > 2009/8/3 Jukka Zitting : >> Hi, >> >> [x] -1, Apache Pivot is not ready to graduate, because... >> >> I'm not seeing sufficient diversity of active committers [1] and not >> too many people seem to be contributing patches [2]. My suggestion >> w

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Pivot

In most discussions I hear (I think it is Roy's quote): "Not community *over* code, but community *for* code" Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h..

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Pivot

eryzhikov didn't come with the team afaik, but his commits are from historical imports. Martijn On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:47 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Thorsten >> Scherler wrote: >> >>> How many committers are in the project? As unde

Re: Diversity as an insurance policy (Was: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Pivot)

AFAIK Nowhere in the policy it is stated that committer activity == code commits. Martijn On Wednesday, August 5, 2009, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: >> On Aug 5, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >>> We are looking for projects with at le

Re: Does an incubation proposal require a codebase?

A code base is not required, but highly recommended. It is hard to bootstrap a community from scratch. Having something readily available makes a project more tangible, and can attract more contributors with more ease. Conversely, a too mature codebase can be a hindrance to a project as well, where

Re: Does an incubation proposal require a codebase?

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Noah Slater wrote: >> ...I am thinking about making an incubation proposal for a project I've been >> wanting to do for a while now. I have list of initial committers and a >> technical >> architecture pr

Re: Reports are soon due!!

Empire-db was too late last month with their report, which required them to report this month. I've asked them to fill in the report for this month, and it's there. Now I just need to read it :) Martijn On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Tomorrow Wednesday is apparently the

Lokahi scavengers alert (was Re: [VOTE] Mothball/Pause Lokahi)

Is there something for projects to cherrypick/scavenge? E.g. some code that can be merged into Tomcat, commons, or any of the web frameworks that are around? Is this something we could send to all PMCs for any podling that is going to be paused/mothballed? Martijn On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:50 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Mothball/Pause Lokahi

+1 On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > PMC and others, > > Lokahi's community has collapsed long time ago and albeit Noel's > repeated efforts to create interest around the project, there is no > signs of any improvement. > I am therefor calling a vote to mothball/pause the pr

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing poddling release voting process

-1 I try to check my podlings' releases personally, but I usually fail where Sebb shines :). It is much easier to guide the addition of new committers/ppmc members than it is to properly vet a *first* release. The first release of any podling is an exercise of patience and frustration, but it doe

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb wrote: > There is only a combined source/binary archive, which is not standard > practise. > All other projects release a source archive; almost all also release a > separate binary archive. FWIW, Apache Wicket has released combined binary/source archives sin

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing poddling release voting process

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:21 PM, ant elder wrote: > Also, if we do the making best practices a graduation requirement > instead of a release requirement that might alleviate the poor mentor > issue as its easy enough to check the latest release at graduation > time and vote against graduation until

Re: Location of Incubator releases

The Incubator release guide provides guidance: Uploading Artifacts The distribution upload location (www.apache.org/dist) for all Apache projects is the /www/www.apache.org/dist directory on people.apache.org. Each project (including the Incubator) owns a directory within dist. The podl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

+1 (binding) On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Thomas Fischer wrote: > +1 (binding) > >      Thomas > >> [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6) >> >> Here we go again :-) >> >> Hi, >> >> We just created an other release candidate for 2.0.5-incubating (rc6). >> Our community approve

Re: [VOTE] Release Pivot 1.3

+1 On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > probably many others> > > All: > > The Pivot community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache > Pivot 1.3 Release Candidate 3. We would now like to request the permission > of the Incubator PMC to publish the artifacts o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

ould be, but it does not seem right. > > On 20/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >>  We need one more binding vote. We already have 2 binding votes from out >> mentors. >> >>  Thanks, >> >> Francis >> >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

5011b8 >> >  > >> >  > Not sure why this should be, but it does not seem right. >> >  > >> >  > On 20/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> >  > > Hi guys, >> >  > > >> >  > >  We need one more binding

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

his should block a podling release, nor a TLP release. Martijn On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Martijn Dashorst > wrote: >> Can we get another +1 or -1 vote? This release is a long time in the >> making and AIUI

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote: >>  On the site url and as Martijn mentioned I also think this is a NON-issue > > Can't one provide the URL as a command-line parameter? > In which case, just drop it from the POM (maybe replace with comment > to show an example command-line) Perhaps

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

them equal but >>>  if we have to make the release process complexer for it I'd rather >>>  have it the way it is now. >>> >>>  I'll probably ping the maven/nexus guys on that second issue to see >>>  how they would handle this. >>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Lucene.Net as a subproject under Apache Lucene

+1 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:33 AM, George Aroush wrote: > > [x]  +1  Graduate Lucene.Net as a sub-project under Apache Lucene. > > > Cheers > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > I  live

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Click as an Apache TLP

+1, congrats and good luck! Martijn On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Bob Schellink wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache Click community has voted to request graduation from the > Incubator as a new TLP [1][2]. > > I would like to start a vote to recommend the graduation of Apache Click as > a Top Lev

Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > To be clear, it's on the mentors to decide what is applicable and > necessary for graduation - not the IPMC as a whole. Nope... The whole IPMC has been tasked with oversight. The mentors are proxies for the whole IPMC. > The IPMC as a >

Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion)

Yes, *AND* ensuring legal dots are put on the i's and j's. This is done through checking the release and ensuring that it is in adherence to our policies which you and others have crafted. *All* podlings have to ensure they have the correct licensing headers, notices and other bits in place before

Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > This is where I think the Incubator has gone awry: the claim that you > are an IPMC member implies that you have merit on a project (in the > form of a binding vote) is false. Not sure if I am looking at the same incubator as you are. I a

Re: Insanity. Apache Incubator should be about education (was: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > We certainly have no intent to bring Bad Code into the ASF! I am sure you do. However that is not the issue I'm going against: when Good Code is brought into the ASF in a Bad Way or in a Good Way with Bad Reasoning. I actually like the way you

Re: How to shorten the duration of incubation (Was: Insanity...)

I like the proposal of 3 steps prior to releasing... In Greg's words: it teaches instead of hinders. It divides the arduous process of cutting a release in more manageable steps and would make passing the actual release easier/faster. Martijn On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin

Re: Two other issues to discuss for Subversion

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > LOL > > Well... the problem is that an "svn mv" from /incubator/subversion/ to > /subversion/ introduces an artificial breakage in the history. It is > actually quite disruptive for tracking history (which is very > important to us). Sounds lik

Re: Review-Then-Commit

As long as the community is not divided on the issue whether to practice RTC vs CTR, I see no blocker for graduation. That is: as long as RTC was not installed to mitigate problems inside the community. If that is the case, the community may still be broken, with the underlying issue mopped under

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > Actually, the vote was kind of withdrawn to update it to new descriptors. > Thus, its not available yet.   In anycase, no need to spam all the PMCs, > especially those not using Maven.   Just keep an eye on the annou...@maven > list.   When av

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Pivot

+1 On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Leo Simons wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert wrote: >> The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the >> "Apache Pivot" top-level project. > > +1 from me! > > cheers, > > Leo > >

Re: [VOTE] Recommend OpenWebBeans graduation to an Apache TLP

+1 On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi; > > After  over  one  years  in  the  incubator  with   providing   three   > releases > OpenWebBeans community with  the  support  of  our  mentors  feel  that  we   > are > ready  to  propose  to  the  Incubator  PMC  to  graduate

Apache Click: still in reporting schedule

Even though Apache Click has graduated from the incubator (and still hasn't landed on http://click.apache.org), they are still in our reporting schedule. I've removed them from the 2009 report wiki. Is there something else that needs to be taken care off? Martijn -- Become a Wicket expert, learn

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Shindig as an Apache Top Level Project

+1 On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the positive feedback on the proposal to graduate Shindig > as a TLP [1]. > > I would like to start an official vote to recommend the graduation of > Apache Shindig as a Top Level Project to the Board. > To that end

Re: Missing reports due NOW

The notification was sent but got stuck in moderation with no moderator for the dev@ list. Martijn On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > As far as I know we (empire-db) also did not receive a notification. > > Cheers, > Francis > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Hyrum

Re: Missing reports due NOW

AFAIK those were added after 1 januari (6 januari iirc), which is when the notice was sent out. Martijn On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Gav... wrote: > > >> -Original Message----- >> From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, 19 Ja

Re: Missing reports due NOW

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > can I as a new mod see what messages are still in the mod queue? I don't know the command and if it is possible. I do know that the marvin messages have expired already (they do so after a week iirc). You can read more about ezml h

Re: Switching incubator.apache.org to svnpubsub?

+0.9 I agree that the site update process is cumbersome, but it also gives podling folks an incentive to log on to p.a.o and learn to use that system to their advantage. Moving to svnpubsub would take that away. That said, I think that most committers never have to go to p.a.o in any case so perh

Re: incubator group membership for tfischer

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Thomas Fischer wrote: > Can someone please add me (tfischer) to the incubator group so I can update > the incubator's webste from svn ? I am member of the incubator PMC. You are already in the incubator group, I'm not sure what goes wrong. Martijn --

Re: Incubator PMC Membership Status Check 2010

Didn't receive one. Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Incubator PMC Membership Status Check 2010

I received mine, apparently minotaur's short day off caused the delay... Martijn On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> Didn't get that. > > Still not?  The e-mail should be flowing now.  You ARE on the roster, and > were on the e-mail. > >      

Re: [VOTE] Apache UIMA as a TLP

[x] +1 to recommend UIMA's graduation Good luck! Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

+1 Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] - Graduate Log4PHP as a subproject of Logging project

+1 Congrats! Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Termination of WSRP4J podling

+1 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ate Douma wrote: > The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project > community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due > to lack of interest to continue the project. > > I would like to call the Incubator PMC to

Incubator blog at blogs.apache.org?

As several podlings have issues publicizing themselves and finding venues for publicity, would it be a good idea to have an incubator blog at http://blogs.apache.org where we allow podlings to publicize themselves? The content should of course be vetted by the IPMC, but IMO it would be a nice outle

Re: Incubator blog at blogs.apache.org?

is infra issue? How do you see > this IPMC vetting? > > Cheers, > Francis > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: >> Martijn Dashorst wrote: >> >>> As several podlings have issues publicizing themselves and finding >>> venues for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubating (rc4)

+1 (again). Could someone from the IPMC take a look at the release? The team is eager to release it, but lacks 2 +1 binding votes. Martijn On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Rainer Döbele wrote: > > +1 > > Rainer > > Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubat

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubating (rc4)

Congrats! Martijn On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > The vote passes as follows: > >   +1 Martijn Dashorst >   +1 Ant Elder >   +1 Craig L Russell >   +1 Thomas Fischer > > Thanks for all your support and reviews! I'll push the release ou

Re: Future of RAT

I'm +1 for TLP. No need to start creating more umbrella projects. If finding a chair is troublesome, I'd be more than willing to fill that gap (although I'm not on the RAT ppmc, nor have written a single line of code for it). As a mentor and user I love the utility, so keeping it around and making

Stop the vitriolic name calling please.

As a Member, and mentor, I take offense at being called a hawk, lunatic, drive-by-shooter, process-obstructor, etc. There is absolutely no reason to conflate changing the dynamics of the Incubator by adding this kind of bile to the discussion. I feel disempowered and insulted by the consistent bi

Re: RAT can be dangerous

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Stuart Monteith wrote: > If I am to offer a suggestion, I would suggest that there be a clear release > process documented in a single location, with the rational for each of its > steps > included. Is this what you'd want? http://incubator.apache.org/guides/re

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

I fully second this sentiment. +1 and godspeed as a TLP! Martijn On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > +1 > > You have worked hard to get to this point, having survived the release > process, two name changes, and community building exercises. > > I have no reservations about

Re: [VOTE] Isis to enter the incubator

+1 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Dan Haywood wrote: >  The Isis proposal has now been updated with a champion and several new > mentors (thanks again guys), and is ready to be voted on. > > The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IsisProposal , the text > is also copied below. > >

No dev-, user- lists for small podlings (was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Kitty to Enter the Incubator)

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks wrote: >>... > >> *Mailing Lists* >> >> kitty-dev >> kitty-commits >> kitty-user >> > > Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the > community across dev/user does not make sens

Re: [VOTE] Thrift to graduate from the incubator

+1 On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Bryan Duxbury wrote: > All, > > Thrift has been humming along nicely lately. We'd made several releases and > added several committers. The Thrift community thinks now is a good time to > consider graduation. > > Please let me know if this resolution is insuffi

Bylaws paragraph in TLP resolutions

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > added one para about bylaws/particiption). Where did you copy your original > from > before search/replace? I'd like to fix that source material. AFAIK, the bylaws paragraph was scrapped from the template because it was deemed no longer necess

Re: [VOTE] Aries Graduation to TLP

+1 On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, > > The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are > ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a > commnunity we were unanimous in deciding to graduate to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.2.0-incubating (rc1)

+1 On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > fyi - we already have one binding +1 (Benson) vote from our PMC vote > round so we need one more +1 > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Thomas Fox wrote: >> +1 >> >>  Thomas >> >> >> -

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduating empire?

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > It's a technical minimum, I agree, but I wouldn't accept graduating a > project with only 3 PMC members. > > 5 looks like a more realistic minimum to make sure the project can > actually get 3 votes when needed. Depends on what is expe

Re: Incubator Status

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Michael Kelleher wrote: > Is there a plan for promoting this project to top level status?  If so, is > there a projected timeline? Unless you specify which project you aim to graduate, I can only assume it is the incubator itself, which is already top level. > Do

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of the Empire-db Podling

of which 3 were also IPMC members > (Benson Margulies, Martijn Dashorst and Thomas Fox). > > I would like to ask the IPMC to approve the graduation. > > [  ] +1 - I approve of the Empire-db graduation > [  ] +0 - I have no opinion > [  ] -1 - There's an issue with graduation a

  1   2   3   4   >