On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is only a combined source/binary archive, which is not standard > practise. > All other projects release a source archive; almost all also release a > separate binary archive.
FWIW, Apache Wicket has released combined binary/source archives since its inception. Not something that needs changing. > The archive does not have a DISCLAIMER file - yes, the disclaimer text > is in README, but the general practise is for a separate file. DISCLAIMER should be next to LICENSE, NOTICE and README. Remember to remove upon graduation :-) > The NOTICE file is incorrect. The date is 2008, and the second > paragraph must be: > > This product includes software developed at > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). > > i.e. switch the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs Should be fixed. > Minor points: > > It would be useful to include compiler source and target versions as > headers in the jar manifests (the manifests are otherwise good) Shouldn't maven do this already? [1] Martijn [1] http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/examples/manifest.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
