On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Upayavira<u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > I think it is important to have some representation of the ASF > membership on a PMC. Perhaps the gauge is to stay on, as a member of the > PMC, until the PMC starts to breed its own ASF members.
It also helps if a podling's PMC consists only of 3 or 4 'merited' contributors, to make the voting easier. While we frown upon PMC's with 3 members, I think 4 is rather common. Having Mentors step in to help voting (real life also happens when you have graduated) is a good thing. While Niclas is right that a Mentor typically hasn't got code merit, it is the interests of the Foundation that should be guarded—the podling has to be able to function after graduation, and I also think that having a Mentor as a PMC member provides that extra weight. Martijn > > It has certainly worked for me in the two graduated podlings I've worked > with - which come to think of it means I could resign both of them > now :-) > > Upayavira > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
