On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <jus...@erenkrantz.com> wrote: > To be clear, it's on the mentors to decide what is applicable and > necessary for graduation - not the IPMC as a whole.
Nope... The whole IPMC has been tasked with oversight. The mentors are proxies for the whole IPMC. > The IPMC as a > whole has only two roles: approving a proposal and recommending > graduation - in between those two stages, it's up to the mentors to > drive the show on behalf of the IPMC. Non-mentors don't get to hold a > podling hostage and all votes by the IPMC are majority-based (no vetos > apply). I'll vote -1 if I'm not convinced SVN is adhering to the set policies. With the rant of Greg I'm less convinced that the project is conducting itself as a proper Apache community (but rather as an Old Boys Network), and I am more convinced that the incubation process for SVN is just a lesson in rubber stamping than an actual and sincere attempt at doing the right thing. Martijn -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
