Celix looks pretty normal; report in getting prepeared, traffic on mailing
list is ok. I don't see any particular cause for concern. Celix might need to
update the project site to reflect recent additions of the committers.
Stratosphere dev list look pretty good, traffic is high and mentors
partic
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:50AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 28 April 2014 19:19, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Henry Saputra
> > wrote:
> > > Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys!
> >
> > Indeed! Best of luck growing your community and project!
> >
> > Tha
Interesting, looks like I got to shepherd a graduated project ;) Henry, let me
know if you need any help with clearing out the situation.
Regards,
Cos
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 10:36AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Tajo already graduated to TLP.
>
> Does the project miss some post gradua
I am going to post my Drill Shepherd review to the June2014 page in a moment,
but I wanted to reflect here that Drill project didn't reported after I have
nudged them on the dev@ list and Ted Dunning forwarded the reminder from the
board.
Cos
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 10:50AM, John D. Ament wrote:
Thanks Henry! In the meanwhile I have removed the project from june2014 wiki
report page.
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:56PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Cos, I will follow up with the post graduation steps that Tajo missed
>
> On Sunday, June 8, 2014, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
>
A small clarification point: is the intention of the project to essentially
implement the functionality of Groovy's JsonSlurper?
http://groovy.codehaus.org/gapi/groovy/json/JsonSlurper.html for the reference
Thanks,
Cos
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 08:40PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 08:43PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi all
>
> See below for the shepherd reports. I've put some additional comments in.
>
> Drill/Konstantin Boudnik
>
> Shepherd/Mentor notes:
>
> In the month of June the project's dev@ list was li
I had an honor to shepherd Celix ones and I like the dynamics of it. I am sure
the community will grow as the time goes. In my opinion, it worth moving it
into TLP. I will be happy to help the project moving forward if my help is
required.
Cos
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:06AM, Alexander Broekhuis
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:23PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> +1 Please go ahead and retire from the incubator. (binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and
> > called f
I share the sentiment with NPanday - doesn't seem like anything is happening
there really.
If it of an interest to the incubator, I will volunteer to help mentoring Tez.
Cos
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:55AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
> I think Tez needs some more help mentoring. I myself h
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:31PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 06/12/2014 07:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > This is one of the questions, I'd like to explore in greater details: are
> > we comfortable with having "professional student" projects in the
> > incubator?
>
> In response to the general
I want to concur on that. Say, in Bigtop that has Gradle build system, we
aren't checking in the wrappers. Instead they are created in the build time,
and consequently might be added into a binary assembly.
Cos
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:23PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Hey Jakob
> We did run into th
Sure Chris.
I'll send an email to dev@ list offering help.
Cos
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 06:54PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> Tez is ready to graduate. Cos, if you can help us manage that process,
> it'd certainly be appreciated. -C
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Kon
Sure, the more the merrier or so I've been told ;)
Looking forward to help getting good project to the next phase!
Cos
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:35AM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> 2014-06-16 21:43 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Boudnik :
>
> > I had an honor to shepherd Celix on
and
>hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>Apache Celix Project:
>
> * Alexander Broekhuis
> * Pepijn Noltes
> * Bjoern Petri
> * Erik Jansman
>
Evidently
+1 to ban the account
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 04:37PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> The dozen or so messages from abiola balogun on this list
> in the past month have been monosyllabic non sequiturs [1]. I think he/she/it
> is a spam bot and propose that he/she/it be removed from the list.
>
nt of view?
Regards,
Cos
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 06:54PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> Tez is ready to graduate. Cos, if you can help us manage that process,
> it'd certainly be appreciated. -C
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > I share the sent
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 05:54AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> > To this end, I'd like to prose a very simplistic criteria
> > for a potential retirement from the incubator: unless both
> > of of the following applies project get put to a r
If I am not mistaken, no one really doubt the possible value of Tez
(incubating) for other open- and close-source projects. I don't think it
is an intention of the IPMC or a wider incubator community to pass the
judgement on the technical viability of a project.
What is discussed, on the other han
Hey Roman.
I can find a few cycles to help with that, if no one else with more experience
wants to step in.
Regards,
Cos
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:04PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> given the current situation with NPanday's mentors,
> I'd like to request additional help from IPMC. If y
help them with the monthly report (they
> are on schedule for this one). If you could
> do that before Wed -- that would be very much
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > Hey Roman.
> >
> &g
t; release, and some that are interested in contributing fixes from time to
> time - we really need to get more of those semi-regular contributors on as
> committers.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> On 2 Jul 2014, at 3:34 pm, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> &g
ed out, we have a few users who are interested in seeing a
> release, and some that are interested in contributing fixes from time to
> time - we really need to get more of those semi-regular contributors on as
> committers.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> On 2 Jul 2014,
I will pick up Flink - I shepherd them before, will do again.
Updating the wiki right now
Cos
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 05:23PM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that Flink does not have a Shepherd assigned. It is also missing a
> review by them. But it looks like half of the projects are
For the Flink:
Shepherd/Mentor notes:
Mentors look active; dev maillist is active. No obvious issues.
Cos
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:05PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> I will pick up Flink - I shepherd them before, will do again.
> Updating the wiki right now
>
> Cos
>
Apache Incubator PMC has VOTEd to add
> Konstantin Boudnik AKA Cos to our ranks.
>
> Welcome, Cos! Great to have you on board!
>
> Please let us know a surprising thing or two
> about yourself.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
If an objective of a podding is to build a diversified community then perhaps
it should be an explicitly defined graduation criteria? In fact, earlier I have
raised exactly the same question about Tez but I don't think it ever been
satisfactory answered.
As for chances of a project to stick with g
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:41AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Thank you for writing back with a detailed clarification.
>
> Regarding encryption at rest, HDFS is adding it as HDFS-6134, so likely
> there will be a new core feature option for the ecosystem to consider
> shortly.
>
> I don’t feel one te
I have just noticed that Celix is still on the roster for
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2014
The project has graduated to TLP last month and will be on the board report.
Hence it needs to be removed from the IPMC report.
Cos
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:36PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> ht
+1
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 02:40PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on REEF. The discussion
> has calmed. I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> The proposal is attached below, and it is also availab
It makes sense. And it also seems to be a decent compilation of the points
agreed in the earlier and lengthy discussion on the topic.
Cos
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 05:22PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Seems like attachments are eaten away by general@
> Including the patch bellow
>
> Index: content/g
idn't clean up
> podlings.xml. Please clean it up on their behalf, as I believe you have
> joined their PMC.
>
> John
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > I have just noticed that Celix is still on the roster for
> > https://wiki.
s/Jon/John/ (clumsy me)
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:08PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Sorry Jon - I missed the email. And of course you're right about the report.
> I will look into what needs to be done for the clean-up tonight.
>
> Cos
>
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 08:32
Arguably, the number of mentored project doesn't reflect "the activity" per
se. Unless I am missing something.
Cos
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:46AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
> Guys, +1 to eventually doing this with JSON and YAML. The big problem
> I see is curation (someone has to maintain
Celix has been graduated, but still need to clear podling. My fault - I've
promissed to fix it up and got distructed. Will finishe it before the end of
the week.
Cos
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 01:45PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Lookse like we need to update podling.xml. The August report states 31.
I have fixed what was hopefully the last item in the graduation list, so Celix
shouldn't appear in the IPMC reports anymore.
Cos
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:13PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Celix has been graduated, but still need to clear podling. My fault - I've
> promissed
)
* Vladimir Ozerov (GridGain Systems, vozerov at gridgain dot com)
* Nikita Ivanov (GridGain Systems, nivanov30 at gmail dot com)
* Sergey Khisamov (FitechSource, skh at gmail dot com)
* Ilya Sterin (ChronoTrack, isterin at gmail dot com)
* Ryan Rawson (WANdisco, rawson at apache dot org)
enry! Would you consider investing a few cycles on your own and
join the mentors for this proposal? Thanks in advance!
Cos
>
> - Henry
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > I would like to propose Silk as an Apache Incubator project. The new
>
dot com)
> * Yakov Zhdanov (GridGain Systems, yzhdanov at gridgain dot com)
> * Alexey Goncharuk (GridGain Systems, agoncharuk at gridgain dot com)
> * Sergey Vladykin (GridGain Systems, svladykin at gridgain dot com)
> * Valentin Kulichenko (GridGain Systems, vkulichenko at gridgain dot
o other Apache projects section"
> in the proposal.
>
> - Henry
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:21PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> >> Hi Cos,
> >>
> >> Looks like a good start of
Andrew Purtell wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:21PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> >> Hi Cos,
> >>
> >> Looks like a good start of the proposal.
> >>
> >> How would this project relat
itial committers have not been involved in ASF
> yet so may need some help to adjust to Apache way.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > I would like to propose Silk as an Apache Incubator project. The new
> > proposal is adde
:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > I would like to propose Silk as an Apache Incubator project. The new
> > proposal is added to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SilkProposal and
> > is duplicated below.
> >
>
> Hi Cos:
>
> Ar
also need commits@ list for all the commits
> activities to the source repo.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>> We have updated the proposal with the section of
>> "Comparative analysis to relevant projects"
>&
on at apache dot org)
* Konstantin Boudnik (WANdisco, cos at apache dot org)
* Roman Shaposhnik (Pivotal, rvs at apache dot org)
* Branko Cibej (WANdisco, brane at apache dot org)
== Sponsors ==
=== Apache Champion ===
* Konstantin Boudnik (cos at apache dot org)
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Mic
The vote has passed with 6 binding +1 votes, 1 non-binding +1, and no +0 or -1
votes.
Binding (+1)
Branko Čibej
Jan Iversen
Henry Saputra
Roman Shaposhnik
Michael Stack
Konstantin Boudnik
Non-binding (+1)
P. Taylor Goetz
We will be carrying on to the the next steps under the normal IPMC rules
hopefully would be able to offer
it as a part of Hadoop 2.x line in the coming days.
Dr. Konstantin Boudnik
Hadoop committer
BigTop PMC
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:03PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm pleased to bring you a proposal to the Apache Incubator
sor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Boudnik
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Date: Friday, May 31, 2013 12:29 PM
> To: "general@in
> On 14/06/11 05:26, Tom White wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Incubator project.
> > Bigtop is a project for the development of packaging and tests of the
> > Hadoop ecosystem. The goal is to do testing at various levels
> > (packaging, platform, runtime, upgr
Steve,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> I've added more on the limitations of the current process (not synchronised
> releases, not enough automated testing on multiple-host clusters), and on a
actually there's a stand-alone Hudson job in Apache
https://builds.apache.o
)
--
═ Thanks,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 ═6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
On Tue, Jun 14, 201
Oh, I see. Looks like a dangling links indeed... Thanks for pointing out.
Cos
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:32PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi Cos,
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > However, iTest repository at github.com/cloudera/iTest isn't
Oh, I see. Looks like a dangling links indeed... Thanks for pointing out.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:32PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi Cos,
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > However, iTest repository at github.com/cloudera/iTest isn't
>
s) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:43, Konstantin Bou
Oh, I see. Looks like a dangling links indeed... Thanks for pointing out.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:32PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi Cos,
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > However, iTest repository at github.com/cloudera/iTest isn't
>
Oh, I see. Looks like a dangling links indeed... Thanks for pointing out.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:32PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi Cos,
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > However, iTest repository at github.com/cloudera/iTest isn't
>
Wow, great stuff to have in OSS! I would love to contribute to the project.
Cos
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:57PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to propose PhoneGap to be an Apache Incubator project.
> (Under the new, still proposed name, Apache Callback.)
>
> Here's a link
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:02AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> >> It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to
> >> help podlings to graduation while following existing A
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 02:50PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 08/04/2015 02:45 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > Sorry if it rubs the wrong way. However, we just have seen through the
> > Ignite
> > discussion (most recent one) the examples where personal expectations we
> has to be interpreted via debate. This is what debate sounds like.
>
> Julian
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:36AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
&g
+1 (binding)
Good luck!
Cos
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 04:15PM, Dave wrote:
> The Usergrid project has made three releases from the Incubator (1.0.0,
> 1.0.1 and 1.0.2), has added multiple and diverse committers, and the
> project has completed all required items on the graduation check-list [1].
I have just updated the podlings.xml to reflect that Ignite has graduated. So
they won't be reporting as a part of Incubator any more.
Thanks,
Cos
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 08:58AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I really like our open way of reporting using the wiki but we have a small
> flaw in the pr
lar builds for HAWQ on builds.apache.org will
> require integration with Docker support.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * Lirong Jian
> * Hubert Huan Zhang
> * Radar Da Lei
> * Ivan Yanqing Weng
> * Zhanwei Wang
> * Yi Jin
> * Lili Ma
> * Jiali Yao
>
t;* TikZ-UML (no license information)
>
> Cryptography
>* N/A
>
> == Required Resources ==
>
> === Mailing lists ===
> * priv...@madlib.incubator.apache.org (moderated subscriptions)
> * comm...@madlib.incubator.apache.org
> * d...@madlib.incubator.
Am I the only one who sees an issue of moral hazard in this proposal?
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:28PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
> HI,
>
> Here is an idea:
>
> Can we offer $20 to the first 3 binding voters of a release on general@? We
> would structure the contract as such:
>
> "The first
+1 (binding). Good luck!
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 03:09PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> The Calcite community has established consensus and held a
> successful vote with 20 +1 votes in favor of proposing
> graduation to a top-level project, including 12 votes from
> committers and 6 votes from IPMC members
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 11:38AM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
> Hi Daniel:
>
> Discussion intertwined below…
>
> Cheers,
>
> Greg Trasuk
>
> > On Oct 9, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >
> > Hi Incubator folks,
> >
> > I would like to propose we adopt a mentor neutrality policy for
> > incuba
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 08:36PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Does there always have to be an actual problem before we can propose a
> policy? must we always be reactive instead of proactive?
"We can't just stay on a side and wait, we should do something!" - sounds all
too familiar, eh?
> Yes, I am in a
s and Ross on immorality of the
guilt-by-association policy.
Cos
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace*
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 09:06AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 10/10/2015 07:51 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > We should address perceived, and certainly provable, instances of
> > corruption at the Foundation directly, rather than prescribe policy that
> > seeks to prevent future instances as if there i
Looks like it is one of those situations that happens from time to time. Makes
sense to me. Thanks.
Cos
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 06:26AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> It's been a month and we haven't heard from Thorsten, nor any lurker
> in the Droids community.
>
> I've changed the subject to make i
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 09:05PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.10.2015 20:11, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 09:06AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >> On 10/10/2015 07:51 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> >>> We should address perceived, and certainly provable,
Continuing this line of reasoning I won't be able to mentor _any_ of the
projects I've mentored or still mentoring because of different levels of
involvements either at my $dayjob or with the organizations that donated the
code initially. Is this really an intent of the original proposal to prevent
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 06:52PM, Reto Gmür wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> > > Hi Incubator folks,
> > >
> > > I would like to propose we adopt a mentor neutrality policy for
> > > incubating podling
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:45PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Producing good code is a community effort. When it comes down to just the
> mentors fix that themselves, there is something wrong with the community of
> the podling.
>
> This discussion is not about what participants do with their mentor hat
And still -1 on the revised proposal for the same reasons I stated before.
Cos
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:39PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> First off: Can we *please* focus on the revised proposal and not get
> into a loop about the original email? I'll change the topic if that helps.
>
> The revised
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 06:10AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> If it can work, that is very good. With intermittent availability, I have
> often seen the need for a spare.
Exactly! I've been out for 6 weeks back in May/June and missed all the reports
and other activity on the projects I am/was a mentor to.
(binding)
Bertrand Delacretaz (binding)
Andrew Bayer (binding)
Jim Jagielski (binding)
Konstantin Boudnik (binding)
Russel Winder
Guillaume Alleon
The Groovy community has:
* completed all required paperwork:
https://incubator.apache.org/projects/groovy.html
* completed
+1 (binding, reiterating my earlier vote on dev@groovy)
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:26PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community
> has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 +1s
> total, 5 ar
voting - I will
fix it before adding to the board's agenda for Nov (assuming the vote passes).
Cos
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:14PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Groovy from the Incubator.
> &
Shaposhnik
If anyone feels that the [VOTE] needs to be restarted because of the clerical
error - please speak and I'd be happy to do it. Sorry for all the jitter.
Cos
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:26PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groo
And with Jim's late response to the Groovy community invitation to join the
PMC the final list going into the resolution will look like this
Cédric Champeau
Paul King
Guillaume Laforge
Pascal Schumacher
Jochen Theodorou
Andrew Bayer
Konstantin Boudnik
+1
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:36PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The Droids community has voted to retire:
>
> http://s.apache.org/Rko
>
> This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling.
>
> [ ] +1 to retire Droids from the incubator
> [ ] -1 to keep Droi
+1
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:38PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The Kalumet community has voted to retire:
>
> http://s.apache.org/fP
>
> This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling.
>
> [ ] +1 to retire Kalumet from the incubator
> [ ] -1 to keep Kal
:35AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> The only thing that catches me off guard is lack of a discuss thread. But
> I can give +1
> On Oct 28, 2015 16:26, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote:
>
> > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community
> > has voted
uides/graduation.html#tlp-resolution> should
> be proposed on the general incubator list
> before
> a VOTE <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> is started to allow
> feedback.
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:37 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
The VOTE to graduate Groovy to the top-level project has passed with
15 binding +1s and 3 non-binding +1s. No 0 or -1 votes were casted.
Binding:
Chris Mattmann
Konstantin Boudnik
Julian Hyde
Marvin Humphrey
Emmanuel Lécharny
Sergio Fernández
Steve Loughran
ance of our mentors in particular
> Bertrand):
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/blob/master/MATURITY.adoc
> On 2 Nov 2015 5:30 am, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
>
> > On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote:
> > >
> > > Foll
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:25AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote
> >thread, duh...
> >
> >Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:11AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 01/11/15 20:30, Rich Bowen a écrit :
> > On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote:
> >> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community
> >> has voted [2] to
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:27PM, Vinod Vavilapalli wrote:
> Many of the active TLPs do tend to center all project discussions on JIRA as
> opposed to mailing lists. OTOH, non-code discussions are usually best served
> on mailing lists.
>
> Instead of making it a JIRA vs mailing list discussion, ho
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:27PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 03:57 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > I see this (the release discussion threads you linked) as a semi-mature
> > community that's well aligned. A number of folks responded to the request
> > for discussion and said they were in fav
Potentially it might mean that you have also subscribed from other mail aliases?
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 07:45PM, Robert Kausch - US wrote:
> Sorry for having to send this to the whole list, but I don't think the
> unsubscribe functionality is working. I've been trying for 10 days, and I'm
> still
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 07:01PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The Corinthia community has voted to retire:
>
> http://s.apache.org/odN
>
> This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to retire the podling.
>
> [ ] +1 to retire Corinthia from the Incubator
> [ ]
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:43AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
>
> > Sounds great.
> >
> > I would love to be an help as a committer, if possible. This seems to be
> > fantastic in line with my focus areas and can help existing big data
> > projects to
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:26PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> Hi Henry -
>
> Absolutely, although I want to point out that only two of our three mentors
which clearly constitutes "almost all" as Henry pointed out :)
On a different note: have the initial delopers considered a possibility of
bringing t
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 04:50PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> >...
>
> > 1) You're right, I don't trust anybody to make code changes to a complex
> > project with zero oversight. I currently work on a project that I
> >
>
> I have always found the "c
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 08:53AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > ...RTC can be framed as "I don't trust you to do things right"...
>
> Or also "I don't trust myself 100% to do things right here and would
> like systematic reviews of my commits"
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:33PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Hi Atri,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the interest! Following the example of other recent incubator
> > > projects, we would like to keep the initial committer list to those who
> > are
> > > already have a track record of contributions to
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:45PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 08:53AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Ted Dunning
> > wrote:
> > > > ...RTC
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
