Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote thread, duh...
Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by my +1 on the vote. Why would I be voting for the graduation if I weren't sure the project is ready? Looks like a rhetorical question, this one. Regards, Cos On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:10AM, Paul King wrote: > I certainly don't want to limit discussion but if anyone hasn't seen it > yet, here is the direct link to our self assessment against the maturity > metrics (completed with the assistance of our mentors in particular > Bertrand): > https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/blob/master/MATURITY.adoc > On 2 Nov 2015 5:30 am, "Rich Bowen" <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > > > has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 > > +1s > > > total, 5 are binding: > > > > > > Guillaume Laforge > > > Cédric Champeau > > > Paul King > > > Jochen Theodorou > > > Pascal Schumacher > > > Emmanuel Lécharny (binding) > > > Bertrand Delacretaz (binding) > > > Andrew Bayer (binding) > > > Jim Jagielski (binding) > > > Konstantin Boudnik (binding) > > > Russel Winder > > > Guillaume Alleon > > > > > > The Groovy community has: > > > * completed all required paperwork: > > > https://incubator.apache.org/projects/groovy.html > > > * completed multiple releases (2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6 is in the works) > > > * completed the name check procedure: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-88 > > > * addressed 50+ JIRAs: > > > http://is.gd/1tACON > > > * voted in multiple new committers/PPMC members > > > > > > Therefore, I'm calling a VOTE to graduate Groovy with the following Board > > > resolution. The VOTE will run for at least 72 hours, ending > > > Saturday, October 31st 8 PM PST. > > > > I recognize that I have missed the vote and thus my response is moot. I > > have been traveling, but i don't expect preferential treatment. > > > > However, as useful as these other measures are, as a member, and as a > > director who will need to vote on this resolution, I'd like to know if you, > > as a mentor, feel that this project had attainded maturity as described in > > the maturity metric document, and will operate according to the Apache way? > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Groovy from the Incubator. > > > [ ] +0 Don't care. > > > [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Groovy from the Incubator because ... > > > > > > Regards, > > > Cos > > > > > > [1] http://is.gd/DX41lO > > > [2] http://is.gd/pPweq3 > > > [3] http://is.gd/VTLiqO > > > > > > ---- Apache Groovy graduation resolution draft > > > > > > Establish the Apache Groovy Top-Level Project > > > > > > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests > > > of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to > > > establish a Project Management Committee charged with the evolution > > > and maintenance of the Groovy programming language, > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee > > > (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Groovy Project", be and hereby is > > > established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Groovy Project be and hereby is responsible > > > for the evolution and maintenance of the Groovy programming language; > > > and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Groovy" be and > > > hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the > > > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Groovy > > > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the > > > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Groovy > > > Project; and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > > > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Groovy Project > > > PMC: > > > > > > Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> > > > Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> > > > Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com> > > > Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net> > > > Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> > > > Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> > > > Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Guillaume Laforge be > > > appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Groovy, to serve in > > > accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors > > > and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, > > > removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be > > > it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the Apache Groovy Project be and hereby is tasked with > > > the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator Groovy > > > podling; and be it further > > > > > > RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator > > > Groovy podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator Project are > > > hereafter discharged. > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
