On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:11AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 01/11/15 20:30, Rich Bowen a écrit : > > On Oct 28, 2015 4:26 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <c...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community > >> has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 > > +1s > >> total, 5 are binding: > >> > >> Guillaume Laforge > >> Cédric Champeau > >> Paul King > >> Jochen Theodorou > >> Pascal Schumacher > >> Emmanuel Lécharny (binding) > >> Bertrand Delacretaz (binding) > >> Andrew Bayer (binding) > >> Jim Jagielski (binding) > >> Konstantin Boudnik (binding) > >> Russel Winder > >> Guillaume Alleon > >> > >> The Groovy community has: > >> * completed all required paperwork: > >> https://incubator.apache.org/projects/groovy.html > >> * completed multiple releases (2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6 is in the works) > >> * completed the name check procedure: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-88 > >> * addressed 50+ JIRAs: > >> http://is.gd/1tACON > >> * voted in multiple new committers/PPMC members > >> > >> Therefore, I'm calling a VOTE to graduate Groovy with the following Board > >> resolution. The VOTE will run for at least 72 hours, ending > >> Saturday, October 31st 8 PM PST. > > I recognize that I have missed the vote and thus my response is moot. I > > have been traveling, but i don't expect preferential treatment. > > > > However, as useful as these other measures are, as a member, and as a > > director who will need to vote on this resolution, I'd like to know if you, > > as a mentor, feel that this project had attainded maturity as described in > > the maturity metric document, and will operate according to the Apache way? > Yes, and Bertrand has conducted the check we now run on poddling we > think are ready to become TLP. > > As a mentor who have followed a few podlings in the past, I must say > that Groovy was one of the easiest ! OTOH, the project was already > mature before being accepted in incubator. Keep in mind that this move > was dictated by the decision from Pivotal to stop paying the main > developpers, combined with the shutdown of the Codehaus hosting > facility. The Groovy fellows decided that The ASF was the best place to > host the project, and they did a long due diligence to check that the > ASF requirements were easy to follow for them. In many ways, it was all > about finding the right place for the project, and The ASF was a perfect > fit.
If we want the credit go where it's due - let's not forget about Roman's effort to present the case, spent a lot of time advocating, and helping Groovy project to finally come under the Foundation's wing. Cos > Every single requirements (IP clearance, voting releases, accepting new > committers, discussion on the ML, etc) where easily met, and the groovy > community was really open minded and ready for any required change in > their way of doing things. Mature ? You bet ! > > My 2cts > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
