Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

For the record, at the time that I reviewed the github repo, there was code that was not merely *inspired* by Mondrian code, but *derived* from Mondrian code. But that code has since been removed, so the issue is resolved. With the usual precautions of a BD scan on the incoming IP and ongoing dilig

Re: [VOTE] Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator

+1 Julian > On May 25, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi all, > > following the discussion thread, I'm now calling a vote to accept CarbonData > into the Incubator. > > ​[ ] +1 Accept CarbonData into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain > [ ] -1 Do not accept CarbonData

What committers need to know about IP hygiene

A couple of projects I am mentoring have raised very similar questions recently: * Do contributions via github PRs require a CLA? * Do PRs require a JIRA case? I know the answers to these questions, but I was unable to find them clearly documented. All committers, including those in podlings, nee

Re: Lack of karma to manage LDAP groups as a mentor impediment

And I’ll add to that, that while as member, IPMC member and PMC chair I probably have karma for most things, I often hesitate to put up my hand and say “I’ll do that” because I know there’s a chance that I’ll hit a permissions wall, and the 2 minute task becomes something that is at the back of

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Twill as Top Level Project

I see a small community with slow growth (Henry is the only committer appointed since incubation, Terence does the majority of the commits, and if the mentors leave the project after graduation the active PMC is dangerously close to 3 members) but it is a glass half full. The project is being us

Re: [DISCUSS] Pirk Incubation Proposal

Some more diversity among mentors would be nice, even though the mentors are all impeccable Apache members. The proposal template[1] says it is “useful” if that initial committers state their affiliations. I think it would be helpful here. Julian [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Twill as Top Level Project

You missed my +1 binding, but the result stands. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/06fbcea8d1dfaa2f1e04b1d08315a3ea2c2d7f079da61bcb1f3c0c95@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Re: Looking for mentors

I strongly believe that one or two people from each graduating podling should serve as mentors soon after graduation. It's totally up to them, of course. But it is appropriate to give back, having received help from so many volunteers during incubation. And, having just been through the experien

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Quarks

That thread was about renaming Optiq to Calcite, and it turned out just fine. We created JIRA cases based on the ones Henrik suggested, and it went pretty smoothly. There are a few cosmetic issues, for instance the github mirror said “mirrored from incubator-optiq.git” for a long time after incu

Re: Looking for mentors

If each graduating podling provided 2 or 3 mentors (or one person prepared to mentor 2 or 3 projects) the problem would be solved. It would be a (virtuous) pyramid scheme and the incubator could grow indefinitely. Julian > On Jun 11, 2016, at 18:40, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

+1 (binding) Checked hashes, license, notice, disclaimer. Built on JDK 1.8, OS X. Nice work, and good luck. Remarks: 0. I noticed .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md … nice! 1. The DISCLAIMER file is sufficient for the purposes of a source release. But for the github audience, reaching https://

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

> On Jun 13, 2016, at 12:08 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > >> But I imported >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/blob/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3/KEYS >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-bea

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 It’s easy to change content (e.g. the incubation disclaimer at the top of the home page and in files that are part of the release) but it’s difficult to change URLs. Remember that projects are ongoing operations, before and after graduation, and they are trying to reduce friction in their pr

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

> On Jun 29, 2016, at 7:03 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > An even worse example than Eagle I’m a mentor of Eagle. Mea culpa, I took my eye off the ball. I’m asked them to do a branding audit and fix themselves. Julian - To

Re: Notes on branding

On 2016-07-01 07:37 (-0700), Shane Curcuru wrote: > > In particular, any feedback on our published policies/guidelines is very > important. As we scale, we need to ensure that most podlings can figure > out the right thing to do from the docs, and not as much from direct > pushes by our volun

Re: [VOTE]: Graduate Apache Kudu from the incubator

Project looks to be in good shape. Good luck! +1 > On Jul 5, 2016, at 12:04 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Kudu has > approved on the dev list with 12 positive votes (11 PPMC, 1 community (6 > from IPMC members)) > > Status page:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.0 (incubating) - rc1

+1 (binding) I checked licenses, notices, built on Ubuntu 14.04 JDK 1.8, checked signatures. I also had fun learning about the WTFPL. I am shocked (SHOCKED!) that you can use words like that on a software distro. I concur with all of the issues Josh raised, especially the RAT exclusions. Keep th

Re: [VOTE] Release: Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating

<https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/releases/tag/$TAG_NAME> >> >> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mw.asc >> <http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/$NAME.asc> >> >> The hashes o

Re: SVN dist question

It’s A1 and B1. By the time you graduate, the old releases will have moved to archive.apache.org/repos/dist/incubator/fluo , but same problem. Incubator releases are not “proper" Apache releases, do not necessarily meet the high standard expe

Re: SVN dist question

Yes, that's correct. All projects (incubating or graduated) remove old releases from dist/release. See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#when-to-archive. Julian On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Christopher wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:52 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > >> I

Re: Ease of release process and exit criteria

+1 Especially for point 2, adding to the maturity model. Finding a release manager can be a problem, but is also an opportunity: a committer who wants to become more involved with project governance can volunteer to be RM. A well-functioning project makes this process as smooth as possible. Ju

Re: Radical proposal: no initial list of committers

+0.5 I like this idea a lot (but there are governance problems to be solved). I have long been frustrated at folks who jump on the bandwagon and become initial committers then play no further part in the project. Do inactive committers harm the project? No, of course they don’t. But it isn’t f

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

Some clarification of what constitutes a “hostile fork” would indeed be useful. On a few occasions I have had discussions with communities on joining Apache, and this often comes up. We have relied on precedent — and in particular, on-the-record comments by board members on this list — and it ha

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.1.1-incubating release

+1 (binding) Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, checksums, ran rat, checked for unexpected binaries. I was not able to build (not your fault - I did not have thrift installed and didn't have the time & patience to install it). Some notes: * It would be useful if source-release.zip contains a R

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 (binding) > On Nov 8, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Luke Han wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM +0800, "Christian Tzolov" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Amol Kekre wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Thks >> Amol >> >> On

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

I like the way that Reynold is coming at this. I am aware of the rule mandating English for discussions. But in the interests of having no more rules than are strictly necessary, is it not sufficient to tell PMCs (and PPMCs): "Do whatever you believe will engage the largest possible community."

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

Regardless of the language being used, keeping discussions on-list can be hard work. In practice it requires the core members of the community to doggedly refuse to answer questions that are not asked in the correct forum. I can see how that doggedness might be perceived as rudeness. Total specula

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

For what it’s worth, I ran into the same issue as John did when I validated the 0.1.1 release[1]. I put it down to my incompetence and voted +1. It would be nice if Thrift were easier to install for idiots like me. Julian [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201610.mb

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 0.2.0-incubating release

stall thrift.(this problem will be solved > automatically once the release is done.) > > Regards > Liang > > > Julian Hyde-3 wrote >> For what it’s worth, I ran into the same issue as John did when I >> validated the 0.1.1 release[1]. I put it down to my incompetence and vote

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron (incubating) 0.3.0-RC1

+1 (binding) but with reservations about branding. Downloaded, checked hashes, built using Oracle JDK 1.8 and maven-3.2.1 on Ubuntu Linux, ran apache-rat. I also re-read discussions about 0.2.0-RC2 [1] and 0.2.0-RC3 [2] releases. In README.md, the product is described as “Metron"; should be "A

Re: [VOTE] Bring Griffin to Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Dec 1, 2016, at 3:30 PM, Liang Chen wrote: > > Hi > > +1(non-binding) > > Regards > Liang > > Henry Saputra wrote >> Hi All, >> >> As the champion for Griffin, I would like to start VOTE to bring the >> project as Apache incubator podling. >> >> Here is the direct quote f

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Beam podling graduation readiness

The project looks to be ready to graduate. The traffic on the dev list shows a community that is in good shape. Thanks for completing the maturity assessment — it helped me assess the state of the project. Julian > On Dec 2, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > Hi everyone, > Apache Be

Re: [RESTART] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Beam

+1 (binding) > On Dec 5, 2016, at 5:28 PM, Neelesh Salian wrote: > > +1(non-binding) > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Liang Chen wrote: > >> +1(non-binding) >> >> Regards >> Liang >> >> 2016-12-06 7:30 GMT+08:00 Davor Bonaci : >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> Please vote on the draft resolution

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Eagle (incubating)

Edward, It’s usual to open a discussion thread to discuss whether a project is ready to graduate, achieve consensus, and only then move to a vote. Can I suggest that you cancel this thread (by sending a “[CANCEL] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Eagle (incubating)” email) and start a “[DISCUSS] Graduatin

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduating Apache Eagle

I am happy to stay on as a PMC member. (I was simply trying to trim my responsibilities, and to avoid collecting PMC memberships the way my younger brother used to collect Boy Scout proficiency badges.) Edward, Please add me to the list when you start the formal vote. As a mentor, let me state

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduating Apache Eagle

Looking a the home page http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/ I think that Eagle should make Apache branding clearer for people who do not scroll down past the fold, remove the prominent GitHub link, and add a “Download” button to a standard download page with

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Eagle to top level project

t; and be it further > > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > > Apache Eagle Project: > > > * Edward Zhang > > * Hao Chen > > * Qingwen Zhao > > * Jil

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - December 2016

on roadmaps, features, and plans together as a community. >>>> >>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >>>> aware of? >>>> >>>> None. >>>> >>>> How has the community developed since the l

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

-1 A release by an incubator project, even an established one (by which I mean, one that has a community and a track record of high-quality releases before entering incubation), is "less than" a release by full Apache project: not necessarily in terms of quality, but in terms of having been throug

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

John, I see your points, and hopefully you see mine. I think we can agree on one thing: we have not reached consensus. :) The inconsistency among build tools is a red herring. If we want consistency across build tools (and more importantly across package formats, regardless of the tool used to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator

+1 (binding) Activity on dev looks very healthy, several releases, active contributors are from a reasonably diverse set of employers. Good luck! On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Ramesh Mani wrote: >> Dear Incubator members, >> >> Apach

Re: [DISCUSS] Podling report format changes

John, What did you have in mind for “podling maturity assessment”? If it is simply one of the existing phases - “still getting started”, “no release”, “community growth”, “ready to graduate” - I can’t see that being contentious. Julian > On Jan 24, 2017, at 5:39 PM, Jim Apple wrote: > > Th

Re: Approving flawed release candidates

While I agree with what both John and Marvin are saying, the key word here is “discretion”. Obviously the IPMC shouldn’t give podlings too hard a time (we all know how difficult and time consuming it is to go through a cycle consisting of a release candidate and TWO votes, and the mechanics of t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

Forwarding my vote from the dev list: +1 (binding) > On Mar 10, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Marc Spehlmann wrote: > > The Apache Incubator Quickstep community has approved a vote to release > Quickstep-0.1.0 RC6. Quickstep is a high performance relational database > system built from the ground up for m

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

Jignesh, Your vote is binding on the dev list vote (because you are a member of Quickstep PPMC) but not binding on this incubator vote (because you are not a member of the Incubator PMC). Your vote is still welcome, but in future please mark it “(non-binding)”. Julian > On Mar 14, 2017, at 7:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

n and Justin yet again. Julian On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > Will do. Thanks Julian for pointing this out, and an even bigger thank you > for being an amazing mentor! > > Cheers, > Jignesh > > On 3/14/17, 4:30 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote: &

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CarbonData Project from the Incubator

+1 (binding) Well done, and good luck. Julian > On Mar 15, 2017, at 8:32 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > > +1 (non binding). > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > ORRTIZ.COM > OFBiz based solutions & services > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

And by the way, since this would be Quickstep’s first release under incubation, I gave them some leniency in my RC5 vote [1] on the dev list. I called out 2 showstopper issues, which they fixed in RC6, and some other issues that they are going to fix in release 0.2. (Being a mentor is very much

Re: New Incubator Logo Selection Results

I had to click on a few links to actually see the logo. To save y’all some clicking, here’s the logo: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/images/apache_incubator_logo.png?view=co&content-type=text%2Fplain

Re: Creating a podli...@incubator.apache.org mailing list

Yes, but let’s continue to strongly encourage PPMC members to subscribe to general@i.a.o . I think that they learn a huge amount about the release process, and in the Apache Way in general, by hearing other podlings go through the same process. I would hope that the traffi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Quickstep (incubating) 0.1.0 RC7

Forwarding my vote: +1 (binding) > On Mar 22, 2017, at 12:44 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > > Forwarding my +1 too from the incubator vote. > > Cheers, > Jignesh > > On 3/21/17, 9:12 PM, "Josh Elser" els...@apache.org> wrote: > >Fwding +1 (binding) from ppmc list. > >On Mar 21, 2017 2

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

I reviewed the last few months on the dev and private lists and the project is healthy, growing, increasing in diversity and making regular releases. In my opinion it is ready to graduate. Good luck! Julian > On Mar 23, 2017, at 11:32 AM, Casey Stella wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > The incubat

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metron podling Graduation

+1 (binding) > On Mar 29, 2017, at 6:55 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > +1 > > When you submit the resolution to the board, the breakdown of PMC by > affiliation (and make sure you use PMC not PPMC) can just be replaced with > the proposed PMC members. My question asking for it is a pure sanity

Re: [PROPOSAL] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

My mentoring cycles are all spoken for, but Superset is a great project and I look forward to it becoming part of Apache. Good luck, and I look forward to voting on your release candidates! Julian > On Apr 13, 2017, at 6:48 PM, Luke Han wrote: > > Happy to help too. > > > Best Regards! > --

Re: Incubator Governance Change

I agree that lack of IPMC votes is a problem. I don’t think that lowering the bar to making a release is the solution. I wish that each IPMC member would personally commit to voting on two release candidates per year. There are so many members of the IPMC that this would easily cover all of the

Re: Incubator Governance Change

sponse to this issue is to grow the ipmc to incorporate > more podling committers. > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:02 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > >> I agree that lack of IPMC votes is a problem. I don’t think that lowering >> the bar to making a release is the solution. >>

Re: Incubator Governance Change

> On Apr 24, 2017, at 11:48 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > While podlings have an explicit set of mentors, the IPMC as a whole can be > thought of as an informal set of mentors. Reviewing and voting on podling > release candidates is one way for any IPMC member to help a podling whether a > men

Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

+1 binding > On Apr 25, 2017, at 12:48 PM, moon soo Lee wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:49 AM Ashutosh Chauhan > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Ashutosh >> >> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Luke Han wrote: >> >>> +1 binding >>> >>> Love to see Supe

Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

t flows. These services require some elevated rights on the > Github repository in order to set up or tune and we would like for the > committers to have the required rights. > > > == Initial Committers == > > * Maxime Beauchemin - PPMC & Committer > * Alanna Scott

Re: Podling release vote terminology

Craig, You seem to imply that things used to be done differently. If so, can you point to process documents or example threads of how things were done differently in the past. Are you proposing merely a change in terminology, or a change in process? The two "votes" are very real, since they have

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On May 17, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Jia Zhai wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:11 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> -Taylor >> >>> On May 16, 2017, at 10:39 PM, Bryan Call wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> As the champion for Pulsar, I would

Re: Thanks for the Talks on YouTube

Following the link from http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apache-big-data-north-america and http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america

Re: Updating PPMC rosters via whimsy

+1 > On May 26, 2017, at 3:17 PM, Carlos Santana wrote: > > +100 to the following simplification: > For that reason, I'd like to make a simplifying assumption: that all mentors > are PPMC members, and all PPMC members are committers. > > - Carlos Santana > @csantanapr > >> On May 26, 2017, at

Re: [DISCUSS] Migration of Podling Maintenance Tooling to Whimsy

+1 It moves us towards a self-service (dare I say “github-like”) experience for podlings, and that is always good. Furthermore, if there are choices to be made (e.g. svnpubsub vs. CMS) I think the tooling should strongly encourage them to take the “standard” option. Maybe it doesn’t even prese

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

If the binaries are built from the released source code I don’t think we should restrict what the binaries do. The question is whether the community is aware of what the code is doing, and considers it to be in the best interests of the project. The answer seems to be yes, and yes. I saw that t

Re: ASF hosted binaries collecting user data without an explicit opt-in

t 7:34 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> If the binaries are built from the released source code I don’t think we >> should restrict what the binaries do. > > Well, but that's not how we treat licensing for example. For example > -- there's plenty of ASF project that >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Atlas Project from Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Jun 6, 2017, at 9:15 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > > +1 (binding) -C > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Suma Shivaprasad wrote: >> Dear Incubator members, >> >> Following the discussion in Atlas community on graduating Apache Atlas from >> incubation to a Top Level Project, st

Re: Images in source code.

Can someone please log a JIRA case on RAT? As soon as this feature is in a released version of RAT I’ll change our release process to require headers in all images. Julian > On Jun 15, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Felix Meschberger > wrote: > > Here: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ ? > >

Re: [VOTE] Heron to enter Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Jun 16, 2017, at 8:43 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 8:28 PM Jacques Nadeau wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Jun 16, 2017 7:26 PM, "Ashish" wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Bill Graham wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Based o

Re: [RESULT][VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Ruilong (and others), If in doubt, look people up at https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html . If a voter’s page has “PMC member of … incubator” then their vote is binding. E.g. https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jmclean

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Calcite - Avatica Go

Apache Calcite is receiving a code for an Avatica driver written in Go. See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/calcite-avatica-go.html and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1240. Please vote to approve this contribution. This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP cleara

Re: svn commit: r1803434 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.xml

This change necessitates a change to section 4 of the template: > Receipt of the software grant form must be acknowledged by an > Officer of the ASF by recording in the correct file (grants.txt for a > License Grant or cclas.txt for a Corporate CLA). needs to be amended to mention iclas.txt. An

[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Calcite - Avatica Go

On Jul 28, 2017, at 12:19 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > +1 (despite being lazy-consensus because I'm really glad to see this > happening!) > > On 7/28/17 2:22 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> Apache Calcite is receiving a code for an Avatica driver written in Go. >>

[IP CLEARANCE] Arrow Plasma Object Store

Apache Arrow is receiving a code for the Plasma Object Store[1]. Please vote to approve this contribution. This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process[2], open for at least 72 hours. Julian [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-plasma-object-store.html [2

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Arrow Plasma Object Store

you. Julian > On Aug 2, 2017, at 12:25 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Julian, > > How are we verifying distribution rights? The git history doesn't match > the documented history. Are these individuals signing ICLAs? > > John > > On Wed, Aug 2,

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Arrow Plasma Object Store

My mistake. All 8 contributors are present and correct in the ICLAs file. Julian > On Aug 2, 2017, at 1:37 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > The plan is for all 8 named contributors to submit ICLAs. > > I understand from Wes that all have submitted ICLAs, and the secretary has &g

Re: Urgent: Regarding Java package name change to org.apache.*

It rarely comes down to the IPMC or the Board dictating how a project names its java classes (does anyone recall an instance?), so it’s mainly the project’s discretion. In my opinion, where the project is on its adoption curve is an important consideration. Most projects that enter the incubato

[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Arrow Plasma Object Store

from which the code was extracted for contribution to >> Apache Arrow is >> >> >> https://github.com/ray-project/ray/commit/b94b4a35e04d8d2c0af4420518a4e9a94c1c9b9f >> >> Thanks, >> Wes >> >> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Distributed Release Audit Tool (DRAT)

Shane, Since products != projects, what is the process for getting a product name onto that list[1]? Avatica is a product and not a project; we conducted podling name search a few months ago[2]; the Calcite PMC has made several releases of "Apache Calcite Avatica" and plans at some point to start

Digests in releases

What is the correct forum for discussing release distribution policy? Current policy [1] states: Every artifact distributed to the public through Apache channels MUST be accompanied by one file containing an OpenPGP compatible ASCII armored detached signature and another file containing an

Re: Digests in releases

After downloading artifacts, there are 3 things to check: (1) the download is successful; (2) the artifacts were indeed created by the named author; and (3) the artifacts have not been tampered with. A security expert would know to use the .md5 for (1), the .asc for (2), and the .sha256 or .sha

Re: Digests in releases

As security experts, you and I know that. But Joe User maybe only checks one digest. (Aren’t we all Joe User sometimes?) Julian > On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Mike Jumper wrote: > > On Aug 31, 2017 11:21, "Julian Hyde" wrote: > > After downloading artifacts, th

Re: Digests in releases

is not a tampering countermeasure. > > It is a "mirror ran out of diskpace" or "IP checksums are only 32 bits" > countermeasure. > > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > >> As security experts, you and I know that. But

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! Julian > On Sep 19, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Luke Han wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > Best Regards! > - > > Luke Han > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Sep 19, 2017, at 11:58

Re: [VOTE] Accept Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) into Apache Incubator WAS Re: [DISCUSS] Accept Science Data Analytics Platform (SDAP) into Apache Incubator

+1 good luck > On Oct 17, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Tom Barber wrote: > > +1 > > Happy to help out if the vote passes. > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara < > madhaw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here is my +1 >> >> Thanks, >> Madhawa >> >> Madhawa >> >> On Tue, Oct 17, 201

Re: Crail project looking for mentors

If you’re still looking for mentors, I volunteer. Julian > On Oct 18, 2017, at 8:38 PM, patrick stuedi wrote: > > Hi Von Gosling, > > That's great, we will be more than happy to learn from your > experience. Great work with RocketMQ btw.. > > -Patrick > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Von

Re: [VOTE] Accept Crail into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding Julian On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Kacie Karo wrote: > One > > kacie karo > >> On Oct 26, 2560 BE, at 11:25 AM, Clebert Suconic >> wrote: >> >> apache > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incub

Re: Crail project looking for mentors

ome aboard! Let me add you to our slack channel as > well (crail.slack.com). > > -Patrick > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Raphael Bircher > wrote: >> Hi Julian >> >> Thanks a load... you save the day! >> >> Regards Raphael >> >>

Re: Crail project looking for mentors

move on now and >> start preparing the mailing lists etc.. >> >> -Patrick >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >>> The vote to accept Crail into the incubator passed almost a month ago >> [1], and I am one of the mentors. I

Re: Crail project looking for mentors

Great. Please reply to this message when you have a name. I need someone to nag. :) > On Nov 28, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Julian Hyde <mailto:jh...@apache.org>> wrote: > >> OK, good to hear. >> >>

Incubator status report - Crail

Crail is a new podling, and I am one of its mentors. It was not listed in the template for this month’s report[1] (we are looking into why) so we wrote it in. There is no shepherd assigned. Julian [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2017

Giving karma

As a mentor of the Crail podling (and an ASF member) I want to give one of the PPMC permission to edit their status file, http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/crail.xml . How d

Re: Giving karma

7; group can edit the SVN files. > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:43 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > >> As a mentor of the Crail podling (and an ASF member) I want to give one of >> the PPMC permission to edit their status file, >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - January 2018

ts: >> [ ](annotator) Jim Jagielski >> Comments: >> >> IPMC/Shepherd notes: >> >> >> >> >> BatchEE >> >> BatchEE projects aims to provide a JBatch implementation (aka JSR352) and a >> set of useful exten

Re: question about including website source in release

I agree that standard practice is to not include the site. However, in Calcite we do include the web site (or rather, the markdown files from which the site is generated) since the web site is also our documentation. So, your choice. Our site includes Jekyll template code under MIT license and s

Re: [DISCUSS] Druid incubation proposal

t; Druid who have expressed interest in being involved in Apache incubation. > Affiliations are listed where relevant. We may seek to add other committers > during incubation; for example, we would want to add any current Druid > committers who express an interest after incubation begins. > > * Charles Allen (char...@allen-net.com) (Snap) > * David Lim (david.clarence@gmail.com) (Imply) > * Eric Tschetter (ched...@apache.org) (Splunk) > * Fangjin Yang (f...@imply.io) (Imply) > * Gian Merlino (g...@apache.org) (Imply) > * Himanshu Gupta (g.himan...@gmail.com) (Oath) > * Jihoon Son (jihoon...@apache.org) (Imply) > * Jonathan Wei (jon@imply.io) (Imply) > * Maxime Beauchemin (maximebeauche...@gmail.com) (Lyft) > * Mohamed Slim Bouguerra (slim.bougue...@gmail.com) (Hortonworks) > * Nishant Bangarwa (nish...@apache.org) (Hortonworks) > * Parag Jain (paragjai...@gmail.com) (Oath) > * Roman Leventov (leventov...@gmail.com) (Metamarkets) > * Xavier Léauté (xav...@leaute.com) (Confluent) > > == Sponsors == > > * Champion: Julian Hyde > * Nominated mentors: Julian Hyde, P. Taylor Goetz, Jun Rao > * Sponsoring entity: Apache Incubator

Re: [DISCUSS] Druid incubation proposal

th Druid currently all have one of the >> following Category A or B licenses: ASL, BSD, CDDL, EPL, MIT, MPL; with one >> exception: the optional Druid MySQL metadata store extension depends on >> MySQL Connector/J, which is GPL licensed. Druid currently packages this as >> a

[VOTE] Accept Druid into the Apache Incubator

(Imply) * Jonathan Wei (jon@imply.io) (Imply) * Maxime Beauchemin (maximebeauche...@gmail.com) (Lyft) * Mohamed Slim Bouguerra (slim.bougue...@gmail.com) (Hortonworks) * Nishant Bangarwa (nish...@apache.org) (Hortonworks) * Parag Jain (paragjai...@gmail.com) (Oath) * Roman Leventov (leventov...@gmail.c

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Druid into the Apache Incubator

* Julian Hyde * P. Taylor Goetz * Ryan Blue * Steve Blackmon * Suneel Marthi * Ted Dunning * Tom Barber * Willem Jiang Non-binding +1: * Amol Kekre * Anu Engineer * Arpit Agarwal * Ashish * Atul K. Gupta * Bhupesh Chawda * Bolke de Bruin * Chinmay Kolhatkar * Hao Chen * Hugo Lauro * Jordan

<    1   2   3   4   5   >