Re: donation of project

but use such licenses to allow them to be distributed with Apache Cocoon. -- Bertrand Delacretaz independent consultant, Lausanne, Switzerland http://cvs.apache.org/~bdelacretaz/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Request for graduation

Le Jeudi, 22 jan 2004, à 00:34 Europe/Zurich, Erik Abele a écrit : ...Indeed and if someone is really interested in meeting other German/Austrian/Swiss/etc. ASF fellows, he/she should have a look at /docs/de-meeting in the committers CVS module. (only 2003 stuff there right now but this will ch

Re: Volunteer Documentation

Le 17 mars 05, à 04:47, Vikas Singhal a écrit : ...I am willing to work on projects that either have no documentation or minimal documentation. Can anyone help me in identifying such projects?.. A documentation "refactoring" effort is currently going on in the Cocoon project, see http://wiki.apa

Re: Roles: user, committer, member, etc.

Le 17 sept. 05, à 01:19, Thorsten Scherler a écrit : ...I am actually unsure whether or not a committer role makes sense because e.g. the cocoon based projects have given the commit right to each other. That means per definition of the role (that we have now) that new committer entering e.g. f

Re: "Closed for renovations" (was:Re: AJAX Toolkit Framework Proposal)

Le 21 déc. 05, à 12:01, Leo Simons a écrit : On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 04:49:29PM -0800, Martin Cooper wrote: Some comments: On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:54:03AM +0100, Raphaël Luta wrote: To me it raises all the possible incubation warning bells: Same feelings here, I agree with Martin's a

Re: Castafiore framework proposal to incubator

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Kureem Rossaye wrote: > ...Castafiore framework is a web frameworks... Love the name - could start a theme, next podling is called Bianca, then Nightingale ;-) -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Castafiore framework proposal to incubator

H, On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Kureem Rossaye wrote: > ...I should have > prefixed the subject of the mail with [PROPOSAL]... That's correct but looking at your proposal IMO the main problem is that it's a one-man show so far. As you already indicated, to start incubation you'll need a cha

Re: [PROPOSAL] Castafiore framework proposal to incubator

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Kureem Rossaye wrote: > ...when you I should build a small community somewhere else before > coming here, the small community can be of around how many contributors?... There's no set size. For me, three contributors, along with other items that demonstrate the exi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote > ...I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional comma

Re: Is there a need for a "Assisten mentor"?

Hi Raphael, On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > ...After now nearly two years at Apache, I would like to come back to > incubator > and help new projects. I don't ask for a mentor roul, but if a mentor would > give me a hand and then I would be happy to join a project as a

Re: [DISCUSS] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > ...So fill the bus with anybody who volunteers? That does not sound > meritocratic It's been like that for a while in the Incubator, people who sign up as initial committers for a podling usually don't have to demonstrate any merit. Wh

Re: The podling initial committers issue

Hi, On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > < those interested in committership) IMO once the possible approaches are documented, we should require incoming podlings to choose one and indicate which one in the incubation proposal. -Bertrand ---

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aurora for Apache Incubation

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Dave Lester wrote: > ...I'd like to call a vote for Aurora to > become an incubated project... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional comm

Re: [VOTE] BatchEE as an incubated project

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > ...I'd like to call a vote for > BatchEE to become an incubated project... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additio

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

+1 Bertrand

Re: Too many late reports

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > I still wonder about DeviceMap. I suspect a lot of people were hit with > conference travel of various types Correct, and sorry about that - can we push DeviceMap to next month? -Bertrand -

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona as an incubated project

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > ...I'd like to call a vote > for Sirona to become an incubated project... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional comm

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Marmotta as TLP

> [X ] +1 Graduate the Marmotta podling from Incubator Congrats! -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Ambari from Apache Incubator

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Yusaku Sako wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate Ambari from Apache Incubator +1, congrats! -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Provisionr podling

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Andrei Savu wrote: > [X ] +1 Retire the Provisionr podling Please tally the vote at [1], right now it's left hanging AFAICS. -Bertrand > [1] http://s.apache.org/xtG - To unsubscribe, e-mail: g

Re: Do we need a disclaimer? (Storm)

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > ...I think Storm could do the same. There is specific interest in the > incubating Storm community > but not general interest in the wider Apache community... +1 Another similar (but older) example is Wicket which made a number of non-Ap

Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean wrote: ... >> My guess is that "Lazy Majority" is used because Majority implies more than >> 50% of possible voters need to vote. > > My guess is that it is a misprint for Lazy Consensus I'd say so - "laz

Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority

Hi David, On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David Crossley wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> ..."lazy majority" is mentioned at >> http://ant.apache.org/bylaws.html but I didn't know there was such a >> concept in our projects. > > Ma

Re: INFRA-6774

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:05 AM, David Crossley wrote: > ...A while ago we added that to the FAQ: > http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#commit-403 > (although that seems to use old terminology). > > http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html I have moved (and linked) the "403 - cannot c

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

Hi, On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Upayavira wrote: > ...My issue is that granting PMC membership is too big a step for many > podling members. Going from being newbie podling member, to a part of a > team responsible for 50+ incubator projects is, with the freedom to > mentor other podlings, i

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Joseph Schaefer wrote: > Can I just ask how many people have we encountered who upon > being offered IPMC membership turned it down with grounds along > these lines?... I'm not saying there are any, hence starting my suggesting with "assuming Upayavira's concerns

Re: Release vote thresholds

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ...Ant, you proposed a minimum of one IPMC vote for each release: ... > How about simply changing the rules for Incubator releases so that they > don't require at least three binding votes, but instead make it at least > three v

Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:29 PM, sebb wrote: > ...This is a bit of a mess Yeah - I wish projects would just refer to http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html and http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html and avoid duplicating that information. -Bertrand

Re: Release Verification Checklist

Hi, On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ...In response to Bertrand's proposal at , I've > created > a draft release verification checklist: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReleaseChecklist ... Thanks for this! I have just added an alterna

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:17 PM, sebb wrote: > On 2 December 2013 13:52, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> ...I think managing and keeping such release manifests in svn, at least >> for incubating projects, would make the release process much clearer >> and easier to understan

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:17 AM, sebb wrote: >>... But it is much harder to update an SVN document compared with replying >> to an e-mail. > > Someone running the VOTE would need to update SVN as each vote comes in. > > There would need to be an ema

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> ...people who review releases work directly on the >> svn document, enter their comments there and that counts as a +1 >> towards the release >> >

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/votes/$PODLING/$RC > ... Added to a new "usage proposal" section at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReleaseChecklist - does that proposal work for you guys? (and thinking about

Re: Release Verification Checklist

Hi, On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > ...3.6 Release consists of source code only, no binaries > > Technically we allow some "binary" formats like .jpg, .png, etc. in releases &g

Re: Release Verification Checklist

Hi, On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > ...I think two more improvements are needed: > > (1) PPMC members should be sure to record the votes of community members who > are not PPMC/committers and have no apache id. > (2) The header should include a reference to the VOTE thread.

Re: Release Verification Checklist

Hi, On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, ant elder wrote: > ...2) Podlings should normally graduate after the first release (and we > should more proactively do that) not stay to do more... I wouldn't set this as a goal. It's nice when it happens, but as you say the goal is for a podling to be gene

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:30 PM, ant elder wrote: >...The point is i think that podlings learn > about the requirements but that doesn't mean we must block releases or > make people jump through hoops to do that learning... I agree with that, and I don't think we're saying that all items from the

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:30 PM, ant elder wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> Define "lower bar". Do you see any of the review items >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release_manifest.txt as optional? >> > ...Probably all of tho

Re: LICENSE and NOTICE Role Models

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:15 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >... In the process of preparing the LICENSE and NOTICE files for Storm, I >started looking at > what other Apache projects (both incubator and TLPs) have done http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/ is a good reference for

Re: Release Verification Checklist

Hi Marvin, On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ...I've taken a stab at a second draft: > >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html > Short and sweet, I like it! I've just added "as a plain text file" in the release manifest creation section. I suggest using sim

Re: Release Verification Checklist

Hi, On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ...here's a first take for a patch to the policy page which will be > submitted as part of the PROPOSAL... > https://paste.apache.org/4A1I Looks good to me but I'd ask for a [VOTE] here before committing this. Suggestions: Call

Re: Release Verification Checklist

Hi Marvin, On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > I also went another round on the Manifest template and the Release Procedure > section of the guide (not yet committed): https://paste.apache.org/a1ya ... Looks good to me but why "it must be approved by a Mentor (who must also

Re: Release Verification Checklist

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ...Next, I will start a PROPOSAL thread, to > re-engage with the rest of the list... There's been ample space for people to comment on this in the last few weeks, I'd be clear that we don't expect any core changes we agree on the final pro

Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

> [X ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ...We've done all that with comparatively few emails: at 466 messages... I'm having a hard time deciding if doing this in 466 messages is good news or not ;-) Thanks very much Marvin for hanging in there and driving this to closure! -Be

Re: GSoC Donation and/or clearance

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > ...The SGA usually comes into play if the code is not the work and > property of an individual. The SGA allows some entity to grant the AL > unambiguously. If the code is the work and property of an individual, > the ICLA does that just fi

Re: GSoC Donation and/or clearance

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote: > ...What about IP Clearance? Does the same apply (we do know > the code is clean) and can we assume it is ok?... If committers of the ASF project in question have followed the development this is not very different from code developed at

Re: Hoya Proposal

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > ...What do people think about a project name "Hyena"? It's close enough, lives > in the savannah... I think it's too close to http://jena.apache.org/ -Bertrand - To unsub

Re: Hoya Proposal

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Steve Loughran > wrote: >> ...What do people think about a project name "Hyena"? It's close enough, >> lives >> in the savannah... > > I think it's

Re: Hoya Proposal

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:57 AM, lars hofhansl wrote: > ...I should we shouldn't rule out a name just because the English > pronunciation is similar to another project. > Will people really confuse Apache Hyena and Apache Jena?... At this early stage it's very easy to switch names, so let's avoi

Re: ApacheCon CFP ends February 1

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > ...For projects that are less technically mature, there's the "Fast Feather > Talks", which are more of a "what is it" kind of talk about your project... I also see the Fast Feather Talks as a way for speakers who wouldn't feel confident being

Re: best development methodology for Apache git?

Hi, On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:47 PM, James Taylor wrote: > The Phoenix project has recently come into incubation from it's former life > as a Github project. I believe other projects have made this same > transition, so I'm looking to get some advice from them... CouchDB has documented their Git

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:06 AM, sebb wrote: > ...There is a mix of ASF e-mails and non-ASF e-mails above... That's a problem indeed, please fix the resolution to use all @apache.org addresses. They are used for example to let https://whimsy.apache.org/ validate the IDs. +1 for graduation apart

Re: best development methodology for Apache git?

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > ...Just wanted to clarify this, as I think this approach doesn't introduce > overhead to commiters/contributors and respects the ASF workflow... Thanks for this, IIUC this is described at http://jclouds.apache.org/documentation/devguides/co

Re: best development methodology for Apache git?

Hi, On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > ...We're working on it, our apologies for the confusion the old links may > cause!... Ok - it would be good add those new links and deprecation warning at the top of the page that I mentioned! -Bertrand ---

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > ...Some of the proposed PMC members have filed ICLAs but are not committers; > some have not > even filed ICLAs; some appear to have been part of the original proposal but > have not contributed > to the project during incubation... Ouch.

Re: Change of IPMC Chair

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ...Congratulations to Roman Shaposhnik! The Incubator PMC has voted to > recommend > Roman as our next Chair in a resolution to the Board next week Cautious congrats here, as the board still has to accept this recommendation. I don't

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:05 AM, David Nalley wrote: > ...The part that disturbs me is that after the vote passed in the > community, and came to the IPMC a mentor is still having to remind > folks that things like strategy and roadmap discussions need to happen > on the mailing list... Yes - cons

Re: Change of IPMC Chair

Hi Marvin, On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: ... >> Cautious congrats here, as the board still has to accept this >> recommendation. ... > You know, I thought about this before posting then

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator (was Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator)

Hi Chris, On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote: >... Bertrand, you originally VOTEd +1 until Craig mentioned his concerns > about accounts not having been filed. Matei and others immediately > stepped up (including myself), and explained the situation, and > filed the accounts. Se

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 1.0.0.incubating

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote: > This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 1.0.0.incubating... +1 for the release, I have checked the signatures, LICENSE/DISCLAIMER/NOTICE, looks good to me. Haven't tried to build but that's not critical as far as the Incuba

Re: Change of IPMC Chair

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ...Congratulations to Roman Shaposhnik! The Incubator PMC has voted to > recommend > Roman as our next Chair in a resolution to the Board next week FWIW, the corresponding resolution was passed by the ASF board last week, so Roman as

Re: Graduation resolution does not allow for committers != PMC

Hi, On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, sebb wrote: > ...consider whether it is necessary to allow creation of a TLP with > additional initial committers not on the PMC. > If so, what is the process?... Although I have a hard time understanding why people who deserve to accompany a podling on gradu

Re: Graduation resolution does not allow for committers != PMC

Hi, On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > ...When consider TLP graduation, all > committers should be PPMC members?... At the foundation level (i.e. in the board resolution that establishes the project) we don't care about committers, it's only PMC members which are relevant.

Re: Need Write Access for Incubator Wiki

Hi, On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Khuram U. Khalid wrote: ... > Please can you grant write access to the following username? > KhuramKhalid... Should be good now. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incub

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] New name for the Stratosphere project

Hi, On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Alan Gates wrote: >> ...We also evaluated the vote if Apache Legal disagrees with "Flink", then >> "Sfera" would win Just a 2-cents note that Flink can sound very similar to Sling depending on the speaker's accent and ambient noise ;-) -Bertrand ---

Re: [VOTE] Accept Parquet into the incubator

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote: > ...I would like to call a vote on accepting Parquet into the incubator. > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ParquetProposal.. +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: gen

Re: [Proposal] Add me as Mentor for ODF Toolkit Podling

Hi, On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > ...As member of this PMC is think there should not be an formalities for you > to help podlings who need it. > > Just make sure to add your name to the mentors list, since reporting templates > will be generated from there... I ag

Re: [DISCUSS] json as new incubator project

On Tuesday, June 3, 2014, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > FYI I renamed the proposal fleece and here is the proposal: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Fleece. We'll be looking forward to those free Apache Fleece vests at the next ApacheCon ;-) -Bertrand

Re: [PROPOSAL] fleece as an incubator project

Hi, On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > ...do I need to cancel this thread and create a new one cause I changed > the proposal content according your remarks?... This is a discussion thread, no problem with that. You'll later copy the full proposal to the [VOTE] thread w

Re: [VOTE] fleece as new incubator project

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Fleece as a > new Incubator project. +1 > ...but also a set of usefule modules... Should be "useful" -Bertrand ---

Re: [VOTE] fleece as new incubator project

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > ...good catch, not sure we need to reroll the vote for this typo, think we > don't, isn't it?... No worries, it's just a typo, just fix it on the wiki. -Bertrand - To

Re: Request for mentor assessment

Hi Roman, On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: ... >* DeviceMap has been in the incubator since > 2012-01-03. It seems like it is still struggling > with the basics: producing releases and growing > its PMC. What's the recommendation here?... I agree wit

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Celix as TLP

Hi, On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Here's current Board member Bertrand Delacretaz in 2012: ... > People come and go, so to be realistic I'd say you need at least five > active PMC members at graduation time, so as to get three votes when

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Celix as TLP

Hi Marcel, On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote: > ...Since I regularly get involved in discussions (but hardly ever commit > code) I > would like to stay involved... Fantastic! Thanks. -Bertrand - To unsubs

Re: moving on, plus Incubator facilities documentation and tools

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:10 AM, David Crossley wrote: > > ...It is time for me to move on from the Apache Incubator. > I feel that i have done as much as is possible You have done a ton indeed! Thanks very much for your contributions, and hope that our paths cross again at some point! -Ber

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tez from Apache Incubator to TLP

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Hitesh Shah wrote: > ...Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Tez is ready to graduate as a Top Level > Project +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For ad

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Tez from Apache Incubator to TLP

On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote: > ...15 binding +1s, another +1 from Abiola A Balogun ( possibly a spam bot ) > and no -1s... you're right, spam bots don't get binding votes here ;-) -Bertrand - To unsubscri

Re: Question on report

Hi, On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > ...So - one of the podlings did not file a report, but one of the mentors > did fill it in. Am I correct in assuming this would still count as a > missed report?... I suppose you mean DeviceMap - we'll probably have to write a book on t

Re: [VOTE] Apache DeviceMap data and java client 1.0.0

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Reza wrote: > ...The DeviceMap project vote thread and replies (+5 votes): > http://markmail.org/message/qwi6wbrrljtmbtuc > http://markmail.org/message/6fejbgf5rhvlsz35 ... Including two +1s from Incubator PMC members (Kevan Miller and myself), so we just need one

Re: [VOTE] Argus as a new incubator project

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Argus as a > new Incubator project. +1 (I agree with the comments about diversity but that's an issue for graduation) -Bertrand ---

[VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] Sling Query contribution

Hi Incubator PMC members, Apache Sling has received the donation of a repository traversal module. See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-query.html for details. Please vote to approve this contribution. This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours and lazy consensus applies. H

Re: [VOTE] Release HDT version 0.0.2.incubating (RC1)

Hi, On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote: > ...Vote Result : > http://apache.markmail.org/message/l3ypavj4rnm2fnwv ... I don't see votes from your mentors there, you might want to ask them to review this release. -Bertrand

Re: Podling binding votes

Hi, On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > ...Whose votes are binding for releases on the podlings dev list?... Technically as Ross says, only votes from Incubator PMC members are binding as far as the ASF is concerned. What matters is getting 3 such binding votes, so that the

Re: Podling binding votes

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > ...the project > (PPMC) are the people who really matter from the projects perspective, even > though their votes are not binding Yeah, a good summary might be that the podling PPMC (+community) establishes consensus about releasing, and

[RESULT][VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] Sling Query contribution

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Apache Sling has received the donation of a repository traversal module. > See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/sling-query.html for details. > Please vote to approve this contribution The vote passes by lazy

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeviceMap BrowserMap version 1.4.1

Hi, On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Radu Cotescu wrote: > ...We voted on our project's list [2] for these release artifacts > and got four +1, out of which two are from Incubator's PMC members Bertrand > Delacretaz and Kevan Miller... So we need just one additional vote,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeviceMap BrowserMap version 1.4.1

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > ...To be fixed in next release: > The RC should be hosted on > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/devicemap... You mean https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/devicemap/ , right? dist/release is for once the vo

Re: web-editor AMAYA software resurrection in Apache Foundation ?

Hi, On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Antoine Chevrier <1antoinechevri...@gmail.com> wrote: > ...could Apache help > Amaya project, which *was* a web-editor software, according to the fact it > is not developed any more... Apache doesn't "help" projects - we just provide a neutral space for project

Re: Start of the report contents

Hi, On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:11 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > ...3. I believe I have all of the releases listed... There's also Apache DeviceMap data and java client 1.0.0 (the vote tally didn't include the [RESULT] tag, that's probably why you missed it) -Bertrand ... > The following releases

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache DeviceMap data and java client 1.0.0

Resending this as the original tally is missing the [RESULT] subject header. -Bertrand On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Reza wrote: > Thanks, the vote has passed. > > IPMC +1: > > Kevan Miller > > Bertrand Delacretaz > > Justin Mclean > > > PPMC +1: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache DeviceMap .Net clients 1.0.0

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:33 PM, eberhard speer jr. wrote: > ...A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's. > Vote thread: http://markmail.org/thread/qlq4b3aijrxjfe5a ... That includes one Incubator PMC vote (myself), so with Justin's vote here we need one more. I'll pin

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator exit criteria

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > ...Including the patch below... Sorry to come in late but I had a look at [1] and it's way too complicated IMO, and I don't think the proposed patch helps with that. In general http://incubator.apache.org/ is way too verbose and hard to

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > ...I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the > Apache Incubator... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For ad

Re: [VOTE] Apache DeviceMap .Net clients 1.0.0

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:33 PM, eberhard speer jr. wrote: > this is the (source only) release email for Apache DeviceMap .Net > clients : > > Apache DeviceMap csharp incubating 1.0.0.0 > and > Apache DeviceMap vbnet incubating 1.0.0.0 +1, details of what I checked are at http://markmail.org/mess

Re: Question about roles.

On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > ...The way I read it and the way I've seen it with the Incubator, mentors > can be active project participants as well Agreed, I've been mentoring projects where I was an active developer, and others where I had about zero clue what th

Re: Documentation Donation

Hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > ...if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of > documentation from a third party, should that go through the same reviews > as source code donations?... IMO yes. Flex did something like that in http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearan

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator exit criteria

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > ... * since I haven't seen much of complaining, can I please commit my > proposed stuff and then we can pile additional edits on top of that?... Sure, my complaining is more a general issue about incubator.apache.org >* re-rea

Re: podling admin questions

Hi, On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > ...In the 'old' days I had to maintain some XML in SVN site-author for my > project which contains the > data for http://incubator.apache.org/projects/batchee.html , etc > How is this done today?... As John says, those files are now m

Re: podling admin questions

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > ...Why don't BatchEE and Fleece not show up on our apache project/committer > index? Used to be the case if I remember correctly Yes, other podlings like storm and devicemap for example do have entries at http://people.apache.org/commit

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >