Hi, On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > ... 3.6 Release consists of source code only, no binaries > > Technically we allow some "binary" formats like .jpg, .png, etc. in releases > without the corresponding composite files from which they were exported > (assuming such composite files exist)...
Agreed, I have added a TODO at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReleaseChecklist - the manifest should point to a page at http://incubator.apache.org that explains such things in a bit more detail. Good opportunity to clarify that ;-) > ...Also, I wonder whether "no binaries" > may provoke newbies to ask "What?! No binaries?!"... Which is good IMO, once we have a clear explanation. ... > 4.1 Based on its dev list activity, the project looks healthy > > 4.2 Based on its private list activity, the project looks healthy > > First, I think these two items should be struck because they belong in a > graduation checklist, not a release checklist... Agreed, I have removed them. Totally agree to keep the checklist as small as possible. I made some other minor changes as well, see wiki history if needed. >... Second, I'm amused that the "commits list" item was quietly dropped, but >new > checklist items have been inserted regarding the dev and private lists... Pure oversight on my part, sorry...but what would we do if no reviewer follows the commit lists? I don't think that's a reason to kill a release. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
