Hi David, On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David Crossley <cross...@apache.org> wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> ..."lazy majority" is mentioned at >> http://ant.apache.org/bylaws.html but I didn't know there was such a >> concept in our projects. > > Many projects use it. See this Google search: > site:apache.org "Lazy Majority"
I stand corrected then. > > We use it at Forrest: > http://forrest.apache.org/guidelines.html And define it there as "a lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes". http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html mentions majority twice, and in both cases it is clear to me a majority there is defined as the Forrest guidelines define "lazy majority". So I don't see a need for the term "lazy majority". No need to change in existing projects bylaws or guidelines, but IMO we should keep it simple for the incubator. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
