On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:17 AM, sebb wrote: >>... But it is much harder to update an SVN document compared with replying >> to an e-mail. > > Someone running the VOTE would need to update SVN as each vote comes in. > > There would need to be an email reference attached for each VOTE....
Not in my suggestion - people who review releases work directly on the svn document, enter their comments there and that counts as a +1 towards the release. A big part of this is teaching people that reviewing a release is not just about dropping a +1 in email - we want them, especially for early incubating releases, to indicate what they reviewed and what they didn't. Working on this in svn (as the board does for its meetings) is efficient, leads to a concise manifest that's easy to review and overall a much clearer process, IMO, than complaints in long email threads. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
