On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
> wrote:
>> Hi...
>>
>> The idea sounds good in general more specifically that should be clear
>> and documented on the incubator site for future incubating projects. But,
>> IMHO, we should
Hi Sam...
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Sam Ruby
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi...
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Nov
sebb wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> >> It is the case that Initial Committers are eligible to serve on the PPMC,
> >> though not all choose to do so.
> >>
> >> Also, it is apparently a recommendation that invited committers be invited
> >> to the PPMC, but it doesn
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the Apache
Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12 in
total now) from diverse organizations and did a release in May this year to
demonstrate we follow the A
+1
Regards
JB
On 11/17/2011 11:42 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the Apache
Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12 in
total now) from diverse organizations
Great news, succes with this!
+1
2011/11/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> +1
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 11/17/2011 11:42 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the
>> Apache Incubator to a Top Level Project.
>>
>> Since joining the incubator
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
Meanwhile, I will personally focus on JSPWiki. If others wish to join
me, here is a a current list of projects that have been incubating
more than a year:
I've been meaning to try to help out with JSPWiki for a while, but I've
not yet had the time. If ther
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Unless anyone jumps in soon, I'll set up a "Suitable Names Search"
>>> JIRA project
>>
On 17 November 2011 10:42, Marcel Offermans wrote:
> In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the
> Apache Incubator to a Top Level Project.
>
> Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12
> in total now) from diverse organizations and d
I'm not sure what this has to do with the graduation vote. The release
as such has been accepted by the incubator pmc and there only need to
be one release. The source for each artifact is there, it is just per
artifact in the -source.jar.
There might be different set-up then a lot of other projec
As much as I don't like this layout, this is not the first projet to use
it, and I don't really see how / why the IPMC should decide the svn layout
for the project. You won't be the one to manage it daily afaik, so that's
not up to you to decide imho.
Sling and Felix already use such a layout and
On 17 November 2011 12:29, Karl Pauls wrote:
> I'm not sure what this has to do with the graduation vote. The release
> as such has been accepted by the incubator pmc and there only need to
> be one release. The source for each artifact is there, it is just per
> artifact in the -source.jar.
AFAI
On 17 November 2011 12:51, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> As much as I don't like this layout, this is not the first projet to use
> it, and I don't really see how / why the IPMC should decide the svn layout
> for the project. You won't be the one to manage it daily afaik, so that's
> not up to you to
Again, we had this discussion before namely, when the actual release
vote happened. I'm still confused why we have to go through this
again. You should be able to build all of the components by using the
-source.jar's that are provided. They contain what is necessary i.e.,
the full source.
regards
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> Again, we had this discussion before namely, when the actual release
> vote happened. I'm still confused why we have to go through this
> again. You should be able to build all of the components by using the
> -source.jar's that ar
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:34 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 17 November 2011 12:51, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> As much as I don't like this layout, this is not the first projet to use
>> it, and I don't really see how / why the IPMC should decide the svn layout
>> for the project. You won't be the one to
To try that I just went to the ACE downloads page which has a bunch of
jars and source jars to download, i downloaded the source of the first
one, org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator-sources.jar, and
looking inside there is the source to some Java classes but no build
scripts or pom.xm
$ mkdir org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator
$ cd org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator/
$ wget
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ace/org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator-source.jar
$ jar -xf org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator-sources.jar
$ wget
+1 to the JIRA project and the notifications coming here. Thanks for
driving this one!
- Shane
On 2011-11-17 6:55 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> $ mkdir org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator
> $ cd org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator/
> $ wget
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ace/org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator-source.jar
> $ jar -xf org.ap
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> ...I agree with others that having an svn tag for that release would be
> much more convenient...
oops sorry, wrong list - moving this thread to ace-...@incubator.apache.org
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 14:30, sebb wrote:
> On 17 November 2011 12:29, Karl Pauls wrote:
> > I'm not sure what this has to do with the graduation vote. The release
> > as such has been accepted by the incubator pmc and there only need to
> > be one release. The source for each artifact is there
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 14:30, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 17 November 2011 12:29, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> > I'm not sure what this has to do with the graduation vote. The release
>> > as such has been accepted by the incubator pmc and there only ne
On 17 November 2011 14:07, Karl Pauls wrote:
> $ mkdir org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator
> $ cd org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator/
> $ wget
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ace/org.apache.ace.client.automation-0.8.0-incubator-source.jar
s/source/sources/
> $
Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
(and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is
configured like this in the apache-parent iirc). However, I'm still
confused what all of this has to do with the graduation proposal vote
and why this has to be on g
Hi Karl,
we can simply need to revert the changes just before the 0.8.0-incubator
release.
When upgrading the ACE build to use Maven, firstly, we used the tags scm
with Maven sub-modules.
So I'm quite sure that reverting just before the 0.8.0-incubator, I can
prepare that for the next ACE rele
JB,
please, lets move this to the ace-dev list.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> we can simply need to revert the changes just before the 0.8.0-incubator
> release.
> When upgrading the ACE build to use Maven, firstly, we used the tags s
Sorry my mistake.
Regards
JB
On 11/17/2011 04:27 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
JB,
please, lets move this to the ace-dev list.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi Karl,
we can simply need to revert the changes just before the 0.8.0-incubator
release.
Whe
Big +1
Carsten
2011/11/17 Marcel Offermans :
> In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the
> Apache Incubator to a Top Level Project.
>
> Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12
> in total now) from diverse organizations and did a
2011/11/17 Karl Pauls :
> Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
> (and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is
> configured like this in the apache-parent iirc). However, I'm still
> confused what all of this has to do with the graduation proposal
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
> (and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is
> configured like this in the apache-parent iirc). However, I'm still
> confused what all of this has to do w
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
>> (and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is
>> configured like this in the apache-parent iirc). Ho
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>> Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
>>> (and the reason this release looks like it does is because that
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:56 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
(and th
Sebb,
Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems there are
other Apache projects that release a single distribution with both source
code and jars. For example,
http://mirror.metrocast.net/apache//zookeeper/zookeeper-3.3.3/ . So, is
source distribution strictly required?
Thanks,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> +1 to the JIRA project and the notifications coming here. Thanks for
> driving this one!
I've done some customisation on PODLINGNAMESEARCH[1] (Hopefully Noel
will forgive me for assigning him as project lead without asking
first; just seeme
Establish whether "Apache Rat" is a suitable name
-
Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1
Project: Podling Suitable Names Search
Issue Type: Su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for "Rat"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for "Rat" p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for "Rat" p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for "Rat" p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13152195#comment-13152195
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
---
Ev
Hello Ant,
On Nov 17, 2011, at 16:56 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
On 17 November 2011 16:30, Jun Rao wrote:
> Sebb,
>
> Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems there are
> other Apache projects that release a single distribution with both source
> code and jars. For example,
> http://mirror.metrocast.net/apache//zookeeper/zookeeper-3.3.3/ .
+1 (binding) congrats!
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
> In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the
> Apache Incubator to a Top Level Project.
>
> Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12
> in t
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Accumulo
(incubating) version 1.3.5. This will be the first incubator release for
Accumulo.
This candidate has received 4 binding +1 votes (1 IPMC, 3 PPMC) and 1
non-binding +1 vote, with no -1 votes. We need 2 additional IPMC votes f
On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:10 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 17 November 2011 16:30, Jun Rao wrote:
>> Sebb,
>>
>> Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems there are
>> other Apache projects that release a single distribution with both source
>> code and jars. For example,
>> http://mirror
Welcome. I have done the first steps as explained here [1]
adding to the ReportingSchedule and a default entry to podlings.xml
The latter still needs the project description and list of mentors.
This is just to get things started, and also enables Clutch
to help guide your project. No rush.
[1] h
sebb wrote:
> Jun Rao wrote:
> > Sebb,
> >
> > Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems there are
> > other Apache projects that release a single distribution with both source
> > code and jars. For example,
> > http://mirror.metrocast.net/apache//zookeeper/zookeeper-3.3.3/ . So
I took a look at the svn source and the binary artifact and have some
additional comments.
1) Your svn contains a number of jar files. I don't believe that the
LICENSE/NOTICE file properly reflects the license/notice requirements of these
jar files.
2) Why are these jars being stored in your s
Thanks Sebb and Kevan. This is helpful.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> 1) Your svn contains a number of jar files. I don't believe that the
> LICENSE/NOTICE file properly reflects the license/notice requirements of
> these jar files.
> 2) Why are these jars being stored
On 18 November 2011 02:17, Chris Douglas wrote:
> Thanks Sebb and Kevan. This is helpful.
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> 1) Your svn contains a number of jar files. I don't believe that the
>> LICENSE/NOTICE file properly reflects the license/notice requirements of
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>
>> We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
>> David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
>> Reporting Schedule, and we cont
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> 2009-02-09 kato
>>
>> I'm comfortable that this is safe enough copyright-wise. I would
>> pref
You should define 'very small' for Joao and work with legal-discuss
and the Incubator PMC to decide if the item can be signed off or not.
[me=bean counter who points to a field not being signed off :) ]
Hen
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can OpenNLP be signed
55 matches
Mail list logo
