On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release >>> (and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is >>> configured like this in the apache-parent iirc). However, I'm still >>> confused what all of this has to do with the graduation proposal vote >>> and why this has to be on general@. >>> >> >> I think why its come up here now is because part of judging if a >> poddling is ready to graduate is if they understand how to make and >> review ASF releases properly. And with whats be said here and how the >> source has to be built i'm wondering if anyone who voted +1 for the >> release would have actually tried to build any of the source. > > I guess the point is: are you arguing that the release should not > haven been accepted by the incubator in the first place on the grounds > that you find it hard to build and hence, you want to see a new one > before the we can vote on approaching the incubator for a graduation? >
I'm not arguing anything yet. Some valid comments and questions were made in the vote thread, you asked why they were happening here and i tried to answer that. The Incubator people should have an opportunity to discuss a graduation, perhaps some of that might be better on a graduation discussion thread but there wasn't one of those before the vote. The release does look a bit dubious to me. ...ant --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
