neral@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: REVISED Policy on Initial Committer and PPMC members
Leo Simons wrote:
> I have never liked this explicit "champion" role, and I don't like
> adding responsibilities to it, making things even more explicitly
> dependent on the champion.
Keep in mind
Thanks Martijn.
Regards,
Antoine
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> PPMC = Podling project management committee
> IPMC = Incubator project management committee
>
> if I'm not mistaken.
>
> Martijn
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > What problem are you trying to solve? Garrett's view is that you
basically
> > "discarded" the Initial Committer list, treated it as advisory, and
dealt
> > with Committers after the fact. So a minimal Initial Committer list
would
> > be nul
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Anyway, I do realize that the discussion was two weeks ago. I just
> missed it. Apologies. Ignore me :)
No way! Yes, discussion started weeks ago, stopped, and so I called a vote.
But I would never want to arbitrarily cut off discussion.
--- Noel
-
Anyway, I do realize that the discussion was two weeks ago. I just
missed it. Apologies. Ignore me :)
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful in Harmony with a
slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt'
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>> Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful in Harmony with a
>>> slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
>>> except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt' start with an
> What does PPMC mean ? Is it the sub PMC of a particular incubator project
?
See: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful in Harmony with a
slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt' start with any
code.
Yes, it should be a Shall,
On 10/25/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful in Harmony with a
> slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
> except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt' start with any
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful in Harmony with a
> slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
> except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt' start with any
code.
Yes, it should be a Shall, since it has been made
treated the Initial Committer list as an indication of interest, and
just looked for people that followed through once the project got started.
geir
Original Message ----
Subject: [VOTE] REVISED Policy on Initial Committer and PPMC members
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:12:19 -0400
r incubator project ?
Regards,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:12:19 -0400
Von: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: [VOTE] REVISED Policy on Initial Committer and PPMC members
> The Champio
bator.apache.org
Betreff: [VOTE] REVISED Policy on Initial Committer and PPMC members
> The Champion shall work with the incoming community identify the initial
> PPMC members*. The Champion shall review each with the incoming community
--
On 10/25/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Based upon all of the discussion -- and positive feedback from Dims, Eric
Newcomer, Craig Russell, Jason van Zyl, Martijn Dashorst, David Recordon and
Nail Pemberton; slight negative feedback from Leo Simons; and no strongly
negative feedba
Based upon all of the discussion -- and positive feedback from Dims, Eric
Newcomer, Craig Russell, Jason van Zyl, Martijn Dashorst, David Recordon and
Nail Pemberton; slight negative feedback from Leo Simons; and no strongly
negative feedback that I notice -- this is now put forth for a formal vot
Leo Simons wrote:
> I have never liked this explicit "champion" role, and I don't like
> adding responsibilities to it, making things even more explicitly
> dependent on the champion.
Keep in mind that the Champion role would still end with the begining of
Incubation. So the Champion's role is h
On Oct 12, 2006, at 6:42 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I
hope is
an agreeable solution:
I have never liked this explicit "champion" role, and I don't like
adding responsibilities to it, making things even more explicitly
depen
+1 (non-binding)
Niall
On 10/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I hope is
an agreeable solution:
--
The Champion shall work with the incoming community to identify the initial
committers. The
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 10/12/2006 9:42 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: REVISED Policy on Initial Committer and PPMC members
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I hope is
an agreeable solution:
--
The Champion shall work with the inc
+1 (non binding)
This sounds reasonable, and takes clearly into account the incoming community.
Martijn
On 10/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I hope is
an agreeable solution:
--
The Champi
+1
On 12 Oct 06, at 11:42 AM 12 Oct 06, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I
hope is
an agreeable solution:
--
The Champion shall work with the incoming community to identify the
initial
committers. The Champion sh
+1 (non-binding, but opinionated)
Craig
On 10/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I
hope is
an agreeable solution:
--
The Champion shall work with the incoming community to identify the
in
PPMC membership.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:43 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: REVISED Policy on Initial Committer and PPMC members
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 10/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I hope is
an agreeable solution:
--
The Champion shall work with the incoming community to identify the initial
committers. The Ch
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I hope is
an agreeable solution:
--
The Champion shall work with the incoming community to identify the initial
committers. The Champion shall review each with the incoming community to
justify each inclusion (
26 matches
Mail list logo
