On Oct 12, 2006, at 6:42 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I
hope is
an agreeable solution:
I have never liked this explicit "champion" role, and I don't like
adding responsibilities to it, making things even more explicitly
dependent on the champion. Take wicket as a recent example -- there
its developers interfaced directly with the PMC to talk about this
kind of thing, and not through their champions.
You can count me -0 if you want.
LSD
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
