Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > What problem are you trying to solve? Garrett's view is that you
basically
> > "discarded" the Initial Committer list, treated it as advisory, and
dealt
> > with Committers after the fact. So a minimal Initial Committer list
would
> > be null except for the Mentors.
> Yes. But having that list of people interested is useful. Maybe the
> name should change from Initial Committer to something else when there's
> no code.
Sure. But do we need to document such a list in the bootstrap process?
Remember: we removed the Emeritus Committer section because it was similarly
unnecessary.
> I was just think that this is a good guideline, but I'm wary of
> strict procedure for something like this.
Too many people didn't like the softer procedure that was originally
proposed (and which worked well enough for Harmony).
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
