On 10/25/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful in Harmony with a
> slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
> except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt' start with any
code.
Yes, it should be a Shall, since it has been made quite clear that the
majority of people want a binding list. The work you did on Harmony:
> We treated the Initial Committer list as an indication of interest, and
> just looked for people that followed through once the project got started.
would have to be done PRIOR to the vote.
I'm not sure how this would prevent what was done with harmony. Just
have the initial proposal come with no list of committers. The
champion has a very easy job to do in validating that list ;-)
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
