Re: [HEADS UP] Merging html site branch (was Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html)

2005-01-13 Thread David Crossley
The main reason that i try to calm down your tone, is that this incubator-general mailing list should be setting an example for the incubating project communities. In general, the ASF communities don't work that way, they are more constructive. If you or anybody else is confused about anything to

Re: [HEADS UP] Merging html site branch (was Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html)

2005-01-13 Thread David Crossley
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > Thank you also for the explanation, Nicola Ken. I saw the messages > about branches, but I don't think they said anything about how the > branches were intended to be used. :-) Yes they did and the howtoparticpate.html had been updated. I just made some more cha

Re: [HEADS UP] Merging html site branch (was Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html)

2005-01-13 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Thank you also for the explanation, Nicola Ken. I saw the messages about branches, but I don't think they said anything about how the branches were intended to be used. :-) No problem, miscommunication happens. I'm actually happy that comments keep getting through, re

Re: [HEADS UP] Merging html site branch (was Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html)

2005-01-12 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Thank you also for the explanation, Nicola Ken. I saw the messages about branches, but I don't think they said anything about how the branches were intended to be used. :-) - -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, develo

Re: [HEADS UP] Merging html site branch (was Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html)

2005-01-12 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > The swearing is at the situation and the confusion, not at any people. > I'm certain everyone has good intentions, and that no-one is tryng > to make things harder. That was rather more graceless than is usual even for me. I a

Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html

2005-01-12 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > 5. Site no longer in Forrest, generation process unknown, update process >unknown. If I'm correctly interpreting David's message, this last is in error. At least the 'no longer in Forrest' aspect. - -- #kenP-)} Ken Co

Re: [HEADS UP] Merging html site branch (was Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html)

2005-01-12 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: David Crossley wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: . Has the site been changed to get files from TEMP_HTML on an svn update? It is still the same, just that you have the choice to use the old *.cwiki or the new *.html The either/or aspect is far from obvious to me.

Re: [HEADS UP] Merging html site branch (was Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html)

2005-01-12 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- David Crossley wrote: > Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > >> All right, so what's the *new* procedure for updating this @[EMAIL >> PROTECTED](&*(!&@# >> site?? >> >> Edit files in site-author/projects/TEMP_HTML/*.html, and then.. what? > > No. Please read the p

Re: [HEADS UP] Merging html site branch (was Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html)

2005-01-11 Thread David Crossley
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > > NOTE for Mentors > > > > > > Under site-author/projects there are still the cwiki version of the > > status files. You can find the automatically converted html version of

Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html

2005-01-11 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Noel J. Bergman wrote: > For templates, having to edit the HTML code looks like more work than > editing the relatively simply CWIKI format files. For example, I compared > the CWIKI for the IP Clearance form to the HTML, and considered which one > would be nice

Re: [HEADS UP] Merging html site branch (was Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html)

2005-01-11 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > NOTE for Mentors > > > Under site-author/projects there are still the cwiki version of the > status files. You can find the automatically converted html version of > the same under site-author/projects/TEMP_HTML.

Re: [HEADS UP] Merging html site branch (was Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html)

2004-12-22 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Done. The site *sources* are now all in plain html that can be edited with any editor. For the record, OpenOffice works fine. NOTE for Mentors Under site-author/projects there are still the cwiki version of the status files. You can find the automatically converted html version

[HEADS UP] Merging html site branch (was Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html)

2004-12-21 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: I've created a branch [1] for the Incubator website, a rendered version of which is visible here [2] [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/branches/move2html4forrest/ [2] http://cvs.apache.org/~nicolaken/whiteboard/incubator-html/site-publish/ Given that

Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html

2004-12-14 Thread David Crossley
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > For templates, having to edit the HTML code looks like more work than > editing the relatively simply CWIKI format files. For example, I compared > the CWIKI for the IP Clearance form to the HTML, and considered which one > would be nicer to edit for every PMC to clear IP.

Re: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html

2004-12-14 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Noel J. Bergman wrote: For templates, having to edit the HTML code looks like more work than editing the relatively simply CWIKI format files. For example, I compared the CWIKI for the IP Clearance form to the HTML, and considered which one would be nicer to edit for every PMC to clear IP. But I

RE: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html

2004-12-14 Thread Noel J. Bergman
For templates, having to edit the HTML code looks like more work than editing the relatively simply CWIKI format files. For example, I compared the CWIKI for the IP Clearance form to the HTML, and considered which one would be nicer to edit for every PMC to clear IP. But I don't know that I care

RE: New Incubator Site branch - sources in html

2004-12-14 Thread J Aaron Farr
> -Original Message- > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I've created a branch [1] for the Incubator website, a rendered version > of which is visible here [2], with the following modifications: ... > Comments? The menu looks a lot better, but I think the banner spac

New Incubator Site branch - sources in html

2004-12-14 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
I've created a branch [1] for the Incubator website, a rendered version of which is visible here [2], with the following modifications: a - the _source_ files are in plain HTML. Forrest is still able to render them as usual and the results are almost identical to the "original" xml versi