Noel J. Bergman wrote:
For templates, having to edit the HTML code looks like more work than editing the relatively simply CWIKI format files. For example, I compared the CWIKI for the IP Clearance form to the HTML, and considered which one would be nicer to edit for every PMC to clear IP. But I don't know that I care too much either way. I'm curious to know how Roy and Ken feel, since they had considered a switch in the past.
The html version can be edited in an editor. I use OpenOffice.
Furthermore, even edited by hand it's easier to use, as basically anyone knows html. It lowers the real and percieved barrier to entry.
It will also eliminate the validation errors that we are getting now on CWIKI files.
Another argument is that cwiki is not a standard document format.
Years from now there won't be any software available to view it other than as plain text, so it's not suitable for records.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
