Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-02-11 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - PODLINGNAMESEARCH-189 for EventMesh has been approved. Regards, Dave > On Feb 2, 2021, at 1:33 AM, Eason Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > "*On one hand we don’t have a policy that say you must have to have done a > name search before becoming a piddling, on the other changing a name does > incur

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-02-02 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, "*On one hand we don’t have a policy that say you must have to have done a name search before becoming a piddling, on the other changing a name does incur a large community cost and Infra would prefer that podlings don’t change names. Most podlings do the name search just before graduation. In

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-02-02 Thread Alexander Alten
Hi, Fully agree with Justin, we from Wayang had the same problem. We renamed the project before we submitted the proposal, and we documented everything. I’d encourage you to find a name which is TM ready in the US, India, CN and EU (if possible). You can’t graduate (or better it is unlikely) if a

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-02-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, On one hand we don’t have a policy that say you must have to have done a name search before becoming a piddling, on the other changing a name does incur a large community cost and Infra would prefer that podlings don’t change names. Most podlings do the name search just before graduation. I

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-02-01 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - A Name Search was started but not completed. I’m surprised that a vote was started while that was still active. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 31, 2021, at 7:19 PM, Eason Chen wrote: > > All problems and risks seem to be well clarified and resolved. Next, I will > initiate

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-31 Thread Eason Chen
All problems and risks seem to be well clarified and resolved. Next, I will initiate a vote, thank you for your attention and continued participation. Regards, Eason On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 1:00 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Exactly. Here’s a link - > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.ht

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Dave Fisher
Exactly. Here’s a link - https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html#namesearch It’s available from here - https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html#podling_suitable_name_search Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 27, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, To help trademarks it would bee best if you provided them with some search results as described here. [1] Have a look at a couple of the other recent polling name search JIRAs to get a good idea of what is needed. Thanks, Justin 1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Eason Chen
Thank you for your correction, a PODLINGNAMESEARCH issue has been created and followed up. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-188 On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:21 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > On Jan 27, 2021, at 4:58 PM, vongosling wrote: > > > > Agree to raise this issue, ev

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Jan 27, 2021, at 4:58 PM, vongosling wrote: > > Agree to raise this issue, even before podling starts. Initial teams need > to follow up on this potential problem[1]. Let's see how things go :-) > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21353 No! Naming is not an INFRA issue.

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread vongosling
Agree to raise this issue, even before podling starts. Initial teams need to follow up on this potential problem[1]. Let's see how things go :-) [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21353 Matt Sicker 于2021年1月28日周四 上午12:35写道: > It's typically a good idea to figure out your project nam

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Dave Fisher
If you want to do the name search before being accepted then please submit a JIRA here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/PODLINGNAMESEARCH/ You then provide the results of your search in the issue. The trademark committee / VP, Brand will review. This might take a few weeks. It is up to

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Matt Sicker
It's typically a good idea to figure out your project name early on. If you have to change the name before graduation in order to get a trademark, then that wastes the momentum gathered under the old name. That can always happen after the podling boots up, though. On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 07:44, She

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Sheng Wu
This is just a reminder, not an instruction. The naming search and approval will officially happen when you are powerful enough to graduate. Personally, I would like to see this as a potential risk, not just regarding Solace. Of course, this is your option. you should know, if you can't get approv

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, I am honored that JB and François are willing to help the eventmesh project. I will soon initiate a discussion on evaluating Karaf 5 in the community. regards, Eason Chen On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 8:54 PM wrote: > +1 for me to be mentor on the project :) > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apa

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread ShannonDing
I would like to make a comments about this serious problem too, In order not to cause unnecessary trouble in the future, we also request the infra member from apache to help check whether this name is appropriate[1]. For us, we have used the name EventMesh for a long time, and we want to keep i

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Eason Chen
@Sheng Wu thank you for your kindly reminder. I would like to clarify this concerns. As @Duane Pauls clarified this before: “*I work for Solace and have consulted internally to confirm that we do not have any copyright or trademark on the term “Event Mesh”. It’s true it is something our products

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread fpapon
+1 for me to be mentor on the project :) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 27/01/2021 à 13:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > If you are open to evaluate/PoC EventMesh with Karaf (especially, Karaf 5 > would be a prefect candidate), you can count on me ! > > I would be more than happy to

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
If you are open to evaluate/PoC EventMesh with Karaf (especially, Karaf 5 would be a prefect candidate), you can count on me ! I would be more than happy to be mentor on EventMesh if you think it would be helpful. Thanks ! Regards JB > Le 27 janv. 2021 à 13:47, Eason Chen a écrit : > > Thank

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Eason Chen
Thanks to the attention of @JB and @François, I have to admit that Karaf's lightweight operating environment, hot deployment, dynamic configuration, and safe and rich management functions are indeed very helpful to help developers and users deploy applications more flexibly. We will further investi

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Sheng Wu
Hi I want to send a reminder for your project name chosen. Event Mesh is widely used as a concept and term, you could find it through Google search, https://www.google.com/search?q=event+mesh&oq=event+mesh Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 于2021年1月27日周三 下午5:12写道: > Hi, > > Yes, it looks very p

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread fpapon
Hi, Yes, it looks very promising. I will be very happy to help in the incubation process and integrate the project into Karaf with JB ;) regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 27/01/2021 à 10:07, vongosling a écrit : > Hi, > > This is a very young but promising project. The team attached great

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread vongosling
Hi, This is a very young but promising project. The team attached great importance to this project according to the feedback given by communities. Through the efforts of the last five months, I am glad to see positive changes in the project and community. @Jean-Baptiste Onofré EventMesh really

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Hi Eason, That’s an interesting proposal, indeed. I would rewrite some part of the proposal, but overall good. I will check if the EventMesh architecture is "pluggable", meaning that we "could" replace RocketMQ with another messaging/async provider. Anyway, if you need some help on the project

[DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2021-01-27 Thread Eason Chen
Good time of the time to all! I'd like to bring this new interesting project for the discussion, comments and feedback with the aim of starting a formal [VOTE] of its acceptance into Incubator. People behind this project aren't new to Apache: some of them were behind the Apache RocketMQ, which I

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, Many previous developments took place internally, but from the perspective of contributors, there have been more and more users, at least now oppo, alibaba, etc. users are participating in the contribution. I believe that with the help of the instructor, we have a better understanding of bui

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, All code of the project will be donated to ASF. There were some inconsistencies when the project was just open source, but now it is developed based on the github version. Thanks, Eason -- Original -- From:

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Willem Jiang
> "general" > > 发送时间: 2020年8月14日(星期五) 晚上9:37 > 收件人: "Incubator General" > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal >

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > After the project was open sourced, we did not conduct evangelism, and the > internal version iterations were not synchronized in time. Does that mean a different version to what in that GitHub will be donated to ASF? That may complicate things a little as we would need to know who the

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, After the project was open sourced, we did not conduct evangelism, and the internal version iterations were not synchronized in time. Many of these issues and prs were raised by many of our partners, and many of them were not reflected on github. Some document changes were also requested b

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Sheng Wu
t; > > > If everyone has no problems, i will initiate the voting processs later. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Eason > > > > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > > 发件人: > "general"

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Willem Jiang
> 发送时间: 2020年8月14日(星期五) 下午4:57 > 收件人: "general" > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal > > > > Hi, > > The incubator prefers that a project comes with a community around it but > it’s not essential. Not having one may possib

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Sheng Wu
"general" > < > wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com>; > 发送时间: 2020年8月14日(星期五) 下午4:46 > 收件人: "Incubator" > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal > > > > Eason Chen > > Hi, > > Maybe a bi

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Thanks for your continued attention.  As i mentened before in my first discuss "And I'd like to emphasize that the community however small it might look so far", if there are seemingly inaccurate descriptions in the proposal, I can modify it as needed. --  

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Thanks Justin, and can not agree more. Thanks everyone for your attention to this project and your valuable comments. If everyone has no problems, i will initiate the voting processs later. Thanks, Eason -- -- ??:

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The incubator prefers that a project comes with a community around it but it’s not essential. Not having one may possibly make graduation harder, as long as the project is aware of that I don’t see any issues. Thanks, Justin --

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Sheng Wu
1108 > > > Thanks, > Eason > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > 发件人: > "general" > < > wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com>; > 发送时间: 

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, Maybe a bit misunderstood, what I am trying to explain is that even if the project is really in its infancy, it does not prevent the building under apache way. In fact, many apache projects are built from 0. And mentors also don't think this is a big problem. Thanks, Eason --

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Sheng Wu
> 发件人: > "general" > < > wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com>; > 发送时间: 2020年8月14日(星期五) 下午3:01 > 收件人: "Incubator" > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal > > > > Eason Chen > > Our pr

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Eason Chen
>1. Just open-sourced >3. Community development would be a challenge As mentioned earlier, the project is still in its infancy. I also asked the mentors how to build the community. I believe that with the help of apache way and the mentors, we have reasons and confidence to make products more

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread heng du
Thanks for @Duane's reply. Duane Pauls 于2020年8月11日周二 上午12:25写道: > I work for Solace and have consulted internally to confirm that we do not > have any copyright or trademark on the term “Event Mesh”. It’s true it is > something our products are closely aligned with, but it is an industry term >

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-14 Thread Sheng Wu
发送时间: 2020年8月14日(星期五) 中午11:35 > 收件人: "general" 抄送: "legal-discuss" 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal > > > > > Thanks for the honesty, I prefer you should adjust the proposal to > match > > the reality. Such as > > 1. Just open-sourced >

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-13 Thread Eason Chen
Our product has actually received a lot of attention from people. We have conducted communication with many people and collected their opinions. We plan to abstract eventmesh more independently, make product positioning clearer, and make it easier for everyone to participate. We will invest more

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-13 Thread Ming Wen
-- 原始邮件 -- > 发件人: > "general" > < > duane.pa...@gmail.com>; > 发送时间: 2020年8月11日(星期二) 凌晨0:16 > 收件人: "legal-discuss" 抄

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-13 Thread Eason Chen
Thanks for your help and answers @Duane, i will initiate the voting processs later if you have no other questions. --  -- ??: "gen

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-10 Thread Eason Chen
Hi?? I want to modify the description of the proposal to make it more accurate, please help me add permissions??thanks Here are the details of my account: Usernamechenguangsheng emailchenguangsh...@apache.org Full NameChen Guangsheng --  -- ??:

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-10 Thread Duane Pauls
I work for Solace and have consulted internally to confirm that we do not have any copyright or trademark on the term “Event Mesh”. It’s true it is something our products are closely aligned with, but it is an industry term that has been adopted by Gartner and is gaining traction in the industry. S

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-06 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, EventMesh will no longer rely strongly on RocketMQ in the future, it is only one choice of the storage layer, other MQs, redis,  blockchain can be supported in the future plans. EventMesh is very different from Camel i think, it positioned in event governance and mesh cloud nativeization.

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-06 Thread Clebert Suconic
n addition, I want to clarify that these codes are submitted by the > > > entire team within our company, but I open sourced them, as you see some > > > components are not yet open source, we are reviewing and reforming > > > internally, and will open source soon. > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-06 Thread heng du
Hi @Michael Thanks for your advice. As far as I know, Solace doesn't have a product called Eventmesh, They're just using that name to promote their PubSub platform. But in order not to cause trouble in the future, I also ask guys of Apache Brand to help check whether this name is appropriate. For

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-06 Thread Clebert Suconic
and reforming > > internally, and will open source soon. > > > > > > > > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > > 发件人: > > "general" > >

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-06 Thread Sheng Wu
< > wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com>; > 发送时间: 2020年8月6日(星期四) 下午5:42 > 收件人: "Incubator" > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal > > > > Hi > > Noticed this a little late. > > I have some questions about the status of the project, especial

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-06 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, We do not deny that the community is not really big and active, we share our best practices and look forward to getting more people's attention and help, at the same time can help our colleagues .we believe that as long as we find the right method and organization such as the apache way, t

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-06 Thread Ming Wen
发送时间: 2020年8月6日(星期四) 下午5:23 > 收件人: "general" > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal > > > > Hi, Eason, > It's an interesting project. And I have a few questions and > it would be great if you could help: > 1. According to github's statistics[1], most of

?????? [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-06 Thread Eason Chen
Hi, wenming 1. I believe more people will join in the future ;) 2. Sure --  -- ??: "general"

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-06 Thread Sheng Wu
Hi Noticed this a little late. I have some questions about the status of the project, especially about the `Orphaned Products` and the activity of the community. With a project open-sourced since September 2019, this doesn't seem like the status you said in the proposal. 1. If the EventMesh repo

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-06 Thread Ming Wen
Hi, Eason, It's an interesting project. And I have a few questions and it would be great if you could help: 1. According to github's statistics[1], most of the code was contributed by yourself. So if you're on vacation, this project will not easy to move forward. 2. An external dependency `logback`

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-06 Thread Michael André Pearce
Hi Im PMC member from ActiveMQ project. I like the idea, nice. +1 on it as a project idea. I am though a little -1 on the name of the project, I would recommend that an alternative name for the project is found as there maybe a conflict in rights ability to copyright and trademark to it. I’m a

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-05 Thread fpapon
Hi, +1, I'm also interesting by this project and I would be happy to help as mentor if needed. regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 04/08/2020 à 19:33, Kevin Ratnasekera a écrit : > Hi Easen, > > +1, Having worked in a similar domain so far, I have to say this is an > interesting project. If

Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-04 Thread Kevin Ratnasekera
Hi Easen, +1, Having worked in a similar domain so far, I have to say this is an interesting project. If you are seeking new mentors, please consider adding me as a mentor to the project. Regards Kevin On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 3:34 PM Eason Chen wrote: > Good time of the time to all! > > > I'd l

[DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal

2020-08-04 Thread Eason Chen
Good time of the time to all! I'd like to bring this new interesting project for the discussion, comments and feedback with the aim of starting a formal [VOTE] of its acceptance into Incubator. People behind this project aren't new to Apache: some of them were behind the Apache RocketMQ, whi