Hi,
We do not deny that the community is not really big and active, we share our
best practices and look forward to getting more people's attention and help, at
the same time can help our colleagues .we believe that as long as we find
the right method and organization such as the apache way, the community will
become stronger and stronger.
In addition, I want to clarify that these codes are submitted by the entire
team within our company, but I open sourced them, as you see some components
are not yet open source, we are reviewing and reforming internally, and will
open source soon.
------------------ ???????? ------------------
??????:
"general"
<wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com>;
????????: 2020??8??6??(??????) ????5:42
??????: "Incubator"<general@incubator.apache.org>;
????: Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal
Hi
Noticed this a little late.
I have some questions about the status of the project, especially about the
`Orphaned Products` and the activity of the community.
With a project open-sourced since September 2019, this doesn't seem like
the status you said in the proposal.
1. If the EventMesh repo is the only code repo, AFAIK, there is only one
contributor who has submitted the codes over 110 lines, most are just < 50
lines. https://github.com/WeBankFinTech/EventMesh/graphs/contributors
2. Only have 35 issues opened on the GitHub.
https://github.com/WeBankFinTech/EventMesh/issues
3. The issues(since issue #21) since 21 days ago have no comment any all.
From my understanding, this project is only limited maintained by one and
only one for now.
To the project community, could you respond what is the real status now?
And why there is a gap between your proposal and GitHub open statistics?
Personally, I have concerns about the activity and support of the
community, or a little more, whether the basic community has been
established.
I think the incubator should notice the status, in case, it will be hard to
make consensus and release soon in the incubating stage.
Sheng Wu ????
Twitter, wusheng1108
Ming Wen <wenm...@apache.org> ??2020??8??6?????? ????5:24??????
> Hi, Eason,
> It's an interesting project. And I have a few questions and
> it would be great if you could help:
> 1. According to github's statistics[1], most of the code was contributed by
> yourself.
> So if you're on vacation, this project will not easy to move forward.
> 2. An external dependency `logback` is LGPL license, which is Category X.
> Can this dependency be removed?
>
> [1] https://github.com/WeBankFinTech/EventMesh/graphs/contributors
>
> Thanks,
> Ming Wen, Apache APISIX & Apache SkyWalking
> Twitter: _WenMing
>
>
> Eason Chen <daerduoc...@qq.com> ??2020??8??4?????? ????6:04??????
>
> > Good time of the time to all!
> >
> >
> > I'd like to bring this new interesting project for the discussion,
> > comments and feedback with the aim of starting a formal [VOTE] of its
> > acceptance into Incubator.
> >
> >
> > People behind this project aren't new to Apache: some of them were
behind
> > the Apache RocketMQ, which I consider a huge success(especially in
> China)as
> > the community is literally thriving almost 3 years after the
graduation.
> >
> >
> > I have been involved a little bit with this project when it just
started
> > in WeBank a few years ago. And I'd like to emphasize that the
community
> > however small it might look so far, has been aligned with Apache ways
of
> > doing things. Heng Du (from RocketMQ PMC) is very instrumental in
> > tirelessly helping this group to learn what it means to be a truly
open
> > source project.
> >
> >
> > The code is already under ALv2 and is publicly available. As you will
see
> > it has a lot of dependency connections with the rest of Apache
ecosystem
> > and IMO will fit very well here and continue to grow the community.
> >
> >
> > The project's proposal is available at [1].
> >
> >
> > Thank you very much for the feedback you're willing to provide!
> >
> >
> > &nbsp;With best regards,
> >
> > &nbsp;Eason Chen
> >
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/EventMeshProposal
>
