Re: [VOTE] Accept StormCrawler Into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) I have a great deal of faith in the success of this project. - Taylor > On Mar 12, 2024, at 4:33 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Following the discussion about the StormCrawler proposal [1], I am > starting this official vote for the StormCrawler podling. Here is the >

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StormCrawler

I would definitely vote +1 (binding) on this proposal.. StormCrawleer has had, and likely will continue to have, a very positive impact on the Apache Storm project and community. The listed mentors and initial contributors all seem to have considerable Apache experience, and earned have my trus

Re: [MENTORS] Research on the incubator / mentor interviews

They contacted me directly and I agreed. Apparently I was the first interview today. They are super nice and extremely appreciative of participation. What they are doing is also really interesting and the results of the study will likely benefit the Incubator and the ASF. I highly recommend ot

Re: [VOTE] Myriad retirement

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Jan 23, 2020, at 10:13 AM, Javi Roman wrote: > > Unfortunately, despite an effort to reboot the project about more than one > year, we weren't successful in keeping the existing committers active. At > this point, a decision to retire the podling was taken, and a vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.16.0 [RC3]

+1 (binding) - signatures are good - LICENCE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER present and look okay. - was able to build from source. -Taylor > On Sep 23, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Forwarding my vote from the dev list: +1 (binding). > >> On Sep 23, 2019, at 4:24 PM, Gian Merlino wrote

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

@apache.org) > * Julian Hyde (jh...@apache.org) > * Kurt Young (k...@apache.org) > * Lijin Bin(binli...@apache.org) > * Maxime Beauchemin(maximebeauche...@apache.org) > * Niketh Sabbineni (nik...@apache.org) > * Nishant Bangarwa (nish

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop requirement that ASF members can join IPMC by just asking

I posted the following in a private@ thread: Traditionally ASF membership + expressed interest has been the main path to the IPMC. Honestly, I think “someone who has significantly helped a project navigate incubation through to successful graduation” holds at least as much merit as ASF membersh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.15.0 [RC2]

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Jun 19, 2019, at 10:38 PM, Jihoon Son wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > The Apache Druid community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache Druid (incubating) 0.15.0 (rc2). > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > incubator

Re: [VOTE] Zipkin leave incubator, return back to OpenZipkin

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Jun 17, 2019, at 9:21 PM, Sheng Wu wrote: > > Hi > > This is a call for official vote of Zipkin leave from incubator, and return > back to OpenZipkin. > > PPMC have voted.[1], carried two IPMC +1 vote from Sheng Wu and Willem Jiang > > There is no trademark, logo t

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1 (RC2)

+1 (binding) - Signature good - DISCLAIMER file exists - L & N look good - ASF headers present - No binaries is source release -Taylor > On Apr 8, 2019, at 5:53 AM, Bohdan Hliva wrote: > > Hello Incubator Community, > > The Apache DLab community has voted on and approved a proposal to relea

Re: IPMC Board report - missing podling reports for DLab, Marvin-AI and Pinot

> On Dec 7, 2018, at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Do you know why this is the case? I forgot, and until today didn’t have access to the machine with all my Apache credentials. > Reminder were sent to the dev list and this list. Are the mentors signed up > to the dev list or this list?

Re: IPMC Board report - missing podling reports for DLab, Marvin-AI and Pinot

Hi Justin, DLab prepared a report and posted it to the dev@ list, but unfortunately we mentors failed to get it posted to the wiki. I’ve since posted it. I’ll work with the podling to get them access to the wiki. -Taylor > On Dec 6, 2018, at 5:29 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > 3 podli

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.0-incubating Candidate 5

+1 (binding) - Checksum and signature look good - L & N files look okay - DISCLAIMER present - ASF headers present - No wayward binaries (Note I didn’t try to build, I just examined that source package.) -Taylor > On Oct 31, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Neng Lu wrote: > > Hi All, > > This is the 5th r

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

o:hrsa...@apache.org>> > * Ivan Brendan Kelly mailto:iv...@apache.org>> > * Jai Asher mailto:j...@apache.org>> > * Jia Zhai mailto:zhai...@apache.org>> > * Jim Jagielski mailto:j...@apache.org>> > * Joe Francis mailto:j...@apache.org>> > * Ludwig Pummer

Re: Graduation Resolutions Should Not Include Project Bylaws Clause

> On Sep 3, 2018, at 12:10 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > Personally, I'd prefer that the concept of project bylaws disappear. Move > to "community guides". A *guide* rather than a *ruleset*. The Board has > kinda gone quiet on the discussion, but hopefully it will pick it back up, > to provide som

Re: Graduation Resolutions Should Not Include Project Bylaws Clause

Greg, I agree with Justin. I know from experience what the “defaults” are, but to a newcomer, it’s likely anything but clear. The project-specific ones you reference make no reference to being bylaws, hence my description of them as “policy.” If we could clearly delineate between Foundation By

Gossip Retirement Complete

All the steps for retiring the Gossip podling are now complete. -Taylor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Graduation Resolutions Should Not Include Project Bylaws Clause

Aren’t the foundation-level bylaws about how the ASF operates as a non-profit business? I may be missing something, but ASF bylaws don’t address project management, ASF policy does. -Taylor > On Sep 2, 2018, at 5:25 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > -private list for now. > > > I disagree with

Re: Poddlings length of time in the incubator

I’d be a +1. -Taylor > On Aug 31, 2018, at 6:35 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:30 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > >> ... >>> FWIW, for the DLab proposal [1], we added a voluntary incubation period >> max of 2 years, essentially saying we didn’t want to become a resource >> d

Re: Dealing with Unresponsive Mentors

I increasingly tend to agree. However, if we put the onus on PPMCs to police inactive mentors, there should probably be a documented process in place (which it is [1]). My concern with that policy is the potential for a chilling effect. Mentors are more often than not ASF Members. I can easily

Re: Poddlings length of time in the incubator

> On Aug 28, 2018, at 9:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> Regarding Quickstep. I am a mentor. (One mentor resigned earlier this >> year, but the other mentor, Roman, is sufficiently engaged.) >> >> I am concerned that Quickstep is not g

Re: [VOTE] Retire Gossip podling

Josh, can we close this vote? -Taylor > On Aug 10, 2018, at 12:22 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > Thanks, Taylor. Appreciate that! > > On 8/9/18 8:51 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >> +1 (binding) >> As the champion for this project, I’ll volunteer to take care of the >

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept DLab into the Apache Incubator

f the author, > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. > > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 6:13 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >> The 72 hour voting period has elapsed, and with 4 binding +1 votes and no

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept DLab into the Apache Incubator

The 72 hour voting period has elapsed, and with 4 binding +1 votes and no -1 or 0 votes this vote passes. Vote tally (* indicates a binding vote): +1: - Dave Fisher* - Ted Dunning* - P. Taylor Goetz* - Matt Sicker* Thanks to all who voted. I will begin the bootstrapping process shortly

Re: [DISCUSS] Marvin-AI Incubator Proposal

Sounds interesting, and I would support it, but I’m currently maxed out on mentorship. That may change. I’m mentoring one podling that is moving toward graduation, and another that is moving toward retirement. -Taylor > On Aug 15, 2018, at 7:16 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 15 August 2018 at 23:37

Re: [VOTE] Accept DLab into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Aug 15, 2018, at 12:38 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 9:36 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:27 AM, P. Taylor Go

[VOTE] Accept DLab into the Apache Incubator

mikhail_teplits...@epam.com == Sponsors == === Champion === * P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org === Nominated Mentors === * P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org * Henry Saputra hsapu...@apache.org === Interested Contributors === * Debo Dutta ddu...@apache.org === Sponsoring Entity === * The

Re: [PROPOSAL] DLab for Apache Incubator

If there’s no further discussion, I will call for a VOTE tomorrow. -Taylor > On Aug 6, 2018, at 10:47 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > I would like to propose DLab as an Apache Incubator project. > > The text of the proposal can be found below as well as on the Incubator w

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC6)

gt; LICENSE file. > > The PIP distribution, which is the binary distribution, then has the > dependencies listed as part of the LICENSE file. > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:34 AM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > >> I noticed the LICENSE and NOTICE files are boilerplate with

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC6)

I noticed the LICENSE and NOTICE files are boilerplate with no additions, but looking at /project/Dependencies.scala I see a number of dependencies with various licenses such as BSD and MIT. Is there a reason those components aren’t listed in the LICENSE file per [1]? If this question has been

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC6)

I’m trying evaluate the RC, but I can’t find the KEYS file for the project. It doesn’t appear to be in any of the typical locations. -Taylor > On Aug 9, 2018, at 12:13 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC6). > > The podling dev

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC6)

If it can wait until Monday, I’ll volunteer. -Taylor > On Aug 11, 2018, at 12:46 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > We already have two IPMC binding votes from the dev list (myself and Ryan) > and we need one more vote. > We would like to announce this release at a conference a week from Monday > .

Re: [VOTE] Retire Gossip podling

+1 (binding) As the champion for this project, I’ll volunteer to take care of the retirement tasks. -Taylor > On Aug 9, 2018, at 6:52 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > Hi, > > The Gossip podling has voted to retire from incubation. > > DISCUSS: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8acab107a15a6b

Re: [PROPOSAL] DLab for Apache Incubator

projects before. > > Debo > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Aug 7, 2018, at 6:08 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >> >> Henry Saputra (hsaputra) has been added to the mentor list. >> >> We are still interested in proposal feedback and mentor volunteers. >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] DLab for Apache Incubator

Henry Saputra (hsaputra) has been added to the mentor list. We are still interested in proposal feedback and mentor volunteers. -Taylor > On Aug 6, 2018, at 10:47 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > I would like to propose DLab as an Apache Incubator project. > > The text of the

[PROPOSAL] DLab for Apache Incubator

Teplitskyi mikhail_teplits...@epam.com == Sponsors == === Champion === * P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org === Nominated Mentors === * P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org === Sponsoring Entity === * The Apache Incubator signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache HAWQ (incubating)

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Jul 27, 2018, at 10:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the HAWQ community > and at the IPMC level: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/67a2d52ef29cbf9e93d8050ed0193cc110a919962dd92f8436b343b7@%3Cdev.hawq.apache.org%3E > h

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.0.0-rc1-incubating Candidate 3

Repeating my +1 (binding) -Taylor > On May 11, 2018, at 8:53 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > IPMC - please note that this vote received 3 IPMC votes from the mentors on > the dev list. > > I’ll repeat my +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 11, 2018, at 4:09 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Traffic Control to a top level project

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Apr 20, 2018, at 2:02 PM, Dave Neuman wrote: > > [ ] +1 Graduate Traffic Control from the incubator signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: Review mailing list membership?

I sent the subscriber list for dev@druid and private@druid to private@druid. -Taylor > On Apr 17, 2018, at 5:31 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > I can do it when I’m back at a computer. Basically you have to send the ezlm > email from an ASF machine. The easiest way is to ssh into

Re: Review mailing list membership?

I can do it when I’m back at a computer. Basically you have to send the ezlm email from an ASF machine. The easiest way is to ssh into minotaur.a.o and use the mail command to send the email. Do you want just the subscription list for dev@ or private@ as well? -Taylor > On Apr 17, 2018, at 5:1

Re: [VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Apr 16, 2018, at 9:28 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Ralph > >> On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:40 PM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote: >> >> Hi Folks, >> Please excuse the error on my part, which essentially missed this important >> stage of VOTE'ing on general@ for

Re: [VOTE] Accept Druid into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Feb 22, 2018, at 2:03 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Hi all, > > After some discussion on the Druid proposal[1], I'd like to > start a vote on accepting Druid into the Apache Incubator, > per the ASF policy[2] and voting rules[3]. > > A vote for accepting a new Apache In

Re: [VOTE] Retire Wave

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Jan 8, 2018, at 1:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling. > > The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC > to confirm this retirement. > > [ ] +1 to retire > [ ] +/- 0 to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Sep 19, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > > Hello IPMC and everyone, > > The Mnemonic community has voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote > passed with > 14 +1s (including +9s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s. > > Here is the vote result thread in the Dev lis

Re: Heron Grant Status & Monthly Reporting

](gearpump) Jarek Jarcec Cecho >>>>>> Comments: >>>>>> [ ](gearpump) Reynold Xin >>>>>> Comments: >>>>>> [ ](gearpump) Todd Lipcon >>>>>> Comments: >&

Fwd: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - September 2017

Forgot to cc general@... Begin forwarded message: > From: "P. Taylor Goetz" > Date: September 12, 2017 at 8:10:55 PM EDT > To: d...@pulsar.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - September 2017 > > I'll also sign off/co

Re: [DISCUSS] Notice to Podlings RE Facebook BSD+Patents License

Hi John, The only thing I would add is that it might help to point out some of the projects that use the Facebook BSD+Patents License — namely React which constitutes the greatest exposure among projects. -Taylor > On Aug 19, 2017, at 11:31 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > I plan to se

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pulsar 1.19.0-incubating Release Candidate 0

+1 (binding) - DISCLAIMER exists - L&N look good - spot checked for ALv2 license headers - no binaries in source dist - can build from source (though I had to skip tests due to a failure) - checksum and signature good > On Aug 4, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > It looks like you're miss

Re: Urgent: Regarding Java package name change to org.apache.*

When Storm was incubating, our package names started with backtype.* and storm.* and it stayed that way through graduation and there was never any mention of a need to change. In fact, Storm only moved to org.apache.* with the 1.0 release in April 2016, about 1.5 years after graduation. There a

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Jul 10, 2017, at 11:09 AM, sblackmon wrote: > > > In concert with the discussion started last week [1], please vote on the > draft resolution which establishes Apache Streams as a new top-level project > at the Apache Software Foundation, as follows: > > [ ] +1,

Re: [VOTE] Retire Sirona

+1 for retirement. We’ve been marching in that direction for a while. Every time it’s come up (multiple times) there’s a little push to move forward, but nothing ever comes of it. The report situation is telling. I think it’s safe to say Apache isn’t the right fit, and the community should expl

Re: [VOTE] Heron to enter Apache Incubator

> * Runhang Li (obj dot runhang at gmail dot com) > * Sanjeev Kulkarni (sanjeevrk at gmail dot com) > * Supun Kamburugamuve (supun at apache dot org)* > * Thomas Sun (tom dot ssf at gmail dot com) > * Yaliang Wang (yaliang dot w dot wang at ieee dot org) > > == Affiliations == > > *

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Blur Podling

+1 with a reminder that retiring is not a failure, just another path out of the Incubator. -Taylor > On Jun 18, 2017, at 12:30 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has been > incubating for nearly 5 years and has not grown a communit

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heron

some help around incubation process, I'd love to >>> help while Geode experience is still fresh in my mind and given that >> it's a >>> project/space that I do have interest. Since I'm not an ASF member, I >> don't >>> think I can offer t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heron

or Beam or something >> else, but there could be synergies for future development here. >> >> thanks, >> Bill >> >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:53 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >> >>> Hi Bill, >>> >>> Could you comment on how/if the Heron c

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heron

Hi Bill, Could you comment on how/if the Heron community would be willing to work with the Storm community? I've seen a number of new features in Storm being ported to Heron, but I have yet to see any attempt by the Heron community to engage with the Apache Storm community. I don't think it wo

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mynewt podling

OLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Mynewt" be >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >> of the Apache Mynewt Project, and to have primary responsibility >> for

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache MADlib podling

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On May 27, 2017, at 3:56 AM, FENG, Xixuan (Aaron) > wrote: > > Greetings IPMC! > > The discussion seems to have died down, so I'm calling the > vote: I propose that we graduate Apache MADlib from the Incubator. > The full text of the proposal is below. The discuss thr

Re: Good examples of licensing in ASF produced web apps?

> On May 26, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > But that's actually not important -- you're right bundling > dependencies is OK, but > doing that makes it even more important to do proper LICENSE and NOTICE. IMO, you hit the nail on the head right there. I would hope the war file wo

Re: Call for a new mentor for Apache Slider

Vinod, You are already a mentor [1]. It sounds like Gour is just looking for mentors to engage and sign off on reports. The technical aspects seem secondary to that request. -Taylor [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/slider.html > On May 24, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar into the Apache Incubator

- > * Rajan Dhabalia - > * Sahaya Andrews Albert - > * Maurice Barnum - > * Ludwig Pummer - > * Jai Asher - > * Siddharth Boobna - > * Nozomi Kurihara - > * Yuki Shiga - > * Masakazu Kitajo - > * Sebastián Schepens - > * Brad

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.11-rc3

+1 (binding) * Signature good. * DISCLAIMER exists * L&N files look good. * Apache headers in source files where appropriate [1] * No binaries in source archive -Taylor [1] Pretty complex licensing situation required some “light” reading to get the full story (LEGAL-293 + background, etc.) ;)

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

erience coding large scale > projects. > > Thanks > Dheeban > >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:11 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >> >> >>> On May 11, 2017, at 2:44 PM, Bryan Call wrote: >>> >>> I added the 3 mentors to the Wiki. Should we put it

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

> On May 11, 2017, at 2:44 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > I added the 3 mentors to the Wiki. Should we put it up for a vote now? > > -Bryan Discussion has died down and the project has enough mentors, so I would say go ahead. -Taylor

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pulsar - proposal for Apache Incubation

I’d be willing to mentor as well. -Taylor > On May 11, 2017, at 2:29 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi All - > > That's 2 mentors. Is there a third? > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 6, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> To be clear, yes, I would. >> >>> On M

Re: Podling release vote terminology

I think that would be a good way to clear up some of the confusion. +1 > On May 9, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > I've seen a few (recent) incubator votes that imply that there are two > separate, distinct votes: one in the podling and one in the incubator > general. And lots of q

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating)

Disregard. I just saw your question about carrying over IPMC votes. Yes, they can be carried over. Just make sure you include them/state that in the result email. -Taylor > On May 9, 2017, at 1:18 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Unless I’m missing something,

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.8.1 (incubating)

Hi Chris, Unless I’m missing something, you’re one vote shy of the requirement of having 3 IPMC +1 votes [1]. Were there mentor +1 votes on the dev@ vote thread that can be carried over? -Taylor [1] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases > On May 9, 2017, at

Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC3

Apologies for the auto correct. Please sub "Niclas" for "Nicolas". -Taylor > On May 4, 2017, at 8:43 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > Nicolas, > > I understand and appreciate your passion, but would respectfully ask that you > step down your tone a litt

Re: [VOTE]: Apache Weex-incubating Release 0.12.0-RC3

Nicolas, I understand and appreciate your passion, but would respectfully ask that you step down your tone a little bit. Craig and John have both taken time to review the release candidate (which you should be appreciative of -- getting IPMC members to review a release can be difficult). In my

Re: Don't forget to un-incubate

general@ moved to BCC. Casey, If you need any help with the graduation steps let me know, I'd be happy to help. -Taylor > On Apr 28, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > Apache Metron, > > You need to move to a TLP. It has been over a week since the Board meeting, > and Infrastructure ha

Re: [VOTE] Apache Trafodion (incubating) release 2.1.0 RC 3

+1 (binding) - L&N look good and DISCLAIMER exists - signature is good - spot checked license headers - verified no binaries included I noticed the same “installer” vs. “install” issue John pointed out, but that’s very minor. -Taylor > On Apr 17, 2017, at 2:24 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan > wrote:

Re: Guidance needed ( Apache Trafodion (incubating) release 2.1.0 )

Hi Sandhya, I’ll review your rc now and will respond today. In the meantime I would suggest asking on general@ to see if anyone is available to help mentor Trafodion (which you mostly have here). You may also want to privately touch base privately with inactive mentors to see if the wish to co

Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

There was a minor change to the proposal in the Incubator wiki, so technically what were voting on and the wiki don't match. I'm okay with that and don't think it should disrupt the vote. Highlighting the change in this thread should be enough. +1 (binding) I would recommend asking for/finding

Re: Incubator Governance Change

> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > I honestly think its time for us to consider being more board like > around here at > IPMC. May be not exactly as strict as the board, but moving in that direction. > > After all, being a podling means being TLP-on-training-wheels. That

Re: [PROPOSAL] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

Hi Jeff, With the change to the proposal on the wiki, it now differs from the proposal text in the VOTE email. The reason we include the proposal text in the VOTE thread is because it represents the state of the proposal (which being a wiki page, is inherently mutable) at the time of the VOTE.

Re: Incubator Governance Change

> On Apr 23, 2017, at 11:09 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > Pat Ferrel wrote on 4/22/17 11:46 AM: >> Probably the wrong place for this but… >> >> What do people think about a governance change for approving releases >> through the IPMC to wit: >> >> A week of no vote activity over the release pro

Re: The state of Sirona

+1 for retirement. There's absolutely nothing wrong with a podling returning to the place from whence it came. I'm encouraged that that sentiment seems to be proliferating among the IPMC. -Taylor > On Apr 16, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > Sounds like consensus is coming tog

Re: Draft - Incubator PMC Board Report - April 2017

t? > > The mailing list has been active with several people who were drawn to the > project by GSOC 17 labels placed on our tickets. Two of them have > contributed features that have been committed, and a third person (who > will > not be doing GSOC) has asked to be

Re: Creating a podli...@incubator.apache.org mailing list

+1 for moderation. -Taylor > On Apr 6, 2017, at 5:21 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > I agree to both points. I've already started on the script, based on the > existing python scripts we use to generate our reports. > > How do others feel about the moderation? Its only for "official" > communic

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metron podling Graduation

Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Metron Project: > > > PPMC by Affiliation: > > Hortonworks: > Sheetal Dolas (sheetal_dolas) >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

l >> PPMC members are committers. >> >> The affiliations are as follows: >> >> Hortonworks: >> * Sheetal Dolas (sheetal_dolas) >> * Larry McCay (lmccay) >> * P. Taylor Goetz (ptgoetz) >> * Ryan Merriman (rmerriman) >> * James Sirota (jsirota) &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

> On Mar 23, 2017, at 7:38 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:10 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: >> >> As a mentor, I fully support Metron's graduation. The community has come a >> long way, learned to make solid releases, build a susta

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Metron podling Graduation

f the Board of Directors as the chair >> of the Apache Metron Project, and to have primary responsibility >> for management of the projects within the scope of >> responsibility of the Apache Metron Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed im

Re: [VOTE] Release Gossip (Incubating) version gossip-0.1.2-incubating (RC1)

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Mar 13, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > > I am pleased to call an IPMC vote for gossip-0.1.2-incubating. > > The PPMC vote thread is here: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5571d2996633f3a7ed10f3b0de3366702027db3b2f7870403c390141@%3Cdev.gossip.apach

Re: Creating a podli...@incubator.apache.org mailing list

+1 for both. -Taylor > On Mar 20, 2017, at 4:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:55 PM Luciano Resende > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:00 PM John D. Ament >> wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> Before I go ahead with it, wanted to see i

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron (incubating) 0.3.1-RC5

+1 (binding) - signature checks out - DISCLAIMER exists - L&N look good - “incubating” in package name - can build from source (had to skip tests) -Taylor > On Feb 27, 2017, at 1:53 PM, Casey Stella wrote: > > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.3.1-RC5 incubating > > Full lis

Re: Forming of a Selection Committee for New Incubator Logo

> On Feb 17, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > (FWIW, I used to work in graphic design and prepress.) Me too. ;) I’d also be interested in participating. -Taylor

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

I can help with pushing Metron forward. They have been discussing graduation for a while now. -Taylor > On Feb 13, 2017, at 7:28 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > As mentioned in this month's report, there are 63 active podlings. While > I've been chasing retiring podlings, I think it w

Re: [DISCUSS] Podling report format changes

re the points to be addressed: > > Is there anything that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:41 AM John D. Ament wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:40 AM P. Taylor Goetz >> wrote: >> >> I'm fine with 1 and

Re: [DISCUSS] Podling report format changes

I'm fine with 1 and 3, but 2 gives me pause. I like the idea of the maturity model, but is it yet another burden on mentors? If we are trying to increase mentor engagement, we probably don't want to set too high a bar. -Taylor > On Jan 24, 2017, at 8:15 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Gossip version gossip-0.1.1-incubating (RC2)

ge because because... >> >> Thank you, >> Edward >> >> Below is a copy of the [RESULT] for voting: >> - >> The vote for gossip-0.1.1-incubating (RC2) has passed. >> >> Josh Elser +1 >> P. Taylor Goetz +1 >

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

-1 (binding) I look at the “-incubating” tag in the same way I do the DISCLAIMER file and the podling website disclaimer — As an indicator and reminder that a release may not be completely clean from a licensing/policy perspective. -Taylor > On Jan 3, 2017, at 4:20 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > >

Re: Anyone else want JIRA access to the INCUBATOR project?

I'd Ike to be added as well. -Taylor > On Dec 21, 2016, at 7:25 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > I was able to get myself added to the PMC list on INCUBATOR which fixed > permissions on the JIRA instance. If anyone else wants access, drop a > note. We don't often see tickets created, bu

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - December 2016

When I read the first draft, I was kind of alarmed at the lack of mentor sign offs, but wanted to give it a few days. I'm still concerned. Do we need some sort of corrective measure? On a brighter note, I'm really impressed with the Streams turnaround. Kudos to the mentors, PPMC, and community

Re: 答复: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Eagle to top level project

che Spark etc.; >>>> >>>> and be it further >>>> >>>> >>>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Eagle" be >>>> >>>> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >>>> &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduating Apache Eagle

The main download page [1] is a little off, but shouldn’t be terribly hard to fix. - The main download link correctly uses closer.cgi, but is missing links to dist.a.o for the signatures/checksums and instructions on how to verify the archive. - The release notes link correctly links to git-wip

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduating Apache Eagle

hang ebay >>>>> * Hao Chen ebay >>>>> * Qingwen Zhao ebay >>>>> * Jilin Jiang yhd.com >>>>> * Ralph Su ebay >>>>> * Jinhu Wu ebay >>>>> * Daniel Zhou dataguise >>>>> * Kumar Senthil

Re: [RESTART] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Beam

+1 (binding) Nice work and good luck! -Taylor > On Dec 5, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > Hi everyone, > Please vote on the draft resolution proposed by the Apache Beam PPMC below, > which establishes Apache Beam as a new top-level project at the Apache > Software Foundation, as foll

  1   2   3   >