The main download page [1] is a little off, but shouldn’t be terribly hard to 
fix.

- The main download link correctly uses closer.cgi, but is missing links to 
dist.a.o for the signatures/checksums and instructions on how to verify the 
archive.
- The release notes link correctly links to git-wip-us.a.o.
- The git tag link incorrectly links to GitHub. It should link to the ASF git 
repository.
- The git commit link also incorrectly links to GitHub.

The last two aren’t required and could be removed or simply changed to point to 
the right place.

The signatures/checksums are in the right place on dist.a.o [2] so adding links 
to them is fairly trivial. I’d also just change the GitHub link on the home to 
be a download link.

I would think the above issues could be addressed before the graduation 
discussion completes. Post graduation I’d recommend a thorough review of the 
website from an ASF branding perspective.

-Taylor


[1] http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/docs/download-0.4.0.html 
<http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/docs/download-0.4.0.html>
[2] 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/eagle/apache-eagle-0.4.0-incubating/


> On Dec 7, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Looking a the home page http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/ 
> <http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/>  I think that Eagle should make Apache 
> branding clearer for people who do not scroll down past the fold, remove the 
> prominent GitHub link, and add a “Download” button to a standard download 
> page with instructions on check-sums.
> 
> I will make sure that this happens immediately after graduation.
> 
> Julian
> 
> 
> 
>> On Dec 7, 2016, at 4:30 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I believe this page is also relevant to what Stian's pointing out
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-download-pages.html#links
>> 
>> I will say this line looks wrong on the page, and probably is missing a
>> "not" - which would preclude pointing to github for downloads (I added the
>> *not*)
>> 
>> Artifacts which are not full official releases (for example, milestones,
>> betas and alphas) may *not* be linked from the download page. Links to
>> these artifacts should be removed in a timely fashion.
>> 
>> It is a bit odd that your downloads page is not linked from the homepage,
>> but it is available within the docs.  But that's an optimization not a rule.
>> 
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:16 AM Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> This download page does not fully comply with the ASF distribution policy,
>>> which says there should also be a link to the signature and description of
>>> how to check it:
>>> 
>>> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/docs/download-0.4.0.html
>>> 
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#distribution_dist
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Is a direct link from front page to an ( implicitly "endorsed"?)
>>> third-party site GitHub (and no link to ASF downloads) OK according to
>>> policy? I would have included a traditional Download link - it's OK for
>>> that page to include both the source code and Maven coordinates, but I
>>> don't think we should encourage downstream to "download from GitHub" at
>>> this stage as it conflates what is a PMC-voted ASF release or not.
>>> 
>>> On 6 Dec 2016 11:22 pm, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> HI Roman, John,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Most of the mentors have full plate to do and especially need to help
>>>>> existing podling to be successful in incubator.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Taylor has been very gracious to stay as  initial member of PMCs, so
>>>>> we have 1 ASF member, which I think good enough and will be seed to
>>>>> invite more Apache Eagle PMCs to be ASF member.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Other than that, I don't the the current members should have good
>>>>> level of diversity.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you looked at Apache Geode when it proposed for graduation, it has
>>>>> 22 PMCs from Pivotal only one or two from different orgs.
>>>> 
>>>> The majority of podlings that come as projects from a single vendor
>>>> struggle
>>>> with PMC diversity. But this gives them even more of a reason to come up
>>>> with creative ways to mitigate it. This is exactly what Geode had to
>>> think
>>>> about
>>>> and I hope Eagle will think about as well.
>>>> 
>>>>> ALL mentors in Eagle believe that the community have been operating in
>>>>> the Apache way, create releases, invite new committers, and follow all
>>>>> communications in Apache resources.
>>>> 
>>>> Good to know! The mentor's vouching for it helps me a lot.
>>>> 
>>>> Quick question to the community: why is there no way to download releases
>>>> of the software that are linked from the http://eagle.incubator.apache.
>>>> org/ ?
>>>> Is GitHub being treated as the way to distribute it?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Roman.
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to