A simple question for you all.
If the current amount of podlings (38):
[terra:~/tmp/podlings-content] mattmann% cat podlings.xml | grep current |
wc -l
38
[terra:~/tmp/podlings-content] mattmann%
Graduated over the next 3 months (~13 a month), or even the next 6 months
(which is
~6 near th
Welcome David!
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~m
Hi All,
Please join me in welcoming Henry Saputra to the Incubator PMC.
Henry, welcome! Please feel free to share a bit about yourself.
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Hi Upayavira,
-Original Message-
From: Upayavira
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 2:17 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Incubator structure (was Re: Vote on personal matters:
majority vote vs consensus)
>Chris,
>
>What I was tryin
n personal matters:
majority vote vs consensus)
>On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
>chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ross,
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ross Gardler
>> Reply-To: "gene
;On 31 March 2013 17:08, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
>chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>> Why is it so hard to see that the board is already watching those 22
>> nascent projects in the same manner they watch the 137 TLPs?
>
>
>Because they are not watching wi
Hi Benson,
-Original Message-
From: Benson Margulies
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2013 8:02 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Incubator structure (was Re: Vote on personal matters:
majority vote vs consensus)
>>[..snip..]
>
>Chris M
+1 (binding) from me.
Good luck!
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW: http:
y moves all the hard parts to the membership and thus
>to
>the board. Moving problems does not solve them.
>
>Ross
>
>Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
>On 29 Mar 2013 16:51, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <
>chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> w
gt;For me the first option is the only outcome that can be considered. If
>that
>is a desired change (it is not for me) then your proposal is great. For
>now
>though the change I want is a more efficient IPMC and this is why we need
>to agree to differ at least until more of the IP
27;re closer than it seems, but yes, I'm fine with
dropping it.
Cheers,
Chris
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorDeconstructionProposal
>
>Ross
>
>
>
>On 28 March 2013 16:19, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
>chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hey
Hi Dave,
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:38 PM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus
>
>On Mar 28, 2013, at 9:19 A
Hey Ross,
>> >I disagree. Chris' proposal removes the IPMC thus making the board
>legally
>> >responsible for everything that committee does today. Yes it replaces
>>it
>> >with an oversight body, but how does that scale?
>>
>> Please let me respectfully disagree with your interpretation of my
>>
Hi Ross,
On 3/27/13 11:33 AM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
>On 27 Mar 2013 16:43, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Ross Gardler
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Perhaps it would make sense to see how the
>> > model that has scaled well for the foundation can be applied here:
>> >
>>
>> ..
+1 (binding).
Good luck!
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/26/13 12:04 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Apache Onami entered incubation before more than 3 months. Since then
>the community has proven to be pretty active and healthy.
>
>A few releases were made and the status page has been comple
Fixed, you just surround the username with spaces with '[[' and with ']]'.
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/13/13 4:41 PM, "David Crossley" wrote:
>Henry Saputra wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to ask for karma to edit proposal for incubator project. In
>> particular http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetaM
+1 from me (binding). Great job and good luck!
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/9/13 4:31 PM, "Gary Martin" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Following the community graduation vote result announcement on the
>bloodhound-dev@i.a.o mailing list [1] and the conclusion of the podling
>name search [2], I would like to invite Apac
+1 from me (binding).
Good luck!
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/6/13 9:04 AM, "Leonidas Fegaras" wrote:
>Dear ASF members,
>I would like to call for a VOTE for acceptance of MRQL into the
>Incubator.
>The vote will close on Monday March 11, 2013.
>
>[ ] +1 Accept MRQL into the Apache incubator
>[ ] +0 Do
Sorry for the spam all.
Long day.
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/7/13 9:34 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
wrote:
>[Dropping general@incubator.a.o]
>
>Great job, Ben and Mesos community!
>
>I see that Mesos 0.10 has synced to the mirrors:
>
>http://apache.claz.org/incubato
[Dropping general@incubator.a.o]
Great job, Ben and Mesos community!
I see that Mesos 0.10 has synced to the mirrors:
http://apache.claz.org/incubator/mesos/mesos-0.10.0-incubating/
Great news!
Got any ideas about the [ANNOUNCE] email? Is there a template?
See this example from the Apache OO
+1 binding.
Great job great community great project.
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/5/13 12:54 PM, "Chen, Pei" wrote:
>This is to open a VOTE to graduate Apache cTAKES podling from the Apache
>Incubator.
>
>Apache cTAKES entered the Incubator in June of 2012.
>We have made significant progress with the
+1 binding.
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/5/13 10:21 AM, "Jordan Zimmerman" wrote:
>Discussion has settled down so I am calling a VOTE for acceptance of
>Curator into the Apache Incubator.
>
>The vote will close at on Friday, March 8, 2013.
>
>[ ] +1 Accept Curator into the Apache incubator
>[ ] +0 Don't
if it's OK.
>
>-JZ
>
>On Feb 26, 2013, at 1:23 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> wrote:
>
>> I would appreciate at some level a note in your proposal regarding at
>> least the concern by
>> one member of the IPMC that Curator should grow in
Hi David,
I'll fix HDT's.
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/4/13 11:15 PM, "David Crossley" wrote:
>Ripple, Streams, Onami, Hadoop Development Tools ...
>
>Those projects would have received the email reminder about reporting.
>
>You need to care for your podling metadata in the
>content/podlings.xml file t
Great.
We just need 1 more IPMC +1 here. Anyone willing to contribute a review of
Mesos 0.10.0-incubating RC4?
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/4/13 9:57 AM, "Benjamin Hindman" wrote:
>Yes, my vote is a +1.
>
>
>On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
>c
+1 (binding) from me.
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/28/13 10:11 AM, "Hyunsik Choi" wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Tajo into the Apache incubator.
>The vote will close on Mar 7 at 6:00 PM (PST).
>
>[] +1 Accept Tajo into the Apache incubator
>[] +0 Don't care.
>[] -1 Don't
Thanks Daniel, I made it a link using '[[' and ']]'.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/27/13 3:40 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>I think you need to edit ContributorsGroup to make the [[username a link]]
>
>
>Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Wed, Feb 2
Sounds awesome guys look forward to the VOTE.
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/2/13 7:12 AM, "Leonidas Fegaras" wrote:
>Dear ASF members,
>
>We would like to propose a new project to the incubator, called MRQL.
>Edward J. Yoon has volunteered to be the champion for this project.
>The proposal draft is availa
Ben, just FYI on this, is your VOTE +1?
The current tally I have is:
+1
Chris Mattmann*
* - IPMC
We need probably a couple VOTEs from the Mesos community here (PPMC
members),
can you poke Vinod, as well as anyone else that has time to build and test
and review the RC?
IPMC folks -- a review
+1 from me (binding).
G'luck!
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/2/13 3:35 PM, "Andrei Savu" wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>
>I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Provisionr into the Apache
>Incubator.
>
>The vote will close on March 8.
>
>[] +1 Accept Provisionr into the Apache incubator
>[] +0 Don't care.
>[] -1 Do
Hi Niall, and Greg,
Just to echo Greg, +1, yes would have preferred it to have happened in the
existing
community then.
Also, agree with Greg -- exceptions can be permitted from time to time,
but I don't think
graduation into existing TLP should be an accepted norm.
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/1/13 8:55
Hi there Joe,
I went ahead and granted karma.
Please let me know if it works. It might not since there are spaces in
your wiki username,
so if it doesn't work let me know.
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/27/13 3:04 PM, "H. Joe Lee" wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I'd like to work on an incubation proposal through wiki.
Hi Dave,
On 2/27/13 9:44 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>[..snip..]
Thanks for the examples.
>Each case differs. I can agree that we do not want to encourage new
>podlings to come in with Plan A to be graduating into an existing TLP,
>but I don't think we should exclude a future case should it be st
Hi Dan,
On 2/26/13 5:36 PM, "Daniel Kulp" wrote:
>
>On Feb 26, 2013, at 5:21 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> On 2/26/13 4:18 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> This i
Hi Dave,
On 2/26/13 4:18 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>>
>> This is exactly the scenario I have in mind. Most of the times,
>> projects aim for being very successful and have their own healthy
>> community, but that is not always the outcome, and exiting Incubator
>> as an adopted project should be
Hi Benson,
On 2/26/13 2:58 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>>[..snip..]
>>>
>>>I think that there are several hairs worth splitting here.
>>>
>>>1. Merging into a TLP is a possible outcome for a podling, even when
>>>the initial intention is to graduate independently. Even if we
>>>eliminate this
Hi Benson,
On 2/26/13 2:17 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> ...I'd like to suggest two changes:
>>>
>>> 1) Incubation is for new TLPs only. Turn off the "graduate-into-TLP"
>>>
Hi Jordan,
Thanks. To be clear, I'll be in support of your guys' acceptance into the
Apache Incubator.
I would appreciate at some level a note in your proposal regarding at
least the concern by
one member of the IPMC that Curator should grow into its own TLP rather
than be a part of ZK
should it
Hi Luciano,
On 2/26/13 12:03 PM, "Luciano Resende" wrote:
>>
>
>
>+1, We don't need to discuss exit criteria before entering incubation.
Actually we do and I can. Else I'm pretty useless on the IPMC.
I just went through an experience where my objection/VOTE didn't really
mean anything in a sit
sounds like you guys are a distinct project
anyways, so I would recommend going that way.
My 2c.
Cheers,
Chris
>
>-Jordan
>
>On Feb 26, 2013, at 10:30 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Sorry I have to ask the question here.
Hey Pat,
On 2/26/13 11:39 AM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote:
>[…snip…]
>>
>> Either: (a) define Curator to be its own separate project/community,
>>with
>> a goal of TLP;
>> or (b) nix Incubation and just make these guys part of ZK, on a branch
>> now.
>
>Hi Chris. Unfortunately it's not clear cut to me
Hi Guys,
Sorry I have to ask the question here. If the mentors consist of PMC
members on ZK
(at least Pat and Mahadev), what's the problem with creating a branch in
ZK and just
having the code be there and getting the Curator proposed committers as
committers in
ZK ville, and hopefully PMC members
+1 (binding)
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/19/13 8:26 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE for
>acceptance of Apache Tez into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till
>into this weekend (Sun 2/24 6pm PST).
>
>[ ] +1 Accept
I took care of granting this karma, after Gav provided it to me via an IRC
chat.
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/19/13 7:04 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote:
>Help, please?
>
>I got one of my other mentors to put up the wiki, but would be nice to
>get write access as well.
>
>thanks!
>Arun
>
>On Feb 18, 2013, at 3
Hi Benson,
Looking really good!
You may consider adding a flow chart/diagram showing the Incubator process
but other than that, I don't have any suggestions.
Wonderful!
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/16/13 10:54 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1XSqXy9rz-RDcE-P2cK7dE
+1 binding.
Cheers,
Chris
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 15, 2013, at 11:23 AM, "Devaraj Das" wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE
> for acceptance of Apache Knox Hadoop Gateway Project into the
> Incubator. The vote will close on Feb 22 at 6:0
hange voting), you can assume that lazy majority decisions
>are the way that decisions are made at Apache (like releases).
>
>Roy
>
>On Feb 14, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
>> Hey Alan,
>>
>> Great point -- thanks for highlighting the c
* - indicates IPMC
I'll get started creating the infrastructure tickets, and thanks to
everyone for VOTE'ing!
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/5/13 8:18 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>OK, now that discussion has settled down, I'd like to call a VOTE for
>accept
Hi Guys,
+1 from me.
SIGS pass:
[chipotle:~/tmp/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc7] mattmann%
$HOME/bin/verify_gpg_sigs
Verifying Signature for file apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Wed Feb 6 14:06:28 2013 PST using RSA key ID D218BB0A
gpg: Good signature from "
s/Apache Open Climate Workbench/Apache Knox Hadoop Gateway/ :)
May want to resend the [VOTE] thread.
On 2/14/13 5:26 PM, "Devaraj Das" wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE
>for acceptance of Apache Knox Hadoop Gateway Project into the
>Incubat
ke a
>> proposal to the board with a schema for handling this case that makes
>> sense in current conditions. I'm happy for it to be your schema, which
>> amounts, as I see it, to the board having a supervisory moment when
>> this happens, with an IPMC vote providing the s
Hi Benson,
I saw your later email(s) and Incubator board report. It's fine and I
think the message of my objection comes across.
So thanks for that.
One thing I wanted to comment on:
On 2/13/13 4:10 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>Chris,
>
>The obvious compromise is to ask them to report the vo
Classifying this as a procedural vote gives the easy out of majority rule.
It is the IPMC's recommendation to the board that the board then evaluates
to become a TLP or not. Based on Benson's later email he is shucking all
of that to the board. Benson, I would hope you consider -1s to be VETO in
t
Hi Jakob,
No worries and appreciate it.
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/11/13 11:25 AM, "Jakob Homan" wrote:
>Sorry I've not yet been as active in my recent mentorship as I needed to
>be. It's likely that I'll have more time shortly.
>-Jakob
>
>
>On Thu, Feb
Hi Alan,
On 2/11/13 10:20 AM, "Alan Gates" wrote:
>
>On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:03 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> Thanks for the pointer.
>>
>> I'm -1 on this graduation for the following reasons:
>>
>>
[CC to mesos-dev@incubator]
Hi Ben,
+1 (binding) from me:
SIGS check out:
[chipotle:~/tmp/apache-mesos-0.10.0-incubating] mattmann%
$HOME/bin/verify_gpg_sigs
Verifying Signature for file mesos-0.10.0-incubating.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Thu Feb 7 22:22:30 2013 PST using RSA key ID F6FB762
[Changing to mesos-dev@ since nothing private about this thread, and since
public discussion is encouraged at Apache (and a good metric).]
Hi Vinod,
The folks to ask here would ASF infra, and the best bet would be to file
an issue here:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA
Requesting a Re
Hi Vinod,
[changing this to mesos-dev@ since there is nothing private about this
request]
Per:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins?action=show&redirect=Hudson#How_do_I
_get_an_account
You need someone to run: modify_appgroups.pl hudson-jobadmin --add= with PMC chair karma.
I have that karma
gt;discussion of how the teams will be merged.
>
>Alan.
>
>On Feb 8, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
>> Dear Alan,
>>
>> Just a quick question: does this mean that the Hive PMC += (Apache
>> HCatalog Incubating PPMC)?
>>
>> Thanks.
Dear Alan,
Just a quick question: does this mean that the Hive PMC += (Apache
HCatalog Incubating PPMC)?
Thanks.
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/8/13 11:38 AM, "Alan Gates" wrote:
>Apache HCatalog entered incubation in March of 2011. In the process it
>has added five new committers and two new PPMC membe
Hi Guys,
I think this may be pretty clear guidance that Mesos needs some mentorship
help.
I'm happy to help here, and I believe Suresh Marru also offered.
I'm going to go ahead and subscribe to the mesos email lists and see what
I can do.
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/6/13 9:17 AM, "Christian Grobmeier"
Hi Folks,
OK, now that discussion has settled down, I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Open Climate Workbench into the Incubator.
I'll leave the VOTE open the rest of the week and close it out next
Monday, February 11th early am PT.
[ ] +1 Accept Apache Open Climate Workbench into
+1 good luck guys. (binding)
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/4/13 11:41 AM, "Josh Wills" wrote:
>This is a call to graduate the Apache Crunch podling from Apache
>Incubator.
>
>Apache Crunch entered the Incubator in May of 2012. We have made
>significant progress with the project since moving over to Apach
7/13 10:34 PM, "Nick Kew" wrote:
>
>On 26 Jan 2013, at 19:48, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone!
>>
>> I bring to the Incubator a new proposal for the Apache Open Climate
>> Workbench (incubating) project. I've added the proposal to
k you and have a great weekend.
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/26/13 11:48 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
wrote:
>Hi Everyone!
>
>I bring to the Incubator a new proposal for the Apache Open Climate
>Workbench (incubating) project. I've added the proposal to the Incubator
>w
Hey Benson,
Here's one from me -- Apache Climate Toolkit -- am on board and here.
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/30/13 12:51 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>Since we have some new proposals in flight, I was wondering about
>finding some polite way to ask proposed champions and mentors about
>their level o
Dear Nick,
On 1/27/13 10:34 PM, "Nick Kew" wrote:
>
>On 26 Jan 2013, at 19:48, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone!
>>
>> I bring to the Incubator a new proposal for the Apache Open Climate
>> Workbench (incubating) project. I've
Hi Suresh,
We would be honored to have you on board. Thank you and I'm looking
forward to your help and guidance!
Cheers,
Chris
P.S. Add yourself to the wiki, no problem!
On 1/27/13 4:36 PM, "Suresh Marru" wrote:
>
>On Jan 27, 2013, at 1:56 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A
d in
that community including Tsengdar Lee, as well as members of the Earth
System Grid Federation. We will definitely be inclusive and are happy to
have involvement.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
>
>Suresh
>
>On Jan 26, 2013, at 2:48 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> wrote:
>
Hi Everyone!
I bring to the Incubator a new proposal for the Apache Open Climate
Workbench (incubating) project. I've added the proposal to the Incubator
wiki here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClimateProposal
The project is a distributed, scalable approach for the rapid comparison
of remot
Hey Benson,
I agree with Joe - not sure that your job as Incubator VP is to drop any
hammers.
The org is fine -- the ticket is opened as you said and no bits (binary or
source) have been shipped anywhere yet. Still discussing and talking. My
fear though is that the discussing and talking are endl
Hi Guys,
On 1/25/13 10:29 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
[...snip...]
>>>
>> Sorry, that's really what I meant: to think about that file as to
>>whether it
>> can do any harm and how to determine its safety. I haven't looked at
>>the
>> file, but it sounds like you know it can do harm.
>
>Depend
Hi Benson,
On 1/24/13 7:23 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>It's unfortunate to have this conversation in parallel here and on
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-157.
>
>Also, this thread is a combo of the discussion of ordinary
>jars-of-classes (where I'd forgotten the policy) and the m
+1 this sounds great to me, too.
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/24/13 3:08 PM, "Chris Douglas" wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Masanz, James J.
>wrote:
>> One goal is to have a binary that contains all resources, which can be
>>used to install cTAKES on a system that does not have an internet
>>c
Great job, Brane!
On 1/24/13 3:50 AM, "Joachim Dreimann"
wrote:
>Good work Brane. Just one feature suggestion: Could you display the
>relative time (ie '3 days ago') in the table, and the absolute time in
>tooltips?
>That would make it much easier to read I reckon.
>
>Cheers,
>Joe
>
>
>On 24 Jan
Hi Guys,
On 1/21/13 11:48 AM, "Matt Franklin" wrote:
>On Monday, January 21, 2013, Masanz, James J. wrote:
>
>>
>> Sorry, I didn't mean for you to have to look through the email archives,
>>
>> tinyurl.com/cTAKES-3-0-0-RC4-RESULT
>> Here is a direct link to the VOTE RESULT for RC4.
>
>
>Thanks,
tivity, and it is a shame we don't
>do a better job of empowering these conscientious
>reviewers with a binding vote on a release.
>
>
>
>
>
>>________
>> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
>>To: "general@incubator.apa
I agree with you on this Joe. A lot of times my metric is more
responsiveness and participation than in legal/language intricacies. More
power to folks who are good at that, it's just not me.
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/12/13 9:07 AM, "Joe Schaefer" wrote:
>One of my long time pet peeves with how we
>PM
nt of ending this useless thread, +1 to that.
Cheers,
Chris
On 12/19/12 8:38 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> wrote:
>> I have always recommended PPMC==C on all of my podlings, and was taught
>> about that flat org
On 12/19/12 8:40 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> wrote:
>> ...Making someone a C without PPMC gives them the power to evolve the
>>code,
>> but not to help make decisions about how can maintain it, o
I was that other mentor...*smile*
But the awesome part is that I respect Marvin's opinion, as well as the
opinion of others that believe (P)PMC != C.
Just not on the projects I will work on :)
Cheers,
Chris
On 12/19/12 5:33 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Benson
I have always recommended PPMC==C on all of my podlings, and was taught
about that flat organizational structure when I started to see the light
at Apache.
2 Tweets that I truly believe in:
https://twitter.com/flamefew/statuses/36352411593351168
https://twitter.com/flamefew/statuses/3635248426385
Hi Guys,
The website and minimal project status is evolving -- sorry, we're trying
to get the project bootstrapped since we just had a mentor change and are
trying to find some mentoring resources here to push forward.
Roman's been doing great, and Adam has really been doing great being the
"doer
Hi Guys,
Same goes for Apache OODT -- I think it will be a good tie in.
Cheers,
Chris
On Dec 3, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Its great to hear you will be able me make it. I am sure NSF will greatly
> appreciate your perspectives. We will be happy to provide a case stud
+1 (binding).
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 29, 2012, at 3:28 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Following the discussion thread, here is the formal vote on the Marmotta
> proposal:
>
> Please cast your votes on whether to accept the Apache Marmotta proposal:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Marmotta into the
+1 great to hear that you are on board, Suresh.
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 27, 2012, at 6:08 PM, Adam Berry wrote:
>
> Fantastic, thanks for the offer.
>
> Could you add your information to the proposal wiki, or go ahead and send it
> to me and I'll add it.
>
> Cheers,
> Adam
>
> On Nov 27, 2012,
nth. I would also like to see some
> milestones set in those six months. If the milestones are met or not met
> then the decision at the end of six months will be less contentious.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Nov 26, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Mattman
+1 to Jukka's suggestion here. The world isn't going to end if we give them
another month, and beyond that, it will give someone besides Eric the
opportunity
to help cruft the plan (hopefully 2 people besides Eric, since that would mean
3 active peeps in the community).
If that plan can't be achi
Yeah my sentiments here are of caution -- seems like we need to root out
what is going on here based on the community reaction.
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 26, 2012, at 2:59 AM, ant elder wrote:
> -1
>
> In the vote on their dev list there wasn't unanimous support for retiring
> the project, that shou
Congrats Benson, and Jukka! You were an awesome chair and will leave some
big shoes for Benson to fill. Enjoy the freedom my friend (and the other
circumstances
surrounding it ;) )
Benson, good luck!
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 21, 2012, at 11:34 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In their meeting y
+1 (binding). Great job, and good luck!
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 21, 2012, at 11:03 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Flex podling from Apache
> Incubator.
>
> Apache Flex entered the Incubator in December of 2011. We have made
> significant progress with the pr
Fromt he peanut gallery of someone who has participated in a number of
sub-projects
over the years (Nutch, Tika, Solr, Hadoop, etc.): I don't think they have a big
place at the
ASF. The word "project" implies "community". Sub communities == umbrella
projects ==
pain, and suffering.
OTOH, sub-"
Hi Guys,
This sounds really interesting looking forward to hanging around and see what
comes of it!
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 16, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> we would like to propose a new project called Apache Linda as a Linked Data
> Platform implementation to t
+1 binding.
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 7, 2012, at 4:57 AM, Adam Berry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
> submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
>
> Cheers,
> Adam Berry
>
> = HDT (Hadoop Development Tools)
Hey Folks,
The Apache Incubator PMC has VOTEd to add Roman Shaposhnik to our ranks.
Welcome, Roman! Feel free to say a bit about yourself.
Cheers,
Chris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For add
+1 to giving it a chance at Apache. I'm not sure what Extras buys this effort
and I for one
am not really interested in helping it there but am sincerely willing to try
while it's at the ASF.
Cheers,
Chris
On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, J
I would be +1 for simply ${podling}.apache.org, per:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorDeconstructionProposal
Cheers,
Chris
On Oct 12, 2012, at 12:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
> live at domains of the form "${podling
I would be +1 for simply ${podling}.apache.org, per:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorDeconstructionProposal
Cheers,
Chris
On Oct 12, 2012, at 12:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
> live at domains of the form "${podling
+1 (binding). Good luck Open Office'ers! :)
Cheers,
Chris
On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Seeing no objections to my last message, and keeping into account that this
> list had been regularly informed about the steps Apache OpenOffice was taking
> towards graduation, I'm
Hi Benson,
Thank you for the kind nomination. I'm not sure I have the time or energy for
these duties anymore, plus my goal would still be to retire the Incubator :)
and I think the folks around here actually want to see it continue on.
If it does continue you, and you're at the helm, I am confid
1 - 100 of 488 matches
Mail list logo
