Hey Benson,

I agree with Joe - not sure that your job as Incubator VP is to drop any
hammers.

The org is fine -- the ticket is opened as you said and no bits (binary or
source) have been shipped anywhere yet. Still discussing and talking. My
fear though is that the discussing and talking are endless and there is
not a top down solution here as I stated before.

So I simply suggested to the community to proceed with the option below in
your statement that gives you and others fewer qualms.

No padded cells for you!

Cheers,
Chris



On 1/25/13 12:55 PM, "Benson Margulies" <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Chris et al,
>
>I'm suffering from a mild crisis of responsibility here. I'm the VP of
>the incubator. cTakes is planning to ship a release containing
>something that, according to some lights, is inadmissible. If that
>'something' is in *the (source) release*, I have serious qualms. If
>it's merely in a the convenience binaries, I have fewer. We have a
>ticket open at LEGAL, and no response except postings of opinion.
>
>So, am I supposed to drop a hammer here, required to drop a hammer
>here, or am I having an acute Alexander Haig moment by even
>considering dropping a hammer here?
>
>I know that a number of board members read this list, so perhaps one
>or more will tell me which padded cell I should retire to.
>
>--benson
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to