+1 to join johndament IPMC
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 7:17 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Following the discussion about Hunter started ten days ago
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ojr23ssmxmfsdbnojxg3q02xdl74t75j
> and its proposal
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HunterP
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 5:21 AM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Thanks Justin for the detailed analysis.
> Checking LEGAL-469 [1], the only issue that seems to force an RC4, is
> the CDDL/GPL licensed source file.
>
The MPL issue I raised is Category B. It's not listed in the LICENSE.
It's a blocker.
The
I was able to get it built eventually, here's my +1.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 6:07 AM John D. Ament
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A couple of notes/questions about your release:
>
> - in LICENSE-binary you're pointing to the licenses/ folder, but there is
> only a licenses-binar
is simply recorded, unless you can fix it.
- John
[1]: https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#weak-copyleft-licenses
[2]: https://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 5:40 AM John D. Ament
> wrote:
> >
> > With that clarification, the orig
Hi,
A couple of notes/questions about your release:
- in LICENSE-binary you're pointing to the licenses/ folder, but there is
only a licenses-binary/ folder. I'm assuming the reference can just be
fixed.
- Your readme is a little curious about Amoro lover...
- RocksDB, Snappy and likely other th
its source release' guide for IPMC reviewers.
>
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 at 03:21, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 1:16 PM Alex Porcelli
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > This email serves as a call for
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 1:16 PM Alex Porcelli wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This email serves as a call for votes to release Apache KIE
> (Incubating) v10.0.0-rc3. In this release candidate we have made
> efforts to incorporate feedback from the previous voting thread [1].
>
> The Apache KIE commu
This seems like a really interesting tool. Look forward to seeing it go
through Apache.
John
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 8:58 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 11, 2024, at 7:59 AM, Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Mick for sharing the proposal.
> >
> > Il giorno lun 11 nov 2024 alle
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:53 PM Yu Xiao wrote:
> No need IPMC vote +1（binding） ？
>
[1] explains the process in depth, but the important part is:
> only lazy consensus is required
John
[1]: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
>
>
>
> Mingyu Chen 于2024年8月29日周四 10:28写道：
> >
> > Hi
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 6:42 AM 胡得潮 wrote:
> Hi PJ,
> I am Dechao Hu, one of the main developers of this project. I am here to
> assist Mingyu in completing the donation process. Regarding your question,
> I have these answers:
>
>1. I contacted the Mingyu to update the svn file to list the
>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:44 AM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hi Mingyu,
>
> Could you provide the iCLA information? The major contributors: have
> they provided iCLAs and if so, what email addresses did they use? We
> need the email addresses or Apache IDs so we can independently verify
> the iCLAs are on
+1
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 13:28 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Following the discussion about Polaris
> (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ymz26dr3bzldbntdgpctbtkb787x311d),
> and after updating the proposal based on comments, I would like to
> start the formal vote to accept Polaris
+1
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:32 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Following the discussion about Gravitino [1], I would like to start
> the formal vote to accept Gravitino into the ASF Incubator.
>
> As reminder, this is the Gravitino Proposal:
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1,
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen
> wrote:
>
>> hi Justin,
>>
>> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and there are
>> no
>> GPL dependencies there.
>>
On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen
wrote:
> hi Justin,
>
> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and there are no
> GPL dependencies there.
> Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it is not
> necessary.
>
Just to put it out there - I think the l
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:06 PM Calvin Kirs wrote:
> Podlings are not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software
> Foundation.
>
> I haven't specifically witnessed any formal decision or process for
> removing the "incubator" prefix from repository names.
>
> Unless there are compelling r
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 1:54 AM Shawn Yang wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> I'm fixing the license issue of Apache Fury to comply with ASF requirements
> for the first release for Fury under ASF.
>
> Currently we borrowed some code from other projects such as
> v8-fast-api-calls.h[1] in v8 and Precon
On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 12:23 AM Apratim Shukla
wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> I'm reaching out on behalf of the ResilientDB team with a request for your
> help in updating our project's page on the Apache Incubator website. Our
> recent milestones include setting up our DNS, creating a mailing list
em I see).
John
>
> The original code written by Matthias Lüneberg was granted to ASF and PJ
> has forked the project. There are no restrictions in the grant as to what
> commit is being granted. The entire repository is covered by the grant.
>
> I do not see a problem.
> Craig
>
s://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/pekko-http-cors.html
(Original repo and PR)
>
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 14:19, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 8:34 AM PJ Fanning wrote:
> >
> > > Hi John,
> > > My GitHub repo [1] is a fork of
that the
code being imported is from your repo at whatever commit hash which was
forked from the original author's work as of whatever commit hash.
Was the forked repo's commit hash recorded on the SGA?
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 13:14, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> >
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 8:41 AM Sheng Wu wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, a project doesn't have to separate the repository into two for
> both website and source codes, once the license has been reviewed.
> Calcite is another TLP, which is guaranteed, so it is on their PMC
> oversight.
>
> My suggestion is
I’m a little confused. You’re referring to a third party Matthias Luneberg
but the code reference is pointing to the officer’s personal GitHub
account.
Which is being imported?
John
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 14:04 PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Apache Pekko is receiving a donation of an A
I think we would also want a SGA from Jetbrains and go through [1] for the
donation.
1:
https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 15:33 PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> Could you raise an INFRA JIRA to transfer the GitHub repo?
>
> An alternative is to create a new A
to include this license when compiling from source.
> >
> > Yeah. I'm going to collaborate with Fury to follow this approach and
> > document clearly how a developer can intentionally run benchmark with
> > JMH as a dep.
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
>
al components?"
> >
> > No. Benchmark is for testing; most users don't even know it and cannot
> > depend on it as a Maven artifact.
>
> > P.S.
> > > don't approach things as "TLP [x] does it this way so
> > > it must be the preferred
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 8:09 PM tison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The new podling Fury depends on jmh[1] which is licensed under GPLv2
> with "CLASSPATH" EXCEPTION.
>
Just to confirm, are you referring to the code under [benchmark]?
>
> IIRC Flink ever factored out its benchmark code into a separate repo
The Gradle wrapper is the only issue I saw. If you think it'll be a big
issue to reroll the release my vote is +1.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022, 16:30 Julian Hyde wrote:
> Good catch. But could you (and others) continue the process of
> reviewing and voting on the release.
>
> It is established that an
error and that the email should be
on file.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 8:16 PM Lucifer Tyrant
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I'm sorry I wrote down their other nickname,
>
> David ==> lidongdai lidong...@apache.org
>
> William-Guowei ==> guowei guo...@apache.org
>
> Cha
Hi
I can't find "David" nor "William-Guowei" as IPMC members.
John
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022, 06:39 Lucifer Tyrant wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The vote closes now as 72 hours have passed.
>
> The vote PASSES with
>
> 3 (+1 binding):
> David,
> William-Guowei,
> Calvin Kirs
>
> No -1 votes
>
> The vote
+1 good luck!
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 4:05 AM Claude Warren, Jr
wrote:
> After reviewing the [DISCUSS] threads concerning bringing Pekko into the
> incubator [1][2], and finding that there is no further comment, I am
> calling for a VOTE to accept Pekko into the Apache Incubator. The text of
>
We should keep in mind that the trademarks requirements and the release
requirements are two different sets of requirements. They're often
conflated. The main thing to remember with trademarks and naming is that
the first time a project is referenced in documentation, websites, etc, it
must be re
add a license header (since they're JSON files). You may want
to consult with legal on how to add license file references for them.
[1]:
https://github.com/UMD-ARLIS/incubator-flagon-distill/blob/distill_toolkit_refactor/NOTICE
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:12 AM John D. Ament
wrote:
> He
>
> Trying to adhere to good practice, but at this point a "consensus vote" on
> general is perfunctory.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Josh (Flagon PPMC)
>
> On 2022/08/30 11:05:03 "John D. Ament" wrote:
> > Note that you're using public and priva
Note that you're using public and private lists which is a big no-no.
I'll be honest I don't understand what you're trying to get the IPMC to
vote on. You may need some help from mentors. I saw IP clearance and will
point out that [1] isn't for podlings. Likewise if this CCLA is new after
your pr
Hi
My questions have mostly to do with translations, as the source sites are
predominantly in Chinese, not a language I understand.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 8:38 PM Sheng Wu wrote:
> Hi Shenyu and incubator
>
> Shenyu is going to graduate in next month, I accidentally have a
> chance to review i
+1 to graduate.
Just a note for internal, maybe we need to update some process documents,
but the resolution can change between when the IPMC votes and the final
version that board reviews during the board meeting. We should not require
the podling to create a new vote in this situation.
On Wed,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 05:51 Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> after a few discussion with interested community members it
> now seems that a board resolution for rebooting Apache Ambari
> PMC may be the quickest and most convenient option. Since
> the initial PMC are all (more or less) ex-Ambar
On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 9:42 PM Calvin Kirs wrote:
> Hi,
> Don't worry, DevLake and Kyuubi have just signed.
> Updated:
> We are missing reports from:
> - Hivemall*
> - Livy*
> - Nemo
> - SDAP*
> - Spot
>
> We are missing mentor sign off on:
> - Marvin-AI
> - PonyMail*
>
This is a little confusin
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 06:23 Brahma Reddy Battula wrote:
> Thanks Justin,it’s good hearing from you that incubation might not require.
>
> I will give the list of people involved on this on next mail..
>
> Are you looking any specific format??
The champion should be helping you with this part.
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 23:32 Daniel Widdis wrote:
> Adding onto this, even if there may be no legal trademark issue, there is
> other software by this name which makes it less than desirable. Quoted
> from [1]
>
> > Avoiding search-results confusion is important for another reason.
> Apache pro
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 08:09 Zhao Chun wrote:
> Justin, thanks for your note.
>
> I'm one of Apache Doris PPMC members, and now working for StarRocks.
>
> We have our web developers update our web site to fix the
> trademark/branding issues.
>
> We have also modified our codebase to ensure that
’m also ok if they add it in the
> first paragraph.
On a 1080p monitor, the text Apache Kvrocks (incubating) gets very close to
the navigation area. It may be confusing to a visitor with the layout, so
putting it in another place that's a little lower but more direct line of
site may be j
[2]: https://ponymail.apache.org/
>
> > On May 18, 2022, at 23:15, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:14 AM kezhenxu94
> wrote:
> >
> >> Congrats but please remember to add “incubating” in the headline and
> >> GitH
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:14 AM kezhenxu94 wrote:
> Congrats but please remember to add “incubating” in the headline and
> GitHub index page (README), I know the podling is in progress but just in
> case.
>
Neither is required per [1]. Please don't recommend undue burden.
[1]: https://incuba
Justin,
I wish you communicated with the RM that you were going to take over. It
gets a little confusing, too many cooks in the pot. I see the following
issues with the report:
- Confluence version doesn't appear reformatted
- Marvin-AI, Spot have no mentor sign offs. In the past, those report
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 3:13 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You are currently down to report this month as the report attribute in
> podlings.xml is set too true. This is probably an error.
The reason all podlings were marked as monthly was explained a couple of
times [1][2]. The podlings w
Hi all mentors,
Don't forget that when you're adding a podling to podlings.xml, their
reporting group should be based on the month that they enter the
incubator. For a podling that is voted in in April, they should be in
reporting group 2, and have a monthly attribute set to May, June, July.
Yes,
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 2:49 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > 2. A lot of the processes error'd out, assuming they're one time runs.
> > Because the entire year's worth of reports were pre-made, it doesn't work
> > right. Some of what I noticed:
> >
> > - I can't rerun shepherd assignments (I
Hi all
Wednesday board reports are due. I plan to submit to the board Wednesday
late afternoon Eastern time. Below please find the report draft, you can
edit it at . We are still missing a few podling reports. They will
remain monthly if unresolved.
--
# Incubator PMC report for May 2022
Hi all
Based on the discussions, it seems like we should start a formal retirement
vote. I will plan to start it within the next couple of days unless
someone else does.
John
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 9:38 AM sebb wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 13:27, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:05 AM Vira Vitanska
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> As I know, DataLab reporting group is #1 (January, April, July, October):
> https://incubator.apache.org/clutch
>
>
> In April we reported on time:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/April2022#datalab
>
> An
Hi all
I've been struggling to read the diffs that confluence generates. I also
looked on the web, and with how we load the report it's just a big lob of
data. Can't really tell what changed.
What do others think?
John
Hi all
Wondering if those more familiar with python may be able to help me. I ran
into a couple of issues using the report runbook and related scripts.
1. report_reminders.py requires python2.7. It seems that Apple is removing
this as they upgrade to latest OS's and wondering how hard this woul
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 5:08 AM Sheng Wu wrote:
> SGA is not required if the project is on a personal repository, this
>
SGAs can apply for individuals and corporations [1]. Doesn't matter
where it's sourced from. We have received a number of SGAs in the past
that just represent a single indi
it was our fault for not pinging them in time, but I really would
> love to see reports, that we missed.
> >
> > But what do the others think?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> > ___
Crail
> - EventMesh
> - Flagon
> - Hivemail
> - InLong
> - Liminal
> - Marvin-AI
> - Milagro
> - Nemo
> - Pony Mail
> - Spot
> - Teaclave
> - Wayang
>
> So, we're also expecting these projects to report this month.
>
> Chris
>
> -Origina
Note - I'm sending this a week early per procedure as we have some catch up
to do.
May 2022 Incubator report timeline:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/May2022
Wed May 04 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun May 08 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun Ma
The incubation proposal guide can be found at [1]. You'll need a champion
and 3 mentors. The champion you can think of as your go to person for
getting the proposal written and submitted. Note that because your
employer wants something doesn't mean the incubator would be the right
place to make
Hi
I went to sign off on Pony Mail's report and I noticed clicking on their
report from the TOC doesn't bring me to their section. It does for the few
other podlings I checked. Is it because it's spelled "Pony Mail" but the
link goes to "#ponymail" ?
John
bucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8
Hi Vladimir,
I think based on what you're describing and the Logging PMC's response,
re-incubating the project makes sense. I would be curious if the Logging
PMC would be interested in restarting the sub-project after a successful
incubation period. This seems to match what Ralph is suggesting a
Hi
Putting aside this subproject for a moment I am concerned with your
contributor vs committer counts. If you’ve had 68 contributors why are the
numbers for new committers and PPMC so low?
John
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 21:08 Eya Badal wrote:
> Hello Willem,
>
> Thank you very much for your fe
nor changed the license headers before
donating. There’s actually no usable history in the GitHub repo as best as
I can tell.
>
> While some history is nice to have, I’m not sure it’s worth this
> conversation.
>
> David Jencks
>
> > On Sep 7, 2021, at 5:42 PM, John D. Ame
Hi Till
fwiw I think the donation is fine though the AsterixDB PMC will need to do
some due diligence in verifying ownership of code before forming a release.
This is likely what Justin is trying to refer to as well.
Some background on possible issues….
Before GitHub became the popular place to
Hi
Any reason that the vote occurred on your private list instead of the dev@
list? Typically a change like this would be voted on a public list. Note
that not all IPMC members would be able to see the vote thread in the
current state.
John
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 22:00 Till Westmann wrote:
>
here’s my -1
>
>
> Thanks for pointing out these issues. I think the PPMC should fix them
> soon. But anyway, I do not think these issues are a blocker for this
> release.
>
> John D. Ament 于2021年6月21日周一 上午12:17写道：
>
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 11:11 张铎(Duo Zhang)
>
*Binding VOTE
>
> I'll progress with the remainder of the release procedure.
>
> Best,
> Gedd Johnson
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 2:36 PM John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 9:52 PM Xun Liu wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, J
eleases, directly to GitHub.
>
> This is the download page
>
> https://pegasus.apache.org/en/docs/downloads/
>
> I haven't seen any old releases here...
>
> Thanks.
>
> John D. Ament 于2021年6月20日周日 下午10:52写道：
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I was checking your v
Hi
I was checking your vote on your dev list. It lists 4 binding votes, but I
can't find the listed voters on the Incubator PMC. For reference, only
IPMC votes are binding for releases, regardless of list they are voted on
(see [1] for reference).
Did any of your mentors review this release? E
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 9:52 PM Xun Liu wrote:
> Hi, Johnson
>
> I have checked the following items:
>
> - Incubating in name
> - NOTICE is fine
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - All links are valid
> - No unexpected JS files
>
> BUT, This file does not have ASF headers, Please fixed it.
>
> https://gith
+1 from me
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 2:42 AM Gedd Johnson wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Please VOTE on the Apache Flagon UserALE.js 2.2.0 Release Candidate #3.
>
> A VOTE was carried out on dev@flagon with the following results:
>
> [ 4 ] +1, let's get it released!!! (+2 (IPMC/Binding) +2 PPMC)
> [ 0 ] +
Yeah apologies, you're good so never mind me
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 9:41 AM Antoine Toulme wrote:
> I thought you needed 3 +1s. Thanks for the clarification.
>
> > On Jun 16, 2021, at 15:38, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> >
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:40 AM Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Thanks all,
>
> The vote has concluded.
>
> The results are as follows:
> 4 +1: Furkan Kamaci (binding), Antoine Toulme (binding), John D. Ament
> (binding), Xun Liu (non-binding).
> 0 +0
> 1 -1: Justin Mclean
&
Thanks for clarifying everything. I think we are in good working order
then and here's my +1 (binding) to release.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:52 AM Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Yes.
> > On Jun 14, 2021, at 14:51, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:48 AM Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Mikuli is from the same company that donated Cava… please, what are you
> talking about?
>
And Cava is the project's name before it was Tuweni?
>
> > On Jun 14, 2021, at 14:45, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Again, no. This
Hi
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:16 AM Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 14, 2021, at 14:10, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> >> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:41 AM Antoine Toulme
> wrote:
> >> OK clearly I don’t get it. This code has bee
Hi
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:41 AM Antoine Toulme wrote:
> OK clearly I don’t get it. This code has been there since day 1 of the
> project in our repo and in good standing.
> Because someone on the Internet copied the defunct project prior to
> donation in no way warrants this release to receiv
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 18:30 Christopher wrote:
> Ideally, the GitHub traffic would go to a separate list... yes?
I think it should be the cvs@ list unless that got converted to commits@
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 12:42 PM Julian Hyde
> wrote:
> >
> > How much will this increase the email t
Hi,
Apologies for not responding earlier.
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:36 PM Nathan Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:42 PM John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > +1 binding from me, with a couple of notes:
> >
> > - it could be how I'm extra
That should be fine since it’s Apache licensed and has no notice.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 23:13 Daniel Widdis wrote:
> The scala configuration file [1] appears to be a copy from [2] or its
> github source at [3].
>
> [1] ./examples/sql/src/test/resources/scalastyle_config.xml
> [2] http://www.sc
Hi
+1 binding from me, with a couple of notes:
- it could be how I'm extracting your source tars, but the packages are
ending up in a directory child to it. We typically look for the
LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in the root folder.
- I'm ok with the LICENSE but would like you all to fix this sectio
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:10 AM Zhang Yonglun
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the 'Creating an Apache Release' section of the graduation guide [1], I
> am a little confused by the statements of 'cut a release', 'publish a
> release' and 'create a release'. What's the difference between them?
> I really know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17346217#comment-17346217
]
John D. Ament commented on INCUBATOR-265:
-
I don't think typo is co
nt and everyone has a sense of
> participation.
>
> Thanks!
>
> sebb 于2021年5月14日周五 下午6:00写道：
>
> > On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 12:30, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:12 Goson zhang
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > H
?filter=doneissues
> 2.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA/issues/INFRA-21881?filter=allopenissues
>
> John D. Ament 于2021年5月13日周四 下午7:30写道：
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:12 Goson zhang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sebb
>>>
>
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:12 Goson zhang wrote:
> Hi Sebb
>
> How should we fix it?
>
> I did not pay attention to the issue, maybe we missed some items that must
> be adjusted
>
I might be missing official sources [1] but after you vote the name it
should be made aware to the IPMC (I would a
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 2:00 PM Nick Kew wrote:
>
>
> > On 4 May 2021, at 16:45, Dave Fisher wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On May 4, 2021, at 8:31 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> >>
> >> IP clearan
IP clearance should be required per this line.
*This form is not for new projects.*
This is for projects and PMCs that have already been created and are
receiving a code donation into an existing codebase. Any code that was
developed outside of the ASF SVN repository and our public mailing lists
Seems like a good first step if not already done is to reach out to
airflow.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:30 Lior Schachter wrote:
> We can't just remove this dependency as it comes from the Airflow package
> deoendencies.
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021, 15:51 JB Onofré wrote:
>
> > Did it change about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament closed INCUBATOR-245.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Slider - Auditing Ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17311756#comment-17311756
]
John D. Ament commented on INCUBATOR-245:
-
sure
> Slider - A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-245:
Attachment: (was: Twitter-Social-Icons (1).zip)
> Slider - Auditing Capabil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-245:
Attachment: (was: iyyd.log)
> Slider - Auditing Capabil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-245:
Attachment: (was: iyyd.log)
> Slider - Auditing Capabil
Hi Andy
Typically you would look at the top contributors and aim for ICLAs from
those. Don't forget you have to have a vote here as well when done!
I would aim for these individuals:
231 Andy Grove
27 Ximo Guanter
7 QP Hou
6 Boaz Berman
5 Daniël Heres
4 Jack Chan
4 Patrick Mor
Hi
I think we should reorder the retirement steps as documented on [1].
Specifically, we say to install an .htaccess file after requesting infra to
disable resources. This probably worked in the SVN days, but now that most
podlings are git and websites are hosted in git, we should probably update
Hi
If the website doesn't show retired that's my fault. I asked infra to mark
the repos readonly, which they have done. But likely missed updating the
landing page to indicate retired status. Let me reach out to infra to see
what can be done.
All other resources are in fact closed down.
John
Hi,
I would suggest that you get in touch with someone from the Apache Pinot
team to get this coordinated. One of their PPMC or mentors should help get
this moving with Apache Infra to get resolved.
John
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:22 PM Jialiang Li wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> This is Jack from L
Please make sure you are using https. HTTP is read only. Try again.
John
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 10:37 Ming Wen wrote:
> hello, incubator,
> I want to submit a new ip clearance to svn[1], but I found that I did not
> have the permission to write.
> How should I apply? thank you.
> my svn user
1 - 100 of 1932 matches
Mail list logo
