On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 9:32 AM PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote:
> The Software Grant is on file with the ASF Secretary. I don't know > where these are checked in but the file is referenced in the > grants.txt in the foundation svn repo. > > The template file makes no reference to commit ids. > > https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant-template.pdf > > Matthias has basically given us permission to use his Apache licensed > code. I am not a lawyer but I think is reasonable to assume that all > commits to his repo up the SGA date are covered. > > I have an iCLA so all my commits to my fork are surely acceptable to the > ASF? > > I don't see why listing commit IDs makes the IP Clearance clearer. I > can't see commit IDs in any of the cross section of previous clearance > forms I have seen. > Commit ID is simply one way it's been done. There's a few examples, I'll list them below. But basically reading your IP form it isn't clear which repo is actually being brought into Pekko, perhaps a PR would work as well? There's a couple of examples like that in this list too. Anything that you feel could be done to make it clearer that it's your repo being brought in but going through IP Clearance/SGA due to the derived work clause (otherwise, it's not clear why you as an officer of the foundation need an IP Clearance to bring in your own work). [1]: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-datafusion-comet (Donation PR w/ repo being stood up by us for the target donation) [2]: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/daffodil-vscode-debugger.html (Full original repo and commit ID) [3]: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/avro-rust-library.html (Full original repo and PR) [4]: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/tinkerpop-gremlint.html (Commit ID) [5]: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/tika-tika-helm.html (Full original repo pointer) [6]: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/netbeans-dukescript-presenters.html (Commit ID and PR) [7]: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/pekko-http-cors.html (Original repo and PR) > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 14:19, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 8:34 AM PJ Fanning <fannin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi John, > > > My GitHub repo [1] is a fork of Matthias Lüneberg's repo [2]. His > > > original repo was built for Akka. My fork modifies it to use Pekko > > > instead. > > > So it is my code that is being imported but the SGA is to acknowledge > > > that the original code was written by Matthias Lüneberg. > > > We can't bring my fork into Apache Pekko itself without Matthias > > > Lüneberg's software grant. > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/pjfanning/aws-spi-pekko-http > > > [2] https://github.com/matsluni/aws-spi-akka-http > > > > > > Ok, I see, you previously created a derived work from the original > author's > > work, and I'm assuming you approached the author about donating to the > ASF > > via SGA which they did so that you can bring the derived work into Pekko. > > To make that clearer, I would update the IP Clearance to state that the > > code being imported is from your repo at whatever commit hash which was > > forked from the original author's work as of whatever commit hash. > > > > Was the forked repo's commit hash recorded on the SGA? > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 13:14, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > I’m a little confused. You’re referring to a third party Matthias > > > Luneberg > > > > but the code reference is pointing to the officer’s personal GitHub > > > > account. > > > > > > > > Which is being imported? > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 14:04 PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > Apache Pekko is receiving a donation of an AWS SPI. > > > > > The AWS SPI is used to make client calls to AWS APIs and is built > > > > > using Apache Pekko HTTP. We use the AWS SPI in a few of the Apache > > > > > Pekko Connectors. > > > > > > > > > > Please vote to approve this contribution. > > > > > This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance > process > > > > > [2], open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > PJ > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/pekko-connectors-aws-spi.html > > > > > [2] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
