Woot!
+1 for druid incubation.
-h
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Gian Merlino wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to open up a discussion about incubating Druid at Apache. I've
> included a proposal in this mail and have also posted a draft at
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DruidPropos
inside the SVN space of the podling.
>
> = External Dependencies =
> None known
>
> = Cryptography =
> The project will use cryptographic utilities available as standard in Java
> 6.
>
> = Required Resources =
> * Mailing lists
> * amber-private (with moderated s
+1 Sorry for being late.
-h
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 13:00, Paul Lindner wrote:
> The Shindig community voted on and approved the release of Apache Shiindig
> 1.1-BETA5. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC
> for this release.
>
> Podling vote thread:
> http://www.mai
+1
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:12, Greg Stein wrote:
> Subversion is a version control system. You probably know it well as
> it is the version control system employed by the Apache Software
> Foundation.
>
> The Subversion project would like to join the Apache Software
> Foundation to remove
;
>> Please cast your vote:
>>
>> [ ] +1 to recommend Click's graduation
>> [ ] 0 don't care
>> [ ] -1 no, don't recommend yet, because ...
>>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Wednesday 2:00 am (UCT).
>>
>> The follow
IMHO, expected: no.
I would expect the PMC to ask their mentors whether they want to stick
around (common courtesy). If a mentor was involved in more than just
steering the project through incubation, I would assume that they will be on
the PMC anyway, otherwise it should be fine to either politel
Pretty much what Ant said. However, let's make this a bit stronger: -1 to
this release proposal. You failed to uphold the basic rules for an incubator
release. Please go back and review what is required from you to make a
release.
-h
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:49, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Hi all,
After a co-worker just pointed me at the slides from NOSQL, consider me
moderately pissed that in all slides, the fact that this project is in
incubation at Apache and wants to be part of a larger community was not
mentioned even once.
Folks, just glueing a feather on your homepage and then baskin
+1 for releasing this. Looks good to me.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 23:04, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> Yes, it does. Thanks.
>
> I looked briefly through the package and I don't see any show stoppers.
>
>Ciao
> Henning
>
>
> On Tue
I did basic checking of the candidate and the RAT report and based on that I
vote +1
Sorry, that it took me a while.
Ciao
Henning
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 09:23, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE <
shanti.subraman...@sun.com> wrote:
> The Olio community has voted and approved this first binar
Oh, I am +1 BTW. ;-)
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 04:51, Dave wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Dave wrote:
> >>...
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SocialSiteProposal
> >>
> >> I look forward to your comments and sug
Calm down, Jason. No one was attacking Maven.
The Apache Software Foundation requires a project (not just an incubator
podling. All projects) to release source in a form that can be used to
recreate the binaries.
For the current state of the Shindig release, this is not possible. Noone
was saying
Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have a choice.
An Apache releases consists of source code. Binary artifacts are just an
"add on bonus". I can ping Roy on that subject if you beg to
differ. ;-)
However, as (at least for the Java part), all source code is available
as sour
I have no idea what that means and how it relates to a ASF release
candidate. Care to elaborate?
Sebb's question is valid: There are two directories with similar named
artifacts.
Ciao
Henning
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 10:17 -0400, BRIAN FOX wrote:
> >
> > Why are there two b
I did not answer in time. I would like to stay on as a committer and on
the PMC.
Ciao
Henning
(My frigging mail server died. Can you believe that? And it is 6,000
miles away from here...)
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 15:28 -0700, Upayavira wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 23:25 +0
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
> In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
> months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
> suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
> I am raising this as a vote.
>
> ---
Sorry, took me a while.
Builds fine with JDK 1.6 under Linux i386 using ant 1.7.1
rat report looks fine.
+1
Ciao
Henning
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 01:02 +0200, Bob Schellink wrote:
> New snapshots are available with the following changes:
>
> # build.properties has new
Hm, I thought I was subscribed to private-click ... but then again, that
is gene...@incubator.
- Builds for me on JDK 1.6.0_12 on i386 Linux.
- I vote +0 for this release. Reasoning:
-- It is not obvious to me how to turn off GPL dependencies like
Hibernate. The "get-deps" download downloads al
RCF is a sore point with me for a while (being a mentor on it). It
hasn't moved at all and from what I know from Matthias, it is held up by
some internal struggle at $BIG_COMPANY_DONATING_IT.
Threatening to terminate it is probably the best way to get a decision.
I would give them a 30 day's noti
+1 Har har har, now we have two pieces of Facebook technology. =:-)
SCNR
Henning
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 18:11 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Update:
>
> > The most contentious, and it isn't very contentious at that, discussion is
> > regarding the Helenus proposal, which
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 13:45 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> How about a brand new idea?
>
> Lay down a Milestone-style chart of what it takes to operate as an ASF
> project. Demonstrate community of meritocracy, add committers or ppmc
> members based on contributions, complete IP review, an
+1
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 22:00 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Please vote on accepting Droids into incubation.
>
> The proposal can be found at:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DroidsProposal
>
> The text of the proposal
>
> = Droids, an intelligent standalone robot framework =
>
> ===
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 10:21 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
>
> > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > We don't have to. We can simply mandate that every ASF project sign
> their
> > > artifacts and charge the Maven PMC with enf
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 12:31 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> We don't have to. We can simply mandate that every ASF project sign their
> artifacts and charge the Maven PMC with enforcing it.
No. The Maven PMC is charged with developing software for the Apache
Maven project. If we really want to
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 11:20 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
>
> > There is a pretty nice proposal on
> > http://people.apache.org/~henkp/trust/, however this will again take a
> > piece of "freedom of doing software at Ap
rote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I did vote -1 not because I think that the current position is all fun and
> > games, but because it is the adopted policy of the incubator as stated
> > on the in
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:41 +0200, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Branching off from the release distribution vote.
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This vote has made it quite clear that we have a much deeper
> > disagreement over the status of in
+1 (as a mentor)
Ciao
Henning
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 07:33 -0700, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Please vote on accepting Olio into incubation.
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
13:36 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I enjoy your scenarios...
>
>
> > And again, there is no "high nineties" security. Your solution is either
> > secure or it is not.
&g
:
> Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> >
> > How do you validate that the pub key presented to you is genuine?
>
> Every project worth it's salt has a www.apache.org/dist/{tlp}/KEYS
> file which contain that project's contributors signatures, countersigned
> o
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:42 -0400, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:12 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 22/09/2008, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The only reason I suggested including the sigs in the source distro is
> >> because a source build like Apach
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:34 -0400, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> The only reason I suggested including the sigs in the source distro is
> because a source build like Apache ServiceMix depends on hundreds of
> third party dependencies.. so an end user would need to end up
Yes. Now you are getting closer.
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:54 +0100, sebb wrote:
> It's a pity that the Tomcat jars don't contain proper manifests + N &
> L files; I'll see about raising that with the Tomcat developers.
Huh, what?
On my freshly downloaded apache tomcat 5.5.27, the servlet API contains
Specification-Title: Java
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:54 +0100, sebb wrote:
> On 22/09/2008, Thomas Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd reckon that we all now agree that the tomcat jars can be included.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Assuming that they have not included the jars incorrectly.
> > >
> >
> > I will check
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 19:52 +0200, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> HI,
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hiram suggested to put the signatures into the source, which in turn is
> > also distributed from the repo.
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 10:08 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> How about we include the signatures in the source distros? That way
>
+1
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 00:36 -0400, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> This item has been out for discussion for a few weeks. Please
> indicate your preference for accepting VCL to the Incubator. Proposal
> is included below for posterity. We're looking for a few more
> mentors. If there is discu
We seem to have some way to check these through nameprotect.com. Once we
narrowed down to two or three candidates, we can check these there.
Ketero sounds a lot like Kitaro. :-)
Olio is nice (and short, which I like).
Ciao
Henning
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 02:44 -0700, Craig
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 10:29 +0200, Thomas Fischer wrote:
> @Henning: the thread is
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200809.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
Well, IMHO you simply erred on the servlet-api / jsp-api thing
(empire-db, as an AL 2.0 licensed project is obviously f
are Foundation
>
> Thomas investigated this and said it was not permitted to distribute those.
> This was the main reason why he rejected the release.
> Martijn agreed with that too.
>
> @Thomas: since Tomcat is distributing them, why can't we?
>
> Rainer
>
>
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 11:00 +0200, Rainer Döbele wrote:
> Does anyone know where to obtain distributable versions of the
> servlet-api.jar and jsp-api.jar from? The only implementations I know come
> from Sun Microsystems and are under CDDL License.
Tomcat is shipping implementations, so there
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 01:02 +1100, Brett Porter wrote:
[...]
> Currently, it has checking turned on by default, but that isn't going to be
> a reasonable setting for some releases to come until the signatures in the
> repository are cleaned up. At the moment I've populated unsigned artifacts
> wit
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 20:14 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 06:57 -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >> I voted +1, but I personally think the vote is kind of irrelevant.
> >
> >> Thus:
> >> I
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 10:31 +0200, Rainer Döbele wrote:
> Hi Henning,
>
> thanks for your vote.
> Here are a few answers to your comments:
>
> Testing is currently performed by running the two example applications
> provided with the distribution, which contain various tasks. Each of them is
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 13:19 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I still maintain that unless Maven makes swift strides to enforce signing,
> the ASF should ban the use of the Maven repository for all ASF projects, and
> go so far as to remove all of our artifacts.
sorry, but that is ridiculous. That
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 06:57 -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> I voted +1, but I personally think the vote is kind of irrelevant.
>
[...]
> Thus:
> If the central maven repository maintainers (Maven PMC) decide to put
> incubator artifacts into their repository without a click through "this is
>
Branch and experiment. FtpServer does not need to be one-dimensional.
You will probably not release this code to an unsuspecting public
anyway, will you? ;-)
Ciao
Henning
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 11:54 +0200, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Hi
>
> Within Apache FtpServer, a subp
md5sum and sha1sum (on linux) did not like the checksum files. Checksums
are ok, though.
gpg key is ok. rat looks good.
apache-empire-db builds for me. Can't say much more. Unit tests? Any
kind of code verification? Test suite? This is hopefully just "coming
soon", right? :-)
nitpick: build resu
Yes, they can. Every member of the empire-db svn group should be able to
change the incubator site files. Please try, if not, it is a bug.
Ciao
Henning
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 21:20 +, Thomas Fischer wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Rainer Dbele wrote:
>
> > ...
> > As f
-1
Here are my reasons:
- If incubator artifacts are distributed the same way as "regular"
artifacts, it removes one of the pain points for Incubator projects to
graduate. Personally, I feel this pain point is intended.
- It makes it too easy for other projects to depend on incubating
artifacts.
From my understanding, Tuscany could leverage Etch to offer a wire
format that can be consumed by a variety of different languages and
environments, not a contestant to it.
Ciao
Henning
Mike Edwards schrieb:
Folks,
Can I ask if anyone has compared Etch with Apache T
Call it "Edge". :-)
My concern is mainly "2". And you will get lots of Linux support
questions on your mailing list.
Ciao
Henning
James Dixson (jadixson) schrieb:
I have heard the name concern a couple of times now...
When we picked the name Etch about 18 months ag
+1
Doug Cutting schrieb:
Please vote on accepting Tashi into the Incubator.
Tashi's proposal is at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TashiProposal
Thanks!
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
Sounds interesting. +1
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 20:02 +0200, Roland Weber wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please vote on accepting project PicaGalley
> (originally proposed under the name of Caitrin)
> for incubation, with the Incubator PMC as the Sponsor.
>
> This vote runs until Sun 2008-08-10 24:00 GMT,
>
You adressed the two concerns that I have, too, thanks.
- The name. "Debian Etch" is a deeply engrained meme with the "Etch"
short cut.
- Office disussions. Projects where a large number of committers are
from the same organization and that also have this company being
invested in the project mig
10:42 -0400, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
>
> > My personal understanding here is, that Ahmed (and any other
> > contributor) contributed that code to a project that is already under
> > AL2. So there is no need to tr
Thanks Martijn.
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 10:15 +0200, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> I've added empire-db to the reporting schedule
> (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule)
>
> I took the liberty to add empire-db to the "March, June, September,
> December" schema, even though our last 3-mo
My personal understanding here is, that Ahmed (and any other
contributor) contributed that code to a project that is already under
AL2. So there is no need to track down the contributors and/or rewrite
code where the contributor can not be tracked down. The AL allows
relicensing under AL2 ( :-) ),
Thanks for pointing this out; in case of Click, this probably means that
all current contribution, which are already covered by Apache licenses
are fine. So, while it is nice to track down the original authors and
get ICLAs from them to explicitly assign the code to the ASF, it is
actually not real
d an ICLA from Phil Barne an early
> committer to the Click project.
>
> I will still try and obtain ICLA's from previous contributors.
>
> regards Malcolm Edgar
>
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
Hi,
this is the current status for the Click incubation:
- ICLAs for Malcolm, Bob and Naoki have been received. ICLA for Ahmed is
still missing. As soon as this shows up, I will request accounts for
Click
- Mentors need to prepare a status page for the click incubation, as
described at http://in
Ask Cayenne who worked that way for a long time.
Ciao
Henning
On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 11:19 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> > While it was incubating, Wicket did a few non-ASF releases on their
> > old project site, to minimize disruption for
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 19:22 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
>
> > XEN e.g. is GPLv2 licensed and you can not host any code at Apache that
> > needs to be linked with XEN.
>
> Now that raises an interesting question ... if we define our own
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 11:10 -0700, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
[...]
Hi Doug,
I noticed that you cut out the part about interfacing with
Apache-incompatible code. As this project will be surrounded on all
sides by non-Apache license able code, do you have a plan on
Hi,
a number of questions:
- Are the proposed committers, people "assigned to work on the project"
or are they genuinely interested in this software.
IAW, will they stick around or leave as soon as they are reassigned to
other projects or their grants run out?
The wording for the Yahoo! "slot"
And the results are in:
+1
Alan D. Cabrera (*)
Andrus Adamchik
Bertrand Delacretaz (*)
Davanum Srinivas (*)
Eelco Hillenius
Henning Schmiedehausen (*)
Jim Jagielski (*)
Les Hazlewood
Martijn Dashorst (*)
Niall Pemberton (*)
Niklas Gustavsson
Siegfried Goeschl
Ted Husted (*)
Will Glass-Husain
Malcolm, Bob can you give a short statement for that question? [I
understood that all proposed committers will be on the PPMC, right?]
Ciao
Henning
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 12:59 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I'm forced to vote -1 for the following section, the rest r
I obviously vote +1, too. :-)
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 13:14 +0200, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> This vote will run until Monday, July 21st, 2008.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Click for incubation
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
>
> -
Ciao
Henning
>
> -- Chris
>
> On Jul 15, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
>
> > Getting a Wiki is as simple as requesting either a MoinMoin or a
> > Confluence Wiki from infra. According to
> >
> >
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 17:06 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Yes, it would be nice if Maven was more secure, properly checked
> signatures, and properly delegated namespaces so that third-parties
> would be unable to add artifacts within other org's trees. None of
> those issues are specific to in
g and Manuel would go for the same scheme.
>
> Thanks and best regards,
>
> Rainer
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Henning Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2008 10:57
> An: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: R
Hi,
Current status:
- ICLAS for Rainer, Matthew and Manuel have been received
- Code grant has been received
Open items:
- CCLA for esteam has not yet been received (strictly speaking that is
optional but as Empire-DB has been developed largely inside esteam, it
would make me feel better to get
ux, Unix
91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache Java Software
Open Source Consulting, Development, Design|
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG Fuerth, HRB 7350
Gesellschaftssitz: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning Schmiedehausen
char name_buf[257];
Edgar
* Bob Schellink
* Naoki Takezoe
* Ahmed Mohombe
* Henning Schmiedehausen
* Will Glass-Husain
* Ted Husted
* Andrus Adamchik
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
* Henning Schmiedehausen
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Will Glass-Husain
* Ted Husted
* A
ent, Design|
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG Fuerth, HRB 7350
Gesellschaftssitz: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning Schmiedehausen
char name_buf[257]; /* max unix filename is 256, right? */
--
[ Whoops, once again with the right subject line to wake up people with
mail filters. :-) ]
And the results:
+1:
Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (*)
Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (*)
Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (*)
Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
And the results:
+1:
Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (*)
Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (*)
Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (*)
Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (*)
0:
none
-1:
none
(*) = Incubator P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12611369#action_12611369
]
Henning Schmiedehausen commented on INCUBATOR-78:
-
I thought e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12610872#action_12610872
]
Henning Schmiedehausen commented on INCUBATOR-78:
-
why not re-use ma
+1!
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 06:37 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> i'm currently working on some improvements to audit (yes i know - six
> months late). i'm plan to use texen to generate indexes for the audit
> pages. so, i finally got round to porting the sitemap code from the
> w.a.o site.
>
t; task I should say).
>
> Let me also sign up as a mentor. I may not be able to dedicate lots of
> time to that, but still I hope to be helpful every now and then.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> > Please see also http
Edgar
* Bob Schellink
* Naoki Takezoe
* Ahmed Mohombe
* Henning Schmiedehausen
* Will Glass-Husain
* Ted Husted
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
* Henning Schmiedehausen
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Will Glass-Husain
* Ted Husted
=== Sponsoring E
Oh, and obviously I vote +1. :-)
Ciao
Henning
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 22:32 +0200, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> This vote will run until Monday, July 7th, 2008.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Empire-DB for incubation
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for
cking ===
* Need a new Jira project called empire-db.
== 4. Identify the initial set of committers ==
* Rainer Döbele
* Matthew Bond
* Jörg Reiher
* Manuel Gamerdinger
* Henning Schmiedehausen
* Thomas Fischer
* Martijn Dashorst
== 5. Identify Apache sponsoring individual ==
We kindly re
committers ==
*Rainer Döbele
*Matthew Bond
*Jörg Reiher
*Manuel Gamerdinger
*Henning Schmiedehausen
*Thomas Fischer
*Martijn Dashorst
== 5. Identify Apache sponsoring individual ==
We kindly request the Apache Incubator PMC to be the sponsor for this
project.
=== Champion and Mentor
Thanks. I've added you to the mentors list.
Ciao
Henning
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 10:52 +0200, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> I'm willing to be a Mentor, but more from an IPMC pov. I'm not a DB buff :-)
>
> Martijn
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8
Hi,
the Empire DB project (proposal at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Empire-dbProposal) is looking for a few
more mentors to help with incubation. I'd very much appreciate if people
from the DB project would help here, as this is a database-related
topic. :-)
Best regards
Please be aware that rebuilding the jar means that it is no longer
signed and does not work as a security provider.
Ff you want to use the bouncycastle security provider and this
recompiled jar in the same application, you will get clashes. Class
Loader fun. The whole monty. :-)
The cleanest solu
+1 to incubation. Go JSPWiki!
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 13:16 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Are we ready to incubate?
>
> Seems as if we have:
>
> Dave Johnson
> Sam Ruby
> Henning Schmiedehausen
> Craig L Russell
>
> as Mentors.
>
> Given that the
Huh, am I late?
+1 (mentoring JSPWiki... ;-) )
Best regards
Henning
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 22:41 -0400, Dave wrote:
> The proposal was posted Aug. 29, we're up to 4 or 5 binding +1 votes
> now and no -1 vote have been cast.
>
> Binding:
> +1 Craig Russell
> +1 Noel Berg
ache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki
> >
> > Issue Tracking
> >
> > Current JSPWiki bug tracking is done at http://bugs.jspwiki.org/,
> > using Bugzilla 3.0. It would be good to be able to move the current
> > bug list to the Apache Bugzilla. The
+1
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 21:10 +0300, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As described in [1], please acknowledge this request to enter the
> Sling project into incubation. The Jackrabbit PMC has voted (see the
> vote request [2] and results [3]) to approve the Sling project (see
> the proposal [4])
|| no
> ||
>
>
> == Affiliations ==
>
> || '''Name''' || '''Affiliation''' ||
> || Charles M. Chen || - ||
> || Carsten Ziegeler || [http://www.day.com/
Is this a legal issue (you need clearance) or just a matter of "well,
there are a bazillion of wrong/strange/bad license headers with (C)'s
inside that we want to clean up first and need time"?
Best regards
Henning
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 14:28 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> O
Big +1. That kind of tool I would have needed a few months ago... :-)
Best regards
Henning
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 11:24 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Java Resource Simulator (JRS) Proposal
[...]
-
To un
it? A mentor must be a member or at least one mentor must be
a member?
Confused
Henning
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 13:57 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 April 2007 02:01, Henning
Manfred Geiler (manolito at apache
> dot org) and the three mentors are Martin van den Bemt (mvdb at apache
> dot org), Carsten Ziegeler (cziegeler at apache dot org), and Henning
> Schmiedehausen (henning at apache dot org).
>
> Please cast your votes.
>
> Thanks,
>
Gee, now here is a sensitive subject. :-)
IRC BTW is very flaky if you don't have good connection (as most people
at AC currently experience). Mail is much better for that because it is
not as volatile as IRC.
Aside from that I do agree with most things that wrowe wrote. I know of
at least o
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 22:41 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a
> vote. There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two
> weeks, so I'll assume that people are comfortable with this.
>
> So what say ye?
>
> [X] +1 Gr
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 05:41 -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> George - I'm bringing this issue to the incubator list. I've not
> been very actively involved in the Incubator, and I got an error
> trying to commit the new directory you request.
>
> $ svn add lucene.net/
> A lucene.net
> ~/d
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
