Yes, they can. Every member of the empire-db svn group should be able to
change the incubator site files. Please try, if not, it is a bug.
Ciao
Henning
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 21:20 +0000, Thomas Fischer wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Rainer Dbele wrote:
>
> > ...
> > As far as I understand it, there are two major problems with the
> > empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3 release:
> >
> > 1. the missing freemarker info in the NOTICE file (we'll add HSQLDB as well)
> >
> > 2. the inclusion of servlet-api.jar and jsp-api.jar.
>
> Plus the status page (about which you cannot do anything, but as I
> understand it, it is a requirement that it is up to date when a release is
> done). Maybe I can spare some time tomorrow evening to update it.
>
> > We can leave the servlet-api.jar and jsp-api.jar out of the distribution
> > but only for the price that it won't compile off the shelf, and this
> > will make it more difficult for beginners to run the sample. Does anyone
> > have a suggestion how to deal with that (given that we use maven only
> > for a forthcoming release)?
>
> I am no ant expert, but there seems to be a tool named ivy which can pull
> it from the maven replository.
>
> > Since all issues concern the empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3 distribution, does
> > this mean that the -1 is for this part only? And would you give a +1 for
> > the empire-db-2.0.3 release? (Just want to make sure, we're on the right
> > track).
>
> As soon as the status page is up to date, I'd give a +1 to the db 2.0.3
> release; if you think it makes sense to release it without the struts
> extension.
>
> > Since we built the 2.0.3 / 1.0.3 release we have made some improvemets
> > and bugfixes. I suggest skipping these releases and continuing with the
> > 2.0.4 and 1.0.4 release.
>
> Hm, the 2.0.3 release is not released yet. You can still call the new
> release 2.0.3. However, to avoid naming confusion, I'd suggest to call a
> release candidate e.g. RC1 in the future, and rename it when the voting is
> through (in the docs etc the "final" name can be used, but in the release
> file names the rc part should be in. So you can just rename the files and
> copy the tag once the voting is done.)
>
> But calling the new release candidate 1.0.4 and 2.0.4 is also fine with
> me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Thomas
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
