+1
Bernd
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 5:33 PM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Wayang (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5fc03ae014f44c7c31a509a6db4ac07faedb2e1c6245cd917b744826%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E)
> I would like to call a VOTE to a
+1
If three mentors for Wayang are not enough (I'm one of them), how much
would a incubating project need?
Bernd
On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 12:43 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Right now, there are 3 people signed up as mentors, however knowing that
> not always are all mentors available at
[X] +1 Accept Training into the Apache Incubator (binding)
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Terence Yim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is to call for a vote for release of Apache Twill
> v0.1.0-incubating. This will be the first incubator release for Apache
> Twill.
>
> Vote on twill-dev:
> http://s.apache.org/Rsy
>
> Result on vote on twill-dev:
> http://s.apa
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 17 January 2014 10:10, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>
>> (side note: When a project graduates, a PMC is established and tasked with
>> a specific task. Two PMCs cannot have the same task. Therefore, it is
>> better
Very informative explanation. I've got a better understanding of the
proposal now.
I suggest that a remark like this is added to the Hoya proposal, so this
part of the discussion becomes part of the vote on the proposal.The
proposal's "Known Risk" section lacks a "Relationships with Other Apache
P
I think that Andreas has a valid point.
With the description you are giving here, there seems to be much more
overlap with the Twill podling than I initially anticipated.
In the Hoya proposal, I'd like to learn about how it compares to Twill and
why it makes sense to start another such podling whi
Which languages are they? I would expect the english pronounciation would
be relevant, where Hyena (see http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hyena) is quite
different from Jena.
Bernd
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
+1
Bernd
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1 for Hyena.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 01/13/2014 03:33 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
>> On 9 January 2014 21:55, Enis Söztutar wrote:
>>
>> Proposal looks good. Let me know if you need any additional help in
>>> mentors
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greets,
>
> I read in the Tajo report and I see on the dev list that the Tajo
> developers
> are now diligently tackling IP clearance:
>
> http://s.apache.org/00w
>
> In my view, IP clearance is only the remain work for graduation.
+1
Bernd
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Arun
>
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> > The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
> > discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I wo
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Eric Yang wrote:
> Apache is a non-profit organization. If we restrict our thinking model to
> metrics of how many developers, and how many patches are committed in
> pre-defeined time limit. There is no software that is gong to succeed in
> this evaluation other
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:55 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I'd hope we can demonstrate finding consensus rather than using the vote to
> resolve this.
>
> I still think forced retirement doesn't seem the right thing in this case
> so my -1 stands. In the other thread Alan now seems open to giving them
>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>> As I mentioned in an earlier email, we did have this conversation seven
>> months ago. We came to a consensus to give it another try. We even added
>> a few committers a "bit
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Chukwa community has voted to retire the project.
>
> Following the retirement guide [1], I now call the Incubator PMC to vote on
> confirming this decision.
>
[X ] +1 Retire the Chukwa project
Bernd, after careful considera
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> At the bottom of the template for each podling's report, I'd like to have a
> space for each of the mentors, every month, to reaffirm his or her
> involvement in the podling. Thus, instead of (at most) one mentor signing
> off on the repo
great proposal and a very promising mentor lineup.
Have fun,
Bernd
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Abstract
>
> Drill is a distributed system for interactive analysis of large-scale
> datasets, inspired by Google’s Dremel (
> http://research.google.com/pubs/pub3
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Yes, though jars don't work as well for packaging... let's drop the
> other mailing lists (left on BCC to let them know they are being
> dropped ;-) ) and move to just jszip-...@googlegroups.com
>
> On 1 June 2012 15:24, LeClaire Garvin wr
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:34, Doug Meil wrote:
> re: "overlap"
>
> This is the "there are multiple webservers in ASF" counter-argument -
> except that ones that exist are in two different languages (Apache WS and
> Tomcat). The point I made in my email is that if a 3rd webserver showed
> up tha
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 18:22, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a vote.
[X] +1 Acce
I've signed up myself, too.
Bernd
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 03:10, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> I can help.
>
> Would you please add yourself to the proposal on the wiki?
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Benson
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 18:16, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2011 3:41 AM, "Bernd Fondermann"
> wrote:
>>...
>>
>> So, you are saying more than 10% of the non-generated code base (and you
> are
>> not counting lib-style uses/JARs here, right?) is derived
On Saturday, September 3, 2011, Adam P Fuchs wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> The latest stable release of Accumulo contains roughly 200,000 lines of
code, of which about 85,000 are machine generated thrift code. Of the
remaining code, about 15,000 lines are derived from other Apache projects,
and about 1,5
On Friday, September 2, 2011, Billie J Rinaldi
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I would like to propose Accumulo to be an Apache Incubator project.
Accumulo is a distributed key/value store that provides expressive
cell-level access labels and a server-side programming mechanism that can
modify key/value
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 19:58, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> When I was doing the initial trademark search for HMS, I found that
> there are a lot of projects (including software) named HMS. It also
> has the problem of being very bad to search for (42.7m hits on
> google).
>
> Before I go through and cr
I don't remember seeing this in the moderation queue, so maybe we need
to unsub someone if we see more posts like this.
Bernd
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 15:19, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> It's a version of the Nigerian scam, but claimed to be from Ivory Coast.
>
> -Original Message-
> Fr
Thanks.
However, the name HMS may be changed before the project will hit the website.
Bernd
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 14:33, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> hehe :)
> It was not the question how it works - it was a reminder to the HMS
> people to generate and commit the page :-)
> Sorry for being c
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 06:56, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> G'luck guys!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Aug 25, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>> This is a vote proposing that HMS be accepted as a project in the Apache
>> Incubator. HMS is monitoring,
t; We are preparing for realese work right now.
>> some mentors in ASF support our project and are willing to give us one
>> more month to do this work.
>> I think
>>
>>
>> 2011/7/19 Bertrand Delacretaz
>>
>>> (dropping bluesky-dev)
>>>
&
Hi everyone,
The vote to retire Bluesky succeeds with only +1 votes from
Martijn, Emmanuel, Bernd, Niklas, Tommaso, Bertrand, Chris, Ralph,
Christian, Noel, Luciano, Alan, Upayavira, Ross, Benson, Craig, Greg,
William (binding)
and Andreas Kuckartz, Kalle Korhonen, Henry Saputra (non-binding).
Ple
I don'tthink that a single mentor is nearly sufficient for this or any podling.
Taking the feedback above and below in this thread into account, there
seems few confidence if any that Bluesky will be able to become an
Apache project. I'll close the vote, which sees no other votes than
+1s ATM, on t
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:37, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> I believe projects from school could also rock in Apache as well. You can
>> look down up on us but you can't deny others.
>
> This is not the point.
>
> The point is, if you have contributors who have no apache id, they
>
> a) need to
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:49, berndf wrote:
> The vote is open at least until 2011-07-02 12:00 UTC.
I'll extend the voting period until 2011-07-05 so the project has some
time to find new mentors.
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
+1, sounds interesting. Good luck!
Bernd
On 28 Jun 2011 08:42, "Ashish" wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose Deft to be an Apache Incubator project. Deft
> > is a non-blocking, asynchronous, event driven high perf
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:49, berndf wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
>
> 3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
> becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and
> developers are changing frequently w
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:00, Donald Whytock wrote:
> What happens to a dormant podling? Are its files still accessible,
> and does its licensing still apply?
I'd guess that the files remain accessible. However...
Please use unreleased code, especially from the Incubator, with extreme care.
Nob
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 16:15, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> We can take that up with the community. They've certainly had their
> struggles, but seem to come back sporadically.
>
> --- Noel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sa3r...@gmail.com [mailto:sa3r...@gmail.com]On Behalf Of Sam Rub
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:33, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst
> wrote:
>> I was under the impression that *any* mentor is an IPMC member, has a
>> binding +1 vote for releases and could therefore approve of releases
>> without having to go through general@
>>
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:52, Dan Peterson wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
>
> The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
> (for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
>
> The earlier discussio
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:26, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Bernd Fondermann
> wrote:
>> PS: It would've been much better to first [DISCUSS] the proposal
>> before putting it up for vote.
>
> I don't see a [VOTE] her
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 01:35, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> Simple review: the original email was sent by Dan Peterson from his
>> google.com address. I imagine that if Google had a problem with it,
>> then he wouldn't be working there tomorrow :
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 22:34, Siegfried Goeschl
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> could you stop believing in a conspiracy taking place at the Apache Isis
> incubator project where a bunch of Isis member plus a few obscure
> mentors are trying to subvert the Apache Software Foundation by having a
> Skype se
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 15:02, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Bernd Fondermann
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:16, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>>> I am nothing if not chronically disingenuous.
>>>
>>> My first co
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:16, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I am nothing if not chronically disingenuous.
>
> My first concern in responding here is a process concern. As far as I
> can tell, the Incubator PMC has not formally voted to forbid the use
> of real-time communications in podlings. Absent
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 00:32, Christopher Brind wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been following gene...@incubator for a while and have a question.
>
> When there's a vote on ip-clearance why would one vote against it?
> Presumably one would only vote against it if someone knows some reason why
> the codeba
Hi Jerome,
Any reason why you didn't follow Incubator process as Bertrand suggested?
We'd be happy to get feedback to know where our documentation[1] is
unclear or lacking detail.
The mailing list archive is also full of best practices of successful
incubation requests.
Thanks,
Bernd
[1] http
No hurry.
Please, do us all favor and start a new thread for a vote, unless you
really don't want to receive any votes.
I can't find the proposal on the wiki either.
Many thanks,
Bernd
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 00:57, Matthew Sacks wrote:
> Changing subject to VOTE
>
> On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:29
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12904300#action_12904300
]
Bernd Fondermann commented on INCUBATOR-111:
oh-ke-y.
you didn't e
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:33, Urs Lerch wrote:
> Good point! I agree with you that three mentors would be perfect. Since
> I've seen other votes that have reported more volunteers as mentors, I
> had the hope that it happens here, too. I did already ask other persons
> for support, but didn't suc
as soon as you come up with 2 more mentors, you have my +1.
Bernd
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 18:09, Urs Lerch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "ALOIS" for incubation in
> the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below and on the
> proposal wiki page (http://w
Hi,
can someone with proper karma please add me to the Incubator group.
Thanks,
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Ok, let give this a second try:
I count the following +1:
Chris Mattmann, Alan Cabrera, Bill Rowe, Bernd Fondermann (all binding),
Owen O'Malley (in process of being added to Incubator PMC)
Greg Reddin, Jerome Boulon, Leif Hedstrom (non-binding).
There were no other explicit votes cast.
Ho
ult of the vote:
>
> Option 1) Ant Elder, Eric Yang, William A. Rowe Jr.
> Option 2) Ari Rabkin, Jerome Boulon, Chris Douglas, Greg Reddin
> Option 3) Bernd Fondermann
You seem to have missed a number of votes.
Could you please identify binding votes for a proper tally?
>
> Owen
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 21:21, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 6/23/2010 8:12 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder wrote:
>>
>>> IMHO we should insist on using the incubator naming for the Chukwa
>>> website/svn/MLs beca
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Bernd Fondermann
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 07:54, Eric Yang wrote:
>>> Besides DOAP file and the incubator nomenclature, I may need help identify
>>> the addition respons
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 07:54, Eric Yang wrote:
> Besides DOAP file and the incubator nomenclature, I may need help identify
> the addition responsibilities for Apache PMC. One problem, Chukwa community
> did not have a vote for PMC Chair because we are not sure what is the right
> process for th
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 09:42, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:09 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 6/21/2010 1:31 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>>
Chukwa has been around for a while now and from my (albeit l
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 23:37, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 6/21/2010 12:29 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
>> Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator.
>>
>> The proposal is posted at:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal
>
> +1
+1
Added myself as a me
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 19:29, Eric Yang wrote:
> Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator.
>
> The proposal is posted at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal
It's best practice to post the full proposal to the list, to have a
snapshot archived.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 16:49, Donald Whytock wrote:
> Okay, getting back into this. Offering to mentor? Have I your
> permission to add you to the proposal in that capacity?
Yep.
> I would not be averse to this project being attached to a bigger
> project. Did you have a particular one in mi
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 22:23, Donald Whytock wrote:
> Sorry to leave things on a sour note...had family in from college.
>
> Do we want to take this off-channel to discuss details?
Preferrably - no. Let's continue here.
Bernd
--
;s sandbox as an alternative to incubation.
Bernd
>
> Any other takers?
>
> Don
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Bernd Fondermann
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 00:06, Donald Whytock wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Bernd Fondermann
>>
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 00:06, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Bernd Fondermann
> wrote:
>> So, what are your short term goals with chatterbot? As you are on the
>> incubator list and put up a proposal, the goal should be to become an
>> Incubato
;d want to test against a local server, I recommend using Vysper
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/mina/sandbox/vysper/trunk/).
Bernd
>
> Don
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Bernd Fondermann
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> What about mentors? I cannot find any note you
Hi,
What about mentors? I cannot find any note you are actively searching
for them, but maybe I missed that.
As I think about volunteering to mentor, my question is: Against what
server did you test your own XMPP implementation? Does it really work
as it seems to be rudimentary to me. Why didn't
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 20:51, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>>
>> The initial code was based on Apache Nutch so all the IP were cleared
>> there. The modification that have been done by myself are all done as
>> ASF committer. There have been code adopted from Henri Yandell patch
Hi,
To bring some light into this, you might want to re-read a thread from
l...@labs.a.o from Aug 2008, starting here
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/labs-labs/200808.mbox/ajax/%3c1219838773.6347.33.ca...@thorsten-desktop%3e
taking off Sept 6th, here
http://mail-archives.apache.org/
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 21:08, ant elder wrote:
> It is quite huge. I haven't looked at every artifact but the ones i
> did all the licensing etc looked ok and it looks like they understand
> what they're doing. The copyright in some NOTICE files is "Copyright
> 2006, 2007" which could probably d
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:50, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> Traffic Server would like to resolve the TradeMark issues.
>> Who would be able to make this call?
>
> Does anyone else have an opinion? Please do offer it. :-)
There's a third option: Rename the project.
Has thi
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 18:48, Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
> Here's a query related to publishing api docs for Subversion project
> periodically.
>
> We tend to update the api docs generated using doxygen and java doc on
> a nightly basis. We are evaluating a workaround to publish it
> periodically. Bas
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:30, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I would like to specify some concerns about podling release procedure.
>
> As an experienced podling releaser guy from the OpenWebBeans podling , it
> takes too much days to release internal milestones of the project. I know
> that podli
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 17:53, ant elder wrote:
> For a while now on general@ we've had people come along during a
> poddling release votes and raise issues about things that aren't
> backed up by clear ASF policy or reasonably obvious consensus in
> behaviour of existing TLPs. Often poddlings just
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:24, Noah Slater wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:09:49AM +0200, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 07:55, Noah Slater wrote:
>> > Moreover, in order to provide a seed to grow and ground discussions on
>> > technical level
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 07:55, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I am thinking about making an incubation proposal for a project I've been
> wanting to do for a while now. I have list of initial committers and a
> technical
> architecture proposal, but no actual code yet.
>
> Moreover, in order to pro
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 13:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Yes, Wookie is a server-side Widget repository and runtime/state management
>> application that implements the Google Wave Gadget APIs; it has an API for
>> connecting to applications that manage participants and contexts, which can
>> in
w my request might be a bit unusual, but is somebody here
>>> preparing an idea for implementing the Google Wave Protocol? I might
>>> want to follow, if somebody does.
>>>
>>
>> You may ask Bernd Fondermann about that. He has started a project ca
2009/7/13 Noel J. Bergman :
>> +1 (binding) on the singular change of dropping Mladen Turk and Nick Kew
>> as Mentors since that makes it 5 mentors, which is problematic (3 seems
>> to be the max).
>
> Where does that idea come from? Mentors are Incubator PMC members. If more
> than three (3) wan
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 19:06, Craig L Russell wrote:
> With 10 +1 votes from incubator PMC members, and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote
> passes.
>
> The following +1 votes were received:
>
> Martin Dashorst (binding)
> Bertrand Delacretaz (binding)
> Craig L Russell (binding)
> Carsten Ziegeler (bind
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:30, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>
>> See:
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Approval+of+Pr
> oposal+by+Sponsor
>
> There is an uncorrected defect in that process document. It says, in part,
> that the sponsoring PMC must provide
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:28, Ian Boston wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received the
> necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There has been 1
> +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes. The vote on
> shindig-dev resul
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 21:53, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> "Apache Kleenex" because the Kleenex registration refers to a paper
> product, not a software product.
Gasp! Don't let the Kleenex folks hear that there product was not soft ware!
Bernd
--
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 22:58, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Bernd Fondermann <
> bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> What I don't get is why would anyone want to keep the name if there
>> are potential overlaps or troubles ahead?
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 21:46, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 12, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 21:24, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Gavin wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: tcu...@vafer.org [mailto:tcu...@vafer.org] On Behalf Of Torsten
>
>
>
>>> The incubator approach just doesn't work well for projects that have a
>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 16:18, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Garrett Rooney
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>> Gang,
>>> I think that the Graduation of these two projects have not been 'clean'.
>>> Both are still listed as Incubating P
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 15:10, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> The Pivot team would like to present the Pivot toolkit for incubation
> at the Apache Incubator.
>
> Please cast your votes;
>
[ X] +1 (binding), bring Pivot into Incubator
Bernd
---
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 01:34, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can the PMC ACK this result and we'll start the next step of the
>> process?
>
> No ACK needed, as it was the Incubator PMC itself who jus
+1
Bernd
On 2008-10-02, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 2, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>> Please vote on accepting Droids into incubation.
>
>
> +1
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:52, Hussain Fakhruddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a rough draft of a Proposal which I would want ASF to have a
> look.
> I am not sure if this is the correct email where I should be sending it.
> Please consider it.
Your MS Word document attache
d examples (projects) here at
the Incubator and on the other projects how that is supposed to work.
Decisions are made in a consent-driven manner, not by team leaders off-list.
Everyone has an equal say. No individual is entitled to make a final
decision unilaterally.
Bernd
> 2008/9
Hi Bluesky project,
Again, I have concerns regarding your svn commits. The recently
commited HTML and CSS code misses a license header.
Please improve the code as soon as possible, to avoid a veto.
Also, I don't remember that the report topics/todo lists contained in
that HTML have been discussed
Hi,
I am concerned about the recent commit from the BlueSky project,
recorded as revision 676177.
This bulk commit looks to me like GPLed code from a third party
project has been taken, being modified to obfuscate the origins of
this code and then being committed to svn without any prior IP
clear
Hi,
I just noticed that BlueSky did not report anything since being voted
into incubation in January and is not linked from the incubator
website.
There is activity, on-list and in svn.
I posted to their dev list to ping the people there.
So, I guess they'd need to report for the next three month
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
>> > "Every incubator release is also an Apache release"
>> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#rules
>
>> +1
>> every incubator release is an official apache release
On 11/1/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is Vysper using MINA?
Sure ;-)
> BTW Openfire team also uses MINA as their
> networking layer.
smart people, it seems :-)
> Please don't hesitate to contact the MINA team
> whenever you have something to say, ask or rant. :)
ok, I will subsc
On 10/30/07, Deepal jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Petar Tahchiev wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > today I was looking for a Jabber server implemented entirely in Java,
> > and the only results
> > that I got was this:
> >
> > ---(free)---
> > http://www.codecobra.com/chime/
> > http://www.open
On 10/30/07, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> today I was looking for a Jabber server implemented entirely in Java,
> and the only results
> that I got was this:
>
> ---(free)---
> http://www.codecobra.com/chime/
> http://www.open-im.net/
> http://www.tigase.org/
> http://ww
On 10/3/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm preparing http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RatProposal but i
> thought i'd get the most controvercial and difficult aspect out of the
> way: the name.
>
> i quite like the name RAT since it's a play on words a Release Audit
> Tool w
On 5/7/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 5/7/07, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, after hearing PDFBox mentioned many times last week, I thought it
> might be a good idea to ask around inside a wider area to see how the
> ASF is potentially interested in adoptin
Digest mailing list (un)subscribe link don't work
-
Key: INCUBATOR-51
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-51
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter:
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
