On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>wrote:
> Greets, > > I read in the Tajo report and I see on the dev list that the Tajo > developers > are now diligently tackling IP clearance: > > http://s.apache.org/00w > > In my view, IP clearance is only the remain work for graduation. > That was also my understanding, that IP clearance is important, and neccessary for successful incubation, but incubator releases are orthogonal and therefore carry a disclaimer being not fully vetted Apache releases because of IP and other open issues. Have I missed a change here to our policie? > However, the fact that this is only happening now represents a failure of > the > IPMC. Tajo made a release last month. That release should not have gotten > our go-ahead until IP clearance was completed[1]. > In the reference "[1]", what exactly are you referring to? > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tajo.html > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance > Thanks, Bernd
