+0 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating is in the name/version
- hash and checksum are good
- DISCLAIMER is present
- LICENSE (source distribution) is not fully correct imho:
- mvnw and mvnw.cmd should be mentioned in LICENSE as it's a copy
from Maven
- ExtendedWhitespaceThrowableProxyConve
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 6:27 PM Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The proposal is:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Iggy+Proposal
> And the discussion:
> https://lists.apac
Hi Jan
It seems there are different communities, so I understand the purpose.
Thanks for the details!
Regards
JB
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 10:53 AM Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 30. Jan 2025, at 09:43, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jan
> >
> &
Hi Jan
It sounds great !
I just have a very stupid question: there's no chance to gather
CouchDB/PouchDB in the same project ? It's not clear to me if CouchDB
and PouchDB have their own communities or it's a more "technical"
split.
If you need a mentor/champion, please let me know if I can help.
Hi Yonik
The proposal looks interesting and it's pretty clear.
Good luck with the proposal !
Regards
JB
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 9:22 PM Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> Hi Apache Incubator,
>
> We would like to propose a new project: Iggy.
> Iggy is a message streaming platform written in Rust, and is c
Hi
This is a good proposal. As part of the new reporting tool for
project, it's a security section is part of the report.
So, it makes sense to have it for podlings.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:35 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I didn't follow up on this when I raised it in
-1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating is in the name/version
- signature and hash are OK
- DISCLAIMER is there
However:
- docs copy code from jquery* under the MIT license. It should be
mentioned in the LICENSE (see
https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps)
- docs copy code fr
Hi,
It looks good to me. Thanks for proposing this !
Regards
JB
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 3:07 AM tison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a continued effort of the thread "Update project maturity
> model to include trademark and branding?"[1] early this year.
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/oc9j
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 4:18 AM Huajie Wang wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> We've got positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread for graduation [1],
> and would like to start an official VOTE thread now.
>
>
> Below are some facts and project highlights from the incubation phase
>
+0.8 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating is in the name/version
- DISCLAIMER-WIP is there
- NOTICE and LICENSE are OK (the LICENSE is OK for source
distribution, but I guess we should have another one for binary
distribution, especially about Hibernate)
- several files don't include ASF header (buil
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating is in the name
- checksum and signatures are OK
- LICENSE and NOTICE look good
- DISCLAIMER is present
- ASF header present in expected file
- No binary file found in source distribution
Regards
JB
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 5:18 PM VGalaxies wrote:
>
> Hello In
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 1:15 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> Following the discussion about Hunter started ten days ago
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ojr23ssmxmfsdbnojxg3q02xdl74t75j
> and its proposal
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HunterPr
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating is in the name/version
- hash and signature are correct
- DISCLAIMER is there
- NOTICE is there (maybe worth to consider grouping all license
notices in the main/root NOTICE file)
- LICENSE is there and look good, the licenses folder is a bit
confusing, maybe m
+1 (binding)
Casting my vote from dev mailing list.
Regards
JB
Le mar. 5 nov. 2024 à 08:42, Vinish Reddy a écrit :
> Hey everyone,
>
> This is a call for the vote to release Apache XTable (Incubating)
> for 0.2.0-incubating, rc2
>
> The Apache XTable (Incubating) community has voted and approv
Hi
There is a rebranding/change effort ongoing.
It should be fixed soon.
Regards
JB
Le mer. 16 oct. 2024 à 11:29, tison a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that Snowflake's documentation site contains several pages
> that still refer to Polaris as a Snowflake product [1].
>
> [1] https://other-docs
+1 (binding)
NB: I see two mentors on the proposal. Are you planning to add one ?
Regards
JB
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:10 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Following the discussion about CloudBerry
> (https://lists.apache.org/thread/1f8jwpjnn430bhsjq98qxlgjojpqrfdh),
> and after seein
Hi Roman
It looks interesting. I see you already listed the Cat X dependencies
which is great.
I just have one question (curiosity): are you planning to have all
"modules" in one repo or separate repos ? (bootcamp, gpbackup, ...)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 5:18 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote
; On Sep 24, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:33 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> >>
> >> Apache DataFusion is receiving a donation of sqlparser-rs [1],
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:33 PM Andy Grove wrote:
>
> Apache DataFusion is receiving a donation of sqlparser-rs [1], a SQL parser
> implemented in Rust.
>
> Please vote to approve this contribution.
>
> This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- name is correct (with incubating)
- signature and checksum are ok
- NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER files are present and look good
- ASF header is present in all file
- No unexpected binary file in the source distribution
Regards
JB
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 1:43 PM Zikuan An
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- signature and checksum are good
- incubating is in the name
- LICENSE and NOTICE look good
- ASF header is present in all files
- No unexpected binary file in the source distribution
Regards
JB
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 4:27 AM Robin Ren wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a c
+1 (binding)
(sorry I didn't have time to vote on Gravitino dev mailing list
before, so I vote here)
I checked:
- checksum and signature are OK
- incubating is in the name
- DISCLAIMER-WIP.txt is there
- NOTICE and LICENSE look good
- ASF header are present (rat is happy)
- no binary file found i
, Jinsong
Zhou, Huajie Wang, Alin Jerpelea
Thanks all for your vote!
I will proceed with the podling bootstrap.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 6:26 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Following the discussion about Polaris
> (https://lists.ap
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
Le ven. 2 août 2024 à 19:26, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> Following the discussion about Polaris
> (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ymz26dr3bzldbntdgpctbtkb787x311d),
> and after updating the proposal based on comments, I would like
Hi folks,
Following the discussion about Polaris
(https://lists.apache.org/thread/ymz26dr3bzldbntdgpctbtkb787x311d),
and after updating the proposal based on comments, I would like to
start the formal vote to accept Polaris into the ASF Incubator.
As reminder, this is the Polaris Proposal:
https:
rds,
> Justin
>
> > On 2 Aug 2024, at 3:33 am, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > Thanks for your message.
> >
> > I'm a bit confused now: it seems that we have a consensus that the
> > Polaris proposal is solid and correc
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your message.
I'm a bit confused now: it seems that we have a consensus that the
Polaris proposal is solid and correct (according to the number of
positive feedback in this discussion so far).
Justin expressed concerns, asking to update the proposal. As said, I
understand the
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- Checksums and signatures are good
- LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are there and look good
- ASF header is present in expected source files
- No binary files found in the source distribution
- Build from source distribution worked in java module with mvn clean
install comman
with Apache Iceberg, Apache Hadoop, Apache
> Spark, Apache Flink, and potentially Apache Hudi, Apache XTable, …"?
>
>
>
>
> 2. If Polaris is only a catalog for data lakes, why not directly provide a
> catalog wrapper and implementaion of Gravitino catalog in Gravitino proje
wrote:
>
> It is a super interesting project, I'm +1 on Polaris joining the Apache
> incubator. I'd be willing to offer guidance or be a mentor if needed.
>
> Best,
> Wangda Tan
>
> On 2024/07/30 17:33:57 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
&g
Thanks for your input Ryan ! Much appreciated.
We would love to have you as mentor ! Do you want me to update the proposal
wiki page or you do ?
Thanks again
Regards
JB
Le mer. 31 juil. 2024 à 22:28, Ryan Blue a
écrit :
> I'm glad to see this proposal because people have been talking about
>
Hi David,
I guess Justin meant "a lot of the proposed PPMC members".
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 6:11 PM David Jencks wrote:
>
> "a lot of the proposed PMCs”
>
> There are a lot of projects mentioned in this thread, and I think this is
> genuinely ambiguous. Do you mean PMCs or PMC memb
contributors on a project and initial committers to be accepted in the
> incubator?
>
> May be it can help new project and people who wants to make a proposal
> to have an idea if their proposition could be accepted or not.
>
> regards,
>
> François
>
> On 31/07/2024 14:07,
provide a great experience to
users, Nessie community decided to contribute Nessie features in
Polaris.
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 2:18 PM roryqi wrote:
>
> Just curious. What's the relationship between Nessie and Polaris?
>
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré 于2024年7月31日周三 20:09写道
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your email. Much appreciated!
I agree with the requirements to join the incubator, I share the same vision.
The codebase is there, public, under the Apache license. So, I think
we are good here :)
About the community, it's a small one, but present, vibrant, and eager
to gr
be updated to
> accommodate
> > > that. There could also be potential collaborations between Polaris and
> > > Gravitino to achieve the goal together, and I am personally pretty
> excited
> > > about that opportunity.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > J
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE look good (I saw PJ's comment, but I
think NOTICE is correct as it's ASF developed component)
- incubating is in the version
- no binary found in the source distribution
- checksms and signatures are OK
- ASF header is present in all expecte
t; > Iceberg", but the proposal changed into "a catalog for data lakes". Does it
> > mean Polaris's scope has been changed?
> > > - What's the difference between this project and Amoro:
> > https://github.com/apache/amoro? How do these two commun
unity building.
That's why I think it's a good starting list.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:19 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 30, 2024, at 11:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > That&#x
laborate?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024, at 04:19, Dave Fisher wrote:
> >> On Jul 30, 2024, at 11:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Dave,
> >>
> >> That's a good question. The main reason is because we wanted
; >> Hi JB,
> >>
> >> An interesting project that looks pretty mature.
> >>
> >> I’m curious about the split between Initial PPMC and initial Committer. In
> >> the usual case a new podling will have all of the Initial Committers on
> >
t; An interesting project that looks pretty mature.
> >
> > I’m curious about the split between Initial PPMC and initial Committer. In
> > the usual case a new podling will have all of the Initial Committers on the
> > PPMC. Can you tell us why this is not the case with P
ot the case with Polaris?
>
> Best,
> Dave
>
> > On Jul 30, 2024, at 10:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > We would like to propose a new project to the ASF incubator: Polaris.
> >
> > Polaris is a catalog for
Hi folks,
We would like to propose a new project to the ASF incubator: Polaris.
Polaris is a catalog for data lakes. It provides new levels of choice,
flexibility and control over data, with full enterprise security and
Apache Iceberg interoperability across a multitude of engines and
infrastruct
Hi everyone,
following the vote about retiring Liminal podling, I completed all tasks.
The Liminal podling is now retired, Liminal close down will be
notified for the next board report.
Regards
JB
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gene
Gentle reminder: we would need an additional binding vote here.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 7:43 PM Junchao Chen
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache ResilientDB(Incubating) version
> 1.10.0-RC3.
>
>
> The Apache ResilientDB community has voted on and
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- KEYS link should be fixed, the links in README should be fixed as well
- LICENSE should be checked (I took a first look, it's a good start
but we should improve it a little)
- signatures and checksums are OK
- incubating is in the version
- ASF header is present in most o
Hi folks,
This vote passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): PJ Fanning, Xuanwo, Ayush Saxena, Dave Fisher, JB Onofré, Tison
I will proceed with the retirement process.
Thanks all for your vote !
Regards
JB
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 2:48 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 2:48 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Based on the discussion/vote on the podling dev mailing list
> (https://lists.apache.org/thread/yo1xgqvwsl28ylsgmhjpz3obczhnhbll), I
> would like to call for a vote to ret
Hi folks,
Based on the discussion/vote on the podling dev mailing list
(https://lists.apache.org/thread/yo1xgqvwsl28ylsgmhjpz3obczhnhbll), I
would like to call for a vote to retire Apache Liminal podling.
The voting will last for at least one week to ensure that everyone has
time to express their
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 1:27 PM Duo Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi Incubator,
>
> Following the discussion about OzHera[1], I am starting this official
> vote for the OzHera project.
>
> Here is their proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/OzHeraProposal
>
+1 (binding)
Apache ID: jbonofre
I checked:
- Checksums and signatures are OK
- LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are correct
- ASF headers are present
- No binary found in the source distribution
- incubating is in the name
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:09 AM Zikuan An wrote:
>
> He
, Nicolò Boschi, likeho
I will create the resources (first updating podlings.xml).
Thanks all for your vote !
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:34 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Following the discussion about OpenServerless [1], I'm starting a vote
> to a
Hi folks,
Following the discussion about OpenServerless [1], I'm starting a vote
to accept OpenServerless into the ASF incubator.
The OpenServerless proposal is available here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/OpenServerlessProposal
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1, accept Ope
;>> www.nuvolaris.io [image: linkedin icon]
> >> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/nuvolaris-io> [image: youtube icon]
> >> >>> <http://bit.ly/nuvtube> [image: twitter icon]
> >> >>> <https://twitter.com/NuvolarisIo>
>
, Jiafeng Zhang, Shawn
Yang, Cheng Pan, Rui Fan, Kaijia Chen
Thanks all for your vote !
We will proceed with the podling bootstrap.
Regards
JB
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:31 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Following the discussion about Gravitino [1], I would like to
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:31 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Following the discussion about Gravitino [1], I would like to start
> the formal vote to accept Gravitino into the ASF Incubator.
>
> As reminder, this is the Gravitino
Sorry, the links have not been pasted correctly:
Here's the discussion:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/5bp5t0hgq2c419m62m2zt71jkv8bhhho
And the proposal:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/GravitinoProposal
Regards
JB
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:31 PM Jean-Baptiste O
Hi folks,
Following the discussion about Gravitino [1], I would like to start
the formal vote to accept Gravitino into the ASF Incubator.
As reminder, this is the Gravitino Proposal:
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1, accept Gravitino into the ASF Incubator
[ ] 0, I don't care either way
[ ] -1, d
Hi folks,
The discussion started 5 days ago. Thanks all for your interest and
feedback. I don't see a blocker so far to move forward to a vote.
I propose to wait one more day and then start a vote.
Regards
JB
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 7:08 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi fo
Hi Michele
I like the proposal, especially by the relationship with several other
Apache projects.
If you look for a champion, please let me know if I can help.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 9:50 PM Michele Sciabarra wrote:
>
> Hi Apache Incubator members,
>
> I would like to pro
;>>>> +1 looks promising and I believe this initial group and the mentors
> > >>>>>> :D
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>> tison.
> > >>>>>> 俊平堵 于2024年5月23日周四 22:53写道：
> > >>>&
Hi
I will check the release today. Sorry for the delay.
Regards
JB
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 10:20 AM Shuailing LI wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The Apache Answer 1.3.1-RC2 version has been waiting for voting for the
> fifth day, and there are currently no IPMC members voting. So, if any IPMC
> membe
Hi folks,
We would like to propose a new project to the ASF incubator: Gravitino.
Gravitino is a high-performance, geo-distributed, and federated
metadata lake designed to manage metadata seamlessly across diverse
data sources, vendors, and regions. Its primary goal is to provide
users with unifi
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 2:31 AM tison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
> proposals:
>
> 1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo
> to
> have a name without the incubator- prefix.
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating is in the name
- LICENSE and NOTICE look good
- DISCLAIMER is present
- ASF header is there
- No binary file found in source distribution
- Build worked on my machine
Thanks
Regards
JB
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 2:23 PM Zikuan An wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
>
+1 (binding)
It's an interesting podling. I see some "issues" to be fixed during
the incubation period (some dependencies use Cat-B/Cat-X licenses it
seems).
I think it's gonna be an interesting incubation period.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 7:24 AM Zhang Yonglun wrote:
>
> Hi Incubator,
Hi Justin,
I already send message to the podling I'm mentoring (I didn't have
reply from all so far).
I will do a new pass within the podlings.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 1:05 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are missing a large number of reports this month. Mentors, can y
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 9:33 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Following the discussion about the StormCrawler proposal [1], I am
> starting this official vote for the StormCrawler podling. Here is the
> proposal:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IN
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 11:44 AM Yu Li wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We've got positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread for graduation [1],
> and would like to start an official VOTE thread now.
>
> Below are some facts and project highlights from the incubation phase
> as well as
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in the name
- signature and checksum are good
- ASF header is present
- No unexpected binary files in the source distribution
- LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are there
NB: are we sure about SECURITY.md file ? Versions in this file look weird.
Regards
JB
On Tue
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 11:50 AM Yu Li wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We've got positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread for graduation [1],
> and would like to start an official VOTE thread now.
>
> Below are some facts and project highlights from the incubation phase
> as well as
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 2:44 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Following on from the discussion of the Amoro proposal [1][2], let's vote on
> having it join the Incubator.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, have it join the Incubator as an incubating project
> [ ] +
rience that feels as straightforward as traditional DBMS while keeping
> openness to various computing engines. At the same time, Amoro hopes to
> empower data product builders with a lightweight solution that integrates
> seamlessly into their modern data workflows.
>
>
>
&g
+1 (binding)
I don't see any blocker for graduation.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:01 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Apache SDAP joined Incubator in October 2017. In the time since, we've
> made significant progress towards maturing our community and our
> project and adopting
serve at the
> direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Pekko
> Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
> projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Pekko
> Project; and be it further
>
>
> RESOLVED, that the
Hi Justin
Even if it looks interesting, I'm not sure to understand exactly the
purpose of the proposal.
What lakehouse management system means exactly ? Is it an abstraction
layer on top of Iceberg, Paimon + query engine powered by Flink,
Spark, Trino ?
Please let me know if you want an addition
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- Checksums and signatures are OK
- incubating is in the name
- NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER exist
- No binary found in the source distribution
Regards
JB
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 4:11 AM LinkinStar wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache Answ
4 at 7:27 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> From my understanding, we don't need to add the ASF headers on the
> markdown or JSON files, as the license header comment could cause some
> trouble for other software to consume.
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> Twitter: willemjiang
> Weibo: 姜
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024, at 18:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > +0.8 (binding)
> >
> > I checked:
> > - hash and signature are OK
> > - incubating is in name
> > NB: some files doesn't contain
+0.8 (binding)
I checked:
- hash and signature are OK
- incubating is in name
NB: some files doesn't contain ASF headers whereas they can (for
instance few md files like README.md or DevelopmentManual.md).
NB: I found some binaries (png, svg, ... from the grafana dashboard)
in the source distribut
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- Hash and signatures are good
- incubating is in the version/name
- LICENSE and NOTICE look good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- ASF headers are present
- no binary file found in the source distribution
Regards
JB
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 4:11 AM Nicholas Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi IPMC,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- Hashes and signatures are good
- incubating is in the version
- LICENSE and NOTICE look good
- DISCLAIMER is present
- ASF headers are present
- No binary found in the source distribution
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 8:33 AM Xuanwo wrote:
>
> Hello Incubator PMC,
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 3:47 AM ShaoFeng Shi wrote:
>
> Hi Incubator,
>
> Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Gluten proposal[1],
> I am starting this official vote for the Gluten project.
>
> Here is their proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/G
Hi Andrew
We did a similar move while ago for Apache Karaf (from Apache
ServiceMix, then Felix, then TLP :)).
AFAIR, you propose a resolution to the board with approval from PMC,
proposing a new PMC/committer set.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:06 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> I apologize if
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 5:17 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Following the discussion in the incubator mailing list [1], I am starting
> this official vote for the XTable project.
>
> Here is the proposal -
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/I
> > >
> > > Regarding the name-changing process and your concerns about it, we're
> > > looking for advice based on past experiences. Specifically, we're
> > > considering whether it's better to change the project's name before
> > pus
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 12:57 PM Shawn Yang wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best regards,
> Chaokun Yang
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands,
[1], I was going to run
> the name search process for XTable after the project is accepted for
> incubation, but before we start to request resources.
>
> -Jesús
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html#startsearch
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 2:02 AM
our concerns about it, we're
> >> > looking for advice based on past experiences. Specifically, we're
> >> > considering whether it's better to change the project's name before
> >> pushing
> >> > the code to the ASF, or if it's more practica
y, OneTable supports widely adopted open-source table
>> > formats such as Apache Hudi, Apache Iceberg, and Delta Lake.
>> >
>> > Here is the proposal -
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/OneTable+Proposal
>> >
>> > I
the incubator with Hitesh Shah [hit...@apache.org], Stamatis
> Zampetakis [zabe...@apache.org], and Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [jbono...@apache.org].
>
> We are looking forward to your feedback!
>
> Thanks,
> Jesús
>
> [1] https://github.com/onetable-io/onetable
--
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 2:50 PM Sheng Wu wrote:
>
> Hi Incubator
>
> Following the discussion from <[DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Seata>[1],
> I am starting this official vote for the Seata project.
>
> Here is their proposal,
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/disp
Hi
It's a very interesting project and proposal.
As Seata is already an Open Source project for a while, why going to
an ASF project now ?
The idea is to grow the community and/or to have an open governance ?
Just curious :)
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 8:36 AM Sheng Wu wrote:
>
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- signatures and hashes
- license, notice and disclaimer
- asf header
Regards
JB
Le mer. 27 sept. 2023 à 12:48, PJ Fanning a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> This vote thread has been open for over a week and we are still short of
> votes. If any of the Pekko mentors or Incub
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- signatures and hashes ok
- asf headers
- license, notice and disclaimer are there
- no binary found in source distribution
Thanks
Regards
JB
Le mar. 3 oct. 2023 à 00:10, Bertil Chapuis a écrit :
> Hello Everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremap
+1 (binding)
Casting my vote here.
Regards
JB
Le mer. 4 oct. 2023 à 19:25, Damon Cortesi a écrit :
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> The Apache Livy has recently been working on reviving the Livy project and
> would like to call for a vote to release Apache Livy(Incubating) version
> 0.8.0-incu
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
Le mar. 3 oct. 2023 à 13:23, Atri Sharma a écrit :
> We want to propose ResilientDB as a new Apache Incubator project.
>
> ResilientDB[1] is a distributed blockchain framework that is written
> in C++ and integrates with Byzantine Fault-Tolerant (BFT) and Crash
> Fault-T
+1 (binding)
Good luck !
Regards
JB
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:17 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Answer [1] I would like to call a
> VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Answer is a question-and-answer (Q&A) platform software for teams at
> any scale to b
Hi,
It looks interesting at first glance. I will do a new pass on the
proposal (in more details).
Regards
JB
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 2:00 PM Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> We want to propose Answer as a new Apache Incubator project.
>
> Answer[1] is a question-and-answer (Q&A) platform software for t
1 - 100 of 774 matches
Mail list logo
