On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:44:59PM -0700, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> During regression tests if i want to disable some features like trampolines i
> can give -DNO_TRAMPOLINES
> as an compiler flag.
By default, -DNO_TRAMPOLINES is set in testsuite/lib/gcc.exp if the
DejaGnu target info
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:22:40PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to check for a non-0 return value in dg-compile testcases in
> gcc.
The compiler's exit status is only known within code from the DejaGnu
product, in proc default_target_compile in DejaGnu's target.exp. If
there w
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:08:01PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a novice question to dg-error. The testcase if for Fortran, but I
> hope to find more dejagnu experts here
I'm not an expert, but as testsuite maintainer I need to continue
learning more about DejaGnu/Tcl/expect.
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:40:01PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > But note this is with RTL checking enabled (--enable-checking=rtl).
>
> Can anyone refresh my memory: why is RTL checking disabled on the mainline?
Because it takes a LONG time.
Janis
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:55:05PM -0800, Ed S. Peschko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:14:00PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > So, again, Is gcc planning on automatically moving to gpl version 3,
> > > staying
> > > at gpl version 2, or having a protracted discussi
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 07:25:47PM +, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PR19978 reports that some overflow warnings are emitted multiple
> times. Like for example,
>
> test.c:6: warning: integer overflow in expression
> test.c:6: warning: integer overflow in expression
> test.c:6: warning:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:51:00PM +, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Dear Janis,
> I am having problems implementing your proposal.
> The following testcase should fail with current mainline for everydg-bogus.
> It actually passes perfectly :-(. I have tried removingthe dg-warning
> tests but
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 11:47:48PM +, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 05/12/06, Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On Mon, Dec 04,
> 2006 at 07:51:00PM +, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:> > The following
> testcase should fail with current mainline for everydg-
Checks for vector instruction support are spreading throughout the
testsuite. I'd like to pull the basic logic into a single place that
can be referenced wherever it's needed. What's there now isn't always
consistent and there might be new things we can do if the information
is presented in a con
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 01:19:03PM +0200, Dorit Nuzman wrote:
> Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/12/2006 03:12:44:
> >
> > I seem to recall from long ago that some processors support generating,
> > and possibly running, multiple kinds of vector inst
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:06:34PM +0100, Jan Eissfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PR19978 reports that some overflow warnings are emitted multiple times. Like
> for example,
>
> test.c:6: warning: integer overflow in expression
> test.c:6: warning: integer overflow in expression
> test.c:6: warning: integ
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 09:43:26PM +, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 21/12/06, Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:06:34PM +0100, Jan Eissfeld wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> PR19978 reports that some overflow warning
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:00:47AM +1100, Ben Elliston wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 09:56 +1100, Ben Elliston wrote:
>
> > After some digging, I managed to work out why: the gcov runtime code
> > wants to create the .gcda file in the same directory that the object
> > file was created on the bui
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:40:46AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> Both AMD and Intel like to have BID as a configure time option
> for DFP. Intel is planning to contribute a complete BID runtime
> library, which can be used by executables generate by gcc.
>
> As the first step, we'd like to contribute a
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 04:10:18PM -0500, Andrew J. Hutton wrote:
> We would like to invite everyone to read over the Call for Papers for
> the 2007 GCC Developers' Summit located at
> http://www.gccsummit.org/2007/cfp.php and to consider submitting a
> proposal for this year.
>
> This year we'
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:10:52AM +0100, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Sorry for this off-topic message, but I have some troubles registering on
> https://www.gccsummit.org/2007/login.php and my email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced.
>
> My own email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Do
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 09:13:14AM +0200, Revital1 Eres wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I get the following error while running
> make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="compat.exp"
> with mainline gcc version 4.3.0 20070312
> on PPC.
> ERROR: tcl error sourcing
> /home/eres/mve_mainline_zero_12_3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:28:22PM -0700, Kazu Hirata wrote:
> Hi Janis,
>
> While PR 28834 stays open, I'm thinking about XFAILing
> gcc.c-torture/execute/mayalias-2.c when it is run with -O3 -g.
> However, I am not having any luck with writing mayalias-2.x. I am
> wondering if you could help me
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:22:06PM -0700, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Revital1 Eres wrote:
> >ERROR: tcl error sourcing
> >/home/eres/mve_mainline_zero_12_3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/compat/compat.exp.
> >ERROR: couldn't open
> >"/home/eres/mve_xline_zero_12_3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/compat/abi/bitfield1_m
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:07:02PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:22:06PM -0700, Jim Wilson wrote:
> > Revital1 Eres wrote:
> > >ERROR: tcl error sourcing
> > >/home/eres/mve_mainline_zero_12_3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/compat/compat.exp
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:47:57AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> > Anyways the best way to fix this is just to fix the bug. Someone
>
> We should have 0 unexpected FAILs in 4.2.0 on common platforms (in
> particular the primary release criteria one
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:58:51AM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Joe Buck wrote:
> > If we allow XFAILing tests that ICE, it should be an extremely rare thing.
> > I worry that once the precedent is set, the number of XFAIL ICEs will
> > go up with time, making it more lik
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 09:07:32AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 3/18/07, Victor Kaplansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >I have obtained the same error on my ppc64 yellow dog linux:
>
> >collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]
> >
> >> I get the following error on PPC wh
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:36:07PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> * Very few people know how to use Janis' scripts, so to encourage
> people to use them, the release manager could write a wiki page with a
> HOWTO for these scripts (or ask someone to do it). Regression hunting
> should only be eas
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:58:13AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Janis Johnson wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:36:07PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> >> * Very few people know how to use Janis' scripts, so to encourage
> >> people to use them, the release
***
Warning: Your file, reghunt-20070417.tar.bz2, contains more than 32 files after
decompression and cannot be scanned.
***
Here's a set of my current regression hunt tools, along with a set of
example configuration files and test scripts and a README fil
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 10:09:35PM +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 12:00 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > I wonder whether there is a role for the gcc compile farm in this?
> > For instance perhaps "someone" could keep a set of builds there and
> > provide folks with a simple way t
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 04:39:23PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 14:44 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > At work we use -O3 since it gives 5% performance gain against -O2.
> > > profile-feedback has many flags and there is no overview of it in the
> > > doc IIRC. Who will use
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:14:04PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I would like to write a short program to test the
> command line parsing of gfortran. I know I can add
>
> ! {dg-do run}
>
> at the top of the program to have dejagnu execute the
> the a.out file. But, I want to execute "a.out 1 2 3
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:59:52PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:14:04PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > I would like to write a short program to test the
> > command line parsing of gfortran. I know I can add
> >
> > ! {dg-do run}
> >
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:23:56AM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 17:08 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > It seems the current dg infrastructure does not support scanning
> > tree-dumps dumped via -fdump-ipa-XXX because they are labeled
> > differently. I worked
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:45:17PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:14:12PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > > DejaGnu's definition of ${tool}_load has an optional argument for flags
> > > to pass to the test program, but none of the procedures
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 01:29:48PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
>
> >I also find it annoying that the dump files aren't cleaned up. Should
> >the dump files for failing tests be left, or would it be OK to remove
>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 11:41:13AM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 14:09 -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > Janis Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > I also find it annoying that the dump files aren't cleaned up. Should
> > > the dump files for faili
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 04:35:54PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:29:45AM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > Is command line processing relevant for embedded targets? (I have no
> > idea.) Tests that pass options to the test program could be skipped
&
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:52:25AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Per Bothner wrote:
>
> > So the immediate question is: how should the testcase be fixed?
>
> Specify a line number in the second dg-error to tell dejagnu what line to
> expect the error on.
>
> { dg-error "e
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:55:03PM -0600, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:
> Is there a reason why non-bootstrap build status reports are not
> archived? For example, for the many targets that are only used in cross
> configurations, it would be nice to see if they are working.
First off, let me apolo
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:02:53PM +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> > Starting around 2005-03-17, I haven't been able to compile
> > several SPEC tests with mainline. Has there been any change in
> > the pre-processor that might explain these err
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 01:07:09PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Sunday, March 27, 2005, at 11:58 AM, Per Bothner wrote:
> >Now I'm willing to fix those tests by adding -fno-show-column where
> >necessary
>
> Ick. I favor adding it unconditionally to compile lines over this.
> See -fmessage-le
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:20:46PM +0200, Björn Haase wrote:
>
> The reason why I have stopped posting the test results is that we are
> currently having 481 failures for the AVR target and the existing real bugs
> are completely hidden behind the huge number of failures due to issues like
> "t
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:23:39AM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Apr 15, 2005, at 1:19 AM, Ranjit Mathew wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> > I think "make bootstrap" does not make sense for
> >cross builds. We however seem to allow it but
> >fail in a weird way later on (as on mainline).
> >I think thi
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 02:36:38PM -0400, William Beebe wrote:
> I've bootstrap built GCC 4.0.0 on Fedora Core 3.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> Target: athlon-fedora-linux
What is the output of config.guess?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 01:05:29PM +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:45 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Some time ago, someone posted a patch which provided beginnings of a
> > general-purpose Ada test suite infrastructure (in addition to the
> > current ACATS tests, which ca
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 08:59:48AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
> >It also looks like this patch has been backported to 3.4 branch but not to
> >4.0 branch? Because 4.0 branch builds are still creating
> >libstdc++-abi.sum, while 3.4 branch builds no longer do, the ABI
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 12:16:54PM +1000, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I originally posted these messages to gcc-help, but had no reply, so I am
> re-posting links to them here.
>
> I think I have found a bug in g++ 4.0.0, but need help in reporting it.
> Maintainers like their bug repor
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:18:28PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> No, the instability in test names is a minor price to pay for having
> less custom Tcl cruft.
>
> You want to talk to Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, she's the
> testsuite maintainer these
Mainline bootstrap fails on powerpc64-linux with:
/home/gccbuild/gcc_mline_anoncvs/gcc/libjava/jni.cc: In function 'void*
_Jv_LookupJNIMethod(java::lang::Class*, _Jv_Utf8Const*, _Jv_Utf8Const*, int)':
/home/gccbuild/gcc_mline_anoncvs/gcc/libjava/jni.cc:2141: error: Statement
marked for throw, bu
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 05:39:08PM +0800, Fei, Fei wrote:
> Also I want to have some document about format of foo.gcda and for.gcno
> files.
See the comments in gcc/gcov-io.h.
Janis
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 08:29:21AM -0700, Devang Patel wrote:
>
> On Jun 9, 2005, at 8:24 AM, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>
> >So, the point is that you cannot select between compile-time/run-
> >time based
> >on a target triplet check, at least for this target. What do you
> >suggest?
> >All the oth
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:53:01PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> I'm trying to build 4.0.1 release on powerpc64-linux, but without success
> so far, since build fails with:
>
> I've configured it with:
> ../gcc-4.0.1/configure --prefix=$HOME/usr/local/gcc-4.0.1 --enable-shared
> --enable-thre
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:45:01AM -0700, girish vaitheeswaran wrote:
> > --- Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 20 July 2005 18:53, girish vaitheeswaran wrote:
> > > > I am seeing a 20% slowdown with feedback optimization.
> > > > Does anyone have any thoughts on th
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 10:41:48AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 07:26:22PM +0200, Fran?ois-Xavier Coudert wrote:
> >
> > PR 22619 and PR 22509 are two examples of recent 4.1 regressions that
> > showed up in gfortran, due to middle-end or optimization bugs (only
> > happen a
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:45:35PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2005 23:19, girish vaitheeswaran wrote:
> > Sorry I still did not follow. This is what I
> > understood. During Feedback optimization apart from
> > the -fprofile-generate, one needs to turn on
> > -fmove-lo
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 09:55:29PM +0200, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2005, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > | I'll echo the generalized request that we try and avoid tightenings
> > | on other than x.y.0 releases.
> >
> > I hear you. In this specific
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 09:41:54AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Please test, post test results to gcc-testresults, and send me an email
> pointing at the results.
OK for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00942.html
Janis
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 08:46:20AM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> >BJE has converted most of the client side scripts in the contrib
> >directory. I have to see what is left and conver the rest.
>
> I looked pretty carefully through every file in that directory. You shoul
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:43:35PM +0200, FX Coudert wrote:
> >is there anything I can provide you with to have a better guess? I'm
> >definately willing to debug if you direct me...
>
> Unfortunately, I think we need a dejagnu expert here, I have no idea how
> to debug these things...
>
> If no
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 01:16:58PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:43:35PM +0200, FX Coudert wrote:
> > >is there anything I can provide you with to have a better guess? I'm
> > >definately willing to debug if you direct me...
> >
>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:32:29AM -0700, Kean Johnston wrote:
> Is there a way to exclude specific line tests based on
> target switches? Something like dg-skip-if? Or perhaps
> thats the right think to use (but all the examples I
> have seen seem to skip the entire test case).
You're in luck! d
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:06:32PM -0700, Kean Johnston wrote:
> >You're in luck! dg-warning and similar directives can be skipped or
> >xfailed for particular targets, but those don't take options into
> >account. There is, however, an effective-target keyword for fpic.
> Ok I'll give that a whi
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 06:15:38PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> There already IS real documentation, and it's very good.
>
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
>
> Actually, I just went to that site and the latest printable (i.e., PDF)
> version I can find there is for version 1.1. Is that
***
Warning: Your file, reghunt.20051020.tar.bz2, contains more than 32 files after
decompression and cannot be scanned.
***
Here's my current regression hunt setup using Subversion in case anyone
would like to try it out. I plan to update contrib/reghunt
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 03:14:47PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Oct 21, 2005, at 3:11 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
> >The use of
> >
> >ncpu=`grep '^processor' /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l`
> >
> >seems Linux-specific; this looks like it should be in gcc-svn-env as a
> >default for the user to cus
The end of http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html#Top-Level
has a link to a separate manual that is supposed to explain how the
top level build works, including building target libraries. Here's the
corresponding text in sourcebuild.texi:
The build system in the top level directory
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 11:12:07AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> The Post-Mont-Tremblant WG14 mailing is now available from the WG14
> website. Particular points of note:
>
> * The current decimal FP draft is now N1150 (no longer N1107 which is the
> version mentioned in svn.html); I don't wh
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 12:24:56PM +0100, FX Coudert wrote:
> I added a test for the testsuite, conditionnal on a new effective
> target. Could someone OK this part?
How does the test in check_effective_target_static_libgfortran check for
use of static libgfortran? Shouldn't it pass -static or s
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:42:54PM -0800, Benj FitzPatrick wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm relatively new to linux as I have only been
> seriously using it for less than a year. However, I
> have been following certain projects for much longer
> (Transgaming.com, etc.) and was wondering if there was
> a way to
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:11:42PM +0100, FX Coudert wrote:
> 2005-11-02 Francois-Xavier Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> PR libfortran/22298
> * gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> (check_effective_target_static_libgfortran): New
> static_libgfortran effective target.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 11:56:16PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> "Michael N. Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> SEGFAULT is not a behaviour defined by the language. It is *just* one
> form of undefined behaviour. If you execute that function, it might
> reformat your harddrive and that woud
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 02:05:03PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Ben Elliston wrote:
>
> > 3. Merge in libcpp and C (only) front-end changes.
> >
> > 4. Merge in middle-end changes and internals documentation.
>
> What have you done in the way of command-line options to en
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:08:14AM +0900, 김성박 wrote:
> How can I register gcc build status for HP-UX 11i
>
> I successfully installed gcc3.4.4 & gcc 4.0.0 for hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
> but therer are no build status in http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/buildstat.html &
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/buildstat
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:27:41PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> > Some more info, the reason hpux only showed one XPASS in 3.4 seems to
> > be that the regexp isn't correct to match the assembler syntax.
> > Patches were installed on mainline but not in 3.4 for mmix and hpux:
> > http://gcc.g
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:33:20AM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > PS: I'm going to try applying the patch to 3.4 and see if it fixes
> > tinfo1.C.
>
> Meanwhile I'm running a regression hunt for the fix on mainline, which
> is currently looking between 2005-07-29
There have been complaints that the GCC community doesn't do a good job
of promoting itself, so in a presumptuous attempt to remedy that I'm
giving a talk at LinuxWorld Conference and Expo in Boston in April on
"Recent Developments in GCC". It doesn't require a paper, just a slide
presentation. I
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:56:13PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > OK. But what if I want sparc-sun-solaris2.* compiler, and later
> > want to compile some 64-bit app that links with GMP too (or the other
> > way around)? I should be able to have both libs on system where
> > multilib is supp
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 05:15:40PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >>So, how would I now get a cc1plus/f951/jc1/cc1 binary compiled by the
> >>stage0 (host) compiler?
>
> >make stage1-bubble STAGE1_LANGUAGES=c,c++,fortran,java
>
> Wow, that's awkward.
>
> >I think that
Currently on trunk, decimal float is configured by default for
powerpc*-*-linux*. The testsuite check to decide whether to run the
dfp tests checks whether sample code compiles, not whether it also
links and runs. The runtime support isn't yet in although Ben Elliston
submitted it quite a while a
On 05/04/2011 11:21 AM, Nenad Vukicevic wrote:
> It seems that I fixed my problem by defining remote_spawn
> procedure (and fixing the order of loading libraries :) ) in my
> own upc-dg.exp file and adding a line to it that append
> additional arguments to the command line: "append commandline
> $
On 05/04/2011 06:13 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>Currently the bootstrap with --enable-build-with-cxx is failing because of
> the following warnings treated as errors...
>
> /sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./prev-gcc/g++
> -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./pr
On 05/04/2011 07:03 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Janis Johnson
> wrote:
>
>> Fix those assignments to use "NULL" instead of "false".
>
> Hi Janis,
>
> is there a way your regression tester could automatically bu
On 06/03/2011 11:14 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> The PPH project has tests that compile two different ways, and
> then compare the assembly. If either of the compiles fails, the
> comparison will fail. We'd like to simply not run the comparison.
>
> We currently have:
>
> set have_errs [llength
On 06/08/2011 01:54 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 6/6/11, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> On 06/03/2011 11:14 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>>> The PPH project has tests that compile two different ways, and
>>> then compare the assembly. If either of the compiles fails, the
>
On 06/09/2011 01:30 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 6/9/11, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> On 06/08/2011 01:54 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>>> On 6/6/11, Janis Johnson wrote:
>>>> On 06/03/2011 11:14 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>>>>> The PPH project has tests th
On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 15:40 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:14 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Steve
> > Kargl wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 12:34:00PM -0400, NightStrike wrote:
> >>> I have been trying to run the gfortran testsuite for a whil
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:16 +0200, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 07/09/2009 12:32 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > Given that libstdc++ is used with compilers other than G++, is it
> > allowable to depend on non-standard C++ compiler support?
>
> Seems reasonable to me, but we may wa
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 00:06 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Often I want to test the exactly same testcase in C and C++, so I find
> myself adding duplicate tests under gcc.dg/ and g++.dg/. Would it be
> possible to have a shared testsuite dir that is run for both C and C++
> languages? (possib
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 15:48 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Janis, it would be extremely useful to have dg-options that are only
> enabled for certain languages, so I can do
>
> /* { dg-options "-std=c99" { dg-require-effective-target c } } */
> /* { dg-options "" { dg-require-effective-target
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 14:52 +0300, Revital1 Eres wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I get the following error while compiling gcc -r150679 on ppc
I get the same failure for powerpc64-linux. It starts with r150641
from Benjamin Kosnik.
Janis
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:09 -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> > I get the same failure for powerpc64-linux. It starts with r150641
> > from Benjamin Kosnik.
>
> Should be fixed in r150707
It fails in the same way.
Janis
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 18:06 -0400, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> mpc-0.7 now has been released, you can get the package here:
> http://www.multiprecision.org/index.php?prog=mpc&page=download
>
> Here's the official announcement:
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/mpc-discuss/2009-Septembe
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 21:48 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Amker.Cheng" writes:
>
> > Recently I found two relative old papers about non-blocking cache,
> > etc. which are :
> >
> > 1) Reducing memory latency via non-blocking and prefetching
> > caches. BY Tien-Fu Chen and Jean-Lo
I've been implementing ISO/IEC TR 24733, "an extension for the
programming language C++ to support decimal floating-point arithmetic",
in GCC. It might be ready as an experimental feature for 4.5, but I
would particularly like to get in the compiler changes that are needed
for it.
Most of the sup
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 10:29 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > I've been implementing ISO/IEC TR 24733, "an extension for the
> > programming language C++ to support decimal floating-point arithmetic",
> &
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 16:27 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 10:29 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> >> > I've been
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 14:21 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/23/2009 02:11 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > The class types for std::decimal::decimal32 and friends do have the
> > proper modes. I suppose I could special-case aggregates of those modes
> > but the p
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 18:39 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 16:27 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2009-09-23 at
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 13:37 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 01:20 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > I've been trying to find a place in the C++ front end where I can
> > replace all references to the class type to the scalar types, but
> > haven't
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:04 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Janis,
>We are seeing failures of the new decimal testcases on
> x86_64-apple-darwin10
> which you committed into the libstdc++-v3 testsuite...
>
> FAIL: decimal/binary-arith.cc (test for excess errors)
> WARNING: decimal/binary-arith.c
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:10 -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:04 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > Janis,
> >We are seeing failures of the new decimal testcases on
> > x86_64-apple-darwin10
> > which you committed into the libstdc++-v3 testsuit
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 18:19 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:44:42AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:10 -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:04 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > > > Janis,
> >
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
