On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 04:35:54PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:29:45AM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote: > > Is command line processing relevant for embedded targets? (I have no > > idea.) Tests that pass options to the test program could be skipped > > for embedded targets and for other kinds of testing where it isn't > > reliable. The dg-program-options directive could warn when it's used > > in an environment for which it's not supported. > > Sounds good to me, at least in theory.
Any ideas on how the testsuite can decide for which targets it supports command line arguments? Would it be reasonable to support them if the target is not remote? Janis
