GCC for C6x DSPs

2025-02-17 Thread Dan via Gcc
Hello! I'm trying to compile for Texas Instruments (TI) C6000 Digital Signal Processor (DSP) using GCC. I'm aware that TI has its own compiler, but I want to use GCC. The documentation indicates that GCC has *some* support for C6x DSPs, as shown in this link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C6

Modifying GCC source code

2024-04-04 Thread Dan via Gcc
Hello! I am trying to slightly modify the source code of GCC to display some messages when the compiler is executed in the terminal. For example, when 'gcc source.c' is executed, I want a print message saying "Building with GCC..." and if the build is successful, "Build Successful!" should be disp

Re: Renaming gcc from source code

2024-03-13 Thread Dan via Gcc
Thanks a lot! I'll look into it. On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 2:59 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 09:46, Dan via Gcc wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I'm new to open source development and am exploring the domain. I am > trying > &g

Renaming gcc from source code

2024-03-13 Thread Dan via Gcc
Hello! I'm new to open source development and am exploring the domain. I am trying to learn the internals of gcc and the first project that I've chosen for myself is to rename gcc to 'myCompiler' from the source and build it so that gcc is renamed in the system, and commands such as *myCompiler --

Re: [[gcc_struct]] potential clang compatibility concerns

2024-01-13 Thread Dan Klishch via Gcc
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 4:50 PM Dan Klishch wrote: > > Hi, > > In the discussion of LLVM's PR adding `[[gnu::gcc_struct]]` support to Clang > (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71148), maintainers asked > me to make sure that whatever > is done there, makes

Re: Proposal: allow to extend C++ template argument deduction via plugins

2022-07-15 Thread Dan Klishch via Gcc
Haskell (I only briefly read project description) <https://github.com/dylex/postgresql-typed>. Thanks, Dan Klishch On 7/15/2022 4:18 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 18:46:47 +0200, Dan Klishch via Gcc wrote: As far as I understand the currently available plugin extension points,

Proposal: allow to extend C++ template argument deduction via plugins

2022-07-14 Thread Dan Klishch via Gcc
welcomed? Thanks, Dan Klishch

http://www.netgull.com mirror broken

2019-12-04 Thread Dan Allen
http://www.netgull.com has gcc snapshots and releases, but in the past few weeks only the diffs are there - none of the actual source tarballs are present. I am not sure how to get this message through to netball, but I figured you had a better chance than I. Thanks for GCC! Dan Allen Idaho

Re: Mirror out of date

2016-08-06 Thread Dan Derebenskiy
; > And looking at ftp://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/gcc/snapshots/ it > appears the mirroring stopped end of February/beginning of March. > > Dan, can you please advise? > > Gerald

Re: IF conversion bug with CC0

2016-04-04 Thread Dan
Got it! That even answers my second round of questions. Thank you! Dan On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 01:24 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > I took a quick look at Visium, and noticed arithmetic instructions in > > the .md file doing a lot of clobbering of the condition codes register. >

Re: IF conversion bug with CC0

2016-04-04 Thread Dan
ce it prevents the arithmetic instructions from being able to set the CC register and have that value be used. Am I reading this right? Is this an oversight, an initial pass at something more complicated, or the "right" way to do things? Thanks, Dan P.S. My apologies if this is a secon

Re: IF conversion bug with CC0

2016-04-04 Thread Dan
or a target ISA difference? Thanks, Dan On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 14:42 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 04/04/2016 02:19 PM, Dan wrote: > > Greetings! > > > > GCC is usually so perfect, that I hate to write, but ... I think I'm > > chasing down quite the bug in it and

IF conversion bug with CC0

2016-04-04 Thread Dan
s a bug in GCC? Thanks! Dan

Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH forRe: Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list

2015-09-09 Thread Dan Derebenskiy
But we will keep the USA mirror up indefinitely. On 9/9/15 10:00 AM, Dan Derebenskiy wrote: Hi Gerald, It definitely was not. If it was, then we wouldn't keep the servers up for a year+ (for some other mirrors, 2+ years)We just discontinued our mirrors project a week or two ago

Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH forRe: Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list

2015-09-09 Thread Dan Derebenskiy
ru.go-parts.com/gcc - bad rsync://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc - bad http://mirrors-uk.go-parts.com/gcc/ - Online Shop ftp://mirrors-uk.go-parts.com/gcc - bad rsync://mirrors-uk.go-parts.com/gcc - bad Yes. Immediately done with the patch below. Dan, heads up. I hope this was not the plan fro

Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH for RE: wrong mirror on GCC mirror sites page

2015-04-07 Thread Dan Derebenskiy
.com is broken, so I removed it per the patch below. Dan? Gerald Index: mirrors.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/mirrors.html,v retrieving revision 1.228 diff -u -r1.228 mirrors.html --- mirrors.html8 Feb

Re: PLEASE RE-ADD MIRRORS (small correction)

2014-07-15 Thread Dan D.
Hi Gerald. Are you still interested in the mirrors? Thanks, Dan & Go-Parts -Original Message- From: Gerald Pfeifer Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 11:52 AM To: Dan D. Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: PLEASE RE-ADD MIRRORS (small correction) Hi Dan, I see there is a later mail

Re: [PATCH] tell gcc optimizer to never introduce new data races

2014-06-16 Thread Dan Carpenter
Error 1 make[1]: *** [scripts/mod] Error 2 make: *** [scripts] Error 2 $ regards, dan carpenter

PLEASE RE-ADD MIRRORS (small correction)

2014-03-14 Thread Dan D .
parts.com/gcc > ftp://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc > rsync://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc > > > Thanks, > Dan

PLEASE RE-ADD MIRRORS

2014-03-14 Thread Dan D .
ftp://mirrors-au.go-parts.com/gcc rsync://mirrors-au.go-parts.com/gcc (Russia) http://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc ftp://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc rsync://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc Thanks, Dan

Re: gnu software bugs

2013-11-02 Thread Dan Kegel
Please don't crosspost. It would probably also help if you posted just one bug per message, and included the commandline, source, and error message for your smallest test case inline, and used a more descriptive subject line. On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Mischa Baars wrote: > Hi, > > I found

Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing

2013-08-28 Thread Dan Kegel
sion of Java/python. For them, one really wants a buildbot/jenkins/whatever build node written in C/C++, since those are the languages most likely to be universally available on such machines. - Dan

Query about DWARF output for recursively nested inlined subroutines

2012-03-02 Thread Dan Towner
pply a test case (for the picochip port) if necessary, but I just wanted to get an idea of whether this really is a problem, or I'm just misinterpreting what is going on. thanks, dan.

What does multiple DW_OP_piece mean in DWARF?

2011-10-31 Thread Dan Towner
am working on a symbolic debugger for the Picochip platform, and need to understand why this sequence is emitted, and what the debugger should do with it. I can supply test cases if necessary, but hopefully someone may know if this sequence is intentional or not. thanks, dan. [1] Using `gcc

re: Should build-sysroot be considered for setting inhibit_libc?

2007-10-12 Thread Dan Kegel
# Building the bootstrap gcc requires either setting inhibit_libc, or # having a copy of stdio_lim.h... see # http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-11/msg00045.html cp bits/stdio_lim.h $HEADERDIR/bits/stdio_lim.h If it'd be cleaner to let the caller directly force inhibit_libc, please do. - Dan

re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x

2007-04-01 Thread Dan Kegel
rwise it'll be hard to get your codebase to a clean enough state for an orderly switchover. http://kegel.com/gcc/gcc4.html has some tips for people dealing with the many syntax errors. I wouldn't recommend moving to gcc-3.x, really. It turns out not to save too much effort in the end... - Da

Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?

2007-03-20 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
"Doug Gregor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 3/20/07, Kaveh R. GHAZI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would you please consider testing the 16 bit tree code as you did for 8 vs > > 9 bits? Perhaps you could also measure memory usage for all three > > solutions? > > I've measured the

re: ggdb3 information lost using temporary preprocessed file

2006-12-11 Thread Dan Kegel
You might want to file a bug at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ for this.

copies of restrict-qualified pointers (PR 29145)

2006-11-02 Thread Dan Gohman
cally allows restrict-qualified pointers to be copied in specific ways. More information and a small test case is available in PR 29145. One way to fix this would be to test that both pointers are restrict qualified, instead of just at least one. Thanks, Dan -- Dan Gohman, Cray Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

gcc-4.3 projects page?

2006-07-26 Thread Dan Kegel
Is it time to create a GCC_4.3_Projects page like http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.2_Projects ? I imagine several projects are already in progress, but not yet mentioned on the wiki... - Dan

Re: Getting to the GCC Summit web page

2006-06-23 Thread Dan Kegel
Thanks! I put an updated page up at http://kegel.com/gcc/summit2006.html I won't be attending myself this year (I needed a break from travel), but if anyone's blogging the event, please let me know and I'll link to their blog from my page. - Dan On 6/23/06, Andrey Bele

re: GCC 4.0.1 compilation errors

2006-05-06 Thread Dan Kegel
++ standard compliant; the new gcc is stricter. I maintain a collection of links about this at http://kegel.com/gcc/gcc4.html including an excellent pair of documents from someone who built all of Debian with gcc-4.1. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

Re: Summer of Code: proposal to participate with Partial Transitions

2006-04-29 Thread Dan Kegel
On 4/29/06, Eder L. Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might want to start by picking just one of the "Partial Transitions" > tasks and trying to work on it, even before submitting a proposal; that > will help you write a better proposal... Its a good idea Dan. :

re: Summer of Code: proposal to participate with Partial Transitions

2006-04-28 Thread Dan Kegel
start by picking just one of the "Partial Transitions" tasks and trying to work on it, even before submitting a proposal; that will help you write a better proposal... - Dan

re: Toolchain relocation

2006-04-16 Thread Dan Kegel
sembly may be required. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

re: Any resolution to the C++ symbol conflict problems?

2006-04-14 Thread Dan Kegel
bstdc++-v7 and non-COW strings and all that stl-ABI-changing goodness that makes my favorite app run several percent faster)? - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X

2006-03-13 Thread Dan Kegel
Is there a bugzilla entry describing the bug Richard is fixing? If not, it'd be nice to have, if for no other reason than it would show up naturally when people look for bugs fixed in gcc-4.1.1. I can create one, but it'd be better if someone actually involved in the action did. - Da

re: gcc-4.0.3 released

2006-03-11 Thread Dan Kegel
4.0.3 release. ... This was done for the previous two releases, and it's a nice touch. Can someone make the change? Thanks, Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

Re: GCC 4.1.0 Released

2006-03-01 Thread Dan Kegel
to do with warnings from tar, which are neither > errors nor silent failures. I believe a file either got skipped or > unpacked with the wrong name. Egads. Can you point me to more info? I've been building with older versions of tar without any problem beyond the warnings. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

re: GCC 4.1.0 Released

2006-03-01 Thread Dan Kegel
ently create spurious files named 'pax_global_header'. These are artifacts reflecting the fact that the tarballs were created with git. Or something like that. Or is tar-1.14 really required? That would be highly annoying. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

Request to become moderator of crossgcc mailing list

2006-02-26 Thread Dan Kegel
days, and I'm willing. Any chance I could become a moderator of the crossgcc list? Thanks, Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

Re: Disabling pch checking?

2006-02-24 Thread Dan Kegel
On 2/24/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 24, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: > > That's painful to set up, though (it requires changing the > > application's source to be effective, doesn't it?) > > No. After reading http://gcc.gn

Re: Disabling pch checking?

2006-02-24 Thread Dan Kegel
On 2/24/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 23, 2006, at 9:05 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: > > it seems to be slow at preprocessing C++ source. > > This matters quite a bit when running distcc. > > One way to mitigate this would be to use a precompiled header,

Disabling pch checking?

2006-02-23 Thread Dan Kegel
'd be nice to be able to disable the stat for the pch (since we know we aren't using pch at all). Is there an option to do that? I couldn't see one in a quick scan. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

Re: Upated memory hog patch for make

2006-02-20 Thread Dan Kegel
; Please find the first release candidate for GNU make 3.81, 3.81rc1, > available now for download from ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/make: > > c907a044ebe7dff19f56f8dbb829cd3f > ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/make/make-3.81rc1.tar.bz2 - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

re: Patch policy for branches

2006-02-19 Thread Dan Kegel
Some projects have a time-based release strategy (e.g. "we release once every six months"). Would it make sense for gcc to do that for all maintenance releases? e.g. leave the current process the same for .0 versions, which users are scared of anyway, but coordinate all other releases to occur on

Re: conversion warnings in c++

2006-01-13 Thread Dan Kegel
Hi Eric! I agree, moving warnings on benign conversions to -Wconversion would help groups porting large codebases from earlier versions of gcc. As long as you're in that area, got any opinion on http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9072 ? -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

Objective-C exceptions on the GNU runtime?

2005-12-29 Thread Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen
kporting the patch to the 4.0 branch? -- - Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen

re: An odd behavior of dynamic_cast

2005-12-20 Thread Dan Kegel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [ Why doesn't dynamic_cast work when I dlopen a shared library? ] I think the right place for this question might have been gcc-help (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/). Nevertheless, I think http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#dso should answer your question. - Dan --

re: Performance comparison of gcc releases

2005-12-16 Thread Dan Kegel
ive me any tips? Finally, it's helpful when replying to the list about filing a PR to include the PR number or a link to the PR. The shortest link is just gcc.gnu.org/PR%d, e.g. http://gcc.gnu.org/PR25449 - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

re: M16C development using GCC, Is It Possible?

2005-10-26 Thread Dan Kegel
> i am currently working on a project of building M16C programs. i have an IRA > M16C/I8C C/C++ compiler on hand, but it is for Windows and i just can not live > w/o my Linux box. Could you perhaps run the compiler under Wine?

pushl vs movl + movl on x86

2005-08-23 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
For this code (from PR23525): extern int waiting_for_initial_map; extern int cp_pipe[2]; extern int pc_pipe[2]; extern int close (int __fd); void first_map_occurred(void) { close(cp_pipe[0]); close(pc_pipe[1]); waiting_for_initial_map = 0; } gcc -march=i686 -O2 generates:

missed-optimization issue count

2005-08-17 Thread Dan Kegel
For fun, I counted the number of open missed-optimization issues: all versions: 423 gcc-3.4.x: 55 gcc-4.0.x: 170 gcc-4.1-x: 93 It looks like many of them, even those filed four years ago, are getting some recent attention, which is encouraging. Thanks to everyone pushing these along. - Dan

re: C++ vs. pthread_cancel

2005-08-15 Thread Dan Kegel
problem? I looked around, and all I could find was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111548 I suppose the controversial part is that you're using pthread_cancel, which is somewhat frowned upon as inherently unsafe. - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://k

re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test

2005-08-08 Thread Dan Kegel
g similar, but not for ICEs. I wish I understood your proposal better. - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

ICE hunting in gcc-4.1

2005-08-03 Thread Dan Kegel
Geez, 'delta' from http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~dsw really does seem to make it easy to track down near-minimal testcases for ICEs. It's tempting to continually beat the crap out of gcc-4.1 snapshots by compiling all the sources I can find, then for each ICE that occurs, using delta to find a mini

Re: Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug

2005-08-03 Thread Dan Kegel
"Paul C. Leopardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I seem to be left with a large ( >2.5MB ) preprocessed source file. Should > I try to report the bug using this large file as a test case? Sure. But you might want to try using an automated tool to reduce the test case first. There's one called

Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ...

2005-08-01 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
michael meeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi there, > > I've been doing a little thinking about how to improve OO.o startup > performance recently; and - well, relocation processing happens to be > the single, biggest thing that most tools flag. Have you tried eliminating all the

gcc-4.1-20050702: ICE in write_template_arg_literal, at cp/mangle.c:2228

2005-07-14 Thread Dan Kegel
I'll submit a bug (unless someone tells me not to bother). - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

gcc-4.1-20050702: ICE

2005-07-13 Thread Dan Kegel
to bother). - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

gcc-4.1-20050702: ICE in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:12618

2005-07-13 Thread Dan Kegel
still happens with the next snapshot, I'll submit a bug (unless someone tells me not to bother). - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

Re: libstdc++ required binutils version [was: Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures]

2005-07-12 Thread Dan Kegel
27;d assume yes, based on Benjamin's statement here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-06/msg00132.html Does 2.16 satisfy the minimum requirement? This should be clearly spelled out in the doc. 2.15.90.0.1.1 is linux-only. - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http

Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" while compiling Linux kernel

2005-07-11 Thread Dan Kegel
Richard Henderson wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:52:22AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: No, this code is protected by various system checks. We want -mcpu=ev5 such that the kernel as a whole will run everywhere, but we require these specific instructions on specific ev56/ev6 systems for i/o

Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" while compiling Linux kernel

2005-07-11 Thread Dan Kegel
bstituting a macro. (Or are there no pure ev5 machines in the world?) - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" while compiling Linux kernel

2005-07-11 Thread Dan Kegel
tructions. # The same is true for IRONGATE, POLARIS, PYXIS. # BWX is most important, but we don't really want any emulation ever. CFLAGS += $(cflags-y) -Wa,-mev6 I'll punt this to the alpha linux kernel folks. Thanks for the help! - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

gcc-4.1-20050709: ICE in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:445 (was: Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: ICE in loop_givs_rescan, at loop.c:5517)

2005-07-10 Thread Dan Kegel
Dan Kegel wrote: sparc-gcc-4.1-20050709-glibc-2.3.2: arch/sparc/kernel/process.c:204: internal compiler error: in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:445 Filed as http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22398 -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" while compiling Linux kernel

2005-07-10 Thread Dan Kegel
Falk Hueffner wrote: Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Likewise, compiling that version of gcc for alpha dies while building the linux kernel, but for a different reason: {standard input}:496: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in effect make[1]: *** [arch/alpha/

Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: ICE in loop_givs_rescan, at loop.c:5517

2005-07-10 Thread Dan Kegel
Falk Hueffner wrote: Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Likewise, compiling that version of gcc for alpha dies while building the linux kernel, but for a different reason: {standard input}:496: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in effect make[1]: *** [arch/alpha/

gcc-4.1-20050709: ICE in loop_givs_rescan, at loop.c:5517

2005-07-09 Thread Dan Kegel
while building the linux kernel, but for a different reason: {standard input}:496: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in effect make[1]: *** [arch/alpha/kernel/core_cia.o] Error 1 Sigh. I'll file bugs with preprocessed source tomorrow. Stage 3 is certainly starting with a bang.

Re: A trouble with libssp in one-tree builds

2005-07-08 Thread Dan Kegel
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: I think we need to finally come up with a way to build the compiler and libraries at different times. Don't tease me. -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

re: [RFC] gcov tool, comparing coverage across platforms

2005-06-27 Thread Dan Kegel
, for what it's worth. I like using Bourne shell for projects it's a good fit for, but you may find yourself needing something like perl, since you'll be wrangling lots of files and lots of text. - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters

2005-06-16 Thread Dan Kegel
suggest a new mailing list, gcc-design, where engineers like myself can propose designs and concepts without upsetting those who find such discussions annoying. I think what gets peoples' blood pressure up is endless discussion about how they ought to do their business. - Dan -- Trying to

Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters

2005-06-15 Thread Dan Kegel
professionally and reasonably. (A few have languished unfixed, but those bugs aren't critical, and it hasn't bothered me too much. And to be fair, I'm sitting on fixes sent me by the gcc developers I've been too busy to verify, so really, I wouldn't have a leg to stand on e

Mac OS X Panther to Tiger Build Changes for GCC 3.3 and 3.4

2005-05-31 Thread Dan Allen
3.3 and GCC 3.4 and they have built successfully under Mac OS X 10.3.9 Panther. GCC 4.0 builds fine on 10.4.1 Tiger without this problem, so whatever small fix was made to GCC 4.0 probably could be made to 3.3.6 and 3.4.4 to get them to build, but I have not taken the time to track this pr

Successful bootstrap of GCC 4.0 on Mac OS X 10.4.1

2005-05-31 Thread Dan Allen
3 stages without any errors. Dan Allen N39°59.8' W111°45.4'

Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version

2005-05-18 Thread Dan Kegel
the gcc-3.4 ABI for C++. (Did you know that gcc-4.0 uses the gcc-3.4 ABI for C++, too? That's right, there is hope!) - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1

2005-05-11 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
"Etienne Lorrain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Etienne Lorrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Some of those problem may also exist in GCC-4.0 because this > >> version (and the 4.1 I tested) gives me an increase of 60% of the > >> code size compared to 3.4.3. > > > > >

Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

2005-04-29 Thread Dan Kegel
qualifies as *really* clear, but my doc on doing remote gcc and glibc test runs is at http://kegel.com/crosstool/current/doc/crosstest-howto.html Have you tried that yet? It worked for me on systems with 16 MB of RAM and a network connection. I bet it'd work with less RAM if you ditched the glib

Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

2005-04-28 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
Dan Nicolaescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Matt Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Richard Henderson wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:57:07PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > >>I would expect it

Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

2005-04-28 Thread Dan Kegel
n the hardware I have available, so hopefully a successful crossbuild will suffice. How about a successful crossbuild plus passing some regression test suite, e.g. gcc's, glibc's, and/or ltp's? Any one of them would provide a nice reality check. - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ d

Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

2005-04-26 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
Matt Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard Henderson wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:57:07PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > >>I would expect it to be drastically faster. However this won't show up > >>clearly in the bootstrap. The, bar none, longest bit of the boot

Re: Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis - Scalability issues

2005-04-19 Thread Dan Kegel
n anything really big.) - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

Re: Problems with MIPS cross compiling for GCC-4.1.0...

2005-04-18 Thread Dan Kegel
bc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips32/sysdep.h.diff?r1=1.3&r2=1.4&cvsroot=glibc will cure what ails ye. - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization

2005-04-18 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
e array - restricted pointers (Dan Berlin is working on the first one (first two?)) An example: struct s { int a; int b;}; void foo (struct s *ps, int *p, int *__restrict__ rp, int *__restrict__ rq) { ps->a = 0; ps->b = 1; if (ps->a != 0)abort (); p[0] = 0; p[1] = 1; i

Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes

2005-04-17 Thread Dan Kegel
fferent C++ libraries. Can you try creating a minimal test case demonstrating this without involving inkscape? If so, maybe it's a glibc shared library loader bug? - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

re: some problem about cross-compile the gcc-2.95.3

2005-04-15 Thread Dan Kegel
ho don't like using canned scripts like crosstool. In other words, for people like Kai :-) - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410

2005-04-13 Thread Dan Kegel
this with LANG=C, export LANG=en_US.UTF-8 and there is no crash b) compiling the dumped proprocessed code isn't crashing in either LANG" So maybe you are in fact running into the same issue. - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation

2005-03-30 Thread Dan Kegel
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:37:33PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: Since I need to handle old versions of gcc, I'm going to code up a little program to fix all the embedded paths anyway, but I was surprised by the paths in the pch file. Guess I shouldn't have been, but

PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation

2005-03-29 Thread Dan Kegel
confident that this will work. Has anyone else tried it? - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

ICE in gcc-4.0-20050305 for m68k

2005-03-21 Thread Dan Kegel
d: invalid expression as operand ... make[2]: Leaving directory `...build/m68k-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-4.0-20050305-glibc-2.3.4/glibc-2.3.4/iconvdata' I'll post a proper problem report when I get a chance, this is just a little heads-up. - Dan -- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http

re: GCC generating invalid assembly

2005-03-06 Thread Dan Kegel
ed 2) -funit-at-a-time is on 3) -O is on Turning off -O caused it to work fine. Turning off -funit-at-a-time caused it to work fine. Using a diffrent debugging information format caused it to work fine. You forgot to say which version of gcc. Is this maybe http://gcc.gnu.org/PR9963 ? - Dan -- T