Freedos in general is an IDE only system, but why not support SATA I/II/III?
No MS-DOS, DR-DOS, etcetera don't support SATA, but why not support it
anyways?
What are the implications of adding SATA support to the kernel or
through a TSR?
The obvious workaround is to get a SATA to PATA con
Note that I am running it in VirtualBox on an AMD FX 8350 processor
with 8 cores.
Might have something to do with CentOS 7 x86_64 as the host system.
Maybe I'm giving freedos too much ram?
Can anyone else reproduce the Bolitare black screens on exit issue?
-- Michael Robinson
___
rce and supported across both heads.
-- Michael C. Robinson
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Quoting Ralf Quint :
On 9/26/2019 6:35 AM, Michael C Robinson wrote:
Is it possible to get the source code to Windows 9x and ME since
Microsoft isn't supporting it anymore?
No.
One would want to get the source code and then open source it of
course. Even Windows 3.1 and Windows 3.
d Wine, and it would
be good if the old MS source code could be released, or, failing
that, the binaries could at least be put under an open-source
license that explicitly allowed reverse engineering.
Original message ----
From: Michael C Robinson
Date: 9/26/
Quoting andrew fabbro :
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 6:36 AM Michael C Robinson <
mich...@robinson-west.com> wrote:
Is it possible to get the source code to Windows 9x and ME since
Microsoft isn't supporting it anymore?
One would want to get the source code and then open source i
Is it possible to get the source code to Windows 9x and ME since
Microsoft isn't supporting it anymore?
One would want to get the source code and then open source it of
course. Even Windows 3.1 and Windows 3.11 is closed source. Surely,
Microsoft could release pre 9x Windows? It wouldn't h
nment on Freedos, but how do you implement the WIN32 API or does
wine work with FLTK and Freedos?
-- Michael C. Robinson
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Quoting TJ Edmister :
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:32:18 -0500, Michael Robinson
> wrote:
>
>> Windows 98 sort of running on top of a DOS system doesn't work with
>> ipxwrapper-0.4.0. There is an error that iplphapi.dll can't be found
>> or something similar.
>
> Why do you need an ipx wrapper on w
The scsi card appears to be 53C1010-66 LsiLogic where I have a Compaq
4.3 gig scsi drive connected to it.
The scsi drive has no partitions on it, but I successfully low level
formatted it.
I searched via google and tried a copy of symdisk.sys and aspi8xx.sys,
but the hard drive doesn't detec
I have a 4G scsi hard drive connect to an LSI Logic low profile scsi
card. I'm trying to install freedos 1.1 from
a floppy disk. Are there scsi drivers I can add to the disk?
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remo
Freedos doesn't support any printers, but software programs which run
on freedos do.
For example, if running WordPerfect 6.0, dos version, you will need a
Wordperfect driver for
that printer, or one which is close enough. HP Laserjets are a good
bet, the pre USB ones in
particular like the 6
I want to be able to play vinyl records, I have a Hauppage PVR150 card
connected via PCI to my P3 system. Under Windows 2000, I can use the
card to run my Playstation II through the monitor. It may also be
possible to run the record player through the soundblaster 16 PCI
sound card.
Honestly, a
I'm using a Freedos system on a play computer, a PIII coppermine system.
I'm also multi booting Windows 98SE and Windows 2000. Question is,
should I be multi booting or should I be emulating all of these OSes
from a more powerful OS on a more powerful computer?
For example, there is talk of wanti
Freedos may provide pressure if it is popular enough to stay with well
known standard interfaces. If AHCI is going to be a well known
interface and it offers some advantage over SATA, Freedos can have a
driver for it and there is no reason to worry. In environments that are
more time sensitive, w
Guess I've been bouncing for about a week.
So, will Freedos 1.1 come out by Christmas?
Are there any long term plans to replace Windows for Workgroups 3.11
with an equivalent free alternative?
How about Wordperfect 6.0a Dos? Anyone interested in reverse
engineering it or buying it from I guess
I know that Christmas is pretty close, but is it possible that Freedos
1.1 will come out by then?
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application per
A Soundblaster is the industry standard card. If you have a 100% true
Soundblaster 16, freedos can use it. I successfully tricked Windows
98SE dos drivers for a PCI soundblaster 16 to work in Freedos. There
should be an open source replacement driver for the soundblaster 16
cards, but I don't kn
> Anyways, you can actually dual boot both FreeDOS and MS-DOS. See MetaKern.
>
> http://www.freedos.org/software/?prog=metakern
The person may not want to dual boot. Too bad there isn't a free
alternative to Windows 3.x that is just as good and capable of running
the same software.
---
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 07:26 +0300, bloger wrote:
> My ISP require PPPoE. Any idea how to access to network?
I just got a Zoom modem that is also a router which doesn't have
wireless, very hard to come by these days. Such a device,
depending on your needs, can take care of PPPoE for you and you
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 01:00 +, Zbigniew wrote:
> 2011/9/14, Michael C. Robinson :
>
> > [..] I'd say that Freedos has it's
> > uses, but without active development on a variant that can take
> > advantage of multiple cores and modern hardware, there are proba
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 19:00 -0500, Michael B. Brutman wrote:
> Here is the link to the announcement:
>
> http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=10488
>
>
> To me this is a serious problem - losing a piece of the DOS community is
> bad. Losing the place where a lot of the programm
As final word, we have the right to sue YOU if you reregister with
another name for bypassing our ban. In germany we call this Hausrecht.
If you wanna discuss this, feel free to join #reactos in about three
hours. I will be there. Feel free to sue me, could be real fun ^^
---
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 08:42 +0200, japhethx gmail wrote:
> > What have I ever said
> > in the ReactOS community that calls for threatening me with prosecution?
> > If nothing merits this, there is proof then that the ReactOS community
> > is troubled and possibly that this trouble is as serious as
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 20:27 -0500, mcelha...@usnetizen.com wrote:
> "There need to be consequences for unprofessionalism, faschism, etcetera. I
> honestly wonder if some of the developers are Neo Nazis."
>
> This comes across as just a bit "over-the-top" (and poor spelling as
> well...). Fascist
Freedos has it's place. Unlike ReactOS, Freedos actually works most of
the time. Partially due to the fact the Freedos is based on something
that is far less complex of course. This is OT, but the relevance is
that people suggest using ReactOS if and when Windows is wanted here.
As far as don't
Windows, especially NT based Windows, is beyond the scope of Freedos.
Unfortunately, there have been suggestions to look at the ReactOS
project. I think this transcript which needs to get out despite the
rules details why the ReactOS project is a disaster that needs to be
cleaned up. Anyone can w
> > menuetOS Syllable Visopsys ReactOS Linux Windows7
>
> Can you mention some pros and cons, in particular of the lesser
> known first 3 items on the list? I can say about the last three
> that: ReactOS tries to clone WinNT/XP, Linux has a lot of free
> open software and Windows7 tries to be cool
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 11:11 +, andrea...@interfree.it wrote:
> Hi at all
> is there anyone who did develop the desktop2 program (by F. Ritter?)
> I use it by many years in dos & freedos. I think it's a true dos/gui,
> easy suitable in freedos -save little defect- with power to
> associate p
Direct hardware access is practically speaking the fastest way to go,
but it is not the most maintainable approach. The problem with
using say WordPerfect or MS Word or Visicalc even, hardware is changing.
The printers of the MS-DOS era have largely been replaced by networked
printers and USB prin
A thought experiment, could a 32 bit version of Freedos with a version
of Opengem that can support modern hardawre run on one processor
core while dos command lines that are actually full blown dos run on
the other processor cores? Segment the memory so that each core, say
1 gig per core on a qu
> Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm afraid, that the system, which is supposed to
> be "simple, light and really fast", just cannot have any "protection
> layers" - and _should_ allow direct access to hardware (unlike all
> those Unix-variants).
The 386 on up supports protection in hardware to a certain de
I'm thinking of modern video cards and multiple core processors.
I would imagine that Freedos in 16 bit mode can't use multiple
cores. One of the problems with DOS that I recall is a total
lack of hardware protection. This allowed direct hardware
access, which is fast. Unfortunately, accessing
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 01:12 +0200, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> Op 3-8-2011 0:51, Jack schreef:
> >
> > Re: my 25-Jun-2011 gall-bladder removal, the hospital has
> > finally sent a $960 bill for my "co-pay" (amount not paid
> > by my medical insurance company). I sent a check today.
>
> you missed a 'g
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 04:12 +0200, japhethx gmail wrote:
> > [snip] I think
> > everybody has learned the last years that GPL software can be used
> > without any second thoughts and distributed freely.[snip]
>
> No.
Yes, that's a huge strong point. As long as you provide access to the
complete
Is there a dos driver for a standard 4x scsi cdrom reader connected to
an Adaptec 2940U2W?
--
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your c
on the ZIP is slow and wear out the disk.
>
> Sent from Johnson's iPhone
>
> On 21 Jun 2010, at 12:54 PM, "Michael C. Robinson" > wrote:
>
> > I have a zip 250 atapi drive where I am wondering why Battletech 2 the
> > Crescent Hawk's Revenge kn
I have a zip 250 atapi drive where I am wondering why Battletech 2 the
Crescent Hawk's Revenge knows that this isn't a harddrive? Does anyone
know a simple way around this issue?
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 08:59 -0400, Pat Villani wrote:
> Please drop the "A Fantasy of a future..." thread. It has degenerated
> and gone on long enough.
>
> Pat Villani
> FreeDOS Project Coordinator
Pat, honestly, do you blame me for this thread going the way it did?
Do I have some incredible
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 11:53 +0100, Liam Proven wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Michael C. Robinson
> wrote:
> > ReactOS is neither a stable nor potentially even a promising project
> > anymore depending on who you talk to. Sadly, I got kicked off of the
> >
ReactOS is neither a stable nor potentially even a promising project
anymore depending on who you talk to. Sadly, I got kicked off of the
forum boards and the IRC channel. I haven't been back since.
I don't like when people say, "ReactOS is cloning Windows under the
GPL and this work doesn't ne
DOS is not a good candidate for multitasking. Why DOS can run in less
memory and with older hardware than NT style systems and Linux style
systems can, others who are more knowledgeable can comment on that.
Remember, QDOS was probably the first DOS where the acronym means,
quick and dirty oper
Well Karen,
I don't know much about screen readers and DOS let alone screen readers
and Linux or screen readers and Windows. I feel after reading your
response, especially the laugh out loud part, that you were rude and not
in line with the spirit of don't turn this mailing list into what is
seen
I know how to boot freedos via etherboot.
How do I load freedos via pxelinux?
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applica
44 matches
Mail list logo
