RE: PPPoE (mpd5) IPv6 issues

> -Original Message- > From: dri...@freebsd.org > Sent: Saturday, 17 September 2022 10:18 > To: 'Evilham' > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: PPPoE (mpd5) IPv6 issues > > > -Original Message- > > From: Evilham > >

RE: PPPoE (mpd5) IPv6 issues

> -Original Message- > From: Evilham > Sent: Friday, 16 September 2022 22:00 > To: dri...@freebsd.org > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: PPPoE (mpd5) IPv6 issues > > Hey, > > On dv., set. 16 2022, dri...@freebsd.org wrote: > > > Hmm

Re: PPPoE (mpd5) IPv6 issues

Hey, On dv., set. 16 2022, dri...@freebsd.org wrote: Hmm this mail was not finished, sorry about that. I will include the link that fell-off, IPv6 PPPoE MSS incorrect | Netgate Forum Any help or pointers are greatly appreciated! PS: I use IPFW as my firewall, if this has anything to do

RE: PPPoE (mpd5) IPv6 issues

Hmm this mail was not finished, sorry about that. I will include the link that fell-off, IPv6 PPPoE MSS incorrect | Netgate Forum Any help or pointers are greatly appreciated! PS: I use IPFW as my firewall, if this has anyt

Re: PPPoE RX traffic is limited to one queue

27.07.2018 14:19, Richard Pasztor wrote: > Hi Eugene, > > the details you requested: > > Router Hardware: PC Engines APU2C4 (http://pcengines.ch/apu2c4.htm) > 3x i210AT NIC / AMD GX-412TC CPU / 4 GB DRAM > > Router Software: Opnsense 18.1.13 > OS: FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p11 FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p

Re: PPPoE RX traffic is limited to one queue

Hi Eugene, the details you requested: Router Hardware: PC Engines APU2C4 (http://pcengines.ch/apu2c4.htm) 3x i210AT NIC / AMD GX-412TC CPU / 4 GB DRAM Router Software: Opnsense 18.1.13 OS: FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p11 FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p11 116e406d37f(stable/18.1) amd64 I am not sure about how

Re: PPPoE RX traffic is limited to one queue

26.07.2018 21:40, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Show output of "top -SHPI" at receiving side while performing your test. > Also, include output of "systat -vm 3" while traffic flows. Also include output of "systat -ifstat 3" while traffic flows, too. ___ fr

Re: PPPoE RX traffic is limited to one queue

26.07.2018 21:27, Richard Pasztor wrote: > Note2: I am not at the level of building a proper PPPoE simlator network to > properly validate the final performance, all my tests were performed using > pure IP routing. So expect PPPoE can be by definition only worse than what > I can possibly reach us

Re: pppoe reconnection issue

hi, pfsense uses mpd so is there anything equivalent to it? Regards, Bipin Original Message Subject: Re: pppoe reconnection issue From: Sin To: Bipin Patel Date: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 11:33:02

Re: pppoe reconnection issue

On 11/1/2011 5:19 PM, Bipin Patel wrote: set link keep-alive 10 60 Lower these values according to: http://mpd.sourceforge.net/doc5/mpd20.html and then run mpd interactively to see what's happening. Nikos ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list ht

Re: pppoe reconnection issue

en Regards, Bipin Original Message ---- Subject: Re: pppoe reconnection issue From: rozhuk...@gmail.com To: 'Bipin Patel' , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 6:41:01 PM I have same problem with one ISP some years ago, but c

Re: pppoe reconnection issue

Regards, Bipin Original Message Subject: Re: pppoe reconnection issue From: rozhuk...@gmail.com To: 'Bipin Patel' , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 6:41:01 PM I have sa

RE: pppoe reconnection issue

I have same problem with one ISP some years ago, but config file is lost ) Try this config for mpd5. If not help - read mpd5 manuals and play with config file. ### Rozhuk Ivan 2009 - 2010 ### MPD configuration file ### startup: ###set user foo bar admin ###set user foo1 bar1

Re: pppoe controlling simultaneous use with freeradius

Fazal Ahmed Malik wrote: > i have trouble in simultaneous use to work with Freeradius 2 and FreeBSD5.2 > pppoe server. My Freebsd box as working as PPPOE server and on same box > freeradius is working. But i don't know how freebsd interact with radius as > nas. Also could not kill stale pppoe s

Re: PPPoE question.

- Original Message - From: "Brian Candler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "fooler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "M. Parsons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:13 PM Subject

Re: PPPoE question.

On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:59:52PM +0800, fooler wrote: > >>set speed sync > > > >And how does that change the pppoe ethernet frames? > > nothing change and still the same... ethernet frames are at layer 2 while > synchronization (either asynchronous or synchronous) is at layer 1... > synchronou

Re: PPPoE question.

- Original Message - From: "Brian Candler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "fooler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "M. Parsons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 8:32 PM Subject:

Re: PPPoE question.

On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 11:27:00AM +0800, fooler wrote: > >what the heck is synchronous pppoe? we connect to pppoe via ethernet so > >it is already synchronous (?) > > set speed sync And how does that change the pppoe ethernet frames? ___ freebsd-net@f

Re: PPPoE question.

- Original Message - From: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "M. Parsons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:49 AM Subject: Re: PPPoE question. M. Parsons wrote: Hello, I was wondering if the freebsd kernel supports

Re: PPPoE question.

M. Parsons wrote: Hello, I was wondering if the freebsd kernel supports synchronous pppoe? I currently use LInux and I use synchronous pppoe (the n_hldc line discipline module), and I find that if I have synchronous off, network efficiency is not what its supposed to be. what the heck is s

Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1

- Original Message - From: "Marcin Jessa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 9:22 PM Subject: Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1 It does. Everything is working now. go

Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:49:13 +0800 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Marcin Jessa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Se

Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1

- Original Message - From: "Marcin Jessa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 8:55 PM Subject: Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1 Thanks a lot.

Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:45:52 +0800 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Marcin Jessa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Se

Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1

- Original Message - From: "Marcin Jessa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 5:29 PM Subject: Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1 The problem s

Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:31 PM > Subject: Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1 > > > > Just tested the same setup on 7.0 built tonight and it did not work. > > The pppoed daemon never sends any requests to freeradius... > > take note that pp

Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1

- Original Message - From: "Marcin Jessa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Marcin Jessa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:31 PM Subject: Re: PPPoE and Rad

Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:31:59PM +, Marcin Jessa wrote: M> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:51:11PM +0200, Marcin Jessa wrote: M> > > M> It seems like PPPoE stoped working with support for radius on 6.0 M> > > M> The log of pppoe and freeradius does not show pppoe attempting to M> > > M> even t

Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:15:49 +0200 Marcin Jessa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:01:45 +0400 > Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:51:11PM +0200, Marcin Jessa wrote: > > M> It seems like PPPoE stoped working with support for radius on 6.0 >

Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:01:45 +0400 Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:51:11PM +0200, Marcin Jessa wrote: > M> It seems like PPPoE stoped working with support for radius on 6.0 > M> The log of pppoe and freeradius does not show pppoe attempting to > M> even talk t

Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1

On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:51:11PM +0200, Marcin Jessa wrote: M> It seems like PPPoE stoped working with support for radius on 6.0 M> The log of pppoe and freeradius does not show pppoe attempting to even talk to the radius server. M> Additionally this message pops up when enabling pppoed: M> WARN

Re: PPPoE (STABLE 5) : two PADI packets emitted and then nothing...

thx for your answer, now seems that PPPoE negociation works better. but i still have no connection, and when I try with #ppp, I stay in ppp mode (ie I can't see the Ppp, PPp, PPP...) : Oct 4 22:01:19 fidelio ppp[30314]: tun0: Debug: Sending PPPOE_CONNECT to .:tun0 Oct 4 22:01:19 fidelio ppp[30314]

Re: PPPoE (STABLE 5) : two PADI packets emitted and then nothing...

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:23:30PM +0200, ComteZero _ wrote: C> Hello, C> C> I already posted this thread in freebsd-stable but seems that this list is C> more appropriate. C> C> it's been two weeks I try to find out what's wrong. Clean install from cvsup C> STABLE (5). C> my ADSL account works

Re: PPPoE (STABLE 5) : two PADI packets emitted and then nothing...

here is ppp.log in plain text : here is ppp.log : Sep 11 19:42:17 fidelio ppp[24723]: Phase: Using interface: tun0 Sep 11 19:42:17 fidelio ppp[24723]: Phase: deflink: Created in closed state Sep 11 19:42:17 fidelio ppp[24723]: tun0: Command: default: set ifaddr X.X.X.X/0 10.0.0.2/0

Re: PPPoE and UDP fragmentation

Charles Sprickman wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Julian H. Stacey wrote: -Are there any tunables at either end (both hosts are FreeBSD 4.11 p11) to alter how fragmented packets are re-assembled? /usr/ports/net/tcpmssd An MTU adapter. Apparently not needed on FreeBSD-5 but I mean to install it

Re: PPPoE and UDP fragmentation

On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Julian H. Stacey wrote: -Are there any tunables at either end (both hosts are FreeBSD 4.11 p11) to alter how fragmented packets are re-assembled? /usr/ports/net/tcpmssd An MTU adapter. Apparently not needed on FreeBSD-5 but I mean to install it on my FreeBSD-4 DSL gateway

Re: PPPoE and UDP fragmentation

> -Are there any tunables at either end (both hosts are FreeBSD 4.11 p11) to > alter how fragmented packets are re-assembled? /usr/ports/net/tcpmssd An MTU adapter. Apparently not needed on FreeBSD-5 but I mean to install it on my FreeBSD-4 DSL gateways when I find time to think if it might hav

Re: pppoe+radius server

- Original Message - From: "Hernán Freschi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 5:55 AM Subject: Re: pppoe+radius server >great great, only one problem. i make the radius server send the >Filter-Id attr, with value "64:32" for 64 dow

Re: pppoe+radius server

On 7/8/05, Hernán Freschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isp/2005-March/002967.html > > > > hope that helps... > > great great, only one problem. i make the radius server send the > Filter-Id attr, with value "64:32" for 64 down/32 up. It seems to get > t

Re: pppoe+radius server

> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isp/2005-March/002967.html > > hope that helps... great great, only one problem. i make the radius server send the Filter-Id attr, with value "64:32" for 64 down/32 up. It seems to get to ppp: /etc/ppp/ppp.log: Phase: Filter "64:32" Notice it says "f

Re: pppoe+radius server

- Original Message - From: "Hernán Freschi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 7:34 AM Subject: pppoe+radius server >Hi everyone, >I'm new to this list and I have a question about PPP. I'm trying to >port to BSD what I have already done in Linux, it's a pppoe access >

Re: pppoe perfomance

On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 01:40:50PM +0300, hydros wrote: h> Does anyone tested a perfomance of pppoe+freebsd as server? h> How much cpu\ram does it east with a different vpn load. h> I`m trying to make a server and not sure does the hardware would be able to h> serve my LAN users h> server pII-450 h

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:01:00 -0400, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:14:33 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > wrote: > > >Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > >>On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > >>wrote: > >> > >> > >Seriously thou

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:14:33 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >Mike Tancsa wrote: > >>On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you >>wrote: >> >> >Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to >get things working again for me. Most of the DSL aggreg

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >>>Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to >>>get things working again for me. Most of the DSL aggregators here >>>are Juniper ERXes which do not play nice with FreeBSD's PPPoE. >>> > >any thoughts as to why? > >Fre

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

Mike Tancsa wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to get things working again for me. Most of the DSL aggregators here are Juniper ERXes which do not play nice with FreeBSD's PPPoE. any thoughts as

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:29:21 -0400, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:47:26 +1000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > wrote: > > > > >I found Mike Tancsa's patch but didn't like it. I rolled my own, which > >seems to be working so far. It works by switching from LQR

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

Stephen McKay wrote: On Saturday, 24th July 2004, Mike Tancsa wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:47:26 +1000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: I found Mike Tancsa's patch but didn't like it. I rolled my own, which seems to be working so far. It works by switching from LQR to simple echo

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

On Saturday, 24th July 2004, Mike Tancsa wrote: >On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:47:26 +1000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you >wrote: > >>I found Mike Tancsa's patch but didn't like it. I rolled my own, which >>seems to be working so far. It works by switching from LQR to simple >>echo requests when LQR

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:47:26 +1000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: > >I found Mike Tancsa's patch but didn't like it. I rolled my own, which >seems to be working so far. It works by switching from LQR to simple >echo requests when LQR times out. I feel so unliked ;-) Seriously though,

Re: PPPoE

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:39:50AM -0700, Yohan wrote: Y> ive done mpd by the book .. but i still get the output Y> i sent you last time .. also could you give me a Y> pointer as to how i could get natd working with mpd natd on ngX interface works just as on any other kinf of interface. Take a loo

Re: PPPoE

gleb .. both are loaded at boot ... here is the kldstat output .. ng_ppp.ko is shown bcos im using ppp to connect as mpd isnt working. ive done mpd by the book .. but i still get the output i sent you last time .. also could you give me a pointer as to how i could get natd working with mpd ...

Re: PPPoE

On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:55:36AM -0700, Yohan wrote: Y> gleb, Y> Y> on your advice im trying mpd istead of ppp. i seem to Y> have problems of a different kind with mpd. mpd now Y> connects ONLY after i run ppp .. i think .. else i get Y> the following in the mpd.log Please check that ng_ether.k

Re: PPPoE

On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:55:36AM -0700, Yohan wrote: Y> on your advice im trying mpd istead of ppp. i seem to Y> have problems of a different kind with mpd. mpd now Y> connects ONLY after i run ppp .. i think .. else i get Y> the following in the mpd.log What version of mpd are you using? -- T

Re: PPPoE

gleb, on your advice im trying mpd istead of ppp. i seem to have problems of a different kind with mpd. mpd now connects ONLY after i run ppp .. i think .. else i get the following in the mpd.log mpd.log --> Jul 12 13:13:10 chennai mpd: mpd: pid 155, version 3.17 ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 03:14 11-

Re: PPPoE

sorry for the inconvenience caused, will follow your instructions next time the message exceeds 10 - 15 K. regards Yo --- Cyrille Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Yohan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip) > > The ppp.log is attached below. i noticed "Jul 11 > > 01:01:05 chennai ppp[182]: t

Re: PPPoE

"Yohan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip) > The ppp.log is attached below. i noticed "Jul 11 > 01:01:05 chennai ppp[182]: tun0: Phase: deflink: ** > Too many ECHO LQR packets lost ** " as the reason for > disconnect. ppp tries to reestablish the connection > but even after that the connection is no

Re: PPPoE

On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:20:10PM -0700, Yohan wrote: > Y> The ppp.log is attached below. i noticed "Jul 11 > Y> 01:01:05 chennai ppp[182]: tun0: Phase: deflink: ** > Y> Too many ECHO LQR packets lost ** " as the reason for > Y> disconnect. ppp tries to

Re: PPPoE

On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:20:10PM -0700, Yohan wrote: Y> The ppp.log is attached below. i noticed "Jul 11 Y> 01:01:05 chennai ppp[182]: tun0: Phase: deflink: ** Y> Too many ECHO LQR packets lost ** " as the reason for Y> disconnect. ppp tries to reestablish the connection Y> but even after that th

Re: PPPoE

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 01:32:43 -0700 (PDT), Yohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The connection hangs invariably after 8 - 10 hours. It > resumes after i kill the ppp process and redial. Could > it be because the isp is re-assingning my IP. How do i > automatically renew my IP with the ISP's DHCP server

Re: PPPoE

On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 01:32:43AM -0700, Yohan wrote: Y> The connection hangs invariably after 8 - 10 hours. It Y> resumes after i kill the ppp process and redial. Could Y> it be because the isp is re-assingning my IP. How do i Y> automatically renew my IP with the ISP's DHCP server. This is a co

Re: PPPoE

The connection hangs invariably after 8 - 10 hours. It resumes after i kill the ppp process and redial. Could it be because the isp is re-assingning my IP. How do i automatically renew my IP with the ISP's DHCP server. regards Yohann ___ >> I tried

Re: PPPoE on Atheros in hostap mode

[please keep me Cc'd as I'm not currently subscribed] On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 11:00:16AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > So, questions: am I doing anything wrong? Is this supposed to work? Is > > ath0 somehow mangling the data it sends to netgraph? > > I'd be willing to put some effort in this i

Re: PPPoE on Atheros in hostap mode

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Andrea Campi wrote: > [please keep me Cc'd as I'm not currently subscribed] > > Hi, [...] > > > Uhm, looks ok to me. But then: > > gw0# nghook -a sis1: orphans > : ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 30 65 a8 ee fc 88 63 11 09 ...0ec.. > 0010: 00 00 00 10 01 01 00 00 01

Re: PPPoE RESOLVED

I tried the ng_pppoe.c, ng_pppoe.h from latest STABLE. But got compile errors. Instead of tracing the source i just downloaded the 4.10 STABLE and ITS WORKING. Seems the problem was exactly as pointed out. Gleb thanks a TON for keeping my hopes alive with your prompt replies. I dont have to get ba

Re: PPPoE

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Brian Somers wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 05:55:41 -0700 (PDT), Yohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq UTF8] > > PPPoE PADO [AC-Name "BANYAN"] [AC-Cookie UTF8] [Service-Name] [Relay-Session-ID > > UTF8] [Host-Uniq UTF8] > > PPPoE PADR [Hos

Re: PPPoE

Or just add the new value in /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_pppoe.[ch] the new value is (u 0x0110 I think) On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 06:44:26AM -0700, Yohan wrote: > Y> Anyways the value of PTT_RELAY_SID in my > Y> /usr/include/netgraph/ng_pppoe.h in the

Re: PPPoE

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 05:55:41 -0700 (PDT), Yohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 17:48:15.035656 0:8:a1:5f:b5:4b Broadcast 8863 60: > PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq UTF8] > 17:48:15.049217 0:4:e6:4:41:1 0:8:a1:5f:b5:4b 8863 76: > PPPoE PADO [AC-Name "BANYAN"] [AC-Cookie UTF8] > [Service-Name] [Relay-Session-ID

Re: PPPoE

a tcpdump of the ethernet interface can be useful too.. On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Yohan wrote: > Gleb, > > I have enclosed another copy of ppp.log with slightly > different results. Thanks for the help. > > regards > > Yohann > > ppp.log > > Jun 21 14:00:53 chennai ppp[353]: Phase: Using > int

Re: PPPoE

Gleb, Thanks for keeping my hopes alive. I have a question .. do i upgrade or downgrade and will it work. because upgrading a production machine for me is slightly time consuming. If thats the way to go .. i will. will take ur advice for it. i have freebsd 4.9 presently. i also do have 4.8 cd;s o

Re: PPPoE

On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 06:44:26AM -0700, Yohan wrote: Y> Anyways the value of PTT_RELAY_SID in my Y> /usr/include/netgraph/ng_pppoe.h in the Tag Y> Identifiers section is (0x0106). May be this is causing problem. This value is incorrect and it is already fixed in recent CURRENT or STABLE. Try to

Re: PPPoE

Gleb, I compiled the following into the kernel .. options NETGRAPH options NETGRAPH_ETHER options NETGRAPH_PPPOE options NETGRAPH_SOCKET because i thought the loadable module was creating the problem. Anyways the value of PTT_RELAY_SID in my /usr/include/netgraph/ng_pppoe.h in the Tag Iden

Re: PPPoE

On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 06:04:32AM -0700, Yohan wrote: Y> 17:48:04.718691 0:8:a1:5f:b5:4b Broadcast 8863 60: Y> PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq UTF8] Y> 17:48:04.732330 0:4:e6:4:41:1 0:8:a1:5f:b5:4b 8863 76: Y> PPPoE PADO [AC-Name "BANYAN"] [AC-Cookie UTF8] Y> [Service-Name] [Relay-Session-ID UTF8] [Host-Uni

Re; PPPoE

where do i post questions regarding PPPoE on FreeBSD Thanks and regards Yohan - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freeb

Re: PPPoE

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 01:44:09 -0700 (PDT), Yohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gleb, > > Thanks for the reply. i have attached my ppp.conf and > ppp.log as requested. I have tried setting carrier / > ctsrts on/off and various other permutations / > combinations. The best i proceeded till is ... > Ju

Re: PPPoE

Gleb, I have enclosed another copy of ppp.log with slightly different results. Thanks for the help. regards Yohann ppp.log Jun 21 14:00:53 chennai ppp[353]: Phase: Using interface: tun0 Jun 21 14:00:53 chennai ppp[353]: Phase: deflink: Created in closed state Jun 21 14:00:53 chennai ppp[353]

Re: PPPoE

Gleb, Thanks for the reply. i have attached my ppp.conf and ppp.log as requested. I have tried setting carrier / ctsrts on/off and various other permutations / combinations. The best i proceeded till is ... Jun 19 13:00:26 chennai ppp[178]: tun0: Phase: Received NGM_PPPOE_ACNAME (hook "BANYAN") J

Re: PPPoE

On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 09:05:19AM -0700, Yohan wrote: Y> Im using PPPoE / FreeBSD 4.9 with a DSL line provided by my ISP. The same modem / line works fine / connects to the internet on a Windows 2000 machine. But when i use it with my FreeBSD machine using ppp i get the following message in my

Re: PPPoE

Im using PPPoE / FreeBSD 4.9 with a DSL line provided by my ISP. The same modem / line works fine / connects to the internet on a Windows 2000 machine. But when i use it with my FreeBSD machine using ppp i get the following message in my ppp.log "-> Waiting for carrier" - "Last message repeated

Re: PPPoE problems

Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [I suspect that the above may have failed.. doing > 'ngctl list', 'ngctl show ath0:orphans' and 'ngctl show .:' > would be constructive..] This is with pppoed running: jmmr# ngctl list There are 5 total nodes: Name: ngctl949Type: socket

Re: PPPoE problems

My comments in [] below.. On Wed, 5 May 2004, Julian Stecklina wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with pppoed: It does not accept connections: > > My system is FreeBSD-current as of some days ago running on x86. ath0 > is a DLINK WLAN card, if that matters. If I watch ethernet traffic via > t

Re: PPPoE problems

Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > use tcpdump to watch teh packets coming and going.. > tcpdump can interpret PPPOE packets. I already did. The only packets coming over the link are some request packets from RASPPPOE on the windoze client jmmr# tcpdump -ev -i ath0 tcpdump: listening

Re: PPPoE problems

use tcpdump to watch teh packets coming and going.. tcpdump can interpret PPPOE packets. On Wed, 5 May 2004, Julian Stecklina wrote: > "Artemis Clide Frog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Have you configured PPP in Daemon mode correctly? Take a look at this > > whitepaper - it may render some

Re: PPPoE problems

"Artemis Clide Frog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Have you configured PPP in Daemon mode correctly? Take a look at this > whitepaper - it may render some assistance. It was insightful and I played with pppoed a second time, but got not further. I also tried to use mpd as PPPoE server (this was a

Re: PPPoE buglet...

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, David Malone wrote: > > > I spent a while trying to get PPPoE going through a Netopia smart > > modem last night. To cut a long story short, the values for > > PTT_RELAY_SID in src/sys/netgraph/ng_pppoe.h are wrong (at least > > wh

Re: PPPoE buglet...

The RFC is al that matters (except for the compatibility code for idiot suppliers that use the wrong ethertype.) Is there a 110 or 1001 nearby that I may have read in error in the spec? On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, David Malone wrote: > I spent a while trying to get PPPoE going through a Netopia smart

Re: PPPoE buglet...

Yes please fix it. On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:52:53 + David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I spent a while trying to get PPPoE going through a Netopia smart > modem last night. To cut a long story short, the values for > PTT_RELAY_SID in src/sys/netgraph/ng_pppoe.h are wrong (at least > whe

Re: PPPoE buglet...

On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:52:53AM +, David Malone wrote: D> I spent a while trying to get PPPoE going through a Netopia smart D> modem last night. To cut a long story short, the values for D> PTT_RELAY_SID in src/sys/netgraph/ng_pppoe.h are wrong (at least D> when compared with tcpdump, linux

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thanks for your analysis Niranjan. Could you please elaborate on what > you meant about the lcp.c patch not being the correct approach? I think > Mike has tested it in multiple situations, and it has worked well for a > guy in the same situation down here too. >

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ... ] Short of actually fixing this LQR negotiation issue (?), might the suggestion of a ppp.conf option to force LCP echo usage be good? Yes. I am surprized it doesn't already have that option since thats a more common scenario. Alternately you could use another ppp

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:52:24 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: > >BTW, the lcp.c patch suggested by someone else is not the correct >approach. It would be great to see a proper config option disable it. However, I dont see any such patches. In the mean time, it works for me. Otherwis

Re: PPPOE server with pppoed and mppe

Hi, G> How much Mbytes/sec have you got with MPPE? I get about 70-80 kbytes/s, while without encrytion the speed is 150-160 kbytes/s (and that's my hardware limit). A friend of mine tested my configuration in a LAN and got no decrease in the performance with encryption added. I am going to try to

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Since my ADSL connection was moved at my ISP's end from one set of > equipment (norte shasta?) to another (unisphere?), I've been having > problems with my PPPoE sessions. > > With "enable lqr" in my ppp.conf, the connection terminates after a few > mintues with "

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

Andre Oppermann wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: G'day, Since my ADSL connection was moved at my ISP's end from one set of equipment (norte shasta?) to another (unisphere?), I've been having problems with my PPPoE sessions. With "enable lqr" in my ppp.conf, the connection terminates after a few m

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

I tried emailing the owner of ppp but got no response. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/11293 Seems to indicate others have run into this as well. I can confirm that here in Canada, FreeBSD's ppp is indeed broken when connecting to Juniper's ERX as part of a PPPoE session. I wo

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > G'day, > > Since my ADSL connection was moved at my ISP's end from one set of > equipment (norte shasta?) to another (unisphere?), I've been having > problems with my PPPoE sessions. > > With "enable lqr" in my ppp.conf, the connection terminates after a few > mintu

Re: PPPOE server with pppoed and mppe

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 06:09:07PM +0200, Emil Filipov wrote: E> OK, I have patched (commented) the MRU problem. Now I'm able to successfully E> connect to the server. But guess what happens when I connect with mppe? I E> get about half the speed compared to connection without encryption.. E> Top s

Re: PPPOE server with pppoed and mppe

> E> As you can see the client does not agree with MRU of 1488 (I tried initially with the default of 1492). Bug in RASPPPOE implementation? > G> Surely. One more person faced this bug. :) G> G> On PPPoE ACes I use a patched mpd, where MRU negotiation is commented out. G> You should send a bug repo

Re: PPPOE server with pppoed and mppe

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:22:05PM +0200, Emil Filipov wrote: <==skip==> E> Jan 16 15:46:28 opera mpd: [pppoe1] LCP: SendConfigReq #3 E> Jan 16 15:46:28 opera mpd: MRU 1488 E> Jan 16 15:46:28 opera mpd: MAGICNUM 1c5e3cf8 E> Jan 16 15:46:28 opera mpd: AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 E> Jan 16 15:46:30 ope

Re: PPPOE server with pppoed and mppe

OK guys, according to your advice I'm now trying with mpd (v.3.16). Works like magic with a SMC Router, but when I try to connect from a Win2k box with RASPPPOE installed, the LCP negotiation fails. Here is a logged example of one such failure: Jan 16 15:46:28 opera mpd: Incoming PPPoE connectio

  1   2   >