The RFC is al that matters (except for the compatibility code for idiot suppliers that use the wrong ethertype.)
Is there a 110 or 1001 nearby that I may have read in error in the spec? On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, David Malone wrote: > I spent a while trying to get PPPoE going through a Netopia smart > modem last night. To cut a long story short, the values for > PTT_RELAY_SID in src/sys/netgraph/ng_pppoe.h are wrong (at least > when compared with tcpdump, linux and the RFC). We have: > > #if BYTE_ORDER == BIG_ENDIAN > #define PTT_RELAY_SID (0x0106) > #else > #define PTT_RELAY_SID (0x0601) > #endif > > but we should have: > > #if BYTE_ORDER == BIG_ENDIAN > #define PTT_RELAY_SID (0x0110) > #else > #define PTT_RELAY_SID (0x1001) > #endif > > Anyone object to my fixing it? The only thing I can think of that > it might break would be people using ng_pppoe as a PPPoE relay with > only ng_pppoe PPPoE clients. > > David. > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
