-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/31/12 3:47 AM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:23:37AM -0400, Tom Judge wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover
>> between the 2 in chassis cisco switches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/10/2012 12:51, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 30/10/2012 12:12, Adam McDougall wrote:
>>> On 10/30/12 11:23,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/10/2012 12:12, Adam McDougall wrote:
> On 10/30/12 11:23, Tom Judge wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover between
the 2 in chassis cisco switches, but it would seem that the link state
is not being propagated up to the lagg device.
Any hints/ideas?
dmesg:
bxe1: metric 0
mtu 1500
options=
On 19/02/2011 11:07, kevin wrote:
>> No, you have to specify stp there. The default STP mode is RSTP.
>> If you don't specify stp, you'll get a dumb ethernet bridge.
> Thanks very much for clarification. This helps me immensely. My room for
> testing is limited so this will help me take the right s
e
memory area get fragmented and the system can't allocate any new 9k
clusters.
>
> So... any feedback is good right now.
>
I will provide more feedback in the coming weeks as we load these (4)
systems up. Currently they are idling waiting for the application jails
to be deployed on th
Hi,
So I have been playing around with some new hosts I have been deploying
(Dell R710's).
The systems have a single dual port card in them:
i...@pci0:5:0:0:class=0x02 card=0xa04c8086 chip=0x10c98086
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
class = network
On 04/11/2010 18:02, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a network segment we have both Linux boxes with keepalived (some sort of
> vrrp implementation) and FreeBSD boxes with carp enabled.
>
> The FreeBSD logs have a gazillion "kernel: carp_input: received len 20 <
> sizeof(struct carp_header)"
On 10/27/2010 01:27 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> We moved an application stack from BSD4(BOO!) to BSD7(YAY!) recently and
> got a great performance increase, so first: GOOD JOB.
>
> Periodically, we are seeing strings of duplicate ACK being sent in
> <100uSec deltas. I can't imagine that this should b
On 10/08/2010 08:48 AM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> Quoting Tom Judge :
>
>>
>> The R610 has a NetXtream II chipset which uses the bce(4) driver. If
>> you are going to doing heavy network traffic, or using jumbo frames I
>> would personally recommend you fit an
On 10/08/2010 07:42 AM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> Quoting Pyun YongHyeon :
>
>>>
>>
>> Ok, there might be a couple of edge cases not handled in bge(4). I
>> believe things will improve over time but it depends on users
>> feedback and testing.
>
> On this particular server I really need to get
On 09/23/2010 02:33 PM, Tom Judge wrote:
> The throttle command I am using in the tests is the one from here:
>
> http://klicman.org/throttle/
>
>
> On 09/23/2010 02:26 PM, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/23/2010 01:21 PM, David Christensen wrote:
>>
>>
On 09/23/2010 03:30 PM, David Christensen wrote:
>>> Failure to allocate a new buffer should cause the driver to
>>> drop the received frame and reuse the buffer, not lock up the
>>> system. Are you seeing the lockup come from bce(4) or does
>>> it come from somewhere else due to the dropped data?
Hi,
I was looking though the brgphy code toady looking for a way to control
flow control from the host rather than from the switch but didn't find
any hints.
Is it possible to control the flow control negotiation on these PHY's?
Thanks
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
__
The throttle command I am using in the tests is the one from here:
http://klicman.org/throttle/
On 09/23/2010 02:26 PM, Tom Judge wrote:
> On 09/23/2010 01:21 PM, David Christensen wrote:
>
>>>>> Under testing I have yet to see a memory fra
On 09/23/2010 01:39 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:05:33AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/13/2010 03:53 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:38:41PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 09/23/2010 01:21 PM, David Christensen wrote:
Under testing I have yet to see a memory fragmentation issue with
>> this
>>
driver. I follow up if/when I find a problem with this again.
>> So here we are again. The system is locking up again
Hi,
Would it be possible to unhide the output of bce_print_adapter_info()
from under boot verbose?
This information is useful for comparing firmware and card versions
between machines.
Alternatively what about adding a sysctl under dev.bce.X for this info?
Thanks
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
_
On 09/13/2010 03:53 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:38:41PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/13/2010 02:33 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
On 09/17/2010 03:18 AM, Vladimir Grigorov wrote:
> greets all
>
>
>
>> If you take a look at icmp_error() in sys/netinet/ip_icmp.c you will see
>> that icmp errors are not sent for packets that have been previously been
>> decrypted by IPSec.
>>
> May be some misunderstandings happens.
On 09/16/2010 09:00 AM, Vladimir Grigorov wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
>
> I have strange problems related to passage icmp need-frag packets, and, as
> result, all packets with packets length greater than output gif MTU.
>
> Network diagram:
>
> [HostA] -- (mtu 1500) --- [FW1] --- ipsec gif mtu 1280
On 09/13/2010 02:33 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/13/2010 01:48 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 09/13/2010 02:11 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 13.09.2010 20:48, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>> Without BCE_JUMBO_HDRSPLIT then we see no errors. With it we see
>>> number
>>> of errors, however th
On 09/13/2010 01:48 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>>
>> Does this mean that these cards are going to perform badly? This is was
>> what I gathered from the previous thread.
>>
>>
> I mean t
On 09/09/2010 07:24 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:58:30PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I am just following up on the thread from March (I think) about this issue.
>>
>> We are seeing this issue on a number of systems running 7.1.
Hi,
I am just following up on the thread from March (I think) about this issue.
We are seeing this issue on a number of systems running 7.1.
The systems in question are all Dell:
* R710 R610 R410
* PE2950
The latter do not show the issue as much as the R series systems.
The cards in one of t
On 08/02/2010 09:22 AM, Vasily Samoilov wrote:
> Hello.
> Do anyone knows any way to recieve (not send) LLDP (CDP, etc) packets
> from other networking hardware and query neighbour discovery results
> from FreeBSD box via snmp?
> Thanks in advance!
>
There is the OpenLLDP project that I have had s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Christensen wrote:
>>> Does the attached patch make a difference for you?
>> This patch seems to do the trick, on at least one of the
>> R610's that we have.
>>
>> Just did cold boot, 5 warm boots, cold boot, 5 warm boots and
>> have not had an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kurt Buff wrote:
> Sigh. Yes, that works.
>
> So, to expose even more of my ignorance, any thoughts on why it isn't
> up at boot?
>
/etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_em0="UP"
> Kurt
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:35, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> Not familiar wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:43:46PM +0000, Tom Judge wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have had some issues with running both carp and VRRP i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
We have had some issues with running both carp and VRRP in the same
physical segment. It has mostly caused issues with the embedded devices
running VRRP. One other side affect is the hugely verbose output on the
FreeBSD side where carp is compla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Ahoy. I have an 8.0-RELEASE/i386 machine (installed clean from the CD,
> so no kernel/world mismatches are possible) on which I am trying to add
> a tun device to a bridge:
>
> # ifconfig tun0 create
> # ifconfig bridge0 creat
David Christensen wrote:
For the record we also have not been able to reproduce the issue on
the R710 only the R610.
I got hold of an R610 system and I now understand why the
issue was difficult to replicate on R710. The R610 ships
without Enterprise iDRAC while the R710 ship with the add-in
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Nov 21, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I was why I get the following error when trying to create a vlan on top of
if_bridge:
# ifconfig bridge0 create
# ifconfig vlan2 vlan 2 vlandev bridge0
ifconfig: SIOCSETVLAN: Protocol not supported
And if there was/is
Hi,
I was why I get the following error when trying to create a vlan on top
of if_bridge:
# ifconfig bridge0 create
# ifconfig vlan2 vlan 2 vlandev bridge0
ifconfig: SIOCSETVLAN: Protocol not supported
And if there was/is any reason for this to not be supported.
Thanks
Tom
David Christensen wrote:
Is there any progress on this issue? We can provide access
to hardware with this fault (Specifically the R610).
I haven't been able to reproduce it on the r710 I have in house.
Checking with other groups now to see if they have one a I can
use, though I'm not sure why
David Christensen wrote:
Hi,
we have two new Dell R610 machines with four bce NICs (only
bce0 is connected at this time). I tried cold (power cycle in
iDRAC) and warm reboot (shutdown -r now), NIC is working on
every reboot, but I am still seeing messages:
bce0: /usr/src/sys/dev/bce/if_bce.c
Tom Judge wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
The next test is to diable the LOM's management firmware
but boot to
an active network.
After disabling the management firmware and doing 1 cold reboot and 3
warms all worked correctly.
After re enabling the firmware and doing 1 cold reboot
David Christensen wrote:
The next test is to diable the LOM's management firmware
but boot to
an active network. Get the User Diag utility at the bottom of
http://www.broadcom.com/support/ethernet_nic/netxtremeii.php.
Run the uxdiag utility with the command line:
"C:\>uxdiag -c 0 -mfw 0 -c 1
David Christensen wrote:
Can you try a different test? Power-on the system with the network
cable attached to an idle switch (i.e. keep all network
traffic from
being forwarded to the NIC during driver initialization). Does the
system power up successfully? Repeatedly? The problem I saw wa
David Christensen wrote:
After fighting with the update process for a bit and then learning
about the live cycle manager I have managed to test the
R610 with the
5.0.9 firmware.
On the face of it, it seems that this resolves the issue.
After a reboot this morning the error has resurfaced and
Tom Judge wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
Thanks for the rapid response.
Dell have firmware 5.0.9 on their website here: http://tiny.cc/ex834
Will that work?
Yes, that release does include a good version of BCM5709 bootcode
(v5.06).
I couldn't really tell until I downloaded the fil
David Christensen wrote:
Thanks for the rapid response.
Dell have firmware 5.0.9 on their website here: http://tiny.cc/ex834
Will that work?
Yes, that release does include a good version of BCM5709 bootcode (v5.06).
I couldn't really tell until I downloaded the file and looked at the
tempor
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Some years ago, I checked to see whether I would be able to let a
single snort process listen on more than one NIC.
At the time it was only possible in Linux.
Now, I searched a bit, but nothing new came up.
Did anything improve since then? Do we still need multiple snor
Steven Hartland wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:02:09 -
"Steven Hartland" mentioned:
If I understand the PR comments right, the code to support this PHY
should be present in 8.0. So you can start by trying out 8.0-RC1
ISO image (or USB stick image, fwiw).
Just tried 8.0RC2 no go, PHY sti
First sorry for the top post, the blackberry won't allow me to bottom post or I
can't find the option.
I will try this update when I get to the office in the morning. Hopefully it
will resolve the issue.
Thanks
Tom
--Original Message--
From: David Christensen
To: Tom J
David Christensen wrote:
Has anyone seen these errors before:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135836&cat=
The system is a Dell R610 and it happens on both cold and warm boots.
I am about to check a second chassis, and test with 8, and
will follow up after my tests.
Yes, I've
The following reply was made to PR kern/108542; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, r...@unix-asp.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/108542: [bce] Huge network latencies with 6.2-RELEASE /
STABLE
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:53:41 +
This should not be a problem
The following reply was made to PR kern/107850; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ol...@ipunplugged.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/107850: [bce] bce driver link negotiation is faulty
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:51:05 +
This bug should not be present in
Hi,
I went looking though all the PRs related to bce(4) this afternoon
trying to shed some light on my R610 issue and came across the following
duplicates:
No SerDes PHY Support: kern/139761 kern/136417 kern/134658 - and
possibly kern/118238 however this is different controller.
CTX Write
The following reply was made to PR kern/134658; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, harald_jen...@dell.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/134658: [bce] bce driver fails on PowerEdge m610 blade.
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:32:24 +
Hi,
This seems to be a
The following reply was made to PR kern/135836; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, rwilli...@borderware.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/135836: [bce] bce BCM5709 Watchdog after warm boot - ok
after cold boot
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:30:51 +
Hi,
This
The following reply was made to PR kern/139761; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, sebastian.tym...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/139761: [bce] bce driver on IBM HS22 [No PHY found on Child
MII bus]
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:25:30 +
Hi,
This
to my page.
Tom
- Original Message - From: "Tom Judge"
To:
Cc: ; "Xin LI" ; "David
Christensen" ; ;
"Stanislav Sedov"
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: bce(4) BCM5907 CTX write errors on 7.2 driver
Tom Judge wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone seen these errors before:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135836&cat=
The system is a Dell R610 and it happens on both cold and warm boots.
I am about to check a second chassis, and test with 8, and will follow
up after my tests.
Here ar
Hi,
Has anyone seen these errors before:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135836&cat=
The system is a Dell R610 and it happens on both cold and warm boots.
I am about to check a second chassis, and test with 8, and will follow
up after my tests.
Tom
_
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I have a setup with two FreeBSD 6.3 domain controllers using samba +
openldap + nss_ldap.
The company might be switching to Active Directory soon (not my
choice, before you ask :-), so I might need to reconfigure the two
FreeBSD boxes to become AD members (with
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
Fast question: are the two above compatible?
Can I use CARP over a lagg interface?
Yes it should work just fine, we use it here with lagg+carp and
lagg+vlan+carp.
Tom
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd
Luiz Otavio O Souza wrote:
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 9:30 AM
In FreeBSD there is only ARP level LB, that is in some cases
just not enough for load balancing.
Is there any plans to port IP level LB from OpenBSD, and,
if yes, will it be ported to 7x and 6x?
In my opinion, full CARP realizat
Jost Boekemeier wrote:
Hi,
from my point of view this issue can be closed.
TCP write/write/read sequences are bad on any operating system, it's just that
other OS are a little bit smarter. -- I think Jon Nagle has had a proposal to
fix/remove this unconditional delay, but I don't know if it
The following reply was made to PR kern/87194; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, gr...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/87194: [fxp] fxp(4) promiscuous mode seems to corrupt hw-csum
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:22:17 -0600
Can you add the output of
The following reply was made to PR kern/96268; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Judge
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, jost2...@users.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/96268: [socket] TCP socket performance drops by 3000% if
packets are split at the first byte
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to R J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I am trying to use tcpdump (or snort, but they are both behaving the same
in this case) to capture all the lines or contents of an msn
chat session, the actual conversation. I am getting partial output; i.e,
I'll only get half of a se
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
Yes we do indeed see a reply from node b. It is good to here that
this is a known issue.
The IPSec configuration is a gif ipip tunnel that is then encrypted
with IPSec using esp in tunnel mode as per the ipsec vpn section in
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
Today I looked into why I can not get a traceroute across a IPSec IPIP
tunnel
I guess not an IPIP tunnel but just IPsec tunnel mode?
...
Any information about this would be appreciated as I would like to be
able to do
Hi,
Today I looked into why I can not get a traceroute across a IPSec IPIP
tunnel an came across an interesting piece of code. Here is a diagram
of the setup:
[Node A] <-> [Router A] <-{IPSec}-> [Router B] <-> [Node B]
If I traceroute from node A to node B I never see the ICMP packet for
Mr Y wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to implement Large Recieve Offload for an Ethernet driver on
FreeBSD 6.3, but all my >MTU packets are being thrown by the OS.
I'm using mbuf chains in this imlpementation, each mbuf is a cluster of
MCLBYTES bytes. They are linked by the m_next pointer.
The first pa
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bill,
Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:36:18PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
I would suggest you ask yourself (and possibly the list) _why_ you think
multiple default routes is necessary ... what is it that you're hoping
to accomplish.
Nick Barnes wrote:
At 2008-02-18 21:36:18+, Bill Moran writes:
I would rather send packets from the P2 subnet addresses to the P2
router, while the packets from the P1 subnet addresses keep going to
the P1 router.
Apparently I can do this with some IPFW cunning, but that seems like
overk
Michael Tuexen wrote:
<>
(also, please don't top post)
Why not? I do that a lot...
Please read:
http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/?toppost
It outlines the arguments quite well.
Tom1
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
Michael Tuexen wrote:
Hi George,
thanks for the feedback. So I'll make sure that
one can compile SCTP with only INET enabled.
You mention nothing about SCTP in you original post.
I belive that SCTP depends on both INET and INET6.
Tom
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 12, 2008, at 3:39 PM, [EMA
Kurt Buff wrote:
All,
My company is getting a fractional DS3 in the near future, and I've
acquired a Sangoma a301 card to handle the interface.
We're retaining one of the T1s we currently have, from a different
provider, and we're intent on using BGP to manage the two connections.
Does anyone
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
On 1/30/08, Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have any error messages on the console in dmesg? ('cannot pad
short frame', 'unable to prepend vlan header' for example).
no :(
Sorry I'm fresh out of ideas now... Un
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
On 1/29/08, Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Hi Tom ! Thanks for your help!
I had to step back the chance an put the "old" gateway back, the
performance was unacceptable :-(
Looking closer I see that still have t
Andrei Kolu wrote:
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
This server is an Dell Power Edge 1950, QuadCore 2.83, 2Gb Ram, one
bce gigabit interface connected to a gigabit port of a Cisco 4500 in
trunk mode.
Why you are using trunk mode? IIRC then "trunk" is used only between Cisco
switches and routers
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Hi Tom ! Thanks for your help!
I had to step back the chance an put the "old" gateway back, the
performance was unacceptable :-(
Looking closer I see that still have the problem using the old gateway
too, in a small scale because I only use vlan to external links.
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Hi Tom ! Thanks for your help!
I had to step back the chance an put the "old" gateway back, the
performance was unacceptable :-(
Where these 2 systems connected to the same switch port and cabling?
Could you post the interface error counters from the switch port?
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Hi list,
I changed the company gateway implementing vlan concept and now I
have a lot of slow and packet loss.
I'm running FreeBSD FW1 7.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE #0:
Fri Jan 25 10:36:18 UTC 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FW
amd64
David DeSimone wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
my question is how to configure 2 nics with different ip on same
box in the same subnet.
Configure the second with a /32 prefix (netmask 255.255.255.255)
instead of the usual n
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Enovation Technologies wrote:
i configure with sysinstall my second nic , but when i restart my box
i have this message
arp: 10.200.1.1 is on re0 but got reply from 00:50:7f:b0:a0:f8 on re1
my question is how to configure 2 nics with different ip on same box
in the
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:49:54PM +, Tom Judge wrote:
On RELENG_6_2 the max multicast memberships per socket
(IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS) is hard coded in sys/netinet/in.h to 20.
Would there be any problem with bumping this to say 40. The problem is
our VPN routers
Hi,
On RELENG_6_2 the max multicast memberships per socket
(IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS) is hard coded in sys/netinet/in.h to 20.
Would there be any problem with bumping this to say 40. The problem is
our VPN routers running quagga (ospf) seem to be hitting this limit.
I know the problem is fixed
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:22:53AM +, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
As brought up in the thread "Programming interface MAC filter without
enabling PROMISC on an interface from user space." it would seem that
if_bridge does not conform to IEEE 802.1D-2004. Wh
Hi,
As brought up in the thread "Programming interface MAC filter without
enabling PROMISC on an interface from user space." it would seem that
if_bridge does not conform to IEEE 802.1D-2004. Which states:
7.12.6 Reserved addresses
Frames containing any of the group MAC Addresses specified
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Personally I can't see why this approach would be a problem, but I am
not a expert. The address is defined in IEEE Std 802.1D-2004 as to
not be forwarded by bridges (which I interpret as it being link local
in a sense as switches/bridges ar
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Thanks for the response. I have a quick grep of the src tree to find
an example of this being used and only found the following from
wpa_supplicant and I have a few questions:
* I am presuming that this will do what I want, am I correct?
Yes
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I have just started experimenting with OpenLLDP and come across a
little bit of a nasty. When it opens the interface, it puts it into
PROMISC mode, which I don't really want to happen. Is there any way
to add the LLDP MAC address (01-80-
Hi,
I have just started experimenting with OpenLLDP and come across a little
bit of a nasty. When it opens the interface, it puts it into PROMISC
mode, which I don't really want to happen. Is there any way to add the
LLDP MAC address (01-80-C2-00-00-0E) to the interface mac filter from
use
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Max Laier wrote:
Alternatively you could change IPPROTO_CARP in netinet/in.h to another
unused protocol number. This is really the preferred way of dealing
with mixed CARP and VRRP environments as the CARP packets might in
turn irritate the VRRP routers, too.
This
Hi,
I have just looked into the source of an error that we are seeing a lot
on our FreeBSD 6.2-p5 systems. The error is:
"carp_input: received len 20 < sizeof(struct carp_header)"
The messages are coming from a pair of systems that are configured to
have a pair of load balancing carp interfa
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Just to clarify, how are the two hooked together? Is it over
gigabit switch, a 10mbps hub, or directly cabled together?
-Mike
Sure. They're both connected over a gigabit switch, but the Windows
dri
Subscriber wrote:
Thank you very much, Tom. It works!
Cache.
One thing that you should note is that if you plan to "make buildworld"
you have to deinstall security/krb5 otherwise the buildworld will fail.
Tom
Tom Judge пишет:
Subscriber wrote:
Hi
I just tried to install
Subscriber wrote:
Hi
I just tried to install net/samba3 (samba-3.0.26a_1,1) on new server and
have an error. Error occurs only when I enable "ADS" option in port
config dialog. Then I try to compile port with gcc-4.2.2 instead of
default system compiler and has the same result.
Does anybody kno
Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
Hi all.
Recently, i discovered following problem (though it was already discussed, see
http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-ipfw_2006/msg00491.html):
pfil handlers (like ipfw or pf) sometime need to create packets (like tcp rst
or icmp errors). In order to avoid loops M
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2007-09-10 14:05, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-09-10 02:03, Nuno Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers
today I noticed that "route add&
Ivan Alexandrovich wrote:
Hi
I'd like to ask for advice - what is the right place for
setting maximum ethernet frame size in freebsd?
It needs 1526 bytes to allow two vlan tags per packet.
Those tags must be processed by ng_vlan code so
it seems that vlanmtu interface flag will be of no use here
Scott Bennett wrote:
My Dell Inspiron XPS has just one built-in Ethernet port, and I need to
have at least one other. Armed with a printed copy of Section 3.2 of the
FreeBSD 6.2 Harware Notes, I went to the several electronics stores, looking
to find a device on the list of supported device
Hi,
While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers
today I noticed that "route add" was showing some strange behaviour.
When adding a route for 128/8 to the table rather than adding
128.0.0.0/8 it would add 0.0.0.0/8, however adding 10/9 works correctly.
Is this a bug i
Gloomy Group wrote:
Hi all,
I am running Freebsd 6.2 as Transparent proxy Server. My hardware is
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz, 1GB DDR2 Memory and 2 SATA hardisk. While
checking dmesg it shows link state change to up and Down and sometimes the
server crashes.
ipfw: pullup failed
ipfw
Shteryana Shopova wrote:
On 9/4/07, Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 10:21:20PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:11:59PM +0100, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if if_bridge had been taught how to speak mu
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
