Re: Re : Re: netgraph and vpp

y performant these days https://issue.freebsdfoundation.org/publication/?i=660151 Benoit > Le sam. 25 nov. 2023 à 00:33, Jim Thompson nov. 2023 à 00:33, Jim Thompson <> a écrit : > > > > On Nov 24, 2023 at 12:48:07 AM, Benoit Chesneau < > beno...@enki-multimedia.eu&g

Re: how to cross-connect 2 interfaces

ng_hub(4)On Nov 25, 2023, at 8:34 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: Is there a way to cross-connect 2 interfaces without using a bridge . Something similar to the command ˋl2 xconnect` in vpp (or cisco) :https://docs.fd.io/vpp/16.12/vnet_vnet_l2.htmlThis could be quite handy to create a patch between di

Re: netgraph and vpp

On Nov 24, 2023 at 12:48:07 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > netgraph and vpp looks similar in their intent. Both are graphs to > process packets. > > I thought that usinv netgraph sounds interresting to build a modern > router or cpe. What about the perforance? Did anyone compRe? Also is there > an

Re: Any reason to not implement VRRP in FreeBSD?

FreeBSD has always been free to have a VRRP implementation. The smoke and mirrors FUD managed to prevent same to this point, but it was always FUD. Jim > On Jan 26, 2023, at 10:08 AM, Nicolas MASSE > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Currently, i'm investigating solutions

Re: Splitting antenna

to enhance reception. Some cards are, as you say, architected to have a 2.4ghz chain on one antenna and a 5ghz chain on another. So we’d have to know more about your wifi card as well. Jim > On Nov 19, 2021, at 11:26 AM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > > I am using my FreeBSD

Re: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on FreeBSD

) prior to the VPP group writing their own. L Your netmap-fed results are also quite low. loos@ (who wrote netmap-fwd) was getting 2.23Mpps single core on a xeon D-1540. https://youtube.com/watch?v=cAVgvzivzII Jim ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing

Re: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on FreeBSD

the main body of VPP. Netmap has a very nice architecture for building something similar, where packets can be directly sent to and received from the host rings by VPP, and these host rings are associated with an interface ring. Netmap-fwd uses this to good effect. Netmap

Re: Status of Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability into FreeBSD

houldn't, but hoping some masochists come >> forward to help :-) Actually, one of the main (original pair of) VPP developers told me a couple weeks ago that if we (Netgate) sent him patches to support FreeBSD, he would check them in. (He had a src bit a couple years ago

Re: Is if_ipsec/ipsec - AESNI accelerated ?

pair of C3558s, using just AES-GCM w/AES-NI. This is with 'pf' on, and KPI mitigations running, btw. If anything, i'd expect routed ipsec to be a bit faster. Jim On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 09.08.2018 23:11, David P. Discher wrote: > >

Re: removal of token-ring infrastructure coming soon

> On Mar 27, 2018, at 5:56 PM, Rodney W. Grimes > wrote: > >> I have posted a revision which removes support for token-ring networking >> from the tree. There have been no such devices for some time. >> >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14875 >> > > Arcnet coming soon? > and probably FDDI?

Re: Multiple instances of hostapd?

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless/2015-January/005345.html > On Jan 1, 2018, at 11:33 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > Dear Colleagues, > > I would like to run multiple instances of hostapd, each per a wlanX > interface. I see some provisions for multiple instances inside the >

Re: Netmap: Build a network SPAN/TAP from netmap

ou could also look at SF-TAP. http://sf-tap.github.io Jim ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: OpenVPN vs IPSec

there is some huge advantage of IPSec I've >>> skipped? >>> >> Hi, >> >> partners/customers with Cisco IOS or ASA wont be able to partner up >> without IPSEC. > > Sure, that's why I wrote "and others compatible with OpenVPN > like pfS

Re: OpenVPN vs IPSec

Performance is better with IPsec. It’s a standard, too. > On Nov 18, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > Dear Colleagues, > > Is there any reason to prefer IPSec over OpenVPN for building VPNs > between FreeBSD hosts and routers (and others compatible with OpenVPN > like pfSense, Ope

Re: state of packet forwarding in FreeBSD?

27;ve not figured out dpdk (dpdk.org) yet. Our first foray into the > test examples, and we're stuck trying to get the interfaces online. DPDK on FreeBSD is a bit of a mess. Jim ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Panic in nd6_prefix_offlink()

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 10:48:15 -0800 Mark Johnston wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 08:11:19PM +0100, Jim wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I observe frequent crashes on Beagle Bone Black running CURRENT r311106 at > > home. > > My home LAN is connected to DSL provider.

Re: Panic in nd6_prefix_offlink()

On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 10:48:15 -0800 Mark Johnston wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 08:11:19PM +0100, Jim wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I observe frequent crashes on Beagle Bone Black running CURRENT r311106 at > > home. > > My home LAN is connected to DSL provider.

Panic in nd6_prefix_offlink()

dvice on how to address observed crashes. Thanks. Kind regards, Jim ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [RFC/RFT] projects/ipsec

> In it's initial state if_ipsec allows to use only one set of encryption > parameters (because only one sainfo anonyumous is possible), so at this time > it doesn't allow to create multiple tunnels with VPN hubs that use different > cipers and/or transform sets, but as far as I understand this

Re: netmap, netmap-fwd, and how many M packets-per-second?

at 1538 byte frames (on the wire) that's around 18.5Gbps. try pkt_gen, it will generate the small frames you seek. Cheers, Jim On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Jordan Caraballo < jordancaraball...@gmail.com> wrote: > Feedback and/or tips and tricks more than welcome. > > We are

Re: projects/routing announcement/status

> On Aug 27, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: > > Second have you considered replacing the existing radix tree with a faster > data structure, specially the Luigi DXR > tables? DXR only supports IPv4. FYI. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing

Re: Netmap Checksum Offloading

We've focused on just the IP header checksum, but it's possible to add L4 checksum offload as well. I asked Luigi why he hadn't included checksum offload (with a library in software for devices that don't offer a hw offload), and his answer was that when he wrote netmap, he wanted a fast path to t

Re: Netmap Checksum Offloading

np@ about it first. ;-) We might do ixl(4) as well. Before Luiz retired to Brazil, we discussed upstreaming these to FreeBSD. We’re committed to make it happen, but I doubt they make 11. Jim > On Jun 15, 2016, at 6:50 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > > On 06/15/2016 16:15, Andrey

Re: [Bug 208389] Netmap Panic

Works fine on recent -CURRENT (r297237M), (Thinkpad x230, em0). > On Apr 1, 2016, at 2:41 PM, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208389 > > --- Comment #4 from Shawn Webb --- > On one box, it's em0, on another, it's ue0. Same backtrace. >

Re: Taking bhyve step forward enterprise grade

VALE is in 10.3, the netmap backend: IDK. It's in pfSense 2.3 (based on 10.3). -- Jim > On Mar 22, 2016, at 8:44 AM, Sami Halabi wrote: > > is it builtin already in 10.3? or in current only? > > בתאריך 19 במרץ 2016 18:55,‏ "Jim Thompson" כתב: >> >

Re: Taking bhyve step forward enterprise grade

terms of network virtualization? Again, > bhyve itself isn't intended to be a giant umbrella but FreeBSD does support > many networking features which could support network virtualization (and > which work fine with bhyve). VALE is built-in to

asm.ca.com (formerly just-ping.com) and FreeBSD

;t subscribe to this list. -- Jim Ohlstein "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubsc

Re: nice stuff from cloudflare (and, we need something like ethtool!)

deas a bit on how that might work? > > I've done nothing more than skim ethtool(8) on linuxcommand.org, and > wondered why its functionality wasn't incorporated into ifconfig, but > then ifconfig (on FreeBSD anyway) is tending towards obesity already Luigi already did netli

Re: netmap: recommended NIC for 40GbE capture on Linux?

5Mpps figure above. See also: http://adrianchadd.blogspot.com.br/2015/04/intel-ddio-llc-cache-buffer-alignment.html Jim (*) this work will need to wait until after we can get pfSense 2.3 released ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lis

Re: Freebsd 10.2 amd64 netmap ipfw

README Note that the "telnet localhost 5566" traffic generator hack mentioned in the README doesn't work without a recompile, but you won't need it for running real traffic. Jim ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://li

Re: remove IPsec SKIPJACK support...

> On Jul 27, 2015, at 10:41 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Jim Thompson wrote this message on Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 20:24 -0500: >>> On Jul 27, 2015, at 7:57 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: >>> >>> I would like to remove it from HEAD immediately as I don'

Re: remove IPsec SKIPJACK support...

> On Jul 27, 2015, at 7:57 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > I would like to remove it from HEAD immediately as I don't see a use > for it. Some time ago I proposed removing Skipjack from the OCF in 12, but > personally, now that I think about how long 12 is, we deprecate these sooner > rather

Re: Realtek Issues (re) on PC Engines APU1 Board...

Do we even know that Karl’s APU(s) aren’t running the current version of firmware (which was released last September)? jim > On Jun 12, 2015, at 11:53 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Hi, > > If this works for people then we should document this somewhere and > include

Re: IPsec on a LAN?

: http://www.schmidp.com/2014/01/20/ipsec-between-freebsd-and-mac-osx/ Jim > On May 6, 2015, at 1:10 AM, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > > Hi there! > > I'm trying to find a resource for learning how to go about setting up IPsec > on an IPv4 LAN. The Handbook and just about ever

Re: netmap-ipfw on em0 em1

> On May 4, 2015, at 10:07 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Jim, and Barney. I hate to sound like a broken record, but we really need > interested people in the network stack. > The people who make the decisions about this are the people who stand up and > say "I have a

Re: netmap-ipfw on em0 em1

of what "can" > happen, and 2) because they test under unrealistic conditions that don't > represent real world events, and 3) they don't have properly tuned ethernet > drivers. > > BC > > > > On Monday, May 4, 2015 12:37 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: >

Re: netmap-ipfw on em0 em1

While it is a true statement that, "You can do anything in the kernel that you can do in user space.”, it is not a helpful statement. Yes, the kernel is just a program. In a similar way, “You can just pop it into any kernel and it works.” is also not helpful. It works, but it doesn’t work wel

Re: [oss-security] CVE Request : IPv6 Hop limit lowering via RA messages

have you considered that there might not be a relevant patch because FreeBSD’s implementation isn’t affected? Jim > On Apr 2, 2015, at 9:15 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > > + FreeBSD lists since I haven't seen any relevant patches (although I > might have missed them). > &g

Re: Invalid subnet masks

ackers/2011-April/034997.html Subject came up on -hackers in 2011 Quoting RFC-1219: "While RFC-950 allows the "ones" in the subnet mask to be non-contiguous, RFC-950 recommends that 1) they be contiguous, and 2) that they occupy the most significant bits of the "host" par

Re: Silly experiments with netisr

> On Feb 5, 2015, at 2:23 PM, hiren panchasara > wrote: > > On 02/05/15 at 12:31P, Scott Long via freebsd-net wrote: >> >> >> Welcome to our workload. Granted, we don?t involve pf, but the majority of >> our CPU processing right now is spent in TCP (with the rest being spent in >> the VM,

Re: Silly experiments with netisr

intel, use CPU_CLK_UNHALTED instead, so you get an > idea of which instructions are spending the most time doing "stuff". > Some instructions are costlier than others (eg things that cause > memory bus stalls.) > >> %SAMP IMAGE FUNCTION CALLERS >&g

Re: is polling still a thing?

owls of “we zero-copy!”, because anyone who asserts this just hasn’t looked at the stack.) There are tricks (if your code is interleaving access to the write pipes well, you’ll see more benefit. This really wants cache-aligned data structures, etc.) So, that’s just a long-winded “YMMV”. Jim

Re: is polling still a thing?

> On Jan 27, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Michael Sierchio > wrote: > > > On small, embedded computers running ipfw w/kernel nat and device polling > enabled (on em ether adapters), I observed the *reported* sy

Re: is polling still a thing?

> On Jan 27, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > (Please CC, as i am not on the list.) > > I was surprised to read this article in the pfSense blog: > > https://blog.pfsense.org/?p=115 That article is from June 2007. It’s over seven years old. T

Re: netmap in GENERIC, by default, on HEAD

> On Nov 5, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > Sorry, I showed wrong numbers here. IPSEC kernel in this test gives 2.4 > Mpps, but with encryption only 180 kpps. This is more in-line with what I'd expect, assuming AES-CBC-HMAC. Improving the situation wrt encryption overhead seem

Re: Intel DPDK added to FreeBSD ports collection

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Rui Paulo wrote: > On Oct 29, 2014, at 05:13, Eggert, Lars wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 2014-10-20, at 17:40, Jim Harris wrote: > >> Just wanted to send a heads-up that Intel's Data Plane Development Kit > >>

Intel DPDK added to FreeBSD ports collection

r dpdk.org. Thanks to Bruce Richardson from the Intel DPDK team and vanilla@ and gnn@ for getting it checked into ports. For any questions, please check out dpdk.org and the developer mailing list (d...@dpdk.org). Regards, -Jim ___ freebsd-net@f

Re: How do I balance bandwidth over several virtual NICs?

> On Sep 22, 2014, at 5:15 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 22 September 2014 13:39, Elof Ofel wrote: >> Hi Adrian! >> >> Now this sounds promising! All my sensors use the ixgbe driver. >> However, my skills in programming/compiling isn't vast. I know how to patch >> and use poudriere. That's ab

Re: IP fast forwarding and setkey

is not compatible with IPSec only but can be used with > TCP_MD5 without problem (tested on FreeBSD 10-stable). Even this is solvable, and will likely occur in a future version of pfSense. Jim ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [netmap/vale-ctl] when could process packet

Jaye, I’d really like to see this work happen. Let me know if I can help. Jim > On Sep 17, 2014, at 9:39 PM, upyzl wrote: > > Hi, > > I think it's right place to talk about FreeBSD 10 - netmap question > (location at FreeBSD 10: /usr/src/tools/tools/netmap ; with ke

Re: jme interface bounces up and down, up and down....

hernet/Linux/jmebp-1.0.8.5.tar.bz provides a workaround for the issue. It adds the delay_time module parameter, which causes the network card to attempt a fall back to 100 mbps after it cannot connect for several seconds (by default 11). With this, link detection “works”, but the connection

RE: Does anybody have set of scripts to support two uplink connections (with two ISPs) without AS and BGP?

pfSense has a bunch of PHP scripts that do this. :-) -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Lev Serebryakov Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 12:38 PM To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Does anybody have set of scripts to s

Re: Intel Support for FreeBSD

FreeBSD is the only reason that there is a project” is incorrect. It is a reason, but not the only reason. Jim > On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net > wrote: > > This kind of stupidity really irritates me. The commercial use of FreeBSD is > the only reaso

Re: Intel Support for FreeBSD

> On Aug 13, 2014, at 8:24, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net > wrote: > > Negative Progress is inevitable. Many here undoubtedly consider the referenced effort to be the opposite. Jim ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org maili

Re: UDP sendto() returning ENOBUFS - "No buffer space available"

> On Jul 18, 2014, at 23:34, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > It upsets the ALTQ people too. I'm an ALTQ person (pfSense, so maybe one if the biggest) and I'm not upset. That cr*p needs to die in a fire. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

Re: ixgbe and igb - how many queues?

But only 8 per VF. -- Jim > On Jul 15, 2014, at 19:04, Ryan Stone wrote: > > The oldest hardware supported by the ixgbe driver is the 82598, which > supports up to 16 RSS queues (see Table 3-48 in the 82598 datasheet). > I believe that the 82599 and X520 are more capable. >

Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux)

On Aug 18, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > The mistake, i think, > is to expect that there is one magic solution to handle all the useful > cases. AKA: not all the world is Yahoo. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.

Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux)

On Aug 18, 2013, at 8:48 AM, Barney Cordoba wrote: > I could fill a tx queue with 10gb of traffic with yesteryear's cpus. It's > not an achievement. Being able to bridge > real traffic at 10gb/s with 2 cores is Or forward at layer 3. Or filter packets. Or IPSEC. Or... _

Re: netmap on wireless NIC

On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 04/06/2013 23:06, Chao Xu wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is it possible to hacking some wireless NIC driver (carl9170 for example) >> to enable netmap on it? I guess this is possible because wireless drivers >> also manage packets using ring buffers.

Re: pf performance?

tforms for pfSense running a set of software including running same across -HEAD, 9-STABLE, and 8.3, both with the pfSense patches (as pfSense), and without. I doubt I'll get this done prior to BSDcan, but I'll get it done, if only for internal reasons. Jim

Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer

make this happen for pf, so it should be possible for pf with some attention. Jim ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Data Center Bridging?

it. > as I've not heard of it. DCB is yet another attempt to 'fix' Ethernet, by eliminating queue overflow and providing bandwidth allocation on individual links. It was intended to be mostly about storage. Linux uses lldpad and dcbtool to manage the settings. Jim

Re: FreeBSD boxes as a 'router'...

he inefficiencies of polling. You're entitled to your opinion, but experimental results have tended to show yours incorrect. Jim ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send an

why use INP_WLOCK instead of INP_RLOCK

setting socket options does. Why do we just use INP_RLOCK(inp), as it looks not changing anything in tcp control block? Thank you for your kindly answer. Jim ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/nfsclient nfs.h nfs_socket.c nfs_subs.c nfsmount.h

Kris Kennaway wrote: Mohan's previous commit that increases the nfs server socket buffer size is also very important for NFS performance. Without it I was only getting 1-2MB/sec throughput over 10Gb ethernet with UDP mounts You're trying to use nfs/udp at 10G? I wouldn't expect that to

Re: ppp/peers/* files

What man/handbook pages/sections should I look at to get a clue. I'm so far from having one, I don't even know the direction... Thanks, -Jim Stapleton On 6/26/07, Artyom Viklenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jim Stapleton wrote: > That partially worked. I could only ping 192.

Re: ppp/peers/* files

gs=88d1 mtu 1396 inet --> netmask 0x == I could not ping the DNS servers. Any suggestions? Thanks, -Jim Stapleton On 6/24/07, Artyom Viklenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jim Stapleton wrote: > I can't find a way to specify mppe-128 for either pptp or pppd in

Re: ppp/peers/* files

pd, neither of which work. Any suggestions? Thanks, -Jim Stapleton On 6/23/07, Artyom Viklenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jim Stapleton wrote: > where do I find the valid commands I can put in these files (yes, > still on the never ending saga to get VPN working on my BSD machine so >

Re: ppp/peers/* files

Thanks, I'll look at it more. I'm trying to connect to a windows vpn, and most of the stuff I see suggests pptp+pppd, but the documentation for most things contains commands that just dont work. -Jim Stapleton On 6/23/07, Artyom Viklenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jim Stapleto

ppp/peers/* files

where do I find the valid commands I can put in these files (yes, still on the never ending saga to get VPN working on my BSD machine so I don't need to boot windows) Thanks, -Jim Stapleton ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: VPNC seems to connect, but cannot ping any IPs

g "$TUNDEV" inet 192.168.1.84 $ifconfig_syntax_ptp "$INTERNAL_IP4_ADDRESS" netmask 255.255.255.255 mtu 1412 up Thanks again, -Jim Stapleton On 5/14/07, Jim Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: which version had a good source? I tried two versions with similar errors? Thanks, -Jim Stapleto

Re: VPNC seems to connect, but cannot ping any IPs

which version had a good source? I tried two versions with similar errors? Thanks, -Jim Stapleton On 5/13/07, Jax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jim Stapleton wrote: > I'm using VPNC (security/vpnc) to get into my works VPN, but I'm > having an odd problem I do not know wh

VPNC seems to connect, but cannot ping any IPs

hould fix this? I'm not sure/can't figure out what I did wrong. Thank you, -Jim Stapleton ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: attempting VPN again

Thanks, I tried the nve0->ng0 thing (see my other email). After reading yours, I tried removing the extra blank line, but that did not fix anything either, or change the output. Thanks, -Jim Stapleton On 4/20/07, Nicolas Gieczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:24

Re: attempting VPN again

Starting --> Initial [vpn] LCP: LayerFinish [vpn] device: CLOSE event in state DOWN [vpn] device is now in state DOWN A few IPs have been cleaned out with anything else sensitive, there's a lot more, which I can clean up and send here, but, I don't know what is needed. Any ideas (

attempting VPN again

7;t enlightening for me. The ipsec section of the handbook left me more confused then I was when I started. Thanks, -Jim Stapleton ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Gigabit Ethernet NIC with Jumbo Frame Support

most stable, best performing card and driver for FreeBSD RELENG_6 line? I have multi TBs to back up from a SAN (via 2Gb Qlogic FC card) to a TSM Server. We currently have the Broadcom BCM5750, but that chipset does not support Jumbo Frames. The card itself needs to be PCI- Express. TIA - - Jim

ndis troubles - what's my next debugging step?

no ndis entry in /dev or /dev/net. Another site suggested pciconf -la to determine what cards are found, and I didn't see anything recognizable there. What's the next step in diagnostics? I'm runing FreeBSD 6.1 on i386. Please cc a copy of the reply to me as well as the newsgro

Problem: fpa(4) on sparc64 6.1-RELEASE

I am getting a panic with a GENERIC with all non-available hardware drivers stripped out with "device fddi" and "device fpa" in the config. The only things I added to GENERIC after stripping out the unneeded things was the fddi, the sound, and the openfirmware. The system boots fine with the

Re: ip-up script of pppd no triggered

Hi Maxim, On Saturday, November 15, 2003, at 11:02 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, 22:44+0200, Jim Xochellis wrote: Hi Maxim, On Friday, November 14, 2003, at 09:13 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, 16:02+0200, Jim Xochellis wrote: Hi list, I have also posted

Re: ip-up script of pppd no triggered

Hi Maxim, On Saturday, November 15, 2003, at 11:02 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, 22:44+0200, Jim Xochellis wrote: > >> Hi Maxim, >> >> On Friday, November 14, 2003, at 09:13 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, 16:02

Re: ip-up script of pppd no triggered

Hi Maxim, On Friday, November 14, 2003, at 09:13 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, 16:02+0200, Jim Xochellis wrote: Hi list, I have also posted this mail to the freebsd-questions list a few days ago, but I had no luck. Hence, I decided to try this list too, which probably is the

ip-up script of pppd no triggered

sending and receiving IP packets. My link becomes available for sending/receiving IP packets, but ip-up is never executed. Any ideas why? By the way, I am using kernel PPP, (on ppp0) if it makes any difference. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks in advance Jim Xochellis _

RE: ENOBUFS

ter you are targeting will need to be rewritten by the sysctl. Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

RE: ENOBUFS

e conclusion that they must be time values. Jim > Anything else that can be done? Does PCI width/speed affect the amount of > time spent in the kernel interrupt or are the PCI transfers asynchronous? > > Pete > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Jim McGrath"

RE: ENOBUFS

r, to process receive descriptors under low load. Jim > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@;FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Luigi Rizzo > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:56 AM > To: Jim McGrath > Cc: Petri Helenius; Lars Eggert; [EMAIL P

RE: ENOBUFS

Careful here. Read the errata sheet!! I do not believe the em driver uses these parameters, and possibly for a good reason. Jim > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@;FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Luigi Rizzo > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2

getnetbyname broken for DNS case?

Hi, I am trying to debug a problem that I have with /etc/exports. I cannot put in the symbolic name for my network (10.26.0.0) without putting it in /etc/networks. It is currently in DNS, but it looks like the getnetbyname is not working correctly for the DNS case. The functions that are bro

RE: Inconsistency between net/if.c and several ethernet drivers

Any driver that uses miibus_attach() is broken if struct arpcom is not at the beginning of the softc structure. There was some discussion of this more than a year ago when this bug showed up in the wx driver. Jim > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: mbuf external buffer reference counters

e Power PC. My only involvement was with the Large File System. and I really don't remember how cluster bufs ref count was implemented. Most of the people who may have been involved are at Egenera, with the code somewhere at Hitachi in Japan. If you have any contact at either place, you might

RE: Hello from Mark Filipak

ort a LINUX driver to FreeBSD. Basicly you have to redo everything that came with GallantWEB. Jim -Original Message- From: Mark Filipak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Hello from Mark Filipak Hello All! This is an introductio

Fw: RIFRAF Routing Changes for FreeBSD

; http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial/ > http://www.RepliGate.net > > The Netfilter Project: Packet Mangling for Linux 2.4 > http://netfilter.samba.org > > Jim Fleming > http://www.IPv8.info > IPv16One Better !! > > - Original Message - > From: "Cha

RE: softc, ifnet and arpcom overlay

It makes the assumption that the ifnet/arpcom structure is at the beginning of the softc structure. In needs to do this to maintain media independence. Also see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=29249 Jim -Original Message- From: 'Luigi Rizzo' [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: softc, ifnet and arpcom overlay

Check mii.c, miibus_attach() Jim -Original Message- From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 12:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: softc, ifnet and arpcom overlay Hi, i remember early in october this topic came out, but while

RE: review of minor clarifying comments

I ran into this same problem with the wx driver and submitted a pr. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=29249 Jim -Original Message- From: Matthew Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: review of minor clarifying

Re: ng_one2many usage

On Monday 06 August 2001 06:55 pm, Julian Elischer wrote: > first kldload ng_ether Yes this does allow the mkpeer stuff work. Thanks. - JimP > > On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jim Pirzyk wrote: > > On Monday 06 August 2001 04:31 pm, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Au

Re: ng_one2many usage

On Monday 06 August 2001 04:31 pm, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jim Pirzyk wrote: > > Ok, what I am trying to do is to follow the example on the > > ng_one2many man page to create a network interface that will > > aggregate across my dc0 and dc1 interfaces.

Re: ng_one2many usage

On Monday 06 August 2001 12:25 pm, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Nope, nor does it work when I change it to dc0 (which there is a device > > called dc0, but I though that was too confusing). > > > > - JimP > > > >

Re: ng_one2many usage

On Monday 06 August 2001 10:07 am, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 02:56:30PM -0700, Jim Pirzyk wrote: > > So I tried to use the one2many netgraph module, but I get errors > > right away. Here is what I get: > > > > Jim.Pirzyk@snoopy:~ > > 47>

Re: ng_one2many usage

Nope, nor does it work when I change it to dc0 (which there is a device called dc0, but I though that was too confusing). - JimP > Jim Pirzyk wrote: > > > > So I tried to use the one2many netgraph module, but I get errors > > right away. Here is what I get: > > >

  1   2   >