Hi,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Pan Tsu wrote:
>> Zhihao Yuan writes:
>>> I'm not sure whether the FreeBSD system administrators (who opens 100
>>> ssh sessions) agree with that to replace the nvi in base system with
>>> this one.
>>
>
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> Among *all* the GNU/Linux distributions I used, they include a vim
> compiled in tiny mode (ln -s it to vi), which doubles the size of nvi,
> in their base systems. A vim.tiny contains much more features compared
> with nvi, but it's not c
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andrew Duane wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Andriy Gapon
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 8:00 AM
> To: Alexander Best
> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers
> Subject: Re:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:00 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:20:30 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> I thought I knew something about how the compiler looks for include
>> files, but now I think maybe I don't know much. :-)
>>
>> So here's what I'm pondering. When I build
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> I think we can change this, because it would break makefiles that assume
> that the entire script is given to the shell in one piece.
>
I'm not sure to parse that. "We can change it because it would break stuff".
That said, if somethi
Hi,
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Martin Möller
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for all the replies.
> We have so far discovered the following suggetions for the parsing Problem:
> Using:
> o a tokenizer/parser is too much overhead for such a simple task
> o strchr, memchr is too low-level and
Hi,
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:17:12PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 May 2011 12:56:40 -0700 Sean Bruno
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Silly thing I ran into today. User wanted to NFS mount a dir inside a
>> > jail. After I gr
Hi Warner,
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
>
>> On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
(2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. This seems like a basic
requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi Warner,
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Warner,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Wa
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote
Hi Kip,
I've got a few question about the buf_ring(9) API.
1) what means the 'drbr_' prefix. I can guess the two last letter, 'b'
and 'r', for Buffer Ring, but what about 'd' and 'r' ?
2) in `sys/sys/buf_ring.h', you defined 'struct buf_ring' as:
struct buf_ring {
volatile uint32_t
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM,
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, K. Macy wrote:
>
>>> Why are you making an MD guess, the amount of padding to fit the size of
>>> a cache line, in MI API ? Strangely enough, you did not make this assumption
>>> in, say r205488 (picked randomly).
>>
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi Kip,
>
> I've got a few question about the buf_ring(9) API.
>
> 1) what means the 'drbr_' prefix. I can guess the two last letter, 'b'
> and 'r', for Buffer Ring, but what ab
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:32 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:57:10AM +0430, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> The data sheet for intel 82576 advertises IP TX/RX checksum offload
>> but the driver does not set CSUM_IP in ifp->if_hwassist. Does this mean that
>> dri
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 03:19:46PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:32 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
>> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:57:10AM +0430, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
>&
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 06:05:33PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 03:19:46PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>&g
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:41 AM, K. Macy wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi Kip,
>>>
>>> I've got a few question about the buf_rin
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> [...]
> If you notice, the Linux driver did not enable multiqueue on the hardware
> either, so do you think a whole department of software engineers backed
> by the hardware engineers who designed the damn thing might have had
> a reason?
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Arnaud (and others),
>
> Liaising with vendors is not an easy task. The reason why Intel (and
> other vendors) don't supply detailed history and reasoning for their
> development efforts is that their engineers are likely tasked with
> "m
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:59 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:17:22AM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> > Arnaud (and others),
>> >
>> > Liaising with v
Hi,
[adding Fabien Thomas to the CC: list]
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Just decided to follow the global trends and trying to throw all of my
> local/private changes at you in hope that the "crowd-sourcing magic" might
> somehow happen :-) This seems definitely easi
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>
> On Sep 20, 2011, at 6:58 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> [adding Fabien Thomas to the CC: list]
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
>>> Jus
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Fabien Thomas
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2011, at 6:58 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [adding Fabien Thomas to the CC: li
br_prod_tail' is marked
`volatile', but there is no guarantee that it will not be re-ordered
wrt. non-volatile write (to `br_prod_bufs' and `br_prod_bytes').
- Arnaud
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 201
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:14:38 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> Just decided to follow the global trends and trying to throw all of my
>> local/private changes at you in hope that the "crowd-sourcing magic" might
>> somehow happen :-)
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:52:43 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:14:38 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:52:43 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:14:38 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
Hi,
[Moving the discussion on -hackers@]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> On 2011-Sep-26 19:48:23 -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>>>On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Just decided to follow the global trends and trying to throw all of my
> local/private changes at you in hope that the "crowd-sourcing magic" might
> somehow happen :-) This seems definitely easier than carefully producing the
> patch
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 28/09/2011 07:23 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
>> available here:
>>
>> https://github.com/lacombar/freebsd/commit/c1d5c4857361028dc40941273dd2ab9576c687fd
>>
>> This patch adds a KODIR_SYMBOLS
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:52:43 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ulrich Spörlein
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:31 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:55 AM, satish kondapalli
> wrote:
>> I am new to FreeBSD, I just want know whether FreeBSD supports NUMA.
>> If FreeBSD supports NUMA what are the kernel API to allocate memory?
>> is there any example driver or any driver
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> You might be interested in this PR:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153157&cat=
>
> This does the same thing for userland .symbols files, and teaches gdb
> how to find them.
>
Actually, I've made my own implementation of thi
Hi,
[Add jhb@ to the CC list]
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:34 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:31 PM, wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:55 AM, satish kondapalli
>>> wrote:
>
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:22:22 +0100
> Lars Engels wrote:
>
>>> Hi Hackers,
>>>
>>> maybe you've heard of the upcoming Raspberry Pi, a credit card sized
>>> ARM computer which is about to get sold for 25$ - 35$ from december
>>> on.
>>>
ven a deeply
embedded and integrated system.
- Arnaud
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
>> > On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:22:22 +0100
>> > Lars Engels wrote:
>
Hi,
[added gber@ and cognet@ to the Cc: list]
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, richo wrote:
> On 03/11/11 10:22 +0100, Lars Engels wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hackers,
>>
>> maybe you've heard of the upcoming Raspberry Pi, a credit card sized ARM
>> computer which is about to get sold for 25$ - 35$ from dece
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 November 2011 at 11:33:25 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> [Please do not top-post.]
>
> Please trim messages.
>
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Nate Dobbs
>> wrote:
>
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Nate Dobbs wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, 3 November 2011 at 21:05:54 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Greg 'groggy' Le
Hi,
[Starting a new thread, added Ben Gray to the Cc: list]
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Nate Dobbs
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey
>> wrote:
>>>
&g
Hi,
2011/11/4 Lev Serebryakov :
> Hello, Arnaud.
> You wrote 4 ноября 2011 г., 6:30:18:
>
>> $89, 700MHz Cortex A8, 256MB DRR2, micro-SD. However, do not expect
>> being able to run FreeBSD on it before a few years :)
> What is so special about A8? We have some ARM code in tree, is Cortex
> SO di
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 4 November 2011 07:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> FWIW, referring to the technology two years ago in computer science is
>> just like referring to the Prehistory to make a point about mankind
>> today :/
>
Hi,
2011/11/4 Lev Serebryakov :
> Hello, Arnaud.
> You wrote 4 ноября 2011 г., 6:30:18:
>
>> $89, 700MHz Cortex A8, 256MB DRR2, micro-SD. However, do not expect
>> being able to run FreeBSD on it before a few years :)
> What is so special about A8?
>
It is the consumer technology of today. The be
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:41:41 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Ulrich
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile
> correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc
> from base system and last gcc 4.2 snapshot from ports. It works with gcc
> 4.3, gcc 4.4 on
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Rafal Jaworowski wrote:
>
> On 2011-12-08, at 17:53, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>
>> On 12/08/11 03:01, Piotr Nowak wrote:
>>> We're working on PowerPC target using GCC 4.2.1
>>> and FreeBSD 6.1. It seems like we have similar
>>> problem. In our case GCC sometime
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:35 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 7:46:34 am Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure why I
Hi,
"Mark Linimon" pisze:
> We don't have a way to track emails that various users send to individual
> maintainers. With a PR open, we have a way to do that. We also track
> maintainer-timeouts, and these can eventually lead to a maintainer reset.
>
It is less a problem of having the tools tha
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> On 24 January 2012 18:36, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> It is less a problem of having the tools than having the will to do
>> everything publicly. From experience, committers loves to do all kind
>> of t
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> I might just be also interested to review/comment code, discuss
>> regressions, and architecture, for a change ;-)
>> Unfortunately, such threads rarely ever happen. Most of the time, the
>> only food provided is a really indigestible +5
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:58:41AM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > You seem to be obsessed by picking over
>> > semantics and finding shortcomings to be aggreived over.
>> >
>> Semantics and
Hi,
Vijay Singh wrote;
> In the code below:
> (kgdb-amd64-6.8-48) l
> 402 if (c_lock != NULL) {
> 403 if (c_lock ==
> &Giant.lock_object) {
> 404 mtx_lock(&Giant);
>
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 02/15/12 21:54, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Alexander Motin wrote:
>>>
>>> I've decided to stop those cache black magic practices and focus on
>>> things that really exist in this world -- SMT and CPU load. I've
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 20/02/2012 01:14, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> What is geom_aes (sys/geom/geom_aes.*) (wherein differs form geli,
>> besides useses fewer geom layer and has a compiled in key), and who
>> can I find something from this geom mod
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
> On 5 Mar 2012, at 12:30, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>> Hello Elman,
>>
>>
>> None of us was born a seer so you might want to tell the model of the
>> network card.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/5/12 12:16 PM, Elman wrote:
>>> Hallo hacker.
>>>
>>> I t
Hi,
[Thanks folks to have removed the original sender from the CC: list...
Adding him back.]
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Mark Blackman wrote:
>>
>> On 5 Mar 2012, at 12:30, Damien Fleuriot wrot
Hi,
[Sorry for the delay, I got a bit sidetrack'ed...]
2012/2/17 Alexander Motin :
> On 17.02.2012 18:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/15/12 21:54, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>>>&g
Hi,
2012/4/9 Alexander Motin :
> [...]
>
> I have strong feeling that while this test may be interesting for profiling,
> it's own results in first place depend not from how fast scheduler is, but
> from the pipes capacity and other alike things. Can somebody hint me what
> except pipe capacity an
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 04/10/12 20:18, Alexander Motin wrote:
>>
>> On 04/10/12 19:58, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012/4/9 Alexander Motin:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:58:00 -0400
> Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Let me disagree on your conclusion. If OS A does a task in X seconds,
>> and OS B does the same task in Y seconds, if Y > X, then OS B is just
>>
Hi,
I will be bringing up an old thread there, but it would seem the
situation did not evolve in the past 9 years. I have a machine running
7.1 whose UHCI controller is generating some interrupt storm:
# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq4: sio0
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will be bringing up an old thread there, but it would seem the
> situation did not evolve in the past 9 years. I have a machine running
> 7.1 whose UHCI controller is generating some interrupt storm:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> Il 20 aprile 2012 19:18, Arnaud Lacombe ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I will be bringing up an old thread there, but it wo
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 18:42:38 -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:41:41 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> >> On Mon, S
Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 16:49:42 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 18:42:38 -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>&g
Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 16:49:42 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Ulrich Spörlein
Hi,
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 16:49:42 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrot
Hi folks,
I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
from `src/sbin/sysctl.c':
/*
* These functions uses a presently undocumented interface to the kernel
* to walk the tree and get the type so it can print the value
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
>> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
>> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
&g
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Boris Popov wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 6:56, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> purpose. However, if I can avoid to re-design that wheel too, by
>> getting access to scfs(4) code, I will.
>
> It is interesting, that the old drive with this code ar
Hi folks,
The problem has been raised in the last BSDCan during a talk, but no
clear answer has been given. Some (pseudo-)devices might require
resources from multiple other (pseudo-)devices.
For example, a device is sitting on an SMBus, but need to access a
software controlled LED, sitting on a
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 5:14 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> The problem has been raised in the last BSDCan during a talk, but no
>> clear answer has been given. Some (pseudo-)devices might r
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> That's neither correct nor robust in a couple of way:
> 1) you have no guarantee a device unit will always give you the same
> resource.
this raises the following question: how can a device, today, figure
out which par
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Ian Lepore
wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:46 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > That's neither correct nor robust in a couple of way:
>> >
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Ian Lepore
wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:45 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Ian Lepore
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:46 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> >>
Hi folks,
Ok, yet another Newbus' limitation. Assuming a device exports more
than one interface, and one of its child has need to use more than one
interface, each interfaces cannot register, concurrently, its own
ivar. While I try to always have a single child per
interface/resource, I need to ke
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Ok, yet another Newbus' limitation. Assuming a device exports more
>> than one interface, and one of its child has need to use more than one
>> inte
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>&
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Ok, yet another Newbus' limitation. Assuming a device exports more
>> than one interface, and one of its child has need to use more than one
>> inte
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>>
>&
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:27 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> Also, I think we should do this in general. We already have one example (e.g.
> ACPI IVARs start at 100 so that things like the ACPI PCI bus driver can
> provide both ACPI and PCI IVARs to child devices). I think we should assign
> each
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> I'm sorry you feel that way.
>
> Honestly, though, I think you'll be more pissed when you find out that the
> N:1 interface that you want is being done in the wrong domain. But I've been
> wrong before and look forward to seeing your re
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:02 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, July 13, 2012 10:42:04 am Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <201207130831.59211@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes:
>>
>> >Every FreeBSD/amd64 kernel in existent is vulnerable. In truth, my
> personal
>> >opinion is t
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> [..]
> Honestly, though, I think you'll be more pissed when you find out that the
> N:1 interface that you want is being done in the wrong domain. But I've been
> wrong before and look forward to seeing your replacement.
>
I will just p
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>> [..]
>> Honestly, though, I think you'll be more pissed when you find out that the
>> N:1 interface that you want is being done in the
Hi,
AFAIK, there is no proper KPI for managing mbuf queue. All users have
to re-implements the queue logic from scratch, which is less than
optimal. From a preeminent FreeBSD developer at BSDCan 2009: "we do
not need a new list implementation". There has been a few attempt of
providing a queue API
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 24.07.2012 20:18, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> AFAIK, there is no proper KPI for managing mbuf queue. All users have
> Before we can talk about an mbuf queue you have to define what you
> w
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:06 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:03:14 am Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner L
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> [...] We lack that right now, which is why you're trying to shoe-horn the FDT
> connections into a newbus world and complaining that everything sucks because
> it is a poor fit. I'd suggest that different mechanisms are necessary.
>
I'
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> [...] We lack that right now, which is why you're trying to shoe-ho
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
> You don't want to work cooperatively.
>
Why is it that mbuf's refactoring consultation is being held in
internal, private, committers-and-invite-only-restricted meeting at
BSDCan ?
Why is it that so much review and discussion on changes
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> You don't want to work cooperatively.
>>>
>> Why
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On 8/1/12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Arnaud Lacombe
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Any interested party is very welcome to approach a developer and get
> added to the developer summits. Plenty of the people at the most
> recent developer summit weren't @freebsd.org committers - we had
> plenty of representation from comp
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Any interested party is very welcome to approach a developer and get
>>&
99 matches
Mail list logo
