Hi, On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacom...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacom...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacom...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Warner, >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. This seems like a >>>>>>>>> basic >>>>>>>>> requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's not >>>>>>>>> yet a >>>>>>>>> resolved issue? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 0 work has been done here to my knowledge. The world view for clang >>>>>>>> and our in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our build >>>>>>> integration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in clang/LLVM? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. The problem isn't hard, the cross compile paradigm is just a >>>>>> little different. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new soft-core >>>>>>>>> 64-bit MIPS platform. We're already using a non-base gcc for our >>>>>>>>> boot loader work, and plan to move to using clang/LLVM later in the >>>>>>>>> year. The base system seems a bit short on detail when it comes to >>>>>>>>> the above, currently. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes. I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close to >>>>>>>> building with xdev compilers. A similar number are needed to make it >>>>>>>> easy to configure and add systree support, I think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just >>>>>>> works" state with regard to this? >>>>>> >>>>>> I sure hope so. I'd like to have demoable stuff by BSDcan. >>>>>> >>>>> BSDCan has passed, has there been any advance made since that discussion ? >>>> >>>> It is "demonstrable" but not ready to commit to the tree. Needs about 4 >>>> hours of work that I've had trouble scheduling on it due to work getting >>>> busier than I expected. >>>> >>> any chances to have a look at the patch or should I wait for the final >>> commit ? >>> >> ping ? >> > ping ? > ping, Warner ?
FWIW, I guess that in 4 months, either you had time to finish the patch, or I could have found to time to complete it myself based on your incomplete version. I'd really be interested to benchmark recent, decent, compiler. Thanks, - Arnaud _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
