Hi, On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, 3 November 2011 at 11:33:25 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> [Please do not top-post.] > > Please trim messages. > >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Nate Dobbs <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> 10 year old core or not, the ARM is the worlds most widely used processor; >>> >> Please read what I said correctly, I said "this ARM11 is obsolete" >> (even if still used, for sure) ... > > Clearly price is an issue for this device. What's so bad about ARM11 > that it shouldn't be used? > If you read my original comment, I did point out the $25 price tag was pretty much the only interesting thing. Now, what it has been designed for, multimedia, is going to be handled by a closed-source binary blob without datasheet, so let me turn back the question: what do you expect doing with it ?
>From my point of view, I would be more interested into bringing up FreeBSD on ARMv7 (ie. Cortex A[89]), rather than any previous, but the effort is clearly not the same. - Arnaud _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
