Yea you're right. :) I'm not sure what I was thinking. So yea we do have to
wait to merge to be able to get passed the merge issue to then tag trunk.
-omar
On Thursday, December 27, 2012, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > You can see the diagram for the nvie model here:
> > http://nvie.com/posts/
Make a tag from the release branch, not the develop branch. Develop branch
could have changes that were made while the release was being prepared.
After merging the release to develop it could be different than what is
being released from the release branch. You can see the diagram for the
nvie mod
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I think this one is the mirror before SVN was reorganized, I think we
> need
> > to put in a ticket to have it deleted.
> Mind doing that?
>
Sure, created this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5686
>
> > I think its
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Was just taking a look at some of the github mirrors.
> https://github.com/apache/flex
I think this one is the mirror before SVN was reorganized, I think we need
to put in a ticket to have it deleted.
>
> https://github.com/apach
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
> Been any progress on this? I seem to recall that someone was working on a
> wiki page with some instructions on how the git workflow will work.
>
> While looking for something else I came across this - which may be of
> interest.
> h
ent of the Flex SDK itself. If your intention is to
actually reach users of the Apache Flex SDK the more relevant list would be
flex-users@ instead.
I hope you don't let this thread deter you from future participation. This
group is for all Flex developers! :)
-Omar Gonzalez
Apache Flex PPMC
s9t
Welcome and congrats Chema!
-Omar
On Thursday, December 6, 2012, Chema Balsas wrote:
> Thanks everyone!
>
> As Om said, I'll try to help around with the compilers. Right now I'm
> trying to get up to speed, and quite happy to see how things are moving
> forward.
>
> Keep the ball rolling! ;)
>
>
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I'm not sure how this model relates since we aren't using git yet.
> The vote was to use the gitflow model now with git, as git is not fully
> supported yet that falls back to use gitflow branching model with SVN.
>
> See note 2 fro
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I am sorry, but it does not make sense to release something that has not
> been tested.
> Again I agree but we have to live with what we have. I'm sure that the the
> tests we currently have do not provide 100% coverage.
>
> > It is
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Given the pending graduation
> Which we'll find out about 19th Dec at minimum.
>
> > and moving of repositories
> Which as far as I can see still up in the air and there's several
> unanswered questions about and may be at a minimum
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Release early and often should be the case, we are way overdue for a
> release IMO.
>
> Justin
While I generally agree with this statement it is predicated on the
assumption that releasing often can happen in an efficient and timely
I have interest, but like you my problem is time.
I'm in the last sprint of a big project and I'm hoping my schedule frees up
as we head into the new year. Lots of things on my todo list right now. :/
-omar
On Tuesday, December 4, 2012, Michael Schmalle wrote:
>
> Quoting Alex Harui :
>
>
>>
>>
Did you try Uglify.js? It has about the same compression results as GCC but
runs a lot faster. There's also an Uglify 2.0 that's supposed to be even
faster than 1.x.
-omar
On Tuesday, December 4, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a lot of reading, trying and testing, as well as looking
On Monday, December 3, 2012, Gordon Smith wrote:
> The possibility of transcoding ABC -> JS (rather than AS -> JS, MXML ->
> JS, CSS -> JS, and .properties -> JS) has come up on another thread. I
> should mention that this approach is the one that the architect of the
> Falcon compiler (Chris Bric
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Anyway, I would like your thoughts on Adobe Legal's desire to review the
> way
> the code will work before it gets checked into SVN.
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
Just thinking o
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> There have been some recent discussions about Maven and how it could work
> with Apache Flex. There are several possibilities, but none of them are
> perfect because of Adobe licensing requirements. This poll is only about
> ho
On Friday, November 23, 2012, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Ok ... If I had seen this thread earlier, I would have posted the link
> to my documentation of "Contributing to Flexmojos" here. At least it
> documents how to contribute to Flexmojos using Github.
>
> I appreciate the effort and it's
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> Seems a of of the conversation is still around accepting pull requests,
> >> without github there will be no pull requests right?
> Outlining the process for non committers (ie what series of git commands
> is needed to run) would b
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/22/12 11:07 AM, "Omar Gonzalez"
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Sure! I can prepare something. Let me get the wiki page started an prep
> > some things and Then we can schedule a date for a Connect
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I just wanted to make sure that everyone on this list knows that if they
> > have any questions regarding the usage of Git and Git workflows that I
> > would be more than happy to help anyone that has those questions.
>
> Seems a of
?
>
> - Christophe
>
>
> 2012/11/22 Omar Gonzalez >
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I just wanted to make sure that everyone on this list knows that if they
> > have any questions regarding the usage of Git and Git workflows that I
> > would be more th
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > So, any questions that you might have regarding Git, GitHub, Git clients
> > and workflows I would be happy to help you get through. I will do my best
> > to either explain it to the best of my ability or direct you to some
> > resources tha
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> >> 2) several committers are "on loan" from Adobe for a very specific
> >> goal (Peter and Gordon). Are they comfortable working with Git,
> >> willing and able (in that they have enough time available to do so) to
> >> learn Git, or would
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > just as long as the CI Server supports that particular Repo type. I
> don't quite get what the "buildbot hooks" are needed for.
>
> The buildbot takes the content files and the templates for the website
> and automatically applies one to the
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Since we can't indefinitely postpone the inevitable, I think we should
> start to plan for the move to Git. I think at least these points
> should be addressed (if they haven't already been, in which case they
> should be documented such tha
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/22/12 1:21 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" >
> wrote:
>
> > that's the MarshallPlan tests
> Yup, and a significant portion of tests with SWFLoader in it.
>
> It turns out that runner.java already launches a mini http server for
> getting result
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > communitcation to give us feedback of the next steps. We should have into
> > account that we have a move out of incubation and that should be a great
> > point in time to make the switch.
>
> In my opinion combining the two moves would be
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> let's see how infra respond to the ticket generated
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5549 (Please all vote to make
> it happen)
>
> Sincerily, this migration should be supported by
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I'm not convinced at all this will work out well for the project, with
> the graduation coming up soon (which will mean moving and changing a
> lot of stuff in SVN and elsewhere) and all. But I'll shut up about
> this (for now).
>
Like I s
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Omar,
>
> >> From the threads here and on the private list I get the feeling that
> >> at least one of our mentors has reservations about the legal standing
> >> of Git repos in relation to Apache.org.
> >
> >
> > Those concerns have been e
the IPMC, the group that would be approving our graduation. The
worst that could happen is Infra denies our request for read/write apache
Git repo. We would never be "on our own" however as its the role of Apache
Infra to support Apache projects. I would not be so concerned.
-omar
>
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At least one vital service (the website) is more than just a SVN repo.
> A post-commit hook activates the 'buildbot' on every commit. How will
> this be 'translated' when the Git move happens? Do we have access to
> the buildbot outsi
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At least one vital service (the website) is more than just a SVN repo.
> A post-commit hook activates the 'buildbot' on every commit. How will
> this be 'translated' when the Git move happens? Do we have access to
> the buildbot outsi
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/21/12 5:25 PM, "Justin Mclean" >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >> The vote closes in a few hours, then we ask the IPMC for approval.
> Because
> >> of the holiday this week
> > What holiday? Not everyone lives in the US you know :-) IMO
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would Is it easier to make progress if we remove github from the equation
> for now and revisit? (And just keep the githib mirror as we do now) The
> vote if I recall was to use git not github.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
The mirrors to Gi
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I've never used GitHub. It doesn't have a way to monitor commits that
> > couldn't send a notification to flex-commits@?
>
> The problem I see here is that github (and git) encourages local
> branching, so peoples experiments and
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> I've never used GitHub. It doesn't have a way to monitor commits that
> couldn't send a notification to flex-commits@?
>
>
Yes they do, they have over 100 service hooks, and email and JIRA are
included. Not only are these features/service h
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > I am new to Git/GitHub, but I am wondering whether Infra considered using
> > its own GitHub (see [1]).
>
>
> I know they looked into that and were in talks with GitHub for a while. I
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> now that I have the committer status I can push the pass from SVN to GIT as
> our main VCS system, based on this vote results here (
> http://markmail.org/message/ajlskznzec4wqda2)
>
> I will base my s
Nice! :(
On Monday, November 19, 2012, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The FalconJS donation was signed off today. It software grant has to be
> processed by Adobe then by Apache before the code hits SVN. Given the
> holiday week in the US, it isn’t clear if it will all get done this week or
Welcome to the team guys!
-omar
On Monday, November 19, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> All,
>
> Let's all join in welcoming our 5 new committers:
>
> Carlos Rovira (carlosrovira)
> Christofer Dutz (cdutz)
> Cyrill Zadra (czadra)
> Frederic Thomas (fthomas)
> Jose Barragan (josebarragan)
>
> These
eider
> * Justin Mclean
> * Kevin Korngut
> * Leif Wells
> * Martin Heidegger
> * Michael Jordan
> * Michael Labriola
> * Michael Schmalle
Just for future reference, Sugan, binding votes only come from (P)PMC team
members.
-omar
On Sunday, November 18, 2012, Sugan Naicker wrote:
> +1 binding
>
>
> On Nov 18, 2012, at 10:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Apache Flex is preparing to graduate to a top-level project at Apache
>
> * Justin Mclean >
> * Kevin Korngut >
> * Leif Wells>
> * Martin Heidegger
> >
> * Michael Jordan>
> * Michael Labriola
nt
> of software out there that requres the Flash plugin and developers like are
> still adding more, just look at the activity in Flash based games running
> in the browser (Zynga, Rovio and a bunch of others are still happily
> churning out Flash based games).
>
> On 17.11.2012
On Saturday, November 17, 2012, Hordur Thordarson wrote:
> >
> But maybe I'm reading all this wrong or maybe I'm believing too much what
> I think I'm reading or maybe the people here advocating a HTML/JS strategy
> for Flex have been burned more by Adobe than I have.
>
>
Bingo!
Also, Adobe can s
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> They could do a 180 on their views of AIR next November. Then what?
> IMO We'd still have some time to change course, as we could still use
> exiting versions of AIR and captive runtime.
>
> Justin
>
>
I'd rather be prepared for th
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd want to ask here if some refactor/experiment about decoupling
> UIComponent with composition over inheritance could be shared. I'd want to
> start experimenting with haxe and that would be very hel
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > a new flex 5 from scratch concept would not be trying to be compatible
> backwards.
> So it's not Flex then but a new framework. I'm sure that would be fun, but
> how would that serve the current users of the Flex framework? Would t
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Hordur Thordarson wrote:
> Well, I got the feeling that some users on this list were advocating a
> total rewrite asap rather than maintaining and improving the current
> codebase. A new Flex framework, built in Haxe or some other language than
> AS3/MXML is a to
>
> "so you're not actually describing something that is under Apache Flex
> control"
> it would be the case if in fact i put Adobe runtimes in my definition of
> flex, which i don't.
>
>
The thread has gotten too long with responses that are even longer for me
to get everything straight.
It sound
So I'm not that intimately familiar with how it compiles to JS, can you
elaborate on your concern here?
Also, why do you say haxe is obscure? It is entirely open source, what's
obscure about that?
-omar
On Friday, November 16, 2012, Ben Dalton wrote:
> Not to add fuel to the fire, but is choosi
The problem with your definition, Sébastien, is that you target all of
those platforms via AIR, so you're not actually describing something that
is under Apache Flex control. Flex just happens to be able to take
advantage of that runtime to target different platforms.
Using haxe as a language woul
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Om wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
> labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
>
> > >Just to be clear, I'm not trying to kick anybody out. I only think it's
> > >fair that we hold the PMC members to the same standards as we do
> > >pros
On Thursday, November 15, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Just to be clear, I'm not trying to kick anybody out. I only think it's
> fair that we hold the PMC members to the same standards as we do
> prospective committers, don't you?
>
> EdB
>
>
I remember a mentor saying you have to do something pre
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Nick Tsitlakidis wrote:
> I agree but just to make the discussion more interesting I'll remind you of
> some very interesting thought by many guys here in the list who want to
> make the framework lighter or make it run better on mobile or whatever
> else. These pl
>
>
> That being said, wouldn't it be advantageous to think about APIs that
> could stand the test of major refactors and start migrating or add
> extensions to the current code base that would give developers the option
> to start moving towards the next framework?
>
> I mean, a public API is just
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Nick Tsitlakidis wrote:
> Carlos is suggesting a very nice way to solve all problems. But my opinion
> is that a total rewrite needs A LOT of time and planning and at this the
> most active people in the list are too few to handle something like this
> and the othe
Perhaps you should read the whole thread, this has already been discussed.
-omar
On Thursday, November 15, 2012, aYo ~ wrote:
> +1, but will he have the time?
> On Nov 15, 2012 9:56 AM, "Jose Barragan"
>
> >
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > --
> > Jose Barragan
> > Software Architect Chief
> > Codeoscopi
On Wednesday, November 14, 2012, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Le 14 nov. 2012 18:44, "Michael Schmalle"
> >
> a
> écrit :
> >
> > Wouldn't it be the same if one of a non Adobe Chair stepped down? We
> would have to solicit another competent leader.
>
> Absolutely, such things happen.
> Bertrand
>
it be the same if one of a non Adobe Chair stepped down? We would
> have to solicit another competent leader.
>
> Alex responded to this question and said he couldn't guarantee but that is
> life.
>
> Also, for the time being who else has the capacity to fill this role for
On Wednesday, November 14, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I guess the same as with the rest of us… Or is Adobe paying you to work on
> the project?
>
> EdB
>
>
>
No it's not the same as the rest of us, his job at Adobe is to spend time
on this project, and I'm sure other things. So what happens when
I don't have any issues at all with Alex or him in this position, but
before I throw in my +1 I have a question: what happens when Adobe decides
they don't want any Adobe resources working on Apache Flex?
-Omar
I've kept quiet about this initiative until now, but, what seems odd to me
is the idea of someone trying to profit off of developing a component, in
private (I'm assuming commits won't be directly into Apache's repo) and
then passing it off as a contribution to OSS. It just seems odd and
sheisty. A
+1 (binding)
All worked on OS X Mountain Lion.
Good work guys, thanks for sticking it out!
-Omar
Flex SDK
> Installer"?
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Omar Gonzalez
> wrote:
> > Might as well fix the app name itself... InstallApacheFlex is an odd
> name.
> > ApacheFlexSDKInstaller makes much more sense or something along those
>
Might as well fix the app name itself... InstallApacheFlex is an odd name.
ApacheFlexSDKInstaller makes much more sense or something along those lines.
-omar
On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Ah, a Windows thing ;-) I really didn't see the point, but had no
> objection... but
Try the Adobe forums you'll have better luck there.
-omar
Then you can look thru JIRA issues and figure out things like this:
http://tinypic.com/r/2hmiyht/6
Perhaps if it is difficult to sort thru items in JIRA then the answer could
be better organizing JIRA as opposed to trying to replace it with yet
another tracking system.
-omar
On Mon, Oct 22, 20
I don't see what the difference in using Trello as opposed to JIRA would be
other than we would have to use yet another service/system to track
information that can be tracked just the same in JIRA, given it wouldn't be
presented in the same visual format as Trello.
What's wrong with using JIRA fo
On Sunday, October 21, 2012, Ram Lee wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, how many Committers of this project do we have, and
> how can I be part of it?
>
> 李楠
U can find those answers here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Apache+Flex+(incubating)+Wiki
And team make up is here: http
On Saturday, October 20, 2012, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -1 for removing localisation. How hard would it be to test the supplied
> patch that looks like it fixes the issue?
>
> I can test on non US locals, and have been able to reproduce the issue BTW.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
Hard enough tha
Agreed, remove localization, release the app, and then bring back
localization in a new release and we can then do more extensive testing and
fixing, I'd vote #2.
-omar
On Saturday, October 20, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Om, first: sorry for changing my mind ;-)
>
> All, here are my th
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:00 AM, sébastien Paturel
wrote:
> What is your source omar?
> Its so important for flex to know that...
> If flex won't work on any new mobile device because Adobe AIR only support
> AS4, it is a survival matter IMO.
>
> Le 19/10/2012 18:26
On Friday, October 19, 2012, Greg Reddin wrote:
>
> > How much progress do we have to continue to make in order to appease your
> > worries?
>
> Sorry, I'm not the one with worries. This thread started with someone
> suggesting that the Apache model was inhibiting progress for this
> project. I don
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Charles Monteiro
wrote:
> "but according to its new strategic shift it will be with the new gaming
> runtime only! "
>
> Do we know this to be true ?
>
>
Yes.
-omar
> Now, to your actual point about Git, etc. It's worth noting that all
> the mentors cautioned against that move precisely because it would be
> difficult and time-consuming to get it implemented. Our fear was that
> it would further stall the progress of the project because we'd be
> focusing on S
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Christophe Herreman <
christophe.herre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry about this, but why would you release the installer in it's current
> state? I know there is a lot of "pressure" and excitement to get this
> released, but there are currently clearly some bigger i
Release, release, release!!!
-omar
On Thursday, October 18, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Stefan,
>
> I understand the problem, and I see the implications. That's why I
> push for a quick "point" update AFTER this release, to adress this and
> other known issues. In fact, I'll enter your fix into
Nice, Peter! Thanks to you and all the committers for getting to this
milestone!
-omar
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Peter Ent wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> We have finished getting all tests in the default configuration (mini_run
> –all) to pass on Mac and Windows platforms! That is currently 3
>
> Gordon mentioned he was getting tests setup for the framework, I have been
> waiting, I'm not doing anything until there is at least a consensus between
> members of this project on how to do that. But wait, there are no members
> of the project that are even involved with the compiler right no
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> Who do we notify when the site goes down?
>
> http://tinypic.com/r/f5274k/6
>
> Or is there a place to look for scheduled downtimes? I thought we usually
> get emails for those.
>
> -omar
>
Nevermind, now its back up...
-omar
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > Talking about the sensation of "Ghost Town": I think it could be
> > removed if people investing time could talk more about what is doing,
> > contributing to the overall feeling that the project is moving
> > forward.
>
> Well, all I can
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
>
> Quoting Omar Gonzalez :
>
>
>>> PS Obviously Gordon is respected by me and I don't expect an Adobe
>>> employee to do everything.
>>>
>>> This list is like a ghost town.
>>&g
>
> PS Obviously Gordon is respected by me and I don't expect an Adobe
> employee to do everything.
>
> This list is like a ghost town.
>
> Mike
>
>
One thing to note, being negative and insulting isn't going to make people
run to your aid.
I think it has a contrary effect.
If there are no other
this Git shit over the hump if no other
volunteers come up by then. We aren't far off from moving it to Git
read/write repo, we just need to come up with that support guy for Apache
INFRA.
Omar Gonzalez
s9tpep...@apache.org
Apache Flex PPMC
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 10/7/2012 12:38 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
>
>>
>> Your post makes it sound like you're looking for a commercial venture. I
>> don't believe Apache, in its OPEN SOURCE nature, is the right place to
>>
http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/wiki/FXG%202.0%20Specification/
> [3] http://html.adobe.com/edge/reflow/
>
>
>
Your post makes it sound like you're looking for a commercial venture. I
don't believe Apache, in its OPEN SOURCE nature, is the right place to look
to develop commercial products.
Just my wild guess... ;)
Omar Gonzalez
s9tpep...@apache.org
Apache Flex PPMC
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 10/5/2012 9:44 AM, sébastien Paturel wrote:
>
>>
>> by the way, why Adobe chose to use new FXG, instead of SVG? (i bet the
>> answer as already been given a few times, sorry for asking again)
>>
>
> There has been some talk about that in
Why is there a vote on something that has nothing to do with Flex SDK
development? This is not the place for this opinion poll, it is not a vote.
And I'm not voting because its off topic.
Omar Gonzalez
s9tpep...@apache.org
Apache Flex PPMC
On Thursday, October 4, 2012, Michael Sumner
On Tuesday, October 2, 2012, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Blaine Bradbury
> > wrote:
> > ...I think it would be EXTREMELY useful to have a device which could
> show the
> > current (as close to the present knowledge as is really manageable)
> > trajectory that the A
continue, isn't it?
>
>
Yes. A roadmap isn't going to prolong the life of Flex. But people
committing, making patches and contributing will.
Omar Gonzalez
s9tpep...@apache.org
Apache Flex PPMC
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Métairie, Stéphane wrote:
> For all observers (and FLEX orphans) the roadmap, or some milestones,
> publicly shared will be helpful and ... comforting : many IT decision-maker
> wonder if they have to continue with Flex or not.
>
>
There's nothing to share publicly
tom line is there seems to be very little interest in maintaing a web
page, and much more interest in just getting shit done. In an ideal world
we would have all the time in the world to maintain roadmaps and status
pages and contribute to the project etc etc, but we don't have all that
time
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, christofer.d...@c-ware.de wrote:
> It was always intended to be an intermediate tool allowing the transition
> to mavenized FDKs.
>
> Ideally Apache would start publishing FDKs directly and from then on the
> Tool would be obsolete.
>
> But as long as this is not
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Erik de Bruin
> >
> wrote:
> > This is starting to feel like the never-ending [VOTE] :( Are all
> > releases going to be like this, or will it get better (smoother, less
> > frustrating) later
As far as I can tell from the conversations that I had ASF Infra has
created a Python based Git administration tool to help perform routine Git
tasks. This tool, I think called asfgit-admin if I remember correctly, has
bugs and some features left to develop. This is where I believe the bulk of
the
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Carlos Rovira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask about GIT official repository. In August some
> mails to this list let us know that the process to get an official GIT
> repo was started and someone point to be about one month to get it
> finished.
>
> I ask since
Just right click on the CSS file in Flash Builder and check the Compile CSS
to SWF option. It'll compile the CSS to SWF. You can use Embed meta data to
embed any assets you need.
-omar
On Sunday, September 23, 2012, christofer.d...@c-ware.de wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> so it should be possible to use
1 - 100 of 650 matches
Mail list logo
