Today I added feature tests for the , , , and
tags. Next to come will probably be and ,
and then property/style/event attributes/tags. Once we've got a set of tests
for all kinds of tags and attributes, I'll work on states and databinding.
I'll be on break and not reading flex-dev until Thurs
= File.createTempFile(outputSwcName, ".swc");
> tmpFile.deleteOnExit(); output = tmpFile.getAbsolutePath();
>
> does remove the temporary swcs.
>
> If you're not doing anything else with the tests, I can commit this
> easy fix.
>
> Cheers,
> Chema
>
> 201
My user directory is getting littered with files like
airframework236875180568976546.swc from the functional tests that compile SWCs.
Did somebody change the way they compile, or has this been happening since I
wrote the test infrastructure?
- Gordon
gt; if not the it sets env.FLEX_HOME as FLEX_HOME.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .. what do think about moving unittest.properties one directory up (
>> maybe rename that file to env.properties ) so it can be used for
>> compiler, compiler.js (and/or compiler.jx) and co
There has always been an ambiguity in AS3 about [Foo] being interpretable as
either metadata or as property access. (This is one reason we're changing the
metadata syntax in AS4!) I don't remember the rule in the old compiler, but I
think Falcon's rule is that if the [Foo] is the first nonwhites
es? Is styleFunction of type Function?
The same case... newStyles is Object, for styleFunction there is
override public function set styleFunction(value:Function):void
{
super.styleFunction = value;
}
2012/12/19 Gordon Smith
> What is the type of newStyles? Is styleFunction of type
Woohoo!
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 1:13 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Flex just became a TLP (top-level project) with Alex as our VP
On 12/19/12 4 :00PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote:
>The D
What is the type of newStyles? Is styleFunction of type Function?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Chema Balsas [mailto:jbal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 12:47 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1423863 -
/incubator/flex/sdk/branches/dev
on(v);
In this case, I used that "hackish" construction because I saw it was already
used somewhere else in the existing code. For example, you can find it in
line 1334 in DateTimeAxis.as
line 377 in LogAxis.as
Of course, I'm open to suggestions :)
Cheers,
Chema
2012/12/19 Gord
What error or warning did Falcon produce without this?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 12:07 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1423863 -
/incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop
e sdk or update this
file...
Cheers,
Chema
2012/12/15 Gordon Smith
> Yep, my fault. Sorry about that!
>
> - Gordon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Smith
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 4:57 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Falcon
't doing this, but
is it going to? It's easy to modify the compile-config files to get these, and
it does show the dependencies more explicitly. What do you think?
Cheers,
Chema
2012/12/15 Gordon Smith
> I'm not sure what's going on with the resource bundle issue, but I
&g
. How's that compc doesn't
> complain? Is this another place where Falcon is pickier?
>
> Take the mx project. Other than its bundles, it uses some from
> framework, so we need to add both folders to the source-path in
> compile-config.xml where none was used before. Is
Yep, my fault. Sorry about that!
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 4:57 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Falcon tests
I have a feeling I may have updated the sdk trunk when I thought I was updating
branches/develop. I&#x
check to see what might be the problem,
but they're currently passing for me.
2012/12/15 Gordon Smith
> > Do you mean sdk, which is copied to compiler/generated/dist/sdk?
>
> I'm not sure what you're asking. I'm talking about removing the
> copy.sdk that I ad
Today I added Falcon feature tests for the /,
/, and / tags, showing that these
codegen properly.
I also ddded Javadoc explaining how these tags differ from ordinary instance
tags.
Feature tests can now optionally compile against various Flex SWCs (rather than
just playerglobal.swc) and can a
run the SWC-building tests. However,
> some of them fail for me:
You probably have to update the sdk (branch develop). I think he made some sdk
changes.
Cyrill
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
> @czadra: Thanks for making all the tests use a consistent way to find th
We now have 18
> out of 29 tests passing. I'll try to start looking over the hard ones
> over the week.
>
> Cheers,
> Chema
>
>
> 2012/12/10 Gordon Smith
>
>> > I've just commited some changes into rpc, authoringsupport,
>> > framework
&g
@czadra: Thanks for making all the tests use a consistent way to find the SDK.
In your template-unittest.properties file, it seems like the four lines for
setting the properties shouldn't be commented out with #, since anybody making
a copy will have to uncomment these lines. Also, is there any
fo.
Mike
Quoting Gordon Smith :
> I would be surprised if the BURM is faster than a simple top-down walk.
>
> The main advantage of using a BURM is that it allows for optimizations
> to be easily coded as alternate reductions with lower cost. Typically
> there are many difference
I would be surprised if the BURM is faster than a simple top-down walk.
The main advantage of using a BURM is that it allows for optimizations to be
easily coded as alternate reductions with lower cost. Typically there are many
difference sequences of bottom-up reductions that could be applied t
> I've just commited some changes into rpc, authoringsupport, framework and
> mobilecomponents so that they compile properly in falcon. I've enabled those
> tests and now we have 11 out of 29 working.
Nice progress!
> Warning: mx.core.Version is defined by multiple files:
This is an example wh
And I'm not blocked by this.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 11:21 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Falcon] Unit tests failing
They're not yet run by 'ant tests'. I just run them in Eclipse. But I
dobe.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 9:01 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Falcon] Unit tests failing
>
>
>
>
> On 12/7/12 4:56 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>
>> It is unacceptable to have to configure every debug config
12/7/12 4:56 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
> It is unacceptable to have to configure every debug config you create.
> I create dozens per day when I work on Falcon.
Agreed.
After reading up on it, it appears that there is no way to set new defaults for
every individual junit t
> The tag isn't in good shape... even simple examples create a SWF that
> throws a TypeError at runtime.
I've fixed the bugs revealed by the tag tests and we now have 5 feature
tests for it, all of which pass.
- Gordon
-Original Message-----
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:g
Today I added feature tests for the and tags. (Each MXML feature
test compiles a tiny MXML app that tests one particular feature, runs it in the
standalone player, and checks that it ran correctly.)
Most cases of work, but I discovered something I never knew: The
tag doesn't just allow code
playing with the settings in one of these tabs:
* Arguments
* Environment
HTH
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
> > Can this really be possible that there is no place to configure
> > Junit's
> runtime environment from within Eclipse?
>
> I l
>
> So I guess I can now ditch the compiler arg crap and just copy the sdk over.
>
> Mike
>
> Quoting Gordon Smith :
>
>> I'm fine with just having 'ant eclipse' do 'ant copy.sdk'. Alex
>> shouldn't care because he doesn't
all this got changed and I didn't know about it. I spent way to
>> much time on something I could have just run a build target on! :)
>>
>> Ow that hurts. I was seriously about ready to give up.
>>
>> So I guess I can now ditch the compiler arg crap and jus
So I've checked in that change.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 4:08 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Falcon] Unit tests failing
I'm fine with just having 'ant eclipse' do
this is
scarce at the best...
2012/12/8 Gordon Smith
> > Can this really be possible that there is no place to configure
> > Junit's
> runtime environment from within Eclipse?
>
> I looked in the workspace preferences dialog under Run/Debug >
> Launching bu
--
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 3:52 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Falcon] Unit tests failing
On 12/7/12 3:48 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
> And it should NOT require any voodoo to launch Eclipse, such as a
> launch scr
ember 07, 2012 3:49 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Falcon] Unit tests failing
Sounds good to me. But where does the default debug configuration get
established? Where in Eclipse do I go to set it up? Or what file can I change
elsewhere?
On 12/7/12 3:45 PM, "Gordon Smith&
And it should NOT require any voodoo to launch Eclipse, such as a launch script.
I would be able to tolerate it requiring a one-time setup in the Eclipse
workspace, but I can't find any place to configure environment variables there.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon
ome sort? If you
set a FLEX_HOME in the config's environment does that work?
Once I understand how you use Eclipse I will try to get it to work.
On 12/7/12 3:27 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
> After trying and failing to do any Falcon work today, I'll keep
> complaining
; without having to customize a run-config or
debug-config for it?
If not, I will restore some ant targets to do the SDK copying. Alex may not
want to use them, but I need to.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 2:58 PM
To: flex-dev@in
by running ant main from the compiler folder. I've been digging, and it
seems a call to the 'dist-dev' target is missing from the main target in the
falcon folder.
Adding a call to the compiler.dist-dev target inside the sdk target in the main
build file seems to do the trick
When I run 'ant tests' for Falcon, the four JAR tests fail due to Java
NoClassDefFoundError exceptions. Does anybody else have this problem?
- Gordon
jar.tests:
[java] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/google/common/base/Function
[java] Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Smith updated FLEX-33288:
Comment: was deleted
(was: What is the point of setting the value of a NumericStepper to NaN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Smith updated FLEX-33288:
Comment: was deleted
(was: This is correct behavior because NaN + step -> NaN according to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526641#comment-13526641
]
Gordon Smith commented on FLEX-33288:
-
What is the point of setting the value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526640#comment-13526640
]
Gordon Smith commented on FLEX-33288:
-
This is correct behavior because NaN +
_HOME environment
variable.
On 12/6/12 1:56 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
> I should have said Falcon's 'mxmlc' and 'compc' shell scripts.
>
> - Gordon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Smith
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2
I should have said Falcon's 'mxmlc' and 'compc' shell scripts.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 1:55 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Falcon] Unit tests failing
So, how does Falcon's
: [Falcon] Unit tests failing
On 12/6/12 12:57 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
> But doesn't it make it impossible to use Falcon's shell scripts, which
> expect to find other things in the SDK using relative paths from those
> shell scripts???
You mean like the mxm
s a goal of mine.
On 12/5/12 4:41 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>> The above folder doesn't exist anymore since we are not copying the
>> full sdk to the compiler folder.
>
> What was the reason for changing this?
>
> - Gordon
>
>
> -Original
> The above folder doesn't exist anymore since we are not copying the full sdk
> to the compiler folder.
What was the reason for changing this?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Cyrill Zadra [mailto:cyrill.za...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 4:37 PM
To: flex-dev@incuba
Congratulations!
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Om
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 3:08 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Welcome Chema Balsas as Apache Flex Committer!
Team,
Please join me in welcoming Chema B
we create a model interface that could be used for more
than one implementation.
I guess I will think about this some more.
Mike
Quoting Gordon Smith :
> I didn't understand why JSEmitter uses lots of ABC classes. I got the
> answer from Bernd P.
>
> Falcon's BURM handle
ng to newcomers. I'd recommend making new structures to
represent the higher-level JS constructs.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 3:31 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: ABC -> JS
I&
If Apache doesn't care about that we should just drop it. It seems strange to
have it in some SWCs and not others.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 6:21 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: F
t;. I've even compiled without including the file and everything seems
to be working. Could we just remove those references completely or there may be
some other side effects?
Chema
2012/12/5 Gordon Smith
> In that case, let's move -include-file option for version.properties
> bac
I'm really happy to see all this movement
> > around Falcon/FalconJS lately :)
> >
> >
> > 2012/12/1 Gordon Smith
> >
> >> Oops! Thank you @Chema!
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On Nov 30, 2012, at 7:09 PM, "Cyr
at this again, Alex put it well, it may be generating Strings but the
WHOLE API of the class is abc.semantics. If you don't know abc semantics, there
is nothing you can do other than learn it all.
Mike
Quoting Gordon Smith :
> Interesting. I don't understand why it is doing
: ABC -> JS
Quoting Alex Harui :
>
> On 12/4/12 12:37 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>
>>> SO I will say to anybody, in the current state of the FalconJS
>>> compiler, you NEED to know opcdes to be able to fix anything.
>>
>> I don't know much ab
or.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hi all
Can you give me the bug base link if any.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:25 AM, vineet sood wrote:
> Ok, makes sense
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Gordon Smith wrote:
>
>> I work on Falcon, so I'll address that area.
>>
them.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gordon Smith wrote:
> Welcome! Do you want to write Flex components in ActionScript? Help
> with finishing the Falcon compiler? Work on JS cross-compilation?
>
> - Gordon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: vineet sood [mailto:vineet
ember 04, 2012 2:24 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ABC -> JS
Quoting Gordon Smith :
> The possibility of transcoding ABC -> JS (rather than AS -> JS, MXML
> -> JS, CSS -> JS, and .properties -> JS) has come up on another
> thread. I should men
I've added some feature tests for the and tags in MXML. Two of
the tests are marked @Ignore because they uncovered bugs which I will
fix soon.
- Gordon
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ABC -> JS
On Monday, December 3, 2012, Gordon Smith wrote:
> The possibility of transcoding ABC -> JS (rather than AS -> JS, MXML
> -> JS, CSS -> JS, and .properties -> JS) has come up on another
> thread. I should mention
Welcome! Do you want to write Flex components in ActionScript? Help with
finishing the Falcon compiler? Work on JS cross-compilation?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: vineet sood [mailto:vineette...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 3:16 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Su
The possibility of transcoding ABC -> JS (rather than AS -> JS, MXML -> JS, CSS
-> JS, and .properties -> JS) has come up on another thread. I should mention
that this approach is the one that the architect of the Falcon compiler (Chris
Brichford, who recently left Adobe) recommended for getting
:05 PM, Cyrill Zadra wrote:
> Yes the old compiler allows both examples... so I'll commit my change
> for CSSFunctionCallPropertyValue and then this last failing test will
> also will turn to "Ok" :).
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
>&g
to the parent IE Bottom Up
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> Quoting Daniel Wasilewski :
>>
>>> huh?
>>>
>>> In computer science both conventions are adopted afik. Not reserved,
>>> that someone can say, there is only 1 correct.
>>> Polis
That's right.
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 2, 2012, at 12:12 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
> Does this mean like expression statements first, statements second,
> blocks next etc?
>
> Mike
>
> Quoting Gordon Smith :
>
>> The bottom-upness of the B
omeday I will figure out what is bottom up about it.
>
> Anyway, thanks, and bottoms up!
>
> -Alex
>
>
> On 11/30/12 9:48 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>
>> The BURM is the Bottom-Up Rewrite Machine that the BURG or Bottom-Up Rewrite
>> Generator ge
ot; wrote:
> BURM? What does that stand for anyway? It might as well have been Burmese.
> It will take a while to understand :-)
>
>
> On 11/30/12 5:36 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>
>>> I don't know SWF format and JBurg
>>
>> The SWF an
WC.
>
> That wasn't me .. I think that work was done by Chema Balsas (see [1]).
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33226
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
>> @Cyril: Thanks for your help with introducing the compile-config.xml fil
I.e.,
Button { fontFamily: 'Times Roman' }
instead of
Button { fontFamily: "Times Roman" }
? If the old compiler allowed this, Falcon should probably allow it.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, No
30, 2012 4:11 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [FlaconJS] pseudo emitter algorithm
Quoting Gordon Smith :
> I didn't follow the whole discussion. Is the issue that you were
> planning to work on MXML->JS but Alex and I think
> MXML->datastructure is a better
autious in commiting ;-)
So single quotes should they also be removed if they exists at the beginning
and end of a rawArgument?
Cyrill
Am 30.11.2012 um 13:03 schrieb Gordon Smith :
> @Cyril: Thanks for adding some unit tests for CSS no
yer specified by the environment
variable FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER to the compiler.tests/temp folder so that JUnit
tests running in Eclipse can find it.
I updated the README to explain that you need to set FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER.
-
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adob
f I'm wrong in places.
And, I will try to really understand Alex's prototype and see if I can get my
brain wrapped around that to help with some simple test components.
Mike
Quoting Gordon Smith :
> That sounds fine. We'll work in parallel:
>
> Me: MXML->ABC
> You:
Subject: Re: [FlaconJS] pseudo emitter algorithm
On 11/30/12 3:22 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
> MXML->JS doesn't exist and is not the way to go.
> MXML->datastructure is a good idea. Alex will do it first for
> MXML->interpretation
> by JS and later for inte
t
>> as
>> -> js. Maybe I'm crazy and just want to create more work for myself.
>>
>> Maybe the way it stands ABC -> js is good enough for now?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> Quoting Alex Harui :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
MXMLLiteralNodes with int values codegen integer values in the VM.
---
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:apa...@teotigraphix.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 1:36 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Falcon SDKSWCTests
Ok we'll meet again next we
:)
I could go head and start looking at the other SWCs to I am sure Cyril will
give them a go as well.
Mike
Quoting Gordon Smith :
> Whoops, the frameworkSWC() compilation test doesn't pass. There are
> still four warnings:
>
> D:\Apache\incubator\flex\sdk\branches\develop
ier (and more correct) than the old
compiler.
Any volunteers to fix the source code so that this test passes?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 1:10 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Falcon SDKSWCTests
@Cyril: Thanks for your help with introducing the compile-config.xml files so
that we can more easily make Falcon JUnit tests that compile each SDK SWC.
Now that we have one such test - for compiling framework.swc - passing, would
anybody like to work on investigating the status of other tests t
@Cyril: Thanks for adding some unit tests for CSS nodes. One test,
CSSFunctionCallPropertyValue_static_getSingleArgumentFromRaw(), is failing for
me. It's expecting "Test" but getting "'Test'".
Does it pass for you?
- Gordon
For FalconJS, I'm fine with Alex pioneering the MXML->datastructure approach,
since there is no MXML->JS at all yet.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:01 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [FlaconJS] pse
mitter algorithm
Quoting Gordon Smith :
> Before I do much more work on Falcon's MXML, we need to decide whether
> we're completing MXML->ABC or discarding that work.
>
> - Gordon
What are the implications of this? How then do you suggest getting MXML to
compile, or
I don't object to generating a data structure for V11, but I think that it
makes more sense to do that as a second phase after ABC generation is working.
Otherwise there are a lot of moving parts and progress will be slower.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto
Before I do much more work on Falcon's MXML, we need to decide whether we're
completing MXML->ABC or discarding that work.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:46 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Fla
class directives be overriden for other output type? Is this
something that could be applied to the as -> js generation?
Mike
Quoting Gordon Smith :
> MXML codegen uses a "class directive processor" but not a BURM.
>
> - Gordon
>
>
> -Original Message-
> Fro
MXML codegen uses a "class directive processor" but not a BURM.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:08 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [FlaconJS] pseudo emitter algorithm
On 11/30/12 9:45 AM, "Mi
n Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Gordon Smith wrote:
> I don't think MXMLApplicationNode is currently getting used in MXML
> compilation. I think just creates an MXMLDocumentNode.
>
> - Gordon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Cyrill Zadra [mailto:cyrill.za...@gm
Sorry, I didn't make Falcon use an env.properties file. (I'm in the habit of
running a setup script that sets my environment variables.) Making it do so
would be a nice enhancement.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 2
I don't think MXMLApplicationNode is currently getting used in MXML
compilation. I think just creates an MXMLDocumentNode.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Cyrill Zadra [mailto:cyrill.za...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 2:49 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [
> several committers are "on loan" from Adobe for a very specific goal (Peter
> and Gordon).
> Are they comfortable working with Git, willing and able (in that they have
> enough time available to do so) to learn Git,
> or would moving to Git mean that they are no longer able to contribute?
I do
I think we can simply use forward slashes..
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 1:02 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Falcon compiler(.tests) building
Gordon uses a Windows machine and the tests have so
I do all my work on Windows 7 and have never tried building Falcon or running
its tests on a Mac. Is there anyone who has successfully done it yet on a Mac?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:35 AM
To: flex-dev@
Correct.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Fritze [mailto:marcus.fri...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 5:11 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; Marcus Fritze
Subject: Re: RichSelectableText-Component missing?
As far as I know, RichText is not selectable.
Marc
Although I'm knowledgeable about the new Falcon compiler, I'm not particularly
knowledgable about the OEM API for the old compiler. (Falcon discontinued this
API.) But my first googling brought up this link:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/compilerAPI_flex3.pdf
Are you aware of this document?
below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Flex Project:
>
> * Alex Harui
> * Carol Frampton
> * Christophe Herreman
> * Chuck Mastrandrea
>
We're not using LLVM in Adobe's AS4 compiler. The new compiler works just like
Falcon's AS3 except it has a somewhat different lexer/parser due to the
syntactic changes, a somewhat different semantic analyzer due to the semantic
changes, and a quite different code generator due to the new byte c
> I was asking them to make the Adobe Flashplayer team aware of this missing
> API that could be worth for us having a look into. Would you agree on this?
Thibault Imbert from Adobe has already revealed the most important change
between V11 and V12... there is no DisplayObject.
- Gordon
-
> I don't think LLVM is involved in Falcon or FalconJS.
That's correct.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 9:47 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: What to expect from FalconJS
On 11/17/12 9:17 PM,
My guess is that once V12 makes its debut, V11 feature addition will drop off
dramatically.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: sébastien Paturel [mailto:sebpatu.f...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 8:58 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Flex 5 in haxe
ok sor
1 - 100 of 305 matches
Mail list logo
