In that case, let's move -include-file option for version.properties back out of compile-config.xml and into the <compc> task.
- Gordon -----Original Message----- From: Chema Balsas [mailto:jbal...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 5:22 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Falcon SDKSWCTests Hi Cyril, The version.properties file is created and removed inside the compile target for those projects. It is generated at the beginning of the target by: <echo file="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/version.properties" append="false">build=${build.number}</echo> And then removed at the end by: <delete file="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/version.properties"/> which is why you shouldn't find it ;) 2012/12/5 Cyrill Zadra <cyrill.za...@gmail.com> > Hey Chema > > In the follwing compile-config.xml is the version.properties included. > > rpc > spark > spark_dmv > > <include-file> > <name>version.properties</name> > <path>../../version.properties</path> > </include-file> > > In my builded flex sdk it does not exists. Is that part really used or > can it be removed? Or does anyone know how this version.properties is > generated? > > Cyrill > > > > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Chema Balsas <jbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > @Cyril Thanks for noticing! > > > > @Gordon You're welcome! I'm really happy to see all this movement > > around Falcon/FalconJS lately :) > > > > > > 2012/12/1 Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com> > > > >> Oops! Thank you @Chema! > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > >> On Nov 30, 2012, at 7:09 PM, "Cyrill Zadra" > >> <cyrill.za...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Gordon > >> > > >> >> @Cyril: Thanks for your help with introducing the > >> >> compile-config.xml > >> files so that we can more easily make Falcon JUnit tests that > >> compile > each > >> SDK SWC. > >> > > >> > That wasn't me .. I think that work was done by Chema Balsas (see > [1]). > >> > > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33226 > >> > > >> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com> > wrote: > >> >> @Cyril: Thanks for your help with introducing the > >> >> compile-config.xml > >> files so that we can more easily make Falcon JUnit tests that > >> compile > each > >> SDK SWC. > >> >> > >> >> Now that we have one such test - for compiling framework.swc - > passing, > >> would anybody like to work on investigating the status of other > >> tests > that > >> compile rpc.swc, mx.swc, spark.swc, etc.? We need to figure out > >> whether > the > >> SDK source code needs to change because Falcon is pickier than the > >> old compiler, or whether Falcon has AS bugs that need to be fixed. > >> >> > >> >> - Gordon > >> >> > >> >
