Just go ahead and commit. - Gordon
-----Original Message----- From: Cyrill Zadra [mailto:cyrill.za...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:13 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [FALCON] parser question - MXMLApplicationNode okay .. I started writing more tests for package org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css and and also for org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.tree.mxml. How shall I proceed. Just commit test after test or do you think it's better to commit them in my whiteboard and after you reviewed it I'll merge them to falcon trunk? Cyrill On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com> wrote: > I don't think MXMLApplicationNode is currently getting used in MXML > compilation. I think <s:Application> just creates an MXMLDocumentNode. > > - Gordon > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cyrill Zadra [mailto:cyrill.za...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 2:49 PM > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [FALCON] parser question - MXMLApplicationNode > > Hey there > > A newbie question ... > >> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.tree.mxml.MXMLApplicationNode > > If Falcon parses following line or mxml that contains following shouldn't > there be at least one instance of MXMLApplicationNode? > > <s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; > xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" /> > > Just tried it out an the MXMLApplicationNode class got never instantiated. > > cyrill
