On 8/15/12 10:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> OK, I will watch for a commit from you.
> Committed.
Ahh, so much better. Only one failure instead of 100+. Thanks.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Here are the results. With a late rally, the PPMC backed the community vote
and elected to use the Git Branching Model and move to Git ASAP. Several
folks volunteered to help Infra move Flex to Git.
Thank you,
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
---B
On 16 August 2012 02:20, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Om wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Om wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Omar Gonzalez <
>>> omarg.develo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Clint Modien wrote:
> ...strange that Apache doesn't have a code signing process in place already…
> seems like a pretty common requirement
See http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing for how releases are signed.
You're right that the ASF doesn't currently
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Guthmann, Scott
wrote:
> ...1) Is there a way to tell how many people are on the Flex-Dev mailing list
> today?
> Please tell me what the number is
http://markmail.org/search/?q=+list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.flex-dev
gives an idea of traffic, and list mod
On 8/15/12 10:54 PM, "Jeff Conrad" wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>> On 8/15/12 2:55 PM, "Jeff Conrad" wrote:
>>> Question(s):
>>>
>>> If we add prompts to download these items for the user, can we have
>>> the prompt itself default to a 'yes' for a category X l
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> On 8/15/12 2:55 PM, "Jeff Conrad" wrote:
>> Question(s):
>>
>> If we add prompts to download these items for the user, can we have
>> the prompt itself default to a 'yes' for a category X licensed item
>> like player/air global, Pixel Bender, o
Hi,
> OK, I will watch for a commit from you.
Committed.
> To me JIRA is a "to-do" list tracker with some overhead.
Agreed no need to add every little issue.
\
Justin
On 8/15/12 10:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> 1) rename the validator.properties bundle in apache.swc to something else
>> and fix up references
> While not ideal first option probably better than second option. I'll go
> ahead, test and check in. However I'm unable to run the Mustel
Hi,
> 1) rename the validator.properties bundle in apache.swc to something else
> and fix up references
While not ideal first option probably better than second option. I'll go ahead,
test and check in. However I'm unable to run the Mustella test so if you could
check that it fixes the issue onc
On 8/15/12 2:55 PM, "Jeff Conrad" wrote:
> Question(s):
>
> If we add prompts to download these items for the user, can we have
> the prompt itself default to a 'yes' for a category X licensed item
> like player/air global, Pixel Bender, or the Standalone Debug Flash
> Player or does that vi
On 8/15/12 6:29 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I need more information than the brief sentence you gave describing the issue
> as I am not as familiar with Mustella as you are.
>
> Please raise a JIRA issue with the exact steps to reproduce and error message
> and I'll try and fix
On 8/15/12 6:52 PM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
>
> To Gordon [et all] In most cases thus far; it seems that PPMC members
> expect to see direct contributions to Apache Flex in order to vote
> someone in. However, we have been making exceptions for Adobe folk who
> are working on specific 'lar
#9
( binding )
On Aug 15, 2012 4:47 PM, "Tink" wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Tink
>
> > 9. Git Branching Model on Git now (see Note 2)
>
>
On 8/15/2012 9:12 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
It is not really considered proper to request committer status directly.
All these different mores that we're still learning. Why is it not
considered proper?
Is it a problem that Gordon asked publicly? Or a problem that he
asked at all?
I wou
Hi Alex,
I need more information than the brief sentence you gave describing the issue
as I am not as familiar with Mustella as you are.
Please raise a JIRA issue with the exact steps to reproduce and error message
and I'll try and fix.
I really don't think there is any need to revert code tha
Thank you. I'm still coming up to speed to Apache process issues. Where is the
best place to read about them?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 6:13 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request for
On 8/15/12 3:30 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> After digging for a while, it turns out that the apache.swc that
>> Justin added to trunk broke the validator tests because he added a validator
>> resource bundle there and the linker uses the first bundle found and does
>> not aggregate
It is not really considered proper to request committer status directly.
The PPMC discusses this on flex-private.
The PPMC is aware of your needs.
The process typically involves a DISCUSS phase followed by a 72 hour vote.
Be patient.
Regards,
Dave
On Aug 15, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Gordon Smith wro
I would like to request committer status since I will be working to improve
Falcon after donation.
- Gordon
I've added a wiki page about Falcon:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Falcon+Overview
It includes an FAQ section. If you ask questions there, I'll try to answer them.
- Gordon
Sounds good… strange that Apache doesn't have a code signing process in place
already… seems like a pretty common requirement.
On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:30 PM, Om wrote:
> So how does this sound:
>
>
> - We don't keep the .p12 file in the repo.
> - We ask developers who want to work with the s
On Aug 15, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Om wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Om wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Omar Gonzalez <
>> omarg.develo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Om wrote:
>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Om wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Omar Gonzalez >wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Om wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Omar Gonzalez <
> > omarg.develo...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:38
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Om wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Omar Gonzalez <
> omarg.develo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Om wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Omar Gonzalez <
On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Om wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Omar Gonzalez
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Om wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Omar Gonzalez <
>> omarg.develo...@gmail.com
wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Om wrot
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Om wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Omar Gonzalez <
> omarg.develo...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Om wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually I fixed all th
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Om wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Omar Gonzalez >wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Om wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Actually I fixed all the license issues but I just noticed there is
> > still
> > > > a non-asset binary in there. as3commons
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Guthmann, Scott wrote:
> > The change is more about the idea that *anything* that gives us a better
> chance of more people contributing in any way right now is good for us and
> I believe git will. My original (and somewhat ongoing) concern is that I
> don't want
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Om wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Actually I fixed all the license issues but I just noticed there is
> still
> > > a non-asset binary in there. as3commons-zip-1.0.0-alpha.1.swc has to
> go.
> > > I can look at that i
So how does this sound:
- We don't keep the .p12 file in the repo.
- We ask developers who want to work with the source code to generate a
.p12 file (using FB or similar tools) for themselves
- They should not check it in (add *.p12 to svn ignore?)
- The release managers would crea
> The change is more about the idea that *anything* that gives us a better
> chance of more people contributing in any way right now is good for us and I
> believe git will. My original (and somewhat ongoing) concern is that I don't
> want to take another
> detour. However, with several people v
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Om wrote:
> >
> > Actually I fixed all the license issues but I just noticed there is still
> > a non-asset binary in there. as3commons-zip-1.0.0-alpha.1.swc has to go.
> > I can look at that if someone else doesn't get to it first.
> >
> >
> Awesome! Thanks Car
That's a great resource to start from.
Thanks Om!
2012/8/16 Om
> We might benefit by going through the Git related Infra JIRA tickets first
> [1]
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> [1]
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+INFRA+AND+resolution+%3D+Unres
We might benefit by going through the Git related Infra JIRA tickets first
[1]
Thanks,
Om
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+INFRA+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+AND+component+%3D+Git+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
Hi,
> After digging for a while, it turns out that the apache.swc that
> Justin added to trunk broke the validator tests because he added a validator
> resource bundle there and the linker uses the first bundle found and does
> not aggregate them so all of the other spark validator resources are m
Great to have git-master on board! I'm your padawan :)
2012/8/15 Jose Barragan
> Carlos, don't forget of me, i'm volunteer too (of course)
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
>
> > Hey! it seems I was accepted in infra dev list
> >
> > :)
> >
> > 2012/8/15 Dave Fisher
> >
Hi,
My questions are at the end. In order to build the Flex SDK, a user
currently has to manually download/install and then set up
environmental variables for where we have the playerglobal.swc,
airglobal.swc, Pixel Bender Toolkit, and optionally the Standalone
Debug Flash Player and the Adobe Ex
>
> Actually I fixed all the license issues but I just noticed there is still
> a non-asset binary in there. as3commons-zip-1.0.0-alpha.1.swc has to go.
> I can look at that if someone else doesn't get to it first.
>
>
Awesome! Thanks Carol.
AS3Commons is under Apache Software License 2.0. How
On 8/15/12 3 :20PM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>
>On 8/15/12 2 :42PM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>
>>That looks nice to me with one modification suggestion earlier in another
>>thread. Bertrand and others suggested whiteboard live under flex rather
>>than under every sub-project.
>>
>>After I check
>
>
>
> But this drove home for me the need for a "develop" branch in options 1-3
> or
> 7-9. Yes, this would be caught if we had mustella running in CI, but there
> are other things like this that might get past mustella.
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.ad
On 8/15/12 2:04 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/15/12 1:13 PM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net"
>> wrote:
>>
Mike, there's about 2.5 hours left. If you change your vote to #9 and get
a
few others who responded to
Anyone could sign code with the cert if they know/crack the password for the
private key.
I would keep all certs out of the repo in the interest of security and keep
them in a safe place and only grant access to people who create distribution
packages.
If you're doing dev… you can generate you
Life is funny. Fate just handed me an example of the idiosyncracies of our
code base. I took on trying to get the Mustella spark validator tests to
run. After digging for a while, it turns out that the apache.swc that
Justin added to trunk broke the validator tests because he added a validator
r
On Aug 15, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/15/12 1:13 PM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net"
> wrote:
>
>>> Mike, there's about 2.5 hours left. If you change your vote to #9 and get a
>>> few others who responded to the poll but did not vote to move to #9, you can
>>> probably
An air app must be signed with the same cert or it won't install/update unless
you change the app id.
On Aug 15, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Isn't the P12 file made out to some individual like Om? If so, it should
> not be in the repo or distro and one of the steps to building is for
On Aug 15, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/15/12 1:14 PM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>
>> I think the question to be asked is can we keep certificate.p12 in the
>> repository and not put it in the source distro?
>>
>> Carol
>>
> Isn't the P12 file made out to some individual
+1 binding
Tink
> 9. Git Branching Model on Git now (see Note 2)
9. Git Branching Model on Git now (see Note 2)
+1 (binding)
>Anything that makes it even a little harder for people to be involved or
>contribute should be removed. Working with Git for a while I don't see an
>equal for open development.
>+1 binding
Jon,
You have a short while to add that to the Vote thread :)
Mike
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> 9. Git Branching Model on Git now (see Note 2)
+1 binding
--
Jonathan Campos
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Git Branching Model on Git now: 2
Anything that makes it even a little harder for people to be involved or
contribute should be removed. Working with Git for a while I don't see an
equal for open development.
+1 binding
--
Jonathan Campos
>Given what I know we want to do short term, I think we can live with GBM on
>SVN for now. The next release isn't going to contain any UIComponent
>refactoring, we've got lots of mustella tests to fix and some >new components
>to integrate. I think SVN can handle that.
I agree with you and
On 8/15/12 1:14 PM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
> I think the question to be asked is can we keep certificate.p12 in the
> repository and not put it in the source distro?
>
> Carol
>
Isn't the P12 file made out to some individual like Om? If so, it should
not be in the repo or distro and one of
On 8/15/12 1:13 PM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net"
wrote:
>> Mike, there's about 2.5 hours left. If you change your vote to #9 and get a
>> few others who responded to the poll but did not vote to move to #9, you can
>> probably tip the scales in favor of GBM.
>
> Alex,
>
> How about you ne
On 8/15/12 1:10 PM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net"
wrote:
> Based upon overwhelming community support, and a desire to ensure that the
> current committer pool grows.
>
> I would like to change my vote to:
>
> 9. Git Branching Model on Git now (see Note 2)
> +1 (binding)
>
Noted. My current
On 8/15/12 4 :05PM, "Om" wrote:
>>
>> I fixed all the issues identified by the RAT check except
>>certificate.p12.
>> That's a binary file and I don't think it can go in the source
>> distribution.
>>
>> I'll leave that to Om and/or Erik to figure out.
>>
>>
>It makes sense for any developer w
>Mike, there's about 2.5 hours left. If you change your vote to #9 and get a
>few others who responded to the poll but did not vote to move to #9, you can
>probably tip the scales in favor of GBM.
Alex,
How about you next? Wanna switch from Git later to Git now? We have people here
who want t
Based upon overwhelming community support, and a desire to ensure that the
current committer pool grows.
I would like to change my vote to:
9. Git Branching Model on Git now (see Note 2)
+1 (binding)
Carlos, don't forget of me, i'm volunteer too (of course)
On Aug 15, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Hey! it seems I was accepted in infra dev list
>
> :)
>
> 2012/8/15 Dave Fisher
>
>>
>> On Aug 15, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:22 PM, C
>
> I fixed all the issues identified by the RAT check except certificate.p12.
> That's a binary file and I don't think it can go in the source
> distribution.
>
> I'll leave that to Om and/or Erik to figure out.
>
>
It makes sense for any developer who wants to work on it to create their
own cert
9. Git Branching Model on Git now (see Note 2)
+1 (binding)
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Harfleet [mailto:dharfl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 4:31 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Branching Strategy and SCM
9. Git Branching Model on Git now (
Thanks, that helps! I believe you when you say that the overhead is going
to be low. That is what I care about.
Regards,
Om
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > I am sorry if I sound like I dont support modularity. But that is not
> > what I am saying here. By Gordon'
> I am sorry if I sound like I dont support modularity. But that is not
> what I am saying here. By Gordon's (who is probably the only person on
> this list who knows the Falcon codebase) own admission, Falcon is tied
> closely to the Flex framework because of the semantics of MXML.
Falcon is o
Falcon is tied to the SDK, the text components in the SDK are tied to TLF, the
networking classes in the SDK are clients of BlazeDS, etc. Flex is an ecosystem
that all works together and you can't just mix-and-match any version of one
part with any version of another part.
But I now agree with
> This ^^^.
???
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Omar Gonzalez [mailto:omarg.develo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 11:45 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Falcon location
>
> IMO, you are arguing against the principle of modularity and/or
> separation
Hey! it seems I was accepted in infra dev list
:)
2012/8/15 Dave Fisher
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Carlos Rovira
> > wrote:
> >> Thanks Greg for pointing me to the list. Here's my first problem.
> >>
> >> *"Participation in these
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Jeff Conrad wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
>
> >
> > Well, crap. I'm sorry, I thought infra-dev was public.
> >
>
> What makes a list public versus private? infrastructure-dev archives are
> publically accessible from Markmail. He
On 8/15/12 2 :42PM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>That looks nice to me with one modification suggestion earlier in another
>thread. Bertrand and others suggested whiteboard live under flex rather
>than under every sub-project.
>
>After I checked in the package stuff I realized I forgot to add the r
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Omar Gonzalez
wrote:
> >
> > IMO, you are arguing against the principle of modularity and/or
> separation
> > of concerns. Yes, there is a bit more overhead, but is should be worth
> it.
> > You voted for a much more complex branching strategy supposedly in favor
On Aug 15, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Guthmann, Scott wrote:
>> 4. Classic Model (see Description 2) on SVN
>
> +1 non-binding.
>
> I do not see the strong evidence for moving to Git now.
>
> I wish we would delay this vote until the research can be done to establish
> the Git options as *actual* choi
On Aug 15, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
>> Thanks Greg for pointing me to the list. Here's my first problem.
>>
>> *"Participation in these lists is only available to ASF committers."*
>
> Well, crap. I'm sorry, I thought infra
I just tried the same...will see what happen ;)
2012/8/15 Omar Gonzalez
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>
> > @jeff you are committer?
> >
> > @ok Alex I'll try to do on my own
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> I just tried sending an email to
>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> @jeff you are committer?
>
> @ok Alex I'll try to do on my own
>
> Thanks
>
>
I just tried sending an email to
infrastructure-dev-subscribe@apache.orgbut didn't get a response.
-omar
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> @jeff you are committer?
>
Nope. Semi-lurker here.
@ok Alex I'll try to do on my own
>
> Thanks
>
> El miércoles, 15 de agosto de 2012, Alex Harui escribió:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/15/12 11:22 AM, "Carlos Ro
9. Git Branching Model on Git now (see Note 2)
+1 (non-binding)
9. Git Branching Model on Git now (see Note 2)
+1 (non-binding)
@jeff you are committer?
@ok Alex I'll try to do on my own
Thanks
El miércoles, 15 de agosto de 2012, Alex Harui escribió:
>
>
>
> On 8/15/12 11:22 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Greg for pointing me to the list. Here's my first problem.
> >
> > *"Participation in these lists is
While I have no problem naming the directory flex/falcon I do understand
Om's concern that it is a code name that people may not know.
flex/newcompiler isn't very pretty.
Carol
On 8/15/12 2 :18PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
>On 8/15/12 10:43 AM, "Om" wrote:
>
>> On Aug 15, 2012 9:07 AM, "Alex H
>
> IMO, you are arguing against the principle of modularity and/or separation
> of concerns. Yes, there is a bit more overhead, but is should be worth it.
> You voted for a much more complex branching strategy supposedly in favor of
> modularity. I'm surprised you are pushing back on it here.
>
That looks nice to me with one modification suggestion earlier in another
thread. Bertrand and others suggested whiteboard live under flex rather
than under every sub-project.
After I checked in the package stuff I realized I forgot to add the rat
check so I'm doing that now. I found a few probl
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
>
> Well, crap. I'm sorry, I thought infra-dev was public.
>
What makes a list public versus private? infrastructure-dev archives are
publically accessible from Markmail. Here's a thread on Git support:
http://markmail.org/message/7ztq2pwm645
Any Flex committer can get a non-commercial SmartGit license at no charge.
If you have already installed SmartGit with a trial license and you want
to switch you can google and find the xml file you have to edit to
convince it to switch to a non-commercial license.
Carol
On 8/15/12 2 :33PM, "Tho
On 8/15/12 11:22 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
> Thanks Greg for pointing me to the list. Here's my first problem.
>
> *"Participation in these lists is only available to ASF committers."*
>
> So, to get into I need to be first a commiter. So I request it here and now.
>
> Could someone tell m
I just e-mailed infrastructure-dev-subscr...@apache.org and did the list
subscription thing. They didn't purge me automatically, so I can say that
it works.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> Thanks Greg for pointing me to the list. Here's my
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Thanks Greg for pointing me to the list. Here's my first problem.
>
> *"Participation in these lists is only available to ASF committers."*
Well, crap. I'm sorry, I thought infra-dev was public.
I'm on infra since yesterday, but I haven't posted yet.
What skills does everyone bring to the table?
I somewhat decently know my way around a *nix shell, but it's not my
preferred way of getting things done. If I do anything that needs to be
repeatable via the shell, I lean on Perl, which I'm p
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Michael A. Labriola
wrote:
> Bertrand wrote:
>>This is about which tools the committers use (and might have to partially
>> support in case of Git, for now) so I wouldn't give much weight to the
>> community's
>> opinion in this particular case. Those who do the w
Michael, this is your turn to make the difference
:)
2012/8/15 Alex Harui
>
>
>
> On 8/15/12 6:52 AM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net"
> wrote:
>
> >> This is about which tools the committers use (and might have to
> partially
> >> support in case of Git, for now) so I wouldn't give much weight
I already vote for it yet ;)
2012/8/15 Erik de Bruin
> >> If the relevant issue trackers don't support voting for issues, I'd
>
> A bug for this has been added to the Adobe bugbase, please vote.
>
> https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3310921
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Softw
On 8/15/12 6:52 AM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net"
wrote:
>> This is about which tools the committers use (and might have to partially
>> support in case of Git, for now) so I wouldn't give much weight to the
>> community's opinion in this particular case. Those who do the work >decide
>> IMO.
Thanks Greg for pointing me to the list. Here's my first problem.
*"Participation in these lists is only available to ASF committers."*
So, to get into I need to be first a commiter. So I request it here and now.
Could someone tell me if it's possible?
In the meanwhile I'll continue to get mor
>Taking into account that we are five, I think we could bring success on this
>soon. In the end, this shouldn't be a hard task only stopped by bureaucracy or
>lack of support by ASF itself.
I agree. Let's get on the infra list and see if we can help.
Mike
On 8/15/12 10:43 AM, "Om" wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2012 9:07 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>>
>>
>>
> I agree that it is the way to go in the long run. But, from Gordon's
> description, it does not sound like Falcon its anywhere close to achieving
> this. In the short term, making it a top level p
>> If the relevant issue trackers don't support voting for issues, I'd
A bug for this has been added to the Adobe bugbase, please vote.
https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3310921
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftwar
Carol, Om,
My $0.02:
- a RELEASE_NOTES makes sense;
- my suggestion would be to have whiteboard, tags, branches and trunk
in the root of 'utilities' and place the 3 project folders in trunk, I
like 'common', 'installer' and 'installerBadge' with project names to
match. This (to me) looks cleanest
Cool, thanks for getting the ball rolling.
I'll subscribe to the infra list and will start reading up on the state of
things tonight.
-omar
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Om wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
>
> > This mail go
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> This mail goes specially for Jeff, Omar, Michael and Om, who express the
> intention to volunteer to bring Git support to Apache Flex. I think we
> should use this thread to organize our efforts and give feed
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> This mail goes specially for Jeff, Omar, Michael and Om, who express the
> intention to volunteer to bring Git support to Apache Flex. I think we
> should use this thread to organize our efforts and give feedback to the
> rest.
As I mention
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> Om and Erik (and anyone else working on this now),
>
> I'm a little confused by the status of InstallApacheFlex right now.
>
> I just checked in a couple of changes to InstallApacheFlex/build.xml so
> that it will build and I added a "rele
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
